by – L. Richardson
A House Judiciary Committee report has unearthed a grave threat to American sovereignty and security. The Biden-Harris administration’s creation of a UN Migrant Fast-Track program, a clandestine operation that bypasses traditional U.S. immigration channels, diverts millions of taxpayer dollars to United Nations operations without Congressional oversight or public knowledge. This urgent situation demands immediate attention and action from concerned citizens, as the threat to our sovereignty is imminent.
The administration’s Safe Mobility Initiative works through UN offices in Latin America. These offices have already processed nearly 20,000 migrants, with another 70,000 currently in the system. American taxpayers unknowingly fund foreign UN bureaucrats who run 13 migration offices at a cost of almost $70 million. The House Judiciary Committee’s investigation reveals how this program aims to move migration patterns away from public view while allowing unchecked entry into the United States.
The House Judiciary Committee Report:
A Closer Look
A House Judiciary Committee investigation has revealed the staggering scale of the Biden-Harris administration’s plan to misuse immigration court proceedings. Their actions have granted backdoor amnesty to nearly one million illegal aliens, leading to an unprecedented rise in immigration court backlogs with 3.7 million new cases since fiscal year 2021. The gravity of this situation cannot be overstated, and concerned citizens must take immediate action.
Key findings show how the administration broke down immigration enforcement:
- Over 700,000 illegal aliens had their cases dismissed or administratively closed 1
- Only 14% of adjudicated asylum cases resulted in grants during the fiscal year 2023 1
- More than 1.5 million new cases were filed in just the first three quarters of fiscal year 2024, 1
American taxpayers are now shouldering a catastrophic financial load due to the Biden-Harris administration’s immigration policies. Analysis by the Federation for American Immigration Reform shows that illegal immigration costs American taxpayers a staggering $150.7 billion annually [26]. With illicit aliens offsetting just 17% through taxes, Americans bear a net burden of $182 billion. The economic impact of these policies is undeniable, and it’s time for concerned citizens to demand accountability.
The Department of Health and Human Services shows the administration’s calculated redirection of taxpayer money. They moved over $2 billion away from essential health initiatives to support this agenda 3. Such massive fund shifts show the administration prioritizes its open-border agenda over American healthcare needs.
“Under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the federal government is actively working to turn the United States into a nation without borders and without laws,” states Attorney General Ken Paxton 4. These words match the Committee’s findings about a systematic breakdown of immigration enforcement mechanisms that created a “quiet amnesty” 1.
The investigation highlights the administration’s strategic weakening of immigration enforcement through multiple channels. They restricted ICE operations, abandoned detention requirements, and closed immigration cases without merit systematically 2. Such coordinated efforts clearly deviate from Congressional intent and established immigration law, potentially leading to increased crime rates, economic strain, and social unrest, putting American sovereignty at risk like never before.
The Safe Mobility Initiative:
Bypassing the Southern Border
The Biden administration’s Safe Mobility Initiative, which started in June 2023, bypasses traditional immigration channels through a network of UN-operated processing centers across Latin America. This 7-month-old program redirects migration flows away from public scrutiny while maintaining steady entry into the United States 5, potentially leading to a surge in undocumented immigration and a strain on American resources.
Safe Mobility Offices (SMOs) now operate in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guatemala 6. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) jointly run these centers as processing hubs for prospective migrants who want to enter the United States and other participating nations 6 [27].
The Program’s True Intent
Behind the humanitarian facade lies a sophisticated system that bypasses traditional border security measures. Through MovilidadSegura.org 5, migrants can submit free applications for various “support services” and migration pathways. The administration claims this approach promotes “safe, orderly, and humane migration management.” Critics view it as a calculated way to circumvent established immigration protocols.
UNHCR’s Strategic Role
The United Nations does more than just processing. The UNHCR actively backs this initiative, claiming to address “growing and complex movements of refugees and migrants in the Americas” 7. They want to prevent exploitation and abuse by criminal networks, yet this partnership hands over U.S. immigration authority to international bureaucrats.
Key operational aspects include:
- Free application processing through UN-operated facilities
- Screening for eligibility and “international protection needs.”
- Direct referrals to U.S. migration pathways
- Coordination with multiple foreign governments, including Canada and Spain 5
The administration’s partnership with these international organizations signals a fundamental change in immigration policy. DHS Secretary Mayorkas frames it as an effort to “cut the smugglers out” 8. The program creates a UN-controlled pipeline for migration into the United States that American taxpayers fund entirely.
This initiative breaks away from traditional immigration enforcement and creates a parallel entry system run by foreign entities. The ministration’s claim of promoting “safe and orderly legal migration” 8 hides a program that unsystematically determines American sovereignty and border security protocols s
Numbers That Should Alarm Every Patriot
Recent data shows a troubling picture of American sovereignty at risk under the Biden-Harris administration’s UN partnership. The numbers are stark: 100,034 refugees settled in fiscal year 2024, reaching the highest level in 30 years 9.
The Safe Mobility Initiative, which started in June 2023, has brought 17,600 refugees into the United States 10. The situation becomes more concerning as over 245,000 individuals have submitted applications through UN-operated Safe Mobility Offices, and 40,400 have already received refugee status approval 10.
American taxpayers face an enormous financial burden:
- The UN’s “Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan” needs $1.72 billion for 2023 alone 11
- $450 million goes to direct cash and voucher assistance for migrants 11
- $130 million helps shelter 586,500 people in 17 nations, 11
- $25 million supports “humanitarian transportation” on migration routes 11
The UN’s 2024 plans include distributing $372 million in cash assistance to help move 624,000 immigrants toward the United States 12. This is a tiny part of their larger $1.59 billion spending plan, which targets three million people across 17 countries 12.
The Department of Health and Human Services’ spending patterns reveal the administration’s calculated shift of American resources. The government spends about $60 million weekly to care for migrant teenagers and children in HHS shelters 13. These costs will rise significantly as 22,000 to 26,000 unaccompanied minors are expected to arrive monthly by September 13.
U.S. taxpayers heavily support the IOM Development Fund, which has directed $161 million into more than 1,000 projects across 125 countries 14. This systematic flow of American money into international migration management shows an unprecedented transfer of national control to UN officials.
The Hidden Agenda:
Out of Sight, Out of Mind
A carefully coordinated strategy to revolutionize America’s immigration system exists beneath public announcements and humanitarian rhetoric. The Biden-Harris administration has implemented a significant change in immigration enforcement that hides migration flows 15.
Analysis of how the Biden-Harris administration has strategically moved migration flows out of public view to avoid political backlash.
The administration’s strategy shows several calculated changes:
- Implementation of humanitarian parole programs allows up to 30,000 eligible migrants monthly from select countries, 15
- Creation of “alternative humanitarian pathways” exists outside official asylum processes 16
- Processing centers now operate in 13 Latin American cities to redirect migration flows 9
- New “complementary pathways” come with built-in refugee flexibilities 17
This systematic restructuring achieved its intended goal. The number of encounters with migrants from targeted countries dropped by an astounding 99% at traditional border entry points 15. The apparent success masks a more profound reality – migration continues through UN-controlled channels instead of stopping.
Details on the alternative resettlement routes provided by the UN for those not qualifying for U.S. Refugee Admissions
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) manages a complex network of alternative pathways alongside traditional U.S. immigration channels. Their projections show they can support 77,830 refugees from the Western Hemisphere in 2023 alone 16.
These UN-managed pathways mark a significant shift from standard protocols. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) took in just 2,485 migrants in FY 2022 16. The administration’s partnership with UN agencies has created several alternative channels that skip traditional vetting processes.
A closer look at the administration’s resource allocation reveals its strategy. It shifted its focus away from border security toward “complementary pathways.” These UN-managed programs help migrants gain legal access to third countries and gradually secure permanent status 17.
This calculated strategy lets the Biden-Harris administration showcase reduced border crossings while keeping migration flows steady through less visible channels. They created a sophisticated system that hands over U.S. immigration authority to international bureaucrats and shields the process from public scrutiny and Congressional oversight.
Implications for U.S. Sovereignty and Security
American communities feel the ripple effects of the Biden-Harris UN migrant expedited processing program. This ever-changing situation puts unprecedented pressure on local resources and infrastructure. Cities nationwide struggle with mounting financial burdens to accommodate the surge in migrants. New York City expects costs to reach $12 billion by mid-2025 18.
How Quick Immigration Processing Weakens National Security
Recent changes in immigration procedures have created dangerous gaps in our national security systems. Strong security measures emerged after 9/11 to protect our borders. However, the current administration has moved resources away from crucial DHS national security operations 19. These decisions have weakened:
- Disaster response capabilities
- Cybersecurity measures
- Core policy planning
- Traditional vetting procedures
Discussion on the ramifications for American communities and the strain on public resources
American communities face a financial crisis. Local governments struggle with unprecedented challenges as cities buckle under the weight of providing essential services:
- Medical care costs have skyrocketed as communities struggle to provide healthcare 18
- Education systems cannot handle the surge of school-age children 20
- Housing markets experience severe pressure, especially in major receiving cities 21
- Shelter systems operate beyond capacity, which forces migrants to seek refuge in subways and streets 21
The problem goes beyond immediate fiscal effects. Studies consistently show that increased immigration raises state and local governments’ spending more than their revenues 20. New York City’s crisis stands out clearly – the city spent $4.3 billion from July 2022 to March 2024 to house immigrants and follow existing housing policies 20.
Communities without solid infrastructure face dire circumstances. Many cities’ shelter systems experience overwhelming pressure that forces them to set strict limits. New York City now limits stays to 30 days for single adults and 60 days for families with children 21 [28].
Receiving cities shoulder an enormous burden because federal support fails to offset state and local costs. Long waiting periods for legal work authorization make things worse. The crisis grows as many new arrivals without established connections in the country depend more heavily on public resources.
Different jurisdictions experience varying degrees of strain, but one fact remains clear—American communities bear the weight of this unprecedented pressure on public resources. Local governments led this crisis with limited federal help. They needed help maintaining essential services while absorbing massive costs from this UN-led migration program 20.
American Taxpayer Funds:
Financing Foreign Bureaucrats
The money trail exposes how American resources are misappropriated through the United Nations system. In 2022, U.S. taxpayers contributed an astronomical $18.1 billion to the UN bureaucracy, more than one-third of all government contributions to the UN system.
Breakdown of how taxpayer money is being directed to foreign UN bureaucrats
These numbers reveal a staggering financial commitment to international organizations:
- $15 billion in voluntary contributions 22
- 50% of all World Food Program funding 22
- 36% of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees funding 22
- 34% of UNRWA contributions 22
- 32% of the International Organization for Migration funding 22
The UN’s “Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan” shows how these funds help mass migration. The plan allocates $372 million in direct cash assistance to support 624,000 immigrants heading toward the United States 12. This amount represents a small part of a larger $1.59 billion initiative that targets three million people in 17 countries 12.
Analysis of the legality and ethical implications of using U.S. funds for international resettlement programs [29]
Constitutional concerns arise from the legal framework that governs this massive wealth transfer. Congress holds appropriation authority, yet the executive branch directs these billions through the State Department and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations 12. This setup has created a shadow immigration system that operates beyond traditional Congressional oversight.
The UN partnership raises disturbing ethical questions as American taxpayers unknowingly fund:
- Direct cash payments to migrants en route to the U.S. border
- “Humanitarian transportation” that enables northward movement
- Shelter networks that support continued migration flows
- Legal advice to bypass immigration laws
The UN’s planning documents reveal an even more troubling admission – this attempt knowingly helps the “onward movement” of immigrants who plan to cross borders illegally 12. These documents acknowledge that one-third of migrants receiving help are in “irregular situations” after crossing international borders without proper documentation 12.
American resources now flow into international migration management, marking an unprecedented surrender of national sovereignty. The Biden-Harris administration portrays this as humanitarian aid. Still, the trend appears much darker – A—American taxpayers must finance their nation’s demographic transformation through unaccountable foreign bureaucrats.
The UN’s 2024 update shows plans to distribute nearly $1.60 billion across 17 Latin American countries through 248 named non-governmental organizations 12. U.S. tax dollars sustain this massive network of foreign entities with minimal oversight and no accountability to the American people who provide these resources.
Call to Action:
What Can Be Done?
American patriots should stand up to protect their nation’s sovereignty against this unprecedented assault on immigration law and order. Our country needs every concerned citizen who values American independence and security to act now.
Urge readers to stay informed and vigilant.
Knowledge is the first step in protecting America’s sovereignty. Research indicates that 62% of immigrants pay attention to politics and government 23. However, many Americans must know about significant policy changes affecting their communities. Every citizen should take these essential steps:
- Watch how local governments handle migration-related changes
- Keep track of federal money going to UN programs
- Stay updated on House Judiciary Committee investigations
- Keep records of how communities and resources are affected
- Help other patriots by sharing verified facts
Encourage political involvement and advocacy for transparent and secure immigration policies.
Research shows that immigration policies can work when officials implement and monitor them properly 24. The data indicates that for the first time in two decades, most Americans want decreased immigration 24. Citizens should take these actions to create change:
- Local Government Participation
- Attend city council meetings
- Document resource allocation
- Challenge Sanctuary City policies
- Just need transparency in migrant services spending
Stress the importance of sharing information and rallying public support to protect U.S. sovereignty.
America’s future depends on our collective action. Studies reveal that while overall support for providing asylum continues above 50%, chaotic border scenes have reduced public backing 25. We need a coordinated response to create meaningful changes.
Key Action Steps for Patriots:
Evidence shows that effective immigration reform needs sustained investment and policy changes 25. Citizens should:
- Create flexible, orderly asylum systems that put American interests first
- Expand CBP’s capacity to process legitimate asylum seekers properly
- Establish coordinated federal, state, and local efforts
- Put proper case management alternatives in place
- Build transparent processing centers
Research shows integration works both ways and affects immigrants and host communities 24. Patriots should focus on:
- Building community awareness about the UN program’s effects
- Documenting local resource strain
- Organizing neighborhood watch programs
- Supporting law enforcement initiatives
- Keeping pressure on elected officials
The data shows that immigration has become increasingly polarized, with candidates using it to appeal to their base 23. Many immigrants feel like pawns in a political game 23. This highlights why we must focus on policy substance rather than political theater.
“The United States’ humanitarian obligations are non-negotiable” 25, but they must balance with national sovereignty and security. Patriots should push for policies that protect American interests and legitimate humanitarian concerns while rejecting UN overreach and administrative circumvention of immigration law.
Conclusion
Recent House Judiciary Committee findings reveal a troubling truth—American sovereignty faces a severe threat. The Biden-Harris administration has quietly partnered with UN officials to create an alternative immigration system. They channel millions of taxpayer dollars into foreign-run migration offices, which process thousands of migrants away from public scrutiny while weakening traditional immigration enforcement.
The administration’s strategy creates a parallel immigration system that avoids Congressional oversight and long-standing security measures. American communities now bear heavy financial costs because of these choices. UN-operated programs pose real threats to national security and independence. The Safe Mobility Initiative goes beyond just policy changes – it shows a radical alteration from American self-governance to international control over U.S. immigration.
Americans just need to hold their elected officials accountable. They must challenge this unauthorized transfer of power and protect their nation’s borders from being weakened by unaccountable foreign groups. American independence hangs in the balance, and every concerned citizen must act now.
References
[3] – https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/15/hhs-covid-stockpile-money-border-migrants-488427
[5] – https://www.state.gov/safe-mobility-initiative/
[6] – https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/us-immigration-management-cooperation
[7] – https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/unhcr-urges-united-states-not-implement-proposed-barrier-asylum
[8] – https://immigrationforum.org/article/explainer-what-are-safe-mobility-offices/
[9] – https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/rebuilt-us-refugee-resettlement-biden
[10] – https://cis.org/Rush/Higher-Refugee-Admissions-FY-2024-under-BidenHarris-Administration
[11] – https://cis.org/Bensman/United-Nations-Hand-Out-Hundreds-Millions-Cash-USBound-Immigrants-2023
[12] – https://cis.org/Bensman/UN-Budgets-Millions-USBound-Migrants-2024
[13] – https://www.texastribune.org/2021/04/09/immigration-biden-migrants-minors-shelter/
[14] – https://www.iom.int/iom-development-fund-faqs
[15] – https://www.npr.org/2024/10/29/nx-s1-5171441/democrats-shift-immigration
[17] – https://www.unhcr.org/what-we-do/build-better-futures/long-term-solutions/complementary-pathways
[19] – https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/immigration-us-national-security-since-911
[20] – https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60569
[21] – https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/housing-crisis-immigrants-integration
[24] – https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/08/united-states-immigration-reform-evidence
[25] – https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/beyond-border-solutions
[26] – Illegal Immigration Costing U.S. Taxpayers $180 Billion in 2023 – KSFO-AM. https://www.ksfo.com/2023/09/22/illegal-immigration-costing-u-s-taxpayers-180-billion-in-2023/
[27] – Previous activities – Resettlement of Refugees – International Organization for Migration (IOM) Slovakia. https://iom.sk/en/activities/counter-trafficking-in-human-beings/47-activities/resettlement-of-refugees/previous-activities-resettlement-of-refugees.html
[28] – Understanding New York’s Migrant “Crisis” — and How to Help | HIAS. https://hias.org/news/understanding-new-yorks-migrant-crisis-and-how-help/
[29] – Downes, P. (1988). The Politics of Aging: A Hands-on Approach. Political Science Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0896082800000155
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment