by – L. Richardson
The viewpoints and interpretations presented in this article are unique to the author and are based on publicly available data. While discussing political activities and public figures, this content is a platform for original opinion-based discussion and analysis.
Our commitment to transparency requires acknowledging that the views expressed here are exclusively those of the author and do not represent the positions of affiliated organizations or entities [44]. Additionally, these perspectives aim to foster open dialog about crucial matters affecting our nation’s governance1.
Given the nature of breaking news and rapidly evolving political situations, some information may require further verification1. Therefore, readers are encouraged to critically approach all claims and assertions and conduct research to form independent conclusions.
This article draws from various public sources and documents, presenting interpretations of events that may not encompass all viewpoints or perspectives. However, in maintaining journalistic responsibility, we acknowledge that rapid information processing can sometimes lead to incomplete details1.
When discussing intelligence agencies, government activities, or political figures, the content reflects analyses based on available public information2. Debating these matters informs and encourages civic engagement rather than providing definitive legal or political guidance3.
Readers should consult appropriate authorities or legal professionals for matters requiring legal interpretation or official guidance. The complex nature of political and governmental affairs often demands careful consideration from multiple angles1.
This disclaimer is a testament to our commitment to responsible journalism. It acknowledges the inherent challenges of reporting sensitive political matters and our dedication to maintaining trust with our readers while providing valuable insights into current events.
Introduction:
The Battle for America’s Soul
The Deep State, a term used to describe a perceived network of entrenched government officials and other forces operating independently of elected leaders, stands exposed as former DNI nominee Tulsi Gabbard reveals shocking evidence of weaponized intelligence operations against President Trump! Indeed, our intelligence agencies have committed unthinkable acts – illegally spying on Trump and spreading false information to help Joe Biden win the 2020 election. Meanwhile, former intelligence chiefs James Clapper and John Brennan have been caught lying under oath about these operations, proving the depth of this corruption.
We’re not just witnessing routine political maneuvering, folks – this is an unprecedented assault on our God-given freedoms enshrined in the Constitution! Above all, these faulty and inadequate intelligence practices have led to catastrophic failures, undermining our national security and threatening the very foundation of our republic. The question now stands before us: Will we allow these shadowy forces to continue their reign, or will we stand with Trump and Musk in this crucial battle to save America?
The Team Effort –
Trump and Musk’s Alliance
A powerful alliance emerged between President-elect Trump and Elon Musk, which was marked by Musk’s substantial quarter-billion-dollar support for Trump’s campaign39. Subsequently, this partnership has become a formidable force against established government structures.
In a notable development, Trump has appointed Musk to co-lead a new non-governmental office focused on reducing government inefficiencies39. The Tesla CEO now oversees a team at the Department of Government Efficiency in Washington, working with presidential authority to implement significant changes in federal operations40. Musk’s role in this alliance is as a financial supporter and a key player in implementing these changes.
The scope of their combined influence extends to several key areas:
- Restructuring federal agencies and freezing Congressional spending
- Gaining access to sensitive government databases
- Implementing civil servant reforms
- Directing federal funding based on specific demographic metrics6
Donald Trump Jr. has addressed media attempts to divide his father and Musk, emphatically stating that “we cannot allow that”39. In contrast to traditional political alliances, this partnership has sparked intense debate over constitutional boundaries, particularly regarding presidential authority limits6.
The collaboration has faced significant opposition from Democrats, who have mobilized against what they view as unconstitutional actions. In fact, Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has encountered protests demanding more vigorous opposition to Musk’s initiatives6. Nevertheless, Republicans controlling Congress have supported mainly these bold moves by Trump and Musk6.
Musk’s influence extends beyond traditional political spheres, as evidenced by his decision to allow Infowars to broadcast on X. This action, coupled with his acquisition of the @America handle for his Super PAC supporting Trump41, demonstrates the expanding reach of their alliance.
Despite their differences on specific issues, such as climate change – where Musk views it as humanity’s second-biggest threat after artificial intelligence42 – their partnership remains focused on shared goals of government reform and resistance against established power structures.
