by – L. Richardson

In a chilling revelation, a growing number of officially released documents expose the U.S. government’s covert agenda to develop an invasive surveillance system that remotely and secretly monitors the biological processes of its own citizens. 1 2 While Americans remain largely unaware of this unconstitutional biosurveillance regime, the evidence points to a blatant violation of civil liberties and an outright betrayal of public trust on an unprecedented scale. 3 4

This exposé delves into the technological tyranny unfolding behind the veil of secrecy, exploring the government’s relentless pursuit of biological data collection through dubious means. 1 2 3 It uncovers the legal and ethical nightmares arising from this egregious overreach while rallying resistance against the erosion of privacy rights and individual freedom. Ultimately, the article provides actionable steps for citizens to safeguard their biological privacy and confront the escalating government intrusion plaguing the nation. 4

Unmasking the Biosurveillance Threat

Detailed look at the government’s covert actions to develop technologies that infiltrate private biology

The U.S. government’s relentless pursuit of biosurveillance capabilities has taken an ominous turn, as evidenced by its covert efforts to develop invasive technologies that can remotely monitor the biological processes of its citizens without their knowledge or consent. 1 2 This chilling revelation exposes the extent to which the government is willing to overstep its boundaries and violate the fundamental right to privacy.

1. Surveillance Dragnet: The government has established a vast surveillance dragnet extending beyond national security. Cell phones, laptops, social media platforms, and online communication channels are being exploited to build detailed profiles of individuals and their associates, creating a comprehensive “pattern of life” database. 7 This indiscriminate data collection ensnares countless innocent Americans, violating their privacy under the guise of preventing terrorist attacks.
2. Compromising Encryption: The Snowden documents have revealed that U.S. intelligence agencies have actively worked to undermine encryption protocols, compromising the digital security of millions of ordinary Internet users. 7 By weakening encryption standards, the government has not only jeopardized the privacy of its citizens but also exposed them to potential cyberattacks, directly contradicting its purported goal of protecting the nation.
3. Biosurveillance Programs: Initiatives like the BioWatch program, operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have deployed air sampling devices in major U.S. cities to detect biological agents [33]. 6 While the stated purpose is to hasten the public health response to a bioterror attack, these programs raise concerns about the government’s ability to monitor and collect sensitive biological data on a massive scale [35].

Evidence from released documents reveals long-standing plans to monitor Americans covertly.

The existence of a covert biosurveillance agenda is no longer a mere conspiracy theory; it is a harsh reality substantiated by a growing body of officially released documents. 1 2 3 These documents provide a chilling glimpse into the government’s long-standing plans to develop technologies capable of remotely and secretly monitoring the biological processes of its citizens.

1. Surveillance Capabilities: According to the documents, the government has been actively exploring ways to collect and analyze biological data from individuals without their knowledge or consent. 1 2 This includes the development of sensors and devices that can detect and monitor various biological markers, such as heart rate, brain activity, and even genetic information.
2. Circumventing Privacy Laws: The documents suggest that the government has been actively seeking ways to circumvent existing privacy laws and regulations to pursue its biosurveillance agenda. 1 2 3 This raises serious concerns about the potential for abuse and the erosion of civil liberties in the name of national security [34].
3. Lack of Transparency: Despite these programs’ far-reaching implications, the government has maintained a veil of secrecy, denying the American public the opportunity to engage in an open and transparent debate about such surveillance practices’ ethical and legal boundaries. 3 4 This lack of transparency only fuels distrust and undermines the democratic principles upon which the nation was founded.

The evidence presented in these released documents is a stark reminder of the government’s willingness to prioritize its own agenda over the rights and freedoms of its citizens. It is a call to action for all Americans to demand accountability, transparency, and a reassertion of their constitutional rights to privacy and bodily autonomy [36].

