Court Bombshell! 9th Circuit Blasts COVID Jabs: Not Vaccines, Pharma Giants Beware!

by – L. Richardson

In a jaw-dropping ruling, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has exposed the mRNA COVID-19 injections as failing to meet traditional medical definitions of vaccines, dealing a legal bombshell to pharmaceutical giants. 1 2 The Court accepted plaintiffs’ allegations that these shots do not prevent transmission or provide immunity, characterizing them as treatments rather than traditional preventive vaccines, potentially stripping Big Pharma of legal liability protections granted to vaccines. 1 2

This landmark case revolves around the Los Angeles Unified School District’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate policies, which the 9th Circuit has deemed as overreaching. The Court’s recognition of the plaintiffs’ allegations that mRNA COVID shots are treatments, not vaccines, is a testament to the power of individuals in challenging the narrative of health authorities and pharmaceutical companies.

9th Circuit Drops Truth Bomb: mRNA Shots Not Vaccines!

In a fiery ruling that tears the mask off the so-called pandemic response, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck a blow against the grand deception of the COVID era: the mRNA COVID-19 injections are not vaccines by any stretch of the traditional understanding [23]. This monumental decision dismantles the façade that Big Pharma and complicit health authorities have hidden behind, exposing these jabs for what they indeed are—treatments misrepresented as preventative vaccines. With this ruling, the Court has potentially opened the floodgates for legal challenges against the pharmaceutical behemoths, challenging the blanket liability protections that have shielded them from accountability. This isn’t just a verdict; it’s a clarion call for freedom and truth in the face of widespread medical manipulation and control.

Explosive Details from the 9th Circuit’s Revelation

In a bombshell revelation, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has acknowledged the plaintiffs’ allegations that the COVID-19 “vaccines” do not meet the traditional definition of vaccines. 3 The Court stated that plaintiffs plausibly alleged that these mRNA injections do not effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19, which is a core requirement for traditional vaccines. 3 This explosive ruling directly contradicts claims made by health authorities like the CDC about the mRNA shots providing immunity and preventing transmission. 3

The Collapse of the COVID-19 Jab Mandate Facade

The plaintiffs’ complaint cited data and statements from the CDC to support their assertions. 3 They claimed that the CDC changed the definition of “vaccine” in September 2021, removing the word “immunity,” essentially conceding that the COVID-19 shots are not traditional vaccines. 3 The Court accepted these allegations as accurate for the current stage of litigation, dealing a severe blow to the legal justification for COVID-19 vaccine mandates. 3 8

Crushing the Myth: COVID-19 Shots Aren’t Real Vaccines

The Court’s ruling aligns with the plaintiffs’ characterization of the mRNA injections as mere “treatments” rather than traditional preventive vaccines. 3 8 This directly challenges the narrative pushed by pharmaceutical companies and health authorities, who falsely claimed that the shots prevented COVID-19 infection and stopped the spread. 8 By acknowledging that the mRNA shots fail to meet the criteria for traditional vaccines, the Court has crushed the myth propagated to justify their widespread mandates. 3 8

Legal Earthquake

The 9th Circuit’s ruling has triggered a legal earthquake with far-reaching implications for pharmaceutical giants. 4 5 By acknowledging that the mRNA COVID-19 injections do not meet the traditional definition of vaccines, the Court has potentially stripped these products of the legal liability protections granted to vaccines. 4 5

Big Pharma’s Nightmare: The Looming Legal Avalanche

The 9th Circuit’s ruling has opened the floodgates for legal actions against pharmaceutical companies. With the mRNA shots now potentially classified as treatments, these corporations could face many lawsuits from individuals and entities claiming harm or injury. This development could significantly shift the legal landscape, challenging the blanket liability protections shielding these companies from accountability.