Tulsi Gabbard:
The Crusader Against Deep State Deceit
The Senate Intelligence Committee has voted to advance Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence43 [45]. With decades of service in uniform and as a Hawaii congresswoman5, Gabbard stands ready to implement sweeping reforms across America’s intelligence apparatus.
Gabbard outlined an ambitious agenda of four primary objectives during her confirmation hearing. First, she aims to thoroughly assess global threats and identify critical gaps in U.S. intelligence capabilities. Second, she has committed to ending the politicization plaguing intelligence agencies. Third, she plans to rebuild public trust through unprecedented transparency and accountability. Fourth, she intends to streamline operations across the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to enhance national security effectiveness5.
In her powerful testimony, Gabbard declared that President Trump’s reelection represents a clear mandate to break the cycle of failure within intelligence agencies5. She specifically addressed the need to:
- Eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic layers that hinder information sharing
- Severely restrict access to sensitive intelligence
- Establish direct whistleblower communication channels
- Reform security clearance processes
Gabbard has positioned herself as a steadfast defender of constitutional rights, specifically regarding Section 702 reforms. She affirmed that warrants should generally be required before agencies query U.S. person data, except in emergency circumstances5. Accordingly, she acknowledged that while Section 702 remains critical for national security, it must coexist with robust civil liberty protections5.
Ultimately, Gabbard’s nomination represents more than a routine appointment – it symbolizes a fundamental shift in how America’s intelligence community operates. She has promised to lead by example, fulfilling her duties without political bias or influence. Her commitment ensures President Trump receives comprehensive intelligence briefings, including all available options and potential consequences for each action.
As her nomination advances to the full Senate, Gabbard’s reform agenda is a testament to her dedication to transforming America’s intelligence apparatus into one that serves the nation’s interests while protecting citizens’ rights. Her emphasis on encouraging dissenting views and establishing clear whistleblower protocols demonstrates her commitment to fostering a more transparent and accountable intelligence community5.
The Deep State’s Dirty Tricks
Fresh evidence reveals systematic abuse of intelligence powers against American citizens. FBI agents filed a class action lawsuit representing over 6,000 employees who fear termination under the new administration8. These agents claim that creating a list targeting those who investigated Trump-related cases violates their constitutional rights8.
Evidently, the manipulation of intelligence reached its peak during crucial election periods. Former DNI James Clapper coordinated to influence the 2016 and 2020 elections through strategic intelligence releases9. Primarily, these actions manifested in two significant interventions:
- The October 7, 2016, intelligence advisory warning about Russian interference, issued just two days before a presidential debate9
- The October 19, 2020 letter discrediting Hunter Biden’s laptop, strategically timed before another presidential debate9
The impact of these interventions proved substantial. A post-election survey by The Polling Company discovered that 45% of Biden voters in swing states remained unaware of the financial scandal involving Biden and his son9. This lack of awareness affected more than 9% of these voters who might have changed their vote – enough to flip all six swing states to Trump9.
Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell’s testimony exposed the calculated nature of these operations. He admitted that one of the primary goals in releasing the Hunter Biden laptop statement was to assist then-Vice President Biden in the debate10. Furthermore, Biden campaign chairman Steve Ricchetti personally thanked Morell for this intervention9.
The depth of this deception becomes clearer through Clapper’s own admissions. Formerly claiming to represent the entire Intelligence Community’s consensus, he later acknowledged they “didn’t see any hard evidence of political collusion”9. Yet, he and then-DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson carefully crafted statements to maximize political impact9.
These revelations paint a disturbing picture of intelligence agencies wielding their considerable powers for political purposes. The FBI agents’ lawsuit underscores legitimate fears of retaliation, with plaintiffs noting that their personal information has already appeared on the dark web through convicted January 6 felons8.
The Fight for Constitutional Freedoms
Faulty and inadequate intelligence practices fundamentally threaten American freedoms, as revealed through extensive surveillance program misuse11. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court discovered FBI agents improperly accessed vast databases to search for information about Black Lives Matter protesters and January 6 participants11.
Gabbard’s Warning on Intelligence Failures
These intelligence failures have primarily led to costly national security breakdowns12. The weaponization of intelligence agencies has critically undermined public trust, simultaneously damaging security interests and civil liberties12.
The surveillance program, known as Section 702, allows for wide-ranging warrantless government surveillance11. Although designed to gather intelligence on foreign nationals suspected of terrorist activities, the program has faced significant abuse11. In one alarming instance, agents improperly searched information on 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign11.
Constitutional Freedoms Under Siege
The constitutional implications reach far beyond surface-level privacy concerns. Opponents argue that the ‘finders keepers’ provision, which permits government agencies to sift through Americans’ incidentally collected communications, violates Fourth Amendment protections13.
To address these challenges, Gabbard has outlined critical reforms:
- Implementing safeguards to protect Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights
- Maintaining vital national security tools while ensuring constitutional compliance
- Establishing precise oversight mechanisms for surveillance programs
- Creating accountability measures for intelligence agencies12
The FBI acknowledges numerous violations of its rules regarding searches of foreign intelligence surveillance data13. These admissions underscore the urgent need for reform as intelligence agencies’ actions continue to affect Americans’ constitutional rights.
Ultimately, the battle for constitutional freedoms extends beyond partisan politics. The director of national intelligence and the attorney general must jointly direct intelligence agencies on proper procedures for electronic surveillance targeting foreign entities13. This responsibility carries profound implications for preserving both national security and individual liberties.
Musk’s Endorsement:
A Turning Point?
Elon Musk’s strategic moves signal a decisive shift in America’s political landscape. His partnership with Tulsi Gabbard extends beyond mere endorsement, as they ink a groundbreaking deal for a show on X platform to defend free speech15.
The significance of Musk sharing Gabbard’s video on X
Musk’s influence became evident in his confrontation with Senator Todd Young regarding Gabbard’s confirmation. After initially labeling Young a ‘deep state puppet,’ Musk reversed course following a private conversation16. This interaction ultimately led to a significant shift in Young’s stance, demonstrating Musk’s growing political leverage.
Moreover, Musk’s authority extends beyond traditional political boundaries. His recent actions have triggered intense reactions from Democratic leadership, with Sen. Patty Murray describing him as “an unelected, unaccountable billionaire with expansive conflicts of interest”17.
This act symbolizes a broader movement against the globalist agenda.
Undoubtedly, Musk’s influence reaches far beyond American shores. His recent endorsements of European populist-right politicians, including Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage18, reflect a coordinated effort against established political structures.
Hence, critics argue that Musk’s platform control serves a larger agenda. His actions appear focused on:
- Supporting far-right parties across Europe
- Pushing an anti-immigration stance
- Challenging progressive policies
- Amplifying alternative viewpoints19
Therefore, Musk’s role has evolved from that of a tech entrepreneur to that of a significant political force. His control over X, a central news and information dissemination platform, provides unprecedented reach for his message19. This position of influence has led to mounting concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of unelected individuals with vast financial resources17.
Democratic representatives like Gerry Connolly and Jamie Raskin have mobilized against what they perceive as overreach, particularly regarding Musk’s involvement in government operations17. Yet, with Trump’s apparent approval of Musk’s actions, this alliance continues to reshape America’s political landscape.
The Senate Confirmation Battle
Breaking news from Capitol Hill reveals a crucial victory: The Senate Intelligence Committee advances Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination by a razor-thin margin of 9-8. The vote, which occurred behind closed doors, strictly followed party lines
Update on Gabbard’s confirmation process
Several key Republican senators who initially disagreed about Gabbard’s nomination have shifted their positions. Once skeptical, Senator Susan Collins of Maine endorsed Gabbard after receiving assurances about her vision to streamline the Office of the Director of National Intelligence20. Similarly, Senator Todd Young of Indiana pledged his support after securing commitments advancing national security interests20.
The committee’s concerns centered on several critical issues:
- Gabbard’s past meeting with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad
- Her previous stance on pardoning Edward Snowden
- Her position on Russia’s actions in Ukraine
- Her earlier opposition to key surveillance authorities20
Gabbard has addressed these concerns by affirming her support for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, describing it as ‘essential’ to national security20 [46]. While this surveillance capability remains crucial, she emphasized that it must coexist with robust protections for Americans’ civil liberties20.
The importance of the full Senate vote
Finally, as the nomination moves to the Senate floor, expectations point to a vote as early as next week. This vote represents more than a routine confirmation – it symbolizes a decisive moment in the struggle against entrenched bureaucratic resistance.
Senator Lankford’s support proved particularly significant after receiving assurances about protecting classified programs, including warrantless wiretaps21. Yet, Democratic critics argue that Republicans are simply following Trump’s directives, setting aside their own reservations about non-status quo nominees21.
The upcoming full Senate vote stands as a referendum on the future of American intelligence operations. A confirmation would signal a dramatic shift toward transparency and accountability within these historically opaque institutions. This confirmation battle embodies the larger struggle between those seeking to preserve the status quo and those fighting for fundamental reform of our intelligence apparatus [47].
The Bigger Picture:
Dismantling the Leftist Globalist Structure
Beneath the surface of Washington’s political theater lies a profound battle against globalist influences. Primarily, Elon Musk has emerged as a key figure in this struggle, targeting several agencies in an aggressive effort to remake the federal government along ideological lines23. His actions have sparked widespread changes, affecting thousands of employees at agencies like USAID.
How this fight is part of a larger war against globalist influences
The resistance against globalization has manifested through significant policy shifts. Currently, Musk’s task force opposes liberal initiatives such as refugee services and trans rights promotion23. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 report specifically called for reforming USAID, accusing it of spreading what they term ‘climate extremism’ and ‘gender radicalism’23.
This movement extends far beyond American borders. Musk’s political involvement aims to support populist individuals, parties and causes worldwide24. His attention spans multiple countries, from backing Italy’s Georgia Meloni to Argentina’s Javier Milei24.
Trump and Musk as modern-day patriots fighting for American sovereignty
The partnership between Trump and Musk represents a strategic alliance against established power structures. Their combined efforts focus on:
- Minimizing state spending on Social Security
- Reducing collective responsibility
- Promoting self-responsibility and market self-regulation
- Transforming welfare systems and pension structures25
Straightaway, Trump confirmed plans to shut down USAID, praising Musk as a ‘significant cost cutter. ‘ This action aligns with their shared vision of dismantling what they view as unnecessary bureaucratic structures.
The impact of their alliance reaches into foreign policy realms. Indeed, Musk positions himself as a global defender of free speech, preparing the ground for Trump’s preferred combination of far-right populism and protectionist trade approaches24. Former European parliamentarian Marietje Schaake argues that “Musk must be seen as representing the US president when he bets against the leadership of key European nations”24.
This movement against globalization differs from traditional nationalist approaches. Instead of focusing solely on protectionism, it aims to reclaim the typical character of goods and services increasingly privatized by international agreements25. Nonetheless, critics argue that this combination of corporate and state power, alongside the suppression of dissent, points toward concerning trends in democratic governance26.
The essence of their fight extends beyond mere policy changes. Their actions represent a coordinated effort to reshape democracy, with implications reaching far beyond American shores26. Through their combined influence, Trump and Musk continue pushing against what they term ‘globalist influences,’ fundamentally altering the landscape of American governance and its role in the international order.
Call to Action
The time for passive observation has ended—now begins the era of decisive action. Our movement demands more than mere social media engagement; it requires sustained, strategic involvement across multiple fronts.
Engage, share, and support this movement.
The path forward demands organized, systematic action. Seasoned organizers emphasize that public protests serve as gateways to identify supporters for more impactful activities27. These activities include:
- Conducting one-on-one interviews with residents
- Creating reliable information channels to combat propaganda
- Building relationships with institutional leaders
- Registering new voters and educating citizens
- Supporting strategic legal actions through targeted fundraising
- Organizing selective confrontational actions like boycotts
Successful movements require a long-term commitment. “We hoped that resistance was a fluke and would pass. We now know it will not,” explains democracy advocate Marc Elias28. Henceforth, we must prepare for an extended campaign to protect our constitutional freedoms.
“We must stand together, or we’ll fall into the hands of those who would see America diminished.”
Unity remains essential for democracy’s proper functioning, yet it must emerge organically rather than through forced consensus29. Fourthly, our focus should be building coalitions that withstand victories and setbacks.
Overall, this battle transcends traditional political boundaries. A recent civic engagement study states, “Everyone on all sides should condemn political violence and acknowledge the power of incendiary rhetoric. ” Our movement’s strength lies in its diversity—from tech entrepreneurs to constitutional scholars, from military veterans to civilian activists.
The message resonates across political lines – our system has become toxic29. Yet, unlike previous movements, we possess unprecedented tools and resources. Through platforms like X, we can rapidly disseminate truth and coordinate action. Through organizations like America PAC, we can pressure key Republicans and target moderate Democrats in pivotal states31.
Our financial influence grows stronger each day. Consider how strategic investments have already yielded results – Musk’s wealth increased from $130 billion in the summer of 2023 to $440 billion. This demonstrates how aligned action can create powerful momentum.
The path ahead requires vigilance and commitment. “Stay engaged when all the news is about Trump and pardons and lies,” urges democracy advocate Marc Elias. “It is precisely when things are demanding that we must remain vigilant and informed”28. Use every platform available – from social media accounts to local book clubs – to speak the truth and educate others about our cause.
Conclusion:
The Future of America Hangs in the Balance
Patriots across America stand at a defining moment in our nation’s history. Deep State operatives have weaponized intelligence agencies against citizens. However, Trump, Musk, and Gabbard are now leading a powerful resistance against this corruption. Their alliance represents hope for millions who demand transparency and accountability from our government institutions.
Above all, evidence proves the systematic abuse of intelligence powers threatens our constitutional freedoms. Clapper and Brennan’s coordinated election interference through strategic intelligence releases demonstrates the urgent need for reform. Gabbard’s confirmation as DNI would mark a decisive victory in our fight to restore integrity to America’s intelligence community.
Trump and Musk’s partnership extends beyond American shores, challenging globalist influences worldwide. Their combined efforts target bloated bureaucracies while defending free speech and national sovereignty. Consequently, this movement has sparked unprecedented resistance from those who benefit from the corrupt status quo [48].
Therefore, we must act decisively to support this crucial battle for America’s future. Each citizen plays a vital role in this fight – sharing truth, supporting reform candidates, and demanding accountability from elected officials. The time for passive observation has ended.
Undoubtedly, history will remember these moments as the turning point when patriots reclaimed their government from unelected bureaucrats. Together, we stand ready to restore constitutional governance and protect the freedoms our founders enshrined. The choice lies before us – surrender to Deep State control or fight alongside Trump and Musk to save America’s soul.
Additional Notes:
This article primarily addresses sensitive topics requiring thoughtful consideration of multiple perspectives. Content warnings span various sectors, with different frameworks developed based on specific needs and jurisdictions33.
Warning:
Some content may be considered provocative or controversial. Viewer discretion is advised.
The arts sector values provocative materials as intentional elements, utilizing content warnings to empower individual choice regarding exposure33. Likewise, the health sector emphasizes professional responsibility in reducing potential trauma responses33. These differing approaches reflect sector-specific priorities and ethical considerations.
Research indicates that polarizing content warnings can indirectly reduce affective polarization34. Nonetheless, passionate debates continue internationally, with scholars from Australia, Ireland, the UK, and the USA contributing varied perspectives33.
Disclaimer:
This article includes opinions on political activities and public figures. The reader is encouraged to conduct their own research and consider multiple viewpoints.
Understanding diverse opinions remains crucial for several reasons:
- Enhanced critical thinking through exposure to varied viewpoints
- Improved problem-solving through consideration of multiple perspectives
- Stronger social cohesion in diverse societies35
The importance of multiple perspectives extends beyond theoretical discourse. Studies show that when diverse opinions remain isolated in echo chambers, people risk becoming insular and fearful of alternative viewpoints36. Political campaigning often employs divisive rhetoric, creating an “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” mentality undermining societal plurality36.