Technological Tyranny Against American Freedom

Critical examination of the advanced surveillance technologies—like remote neural monitoring and biometric data collection

The U.S. government’s relentless pursuit of advanced surveillance technologies poses a grave threat to the fundamental freedoms and civil liberties that define the American way of life. The covert development of invasive tools like remote neural monitoring and biometric data collection represents a technological tyranny that strikes at the very heart of personal privacy and bodily autonomy. 1 2

Remote neural monitoring, a chilling concept straight out of a dystopian nightmare, envisions the ability to remotely access and manipulate the brain’s electrical activity, effectively granting the government unprecedented control over the most intimate aspects of human cognition and consciousness. 1 2 This flagrant violation of the sanctity of the human mind not only undermines individual agency but also paves the way for potential mind control and psychological manipulation on a massive scale.

Moreover, the government’s obsession with biometric data collection, including facial recognition technology, poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties. 5 6 These technologies enable the indiscriminate tracking and profiling of individuals based on immutable physical characteristics, effectively transforming every citizen into a suspect under constant surveillance. The inherent biases and inaccuracies of these systems further exacerbate the risk of discrimination, disproportionately targeting marginalized communities and perpetuating systemic injustices. 5 6

Discussion on how these technologies are a direct assault on personal liberties and the foundational values of America

The deployment of these advanced surveillance technologies represents a direct assault on the personal liberties and foundational values that have long been cherished by the American people. The right to privacy, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is being eroded by the government’s insatiable appetite for data collection and monitoring [37]. 3 4

The notion of a free society hinges on the ability of individuals to exercise their rights without fear of unwarranted intrusion or retribution [38]. However, the pervasive presence of these surveillance tools creates an atmosphere of perpetual scrutiny, chilling free expression, stifling dissent, and undermining the democratic principles upon which the nation was built. 3 4

Furthermore, the potential for abuse and misuse of these technologies by those in power is a grave concern [39]. History has taught us that unchecked government overreach often leads to the oppression of marginalized groups and the suppression of dissenting voices. 7 Normalizing such invasive surveillance practices sets a dangerous precedent, paving the way for future civil liberties encroachment under the guise of national security or public safety.

The American people must resist this technological tyranny and stand firm in defense of their inalienable rights. The pursuit of security cannot come at the expense of the freedoms that define the American spirit. It is incumbent upon all citizens to demand transparency, accountability, and a reassertion of the constitutional protections that have safeguarded individual liberties for generations. 7

The Veil of Secrecy and the Betrayal of Trust

Analysis of the government’s secretive operations devoid of public consent or awareness

The U.S. government has shrouded its covert biosurveillance agenda in secrecy, operating without the American people’s knowledge or consent. 1 2 3 This flagrant disregard for transparency and public accountability represents a betrayal of citizens’ trust in their elected representatives.

The government’s exploitation of legal loopholes, such as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), has enabled the mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications [40]. 1 2 This includes phone calls, texts, emails, social media messages, and web browsing, all collected under the guise of pursuing vaguely defined “foreign intelligence targets.” However, the true scope of this surveillance dragnet extends far beyond its stated purpose, ensnaring the private communications of countless ordinary Americans in a blatant violation of their constitutional rights. 1 2

Furthermore, the government has actively sought ways to circumvent existing privacy laws and regulations, demonstrating a willingness to prioritize its own agenda over the fundamental rights of its citizens. 1 2 3 This lack of transparency and disregard for public discourse on such critical issues erodes the democratic principles upon which the nation was founded, fueling distrust and undermining the very fabric of a free society.

Outlining the severe implications of a government that operates in the shadows, betraying the trust of its citizens

The government’s covert operations and lack of transparency have severe implications for the American people and the integrity of the nation’s democratic institutions. By operating in the shadows, the government has effectively betrayed the trust of its citizens, violating the sacred covenant that binds the governed and their elected representatives.

1. Erosion of Civil Liberties: The government’s warrantless surveillance programs, such as those enabled by Section 702 of FISA, violate the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures. 1 2 3 This erosion of civil liberties sets a dangerous precedent, paving the way for further encroachments on individual freedoms under the guise of national security or public safety [41].
2. Chilling Effect on Free Speech: The pervasive fear of government surveillance has a chilling effect on free speech and freedom of association, two pillars of a healthy democracy. 1 2 Journalists, lawyers, activists, and ordinary citizens may self-censor or refrain from engaging in open discourse, fearing that the government monitors their private communications, which is supposed to protect their rights.
3. Abuse of Power and Lack of Accountability: The government’s refusal to comply with its own rules and oversight mechanisms, as evidenced by the repeated violations of FBI agents accessing Americans’ private communications without legitimate purpose, highlights the potential for abuse of power and the lack of accountability. 1 2 3 This unchecked overreach undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in the institutions meant to safeguard their rights [42].

The veil of secrecy surrounding the government’s biosurveillance agenda and its betrayal of trust strikes the heart of the American democratic experiment. It is a stark reminder that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. The people must remain resolute in demanding transparency, accountability, and preserving their inalienable rights.

Mobilizing Resistance: Standing Against Big Brother

Inspiring stories and strategies from the frontline of citizens and groups combating government surveillance

In the face of the U.S. government’s relentless pursuit of invasive biosurveillance technologies, a growing resistance movement has emerged, fueled by the unwavering determination of citizens and advocacy groups to safeguard their fundamental rights and liberties. 1 2 3 These courageous individuals and organizations have taken a stand against the encroachment of technological tyranny, employing various strategies to expose the government’s covert agenda and demand transparency and accountability.

One such inspiring example is the work of Simone Browne, a scholar whose award-winning book “Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness” shines a light on the powerful institutions that lurk in the shadows. 1 Browne’s concept of “dark sousveillance” – a watching-the-watchers approach – has become a rallying cry for those seeking to challenge the antiblack surveillance practices that have long been a tool of oppression.

Throughout the 1970s, a diverse coalition of activists targeted the surveillance apparatus in unprecedented ways, pursuing three primary efforts: opposing repressive legislation that sought to expand police authority and state surveillance, fighting against the expansion of the carceral state, and supporting those who resisted grand juries. 1 2 3 This multifaceted resistance movement challenged the government’s overreach. It exposed the inherent flaws in a system prioritizing secrecy and unchecked power over individual rights and civil liberties.

More recently, whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning have taken a courageous stand against the government’s abuse of grand juries and secret processes. 1 Manning, who spent seven years in prison for leaking documents exposing U.S. military atrocities, refused to cooperate with a grand jury investigation, stating, “I will not participate in a secret process that I morally object to, particularly one that has been historically used to entrap and persecute activists for protected political speech [43] [44].” 1

These inspiring stories of resistance serve as a potent reminder that the fight against government surveillance is a battle for privacy and a struggle to preserve the foundations of a free and democratic society.

Practical advice for empowering Americans to resist and demand transparency and reform

To effectively resist the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda and demand transparency and reform, Americans must take proactive steps and leverage the power of collective action. 2 3 Here are some practical strategies that can empower citizens to confront the escalating government intrusion:

1. Educate and Raise Awareness: Knowledge is power, and educating oneself and others about the government’s surveillance practices is crucial. Attend public forums, join advocacy groups, and engage in discussions to raise awareness about the implications of biosurveillance and the erosion of civil liberties. 2 3
2. Support Whistleblowers and Leakers: Whistleblowers and leakers play a vital role in exposing government wrongdoing and holding those in power accountable. Support organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that provide legal assistance and advocacy for individuals who risk their freedom to shed light on government overreach [45] [46]. 1 2 3
3. Engage in Collective Action: Collective action is a powerful tool for effecting change. Participate in protests, rallies, and grassroots movements that demand transparency, accountability, and the protection of privacy rights. 2 3
4. Advocate for Legislative Reform: Engage with elected representatives and demand legislative reforms that strengthen privacy protections and impose strict oversight on government surveillance programs. Support initiatives that promote transparency and limit the government’s ability to operate in secrecy. 2 3
5. Embrace Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: Utilize encryption tools, virtual private networks (VPNs), and other privacy-enhancing technologies to protect your digital communications and online activities from government surveillance. 2 3
6. Challenge Unconstitutional Practices: Be prepared to challenge unconstitutional practices through legal channels, if necessary. Support organizations like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) that litigate against government overreach and defend civil liberties [47]. 2 3

By embracing these practical strategies and standing united against the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda, Americans can reclaim their privacy rights, demand transparency, and ensure that the principles of individual liberty and democratic accountability remain at the forefront of the nation’s priorities.

Confronting the Legal and Ethical Nightmares

Exploration of the legal confrontations and challenges to unauthorized surveillance practices

The U.S. government’s covert biosurveillance agenda has sparked a firestorm of legal challenges and confrontations as citizens and advocacy groups fight to uphold constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Patriot Act, hastily passed in the aftermath of 9/11, laid the groundwork for an unprecedented expansion of government surveillance powers, turning ordinary Americans into suspects. [8]

One of the most egregious provisions of the Patriot Act is the issuance of National Security Letters (NSLs) by FBI agents, without a judge’s approval, to obtain personal information, including phone records, computer records, credit history, and banking history [48]. [8] Between 2003 and 2006 alone, the FBI issued a staggering 192,499 NSLs, leading to a mere one terror-related conviction – a conviction that would have occurred even without the Patriot Act [49]. [8]

The abuse of privacy under the guise of national security is further compounded by the fact that the Patriot Act does not require information obtained through NSLs to be destroyed, even if it concerns innocent Americans. [8] This means that the personal data of law-abiding citizens can be retained indefinitely, creating a vast repository of information ripe for exploitation and abuse.

Moreover, the Patriot Act prohibits Americans who receive NSLs from telling anyone, effectively gagging them from seeking legal recourse or public scrutiny. [8] These gag order provisions have been repeatedly challenged in court and held unconstitutional in several legal cases, highlighting the blatant disregard for civil liberties enshrined in the law.

Ethical arguments against the moral bankruptcy of spying on citizens without their knowledge or consent

Beyond the legal challenges, the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda raises profound ethical concerns about the moral bankruptcy of spying on citizens without their knowledge or consent. 9 The notion of a free society hinges on the ability of individuals to exercise their rights without fear of unwarranted intrusion or retribution.

Proponents of such surveillance practices often argue that those with nothing to hide should have no reason to fear being monitored. 9 However, this argument fails to consider the inherent power imbalance and the potential for abuse when the government wields unchecked authority over the private lives of its citizens.

The collection of personally identifiable data or recordings creates an archive of information that is vulnerable to exploitation by trusted insiders, as evidenced by numerous instances of government employees abusing their access to surveillance systems for personal gain or harassment. 9 As the amount of personal data collected increases, so does the risk of such abuses becoming more numerous and egregious.

Furthermore, allowing surreptitious surveillance, even for a limited scope or contingency, encourages the government to expand such programs, setting a dangerous precedent for further encroachments on individual freedoms. 9 History has shown that the slippery slope of government overreach is not mere paranoia, with biometric data collection expanding immensely in recent years, from fingerprinting schoolchildren to proposals for DNA collection of those deemed potential future criminals. 9

The ethical implications of such practices cannot be ignored, as they strike at the core of human dignity and autonomy. The government’s relentless pursuit of biosurveillance technologies represents a flagrant disregard for the sanctity of the human mind and body, paving the way for potential psychological manipulation and the erosion of bodily autonomy on a massive scale. 1 2

In a genuinely free society, the burden of proof should lie with the government to justify its intrusions into the private lives of its citizens, not the other way around. The moral bankruptcy of spying on citizens without their knowledge or consent is a betrayal of the fundamental principles upon which the nation was founded and a stark reminder of the eternal vigilance required to safeguard individual liberties from the encroachment of unchecked government power [50]. 3 4

Action Steps for Protecting Privacy and Ensuring Freedom

Guiding readers on how to shield themselves from government prying and intrusion

In the face of the U.S. government’s relentless pursuit of invasive biosurveillance technologies, Americans must proactively safeguard their privacy and shield themselves from unwarranted government intrusion [51]. 1 2 Here are some practical strategies that can empower citizens to confront the escalating government overreach:

1. Embrace Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: Utilize encryption tools, virtual private networks (VPNs), and other privacy-enhancing technologies to protect your digital communications and online activities from government surveillance. 2 3 By encrypting your data both in transit and at rest, you can make it more difficult for the government to access your sensitive information without expending significant resources.
2. Follow Cybersecurity Best Practices: Implement robust cybersecurity measures, such as frequently changing usernames and passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, and installing continuous monitoring security solutions. 2 3 These practices can help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access to your devices and networks, making it harder for the government to infiltrate your systems [52].
3. Limit Online Footprint: Be mindful of the personal information you share online and on social media platforms [53]. 1 2 The government’s surveillance dragnet extends to these channels, amassing vast databases of personal data that can be used to build detailed profiles of individuals and their associates [54].
4. Support Privacy Advocacy Groups: Support organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which are at the forefront of the struggle to prevent the entrenchment of a surveillance state [55] [56]. 1 2 These groups challenge the government’s secrecy, violations of privacy rights, and disproportionate targeting of minority communities and activists.
5. Go Offline When Necessary: In extreme cases, the most effective way to protect sensitive data is to go offline altogether. 2 3 Store your data on secure servers that have zero connections to the outside world, in locations under your control, to minimize the risk of government surveillance and data breaches.

Advocacy for more decisive legislative action and public pressure to safeguard American freedoms

While individual efforts to protect privacy are crucial, the fight against the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda also requires collective action and advocacy for more robust legislative safeguards. 2 3 Here are some steps that can be taken to exert public pressure and demand accountability:

1. Engage with Elected Representatives: Contact your elected representatives at the local, state, and federal levels, urging them to support legislation that strengthens privacy protections and imposes strict oversight on government surveillance programs. 2 3 Demand transparency and accountability and insist that the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution and the rule of law.
2. Support Legislative Initiatives: Support initiatives like the Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2023 (GSRA), which aims to reverse the erosion of privacy rights and prevent further government abuses. 1 2 3 The GSRA includes provisions prohibiting warrantless searches of Americans’ communications. These close loopholes allow the purchase of personal data from data brokers and strengthen the role of independent oversight bodies.
3. Participate in Grassroots Movements: Join grassroots movements and protests that demand an end to the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda and the restoration of civil liberties. 2 3 Collective action and public pressure can be powerful catalysts for change, forcing the government to address the concerns of its citizens and uphold the principles of a free society.
4. Challenge Unconstitutional Practices: Be prepared to challenge unconstitutional practices through legal channels, if necessary. 2 3 Support organizations that litigate against government overreach and defend civil liberties, ensuring that the judiciary remains a bulwark against the erosion of individual freedoms.
5. Educate and Raise Awareness: Knowledge is power, and it is crucial to educate oneself and others about the government’s surveillance practices. 2 3 Attend public forums, join advocacy groups, and engage in discussions to raise awareness about the implications of biosurveillance and the erosion of civil liberties.

By taking these proactive steps, individually and collectively, Americans can reclaim their privacy rights, demand transparency, and ensure that individual liberty and democratic accountability remain at the forefront of the nation’s priorities. 1 2 3 4 The fight against the government’s covert biosurveillance agenda is a battle for privacy and a struggle to preserve the foundations of a free and democratic society.

Conclusion

The alarming revelations exposed in this article should serve as a wake-up call to all Americans who cherish their fundamental freedoms and civil liberties. While the U.S. government continues to shroud its actions in secrecy, a growing body of evidence suggests a disturbing agenda to develop invasive technologies capable of secretly monitoring the biological processes of its own citizens. This flagrant disregard for privacy and bodily autonomy represents a direct assault on the core values upon which this nation was founded, paving the way for a technological tyranny that must be resisted at all costs.

The American people must stand united against the creation of a biosurveillance regime that would grant the government unprecedented control over the most intimate aspects of human life. We cannot allow the U.S. government to pursue the development of a surveillance system that remotely and secretly surveils human biology! This covert agenda, while largely unaware to most Americans, is an affront to our cherished freedoms and a betrayal of the public trust. We must remain vigilant and steadfast in our resistance, demanding transparency, accountability, and dismantling any such unconstitutional programs. The fight against this insidious overreach is not just a battle for privacy but for the very soul of America!

FAQs

1. How does the U.S. government gather information for surveillance?

The U.S. government acquires vast amounts of consumer data for surveillance purposes. This includes data from cell phones, social media profiles, internet ad exchanges, and other publicly accessible sources. These data are used for various, often secret, purposes, such as law enforcement and national security, both domestically and internationally.

2. Does the U.S. engage in espionage against other nations?

The United States has been involved in numerous espionage activities targeting allied and rival nations. These operations encompass industrial and cyber espionage and extensive surveillance practices.

3. Which U.S. intelligence agency is known for being highly secretive?

The National Security Agency (NSA) is notably secretive in its operations. Located in Fort Meade, Maryland, the NSA employs approximately 32,000 people and uses clandestine methods to fulfill its mission.

4. Has the U.S. conducted surveillance on its allies?

Yes, the U.S. has spied on its allies. This was most notably exposed in 2013 when documents revealed mass surveillance activities by the National Security Agency. However, these revelations have caused relatively limited outrage internationally compared to other intelligence leaks.

References

[1] – https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/surveillance-under-patriot-act

[2] – https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/five-things-to-know-about-nsa-mass-surveillance-and-the-coming-fight-in-congress

[3] – https://aspr.hhs.gov/Shared%20Documents/NBSB%20Files/final-nbsb-sa-wg-bsv.pdf

[4] – https://www.health.mil/News/Dvids-Articles/2024/03/12/news466007

[5] – https://ifp.org/mapping-americas-biosurveillance/

[6] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254002/

[7] – https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded

[9] – https://www.epicpeople.org/surveillance-technology-american-freedom/

[10] – https://freedomonlinecoalition.com/guiding-principles-on-government-use-of-surveillance-technologies/

[11] – https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/markey-merkley-jayapal-lead-colleagues-on-legislation-to-ban-government-use-of-facial-recognition-and-other-biometric-technology

[12] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447561/

[13] – https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/five-things-to-know-about-nsa-mass-surveillance-and-the-coming-fight-in-congress

[14] – https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-fbi-violated-privacy-rights-tens-thousands-americans

[15] – https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1998/12/19/the-peoples-trust-has-been-betrayed/5e761b46-198e-496d-ad09-5d17c8ad1f25/

[16] – https://www.brown.edu/Research/Understanding_the_Iran_Contra_Affair/v-cs4.php

[17] – https://www.aaihs.org/mapping-resistance-to-surveillance/

[18] – https://www.propublica.org/article/the-best-stories-on-the-governments-growing-surveillance

[19] – https://cdt.org/insights/transparency-the-first-step-towards-government-surveillance-reform-%E2%80%93-in-the-us-europe-and-beyond/

[20] – https://www.pogo.org/testimonies/testimony-in-support-of-increased-transparency-and-reform-of-fisa-surveillance

[21] – https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/surveillance-under-patriot-act

[22] – https://www.aclu.org/court-cases?issue=privacy-and-surveillance

[23] – https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/ethics-of-surveillance/ethics.html

[24] – https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-ethical-and-moral-concerns-and-worries-of-government-surveillance-of-its-own-citizens

[25] – https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance

[26] – https://info.cloudcarib.com/blog/7-ways-to-protect-data-from-government-spying

[27] – https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/reform-bill-would-protect-americans-warrantless-surveillance

[28] – https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/surveillance-under-patriot-act

[29] – https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/biosurveillance

[30] – https://ifp.org/mapping-americas-biosurveillance/

[31] – https://raskin.house.gov/2023/6/raskin-kiley-introduce-press-act-to-protect-reporters-first-amendment-rights-against-government-surveillance

[32] – https://nccs.net/blogs/weekly-constitution/government-overreach-the-cause-solution

[33] – Roberson, J. A. (2008). Roles of Federal, State, and Local Authorities in Water Infrastructure Security. Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087923.hhs187

[34] – Uncovering the Chinese Government’s Use of Technology to Spy on its Citizens – Michael Megarit. https://michaelmegarit.com/blog/uncovering-the-chinese-governments-use-of-technology-to-spy-on-its-citizens/

[35] – Stein, B. D., Tanielian, T., Vaiana, M. E., Rhodes, H. J., & Burnam, M. A. (2003). The Role of Schools in Meeting Community Needs During Bioterrorism. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-Biodefense Strategy Practice and Science. https://doi.org/10.1089/153871303771861487

[36] – Murray, Cortez Masto, Whitehouse, Gillib… | Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. https://www.help.senate.gov/chair/newsroom/press/murray-cortez-masto-whitehouse-gillibrand-introduce-bill-to-protect-womens-right-to-travel-across-state-lines-to-seek-abortion-care

[37] – The Privacy Boom Is Going to Change Everything. https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/privacyweek/2022/01/24/the-privacy-boom-is-going-to-change-everything/

[38] – (2020). United States: Governor Sisolak responds to President Donald Trump. MENA Report, (),.

[39] – Android apps are spying on you, and there is no easy way to stop them | CellularNews. https://cellularnews.com/mobile-operating-systems/android/android-apps-are-spying-on-you-with-no-easy-way-to-stop-them/

[40] – (2018). United States: Heinrich Statement On House FISA Reauthorization Vote. MENA Report, (),.

[41] – Iran president: If the U.S. wants talks, it must lift sanctions – Egypt Independent. https://244.18.118.34.bc.googleusercontent.com/iran-president-if-us-wants-talks-it-must-lift-sanctions/

[42] – Sezgin, Y. (2022). Undignified Jurispathy: Muslim Family Law at Ghanaian Courts. Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of The American Bar Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.29

[43] – Jail Record Near for Videographer Who Resisted Grand Jury | Strike-The-Root: A Journal Of Liberty. http://strike-the-root.com/node/19181

[44] – Chelsea Manning Against the Grand Jury. https://jacobin.com/2019/06/chelsea-manning-grand-jury-truth-democracy

[45] – Barden, J. D. (2018). Where’s the Fair Use? Participatory Culture, Creativity, and Copyright on Youtube. https://core.ac.uk/download/217194411.pdf

[46] – What if You Are Asked an Identity Question During an Interview. https://www.awesomelyauthentic.com/post/what-if-you-are-asked-an-identity-question-during-an-interview

[47] – Massa alerted Your private affairs offline and online through leafBuilder. https://leafbuilder.net/massa-alerted-to-your-private-affairs-off-and-online/

[48] – Surveillance Under the Patriot Act | American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/surveillance-under-patriot-act

[49] – Secret FBI National Security Letters Ruled Unconstitutional | PCMag. https://www.pcmag.com/news/secret-fbi-national-security-letters-ruled-unconstitutional

[50] – Surviving the Future. https://emspecs.com/services/surviving-the-future/

[51] – Enhancing Privacy Settings — PANSafeKids. https://pansafekids.com/blog/enhancing-privacy-settings-empowering-users-in-the-world-of-social-media

[52] – Tips for Protecting Your Personal and Financial Information When Gambling Online | 400 Gold Metal. https://400goldmetal.com/23970-tips-for-protecting-your-personal-and-financial-information-when-gambling-online-27/

[53] – 10 Essential Cybersecurity Tips to Protect Your Home:: Taylor Telecom, formerly Taylor Telephone Cooperative. https://online.taylortel.net/10-essential-cybersecurity-tips-to-protect-your-home

[54] – Open Source Intelligence — MCSI Library. https://library.mosse-institute.com/cyber-domains/osint.html

[55] – Privacy and Surveillance | American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance?redirect=spy-files

[56] – Privacy and Surveillance | American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance?redirect=spy-files

[57] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/is-the-us-government-pursuing-the-creation-of-a-biosurveillance-regime/

[58] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/is-the-us-government-pursuing-the-creation-of-a-biosurveillance-regime/

[59] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/canada/

[60] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-us-governments-absurd-justification-for-fbi-police-secrecy/

[61] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/are-the-fbi-and-other-govt-employees-interfering-with-americans-right-to-vote/

[62] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/fbi-has-disturbingly-broad-authority-to-commit-crimes-and-violence/

[63] – https://www.lifesitenews.com/author/robert-l-kinney-iii/page/3/

[64] – https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA522207.pdf

[65] – https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA564854.pdf

[66] – https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/04/brain_surveillance_for_national_security.html

[67] – https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA564854.pdf

[68] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895860/

[69] – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023004075

[70] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964611/

[71] – https://braininitiative.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/bns_roadmap_10212019_rev_10282019_508c.pdf

[72] – https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2000106

[73] – https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/biosurveillance_roadmap_2013.pdf

[74] – https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2006-09-28/pdf/CREC-2006-09-28-pt2-PgH7853.pdf