Cracking the Armor: End of Liability Shield for Vaccine Giants

The legal liability protections for vaccines have long served as a formidable armor for pharmaceutical companies, shielding them from lawsuits related to vaccine injuries. 6 However, the 9th Circuit’s ruling has the potential to crack this armor wide open, exposing these corporations to a barrage of legal challenges they have thus far mainly been immune to. 6

The Legal Frontline: Anticipate Fierce Courtroom Battles

As the legal implications of this ruling unfold, fierce courtroom battles are anticipated between pharmaceutical giants and those seeking justice for alleged injuries or harm caused by the mRNA injections. 7 The legal frontline is set to witness a clash of titans, with Big Pharma fighting tooth and nail to maintain its liability shield. At the same time, plaintiffs aim to hold these corporations accountable for their actions. 7

The Path Ahead

In the wake of the 9th Circuit Court’s earth-shattering declaration that mRNA COVID-19 injections are not actual vaccines, we are stepping into a battleground for the future of health freedom and truth [24]. This ruling is not just a legal footnote; it’s a war cry for all who value bodily autonomy and challenge the coercive overreach of Big Pharma and government mandates. Armed with this robust judicial backing, we now have the leverage to dismantle the oppressive structures that have pushed these experimental treatments under the guise of public health. The path ahead is clear: we must mobilize to reclaim our rights, hold deceptive pharmaceutical giants accountable, and ensure that personal health decisions are guided by informed consent, not profit-driven agendas or manipulated data. The fight is far from over, and it’s time to stand up, speak out, and push back against the tyranny of false narratives and forced medical interventions.

Dismantling the Oppression of Unjust Vaccine Mandates

The 9th Circuit’s ruling has paved the way for dismantling the oppressive and unjust COVID-19 vaccine mandates imposed by various entities, including schools and workplaces. 15 By acknowledging that the mRNA injections do not meet the traditional definition of vaccines, the Court has effectively invalidated the legal justification for these mandates. 15 This decision empowers individuals to challenge such mandates on the grounds of violating their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. 15

Public Health or Propaganda? Questioning the Official Narrative

This groundbreaking ruling also calls into question the official narrative health authorities and pharmaceutical companies propagated regarding the efficacy and purpose of COVID-19 injections. 15 16 The Court’s acceptance of the plaintiff’s allegations that the shots do not prevent transmission or provide immunity directly contradicts the claims made by entities like the CDC. 15 16 This ruling encourages a more critical examination of the information disseminated by these institutions, prompting a reevaluation of the true nature and intent behind the COVID-19 injection campaign. 16

Championing Freedom: Prioritizing Rights Over Deceptive Public Health Claims

Ultimately, the 9th Circuit’s decision represents a victory for individual freedom and a rejection of deceptive public health claims used to justify infringements on personal liberties. 15 16 17 By acknowledging the mRNA injections as mere treatments rather than traditional vaccines, the Court has prioritized the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment over the purported public health benefits touted by authorities. 17 This ruling sets a precedent for championing individual autonomy and challenging overreaching mandates that violate personal freedoms under the guise of public health measures. 17

Conclusion

The 9th Circuit’s ruling has sent shockwaves through the legal and medical realms, exposing the mRNA COVID-19 injections as mere treatments masquerading as traditional vaccines. This bombshell decision has the potential to strip Big Pharma of its coveted liability protections, leaving them vulnerable to a deluge of legal actions from those harmed by these deceptive products. The oppressive COVID-19 vaccine mandates, once justified by the false narrative of preventing transmission and granting immunity, now stand on shaky ground, empowering individuals to challenge these infringements on their fundamental rights.

The ruling serves as a resounding victory for health freedom champions, dismantling the propaganda peddled by manipulative forces like the CDC and pharmaceutical giants. It’s a clarion call to question the official narratives, prioritizing individual autonomy over deceptive public health claims used to erode personal liberties. The 9th Circuit has ignited a legal firestorm, leaving no doubt that the mRNA COVID-19 injections are NOT traditional vaccines, and Big Pharma’s reign of impunity may be nearing its end – a triumph for those seeking justice and accountability in the face of corporate greed and deception.