Ultimately, healthy debate and differences of opinion foster understanding. An opinion represents personal perception rather than an attack on others37. Most news channels maintain political biases, making gathering information from various sources essential to form well-rounded perspectives37.
The Federal Election Commission mandates that public communications made by political committees must display appropriate disclaimers2. These notices must identify who paid for the communication and whether any candidate authorized it. Disclaimers must appear within a printed box set apart from the content for print communications, using sufficient font size and color contrast2.
References
[1] – https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077699020910116
[2] – https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/advertising-and-disclaimers/
[3] – https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/politics-workplace-what-employers-need-know
[4] – https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2022/news-orgs-mark-old-articles-disclaimer/
[6] – https://www.wdsu.com/article/politics-democrats-trump-musk-power-struggle/63668401
[7] – https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/elon-musk-x-corp-alex-jones-infowars-rcna180487
[11] – https://19thnews.org/2025/01/tulsi-gabbard-confirmation-hearing-surveillance-program/
[12] – https://www.npr.org/2025/01/30/nx-s1-5279345/trump-cabinet-picks-tulsi-gabbard-confirmation-hearing
[15] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqnt3pPE4vU
[17] – https://time.com/7212840/elon-musk-rally-treasury-usaid/
[18] – https://www.politico.eu/article/elon-musk-endorses-germanys-far-right/
[23] – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/04/trump-elon-musk-federal-government
[25] – https://www.britannica.com/event/antiglobalization
[27] – https://thefulcrum.us/civic-engagement-education/pro-democracy-civic-movement
[28] – https://www.democracydocket.com/opinion/10-things-we-can-all-do-to-protect-democracy/
[29] – https://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/when-political-unity-becomes-the-goal-our-democracy-suffers
[30] – https://www.cloudresearch.com/resources/blog/unity-after-political-violence/
[32] – https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/01/31/elon-musk-trump-tesla-doge-far-right/
[33] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067675/
[34] – https://academic.oup.com/hcr/article/50/3/404/7666733
[35] – https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-important-to-understand-multiple-perspectives
[36] – https://www.thersa.org/blog/2017/01/why-diverse-opinions-lead-to-better-outcomes
[37] – https://themanitoban.com/2023/04/the-importance-of-different-perspectives/45159/
[38] – https://termly.io/resources/articles/views-expressed-disclaimer/
[39] – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/23/trump-elon-musk-influence
[40] – https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-nominees-kennedy-gabbard_n_67a28730e4b0b9a29af3cc55
[41] – https://www.axios.com/2024/11/26/musk-x-infowars-onion-social-media
[42] – https://thefulcrum.us/business-democracy/elon-musk-and-trump
[44] – McKeever, D. B. (2010). Evidence Obtained Through Torture Before the Khmer Rouge Tribunal: Unlawful Pragmatism? Journal of International Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq027
[45] – Headlines for March 06, 2013 | Democracy Now!. https://www.democracynow.org/2013/3/6/headlines
[46] – House Passes Bill to Renew NSA Internet Surveillance Program. https://freebeacon.com/national-security/house-passes-bill-renew-nsa-internet-surveillance-program/
[47] – Coombs, W. T. (2015). What Equivocality Teaches Us about Crisis Communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12088
[48] – Key issues facing education and the fight for democratic rights of students and campus workers – Democratic Socialist Movement. https://www.socialistnigeria.org/4234/2019/11/05/key-issues-facing-education-and-the-fight-for-democratic-rights-of-students-and-campus-workers/
[49] – Resnik, J., Wu, H., Dikler, J., Wong, D., Lilollari, R., Stobb, C., Beling, E., Fried, A., Selbrede, A., Sollows, J., Tessema, M., & Udell, J. (2024). Lawyerless Litigants, Filing Fees, Transaction Costs, And The Federal Courts: Learning From Scales. Northwestern University Law Review, 119(1), 109-192.
[51] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1886923154586849438
[52] – https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1djGXVeeZmOxZ
[53] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1886933172731924988
[54] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1886938840071393528
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment