Is Zelensky Trading Peace Talks for Nukes Under Trump’s Pressure?

by – L. Richardson

Attention, Patriots! While Zelensky wants nukes and clings to power, Trump stands ready to meet Putin immediately to end this devastating conflict. Indeed, the truth about this war is more shocking than the mainstream media will tell you – a staggering 45,100 Ukrainian soldiers have lost their lives since Russia’s invasion began in February 2022.

This isn’t just Ukraine’s fight anymore-it’s become a battle between peace and potential nuclear catastrophe. The facts are clear: Trump is pushing for peace talks to save lives. However, Zelensky seems more focused on acquiring nuclear weapons than protecting his people. This isn’t just speculation, folks – Zelensky himself has admitted that 390,000 soldiers have been wounded on the battlefield, with only half returning to combat. While Trump pledges to broker a ceasefire within his first six months in office, Zelensky’s nuclear ambitions threaten to escalate this conflict beyond the point of no return.

The Peace Offensive:

Trump’s decisive push for peace in Ukraine is not just a departure from conventional diplomatic approaches; it’s a call to immediate action. His administration has initiated ‘earnest’ discussions about ending the conflict, focusing on immediate action rather than prolonged negotiations. The urgency of this initiative cannot be overstated.

Trump’s commitment to swift resolution manifests through concrete steps. Notably, he plans to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as possible10, demonstrating unprecedented urgency in diplomatic efforts. Furthermore, his team projects a timeline of months, not years, to achieve peace11.

The human cost of delayed negotiations is not just a number; it’s a staggering loss. According to recent data, the conflict has resulted in approximately 43,000 Ukrainian military deaths and 370,000 wounded since February. Trump emphasizes this toll, stating, ‘Every day we don’t meet, soldiers are being killed on the battlefield. ‘This is not just a statistic, it’s a call to action.

His peace strategy encompasses several key initiatives:

Direct negotiations with Putin within the first six months of taking office
Immediate ceasefire implementation
Balanced pressure on both Moscow and Kyiv to enter peace talks

Consequently, Trump’s administration has developed a “solid action plan” 11. This approach includes threatening additional military aid to Ukraine if Russia refuses negotiations and, consequently, offering potential sanctions relief if Moscow accepts a settlement13.

The strategy is gaining traction. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has expressed openness to talks13, whereas Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has indicated willingness to consider peace proposals11. Trump’s team emphasizes they won’t force Ukraine to accept unfavorable terms, demonstrating a balanced approach to negotiations13.

The urgency stems from alarming casualty statistics. The Global Peace Index 2024 reveals that Ukraine’s conflict accounted for more than 50% of global battle deaths in 2023. Additionally, with approximately 15,000 people reported missing by October 202315, the humanitarian imperative for peace grows stronger each day.

Zelensky’s Nuclear Craze:

In a startling revelation during his interview with Piers Morgan, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demanded nuclear weapons if NATO membership remains distant16. This marks a dramatic shift from Ukraine’s historical position, considering the nation once held the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal with 1,900 strategic warheads.

Zelensky’s nuclear demands primarily centered around immediate NATO membership or acquisition of atomic weapons acquisition18. “Will they give us nuclear weapons? Let them give us nuclear weapons,” Zelensky stated explicitly during the interview16. Moreover, he emphasized that nuclear capabilities would protect against Russian aggression if NATO accession takes “years or decades “19.

The Kremlin swiftly condemned these statements as “bordering on madness “16. Specifically, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov expressed hope that European politicians would recognize the dangers of such discussions16. This reaction underscores the heightened tensions, particularly given Ukraine’s previous nuclear history.

Looking back, Ukraine’s nuclear journey tells a compelling story. By 1996, the nation had transferred all nuclear warheads to Russia in exchange for economic aid and security assurances17 [57]. Nevertheless, this decision wasn’t unanimous among Ukrainian politicians, with some viewing Russia as a persistent threat17. The Budapest Memorandum, signed in December 1994, provided these key guarantees:

Security assurances from the United States and Russia
Respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders
Economic compensation for surrendered nuclear materials
Assistance in dismantling nuclear infrastructure17

Zelensky’s current stance overtly contradicts these historical agreements. His “Plan B” for security now includes:

Demanding missile systems for defense
Requesting support for a million-strong army
Seeking international contingents for stability19

The Ukrainian president’s nuclear ambitions present a significant obstacle to peace negotiations. Peskov emphasized that Ukraine’s readiness for talks must be based on concrete proposals rather than rhetoric16. This development creates additional complications for diplomatic efforts, particularly as Ukraine faces mounting casualties and territorial challenges.

The Legitimacy Crisis:

A critical legitimacy crisis looms over Ukraine as Volodymyr Zelensky’s presidential term formally ends on May 20, 2025. Under normal circumstances, elections would have occurred in March. Yet, Ukraine’s constitution prohibits presidential and parliamentary elections under martial law21.

The legal framework remains unambiguous – Zelensky retains power until a new president takes office20. A January survey by the Razumkov Center revealed that 69% of Ukrainians trust Zelensky21, undoubtedly strengthening his position despite the absence of elections.

Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, has primarily pushed for elections, potentially by year’s end, especially if Kyiv reaches a truce with Russia22. “Most democratic nations have elections in their time of war. I think it is important they do so,” Kellogg emphasized23.

Essential challenges preventing immediate elections include:

Security concerns amid constant air attacks and bombardments
Over five million internally displaced citizens
Approximately six million refugees abroad require voting access
Restricted campaign freedoms and assembly rights21

The Ukrainian government has firmly resisted Washington’s election pressure. Officials in Kyiv warned that hosting polls during such volatile times would divide Ukrainian leaders and potentially invite Russian influence campaigns24. Furthermore, lifting martial law for elections could trigger an exodus of hard currency and prompt many draft-age men to flee24.

Putin has openly questioned Zelensky’s legitimacy without a renewed electoral mandate, claiming the Ukrainian president lacks legal authority to sign binding documents related to peace deals24. A Ukrainian government source described this as “setting a trap,” suggesting Putin might later dismiss any agreements if Ukraine refrains from holding elections22.

Despite these complexities, a February poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found that 69% of Ukrainians believe Zelensky should remain in office until martial law ends, with merely 15% supporting wartime elections21. This overwhelming public consensus reflects the population’s understanding of the practical impossibilities of conducting fair elections during active conflict.

The Human Cost:

Recent revelations paint a devastating picture of human loss in Ukraine. Zelensky acknowledged 45,100 Ukrainian soldiers killed and 390,000 wounded since Russia’s invasion began25. Altogether, approximately half of the wounded soldiers return to combat25.

The toll extends far beyond military casualties. The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission verified 30,457 civilian casualties, including 10,582 killed and 19,875 injured26. Primarily affecting populated areas, these numbers likely understate the actual impact26.

The war’s reach has shattered communities across Ukraine:

Over 14.6 million people require humanitarian assistance26
14 million Ukrainians have fled their homes26
3.7 million remain internally displaced26
6.5 million have become refugees globally26

Russian losses simultaneously paint an equally grim picture. The UK Defense Intelligence estimates an average of 1,523 Russian soldiers are killed or wounded daily27. Essentially, October 2024 marked the highest number of Russian casualties since the invasion began, with 42,000 losses reported in that month alone28.

The conflict’s impact on Ukraine’s demographic future appears bleak. In the first half of 2024, three times as many people died as were born. The war has overall devastated millions of Ukrainians, intensifying repression and unleashing unprecedented humanitarian challenges26.

Zelensky’s admission comes as Ukraine faces mounting pressure. The Russian defense ministry claims more than 38,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed or wounded in Kursk alone27 [58]. These numbers, though unverified, underscore the war’s escalating human cost.

The long-term impact of this conflict will affect generations. Families remain separated, children are homeless, and communities are destroyed26. The war has damaged or destroyed hundreds of medical and educational institutions, significantly impacting people’s rights to health and education26.

The Deep State’s Game:

Public opinion has shifted dramatically regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict. A recent Gallup poll reveals that 50% of Americans now support a quick end to the conflict, even if Ukraine doesn’t recover all its territory29. For the first time since the war began, Republican support for swift resolution has surged to 74%.

In contrast to the Deep State’s agenda of perpetual conflict, Trump’s peace initiative gains momentum. His strategy primarily involves coercive diplomacy with Putin30, offering a potential checkmate to globalist interests. His unpredictability and dealmaking instincts might help Ukraine secure a ceasefire on its own terms30.

The American public’s stance reflects growing war fatigue. Currently, 27% of citizens believe the U.S. provides too much assistance to Ukraine31. Among Republicans, this sentiment reaches 42%, while only 13% of Democrats share this view31. These numbers demonstrate substantial political leverage for Trump’s peace agenda.

Trump’s approach differs markedly from the Deep State’s traditional playbook. His administration emphasizes:

Immediate action over prolonged negotiations
Direct engagement with Putin
Focus on American interests over globalist agendas

As a result of mounting casualties and economic strain, 52% of Ukrainians now favor negotiating an end to the war32. Subsequently, this shift strengthens Trump’s position against the Deep State’s narrative of endless conflict.

The stakes remain high for Trump’s peace initiative. If successful, it could earn him consideration for the Nobel Peace Prize30. Yet, the challenge lies in avoiding a rushed agreement that might lead to catastrophic consequences for Ukraine and global stability30.

Recent polls indicate that merely 30% of Americans now view Russia’s invasion as a significant threat to U.S. interests31. This declining concern and growing support for peace talks suggest a potential realignment of public sentiment with Trump’s diplomatic approach.

The Deep State’s resistance to peace talks becomes increasingly apparent through their actions. Their strategy involves presenting the new Trump administration with accomplished facts before taking office33. Nevertheless, Trump’s team maintains that ending the conflict remains a top priority, emphasizing the human cost of continued fighting.

The Kremlin’s Stance:

Russia’s diplomatic stance reveals a complex interplay between negotiation openness and firm conditions. Fundamentally, Moscow has consistently expressed willingness for a diplomatic resolution, primarily through direct negotiations with Ukraine34.

Putin’s readiness for compromise comes with specific prerequisites. Currently, Russia demands recognition of its territorial gains, including Crimea and the regions it claims but doesn’t fully control. The Kremlin’s position on Ukraine’s leadership remains unequivocal—Putin considers only the Ukrainian parliament a legitimate authority36.

Moscow’s key demands for peace include:

Recognition of Russia’s annexation of claimed territories
Ukraine’s permanent exclusion from NATO
Complete demilitarization of Ukraine
Lifting of international sanctions35

The Kremlin’s nuclear doctrine has significantly changed as a strategic response to Western involvement. Putin has authorized nuclear responses to Western non-nuclear strikes on Russia37. Alternatively, Moscow views this as a “last resort measure.” However, the policy creates more flexibility for nuclear responses to Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory37.

Putin’s strategic warnings to NATO members carry profound implications. He cautions that NATO countries, notably smaller European nations with dense populations, risk severe consequences by supporting Ukrainian strikes deep into Russia36. The Russian president emphasizes that Ukrainian long-range attacks would require Western satellite and intelligence support, potentially drawing NATO directly into the conflict36.

Indeed, recent developments suggest intensified diplomatic activity. Contact between certain government agencies has increased, though the Kremlin maintains it’s premature to discuss specific negotiation formats. Henceforth, Russia’s stance combines openness to talks with firm conditions and strategic deterrence, creating a complex diplomatic landscape that demands careful navigation for any peace initiative to succeed.

Zelensky’s Victory Plan or War Plan?

Unveiled in October 2023, Zelensky’s Victory Plan primarily focuses on deterrence rather than achieving comprehensive peace40. Initially, the plan outlines five key components:

NATO membership and immediate alliance invitation
Enhanced defense capabilities with unrestricted weapon usage
Strategic deterrence package implementation
Joint investment agreements for natural resources
Ukrainian troops replacing U.S. forces in Europe

Fundamentally, the plan faces significant hurdles. Russia currently occupies slightly less than 20% of Ukrainian territory. Alternatively, most of this occupation predates the full-scale war, with Crimea seized in 201441. The military situation remains challenging – Russian forces advance slowly, primarily turning captured cities into wasteland41.

The Victory Plan’s economic aspects reveal Zelensky’s strategic thinking. He emphasizes Ukraine’s vast reserves of uranium, graphite, and lithium40. These resources, he warns, “will either strengthen Russia or Ukraine and the democratic world” 40. Meanwhile, Western support wavers – maintaining current aid levels proves increasingly difficult2.

NATO membership remains a contentious issue. Although Zelensky acknowledges that membership is “for the future, not the present “2, he demands immediate invitation as a “demonstration of resolve “2. Nonetheless, key NATO members, notably the United States and Germany, remain hesitant about extending membership during active conflict2.

The plan’s military components raise concerns. Zelensky seeks permission for long-range strikes inside Russia42, hence risking direct confrontation. Furthermore, he proposes that Eastern European neighbors shoot down Russian missiles from their territory42, potentially expanding the conflict’s scope.

Ultimately, the Victory Plan focuses more on prolonging conflict than achieving peace. Putin seems to have unreasonable expectations regarding potential U.S. involvement, including hopes for “total subjugation of Ukraine “41. Accordingly, this creates a dangerous stalemate where neither side is willing to compromise.

The plan’s implementation faces mounting obstacles. Western manufacturing capacity limitations and weapons stocks constrain support possibilities2. Additionally, the Biden administration maintains restrictions on long-range strikes, arguing they would cross Russian red lines without significantly altering the conflict’s trajectory2.

The Media’s Role:

Media personalities shape the narrative of the Russia-Ukraine conflict through vastly different lenses. The Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan debate highlighted stark contrasts in their perspectives on Zelensky’s leadership43. Fundamentally, while Morgan defended Zelensky’s actions, Carlson questioned his democratic credentials, pointing to his postponement of elections and rule through martial law44.

The media landscape reveals complex dynamics in portraying Zelensky. His previous career as an actor and audiovisual producer uniquely qualifies him to create technically sophisticated and persuasive content45. At length, his social media strategy demonstrates remarkable sophistication – he releases institutional videos timed with international media agendas. He delivers emotional speeches reminiscent of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s fireside chats45.

The contrast between media portrayal and reality becomes apparent through several key elements:

International media largely echoes government messaging, presenting minor changes as major overhauls46
Russian state media consistently portrays Zelensky negatively, using specific language to delegitimize his leadership47
Western coverage focuses on keeping audiences updated but struggles to explain broader implications48

Analogous to Roosevelt’s communication style, Zelensky strategically uses social media to appeal for international support49. His Twitter strategy actively constructs topics like ‘nature of the war,’ ‘sanctions against Russia,’ and ‘hope for victory’ to influence public opinion49. He carefully crafts his image whenever he posts, transitioning from political elite to “people’s guardian” and “heroic president “49.

Straightaway, the reality behind media coverage reveals mounting pressures. Ukrainian journalists have expressed concerns about declining press freedom, with some facing harassment and intimidation50. A coalition of media organizations reported “systematic” targeting of journalists by pro-government Telegram accounts50.

The media’s role extends beyond traditional channels. Social media influencers and content creators have become opinion makers and agenda setters51 [59]. Their impact proves particularly significant as younger generations increasingly consume news exclusively through social media platforms51. Through short-form media platforms like TikTok, Ukrainian content creators form parasocial bonds with followers, making support for Ukraine feel personal52.

This complex media ecosystem shapes public understanding of the conflict. The news media’s performance varies across countries, with audiences seeking more precise explanations of the conflict’s broader implications48. The challenge remains to balance accurate reporting with the need to maintain public engagement as the war continues52.

Call to Action:

The path forward demands immediate action from citizens and leaders alike. Trump’s coercive diplomacy approach primarily offers a viable route to peace30, fundamentally different from the current trajectory toward nuclear escalation.

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington and Congressman Jack Bergman have demanded complete transparency regarding Ukraine funding53. Their investigation reveals crucial oversight gaps:

A full accounting of expenditures is required
Detailed transfer documentation is needed
Clear obligations and apportionments demanded
Comprehensive outlay reporting is essential

Establishing DREAM, Ukraine’s digital ecosystem for reconstruction projects marks a significant step toward accountability54. This system creates a unified digital pipeline for all reconstruction initiatives, fostering trust between government, citizens, businesses, and financial institutions.

Ultimately, the U.S. government faces three competing demands in supporting Ukraine55:

Surging defense articles and services
Ensuring accountability for arms shipments
Managing escalation risks

The U.S. has increased oversight of weapons flow into Ukraine55. This monitoring will continue post-war to prevent unauthorized transfers. Henceforth, these lessons can improve future U.S. security cooperation and assistance evaluation.

Alternatively, Ukraine’s civil society demonstrates remarkable strength during wartime56. Their self-organization capabilities and vigilant oversight of state power prove essential for maintaining democratic values. A robust investigative media remains crucial for this task.

The European Union’s commitment to Ukraine’s future manifests through concrete actions. Negotiations for EU membership opened on June 25, 2024. This process should not merely reward Ukraine but serve as an integral part of essential reforms.

The stakes remain extraordinarily high. If Trump succeeds in helping Ukraine defend its territory without arms diversion or humanitarian law violations, it could establish a precedent for promoting transparency in U.S. arms transfers55. This success would inform future transfer procedures and policies.

Citizens must demand their leaders prioritize:

Transparent accounting of all Ukraine-related expenditures
Regular updates on peace negotiation progress
Clear timelines for democratic reforms
Concrete steps toward ending the conflict

The time for decisive action has arrived. Supporting peace initiatives over nuclear ambitions represents the only viable path forward. Through unwavering commitment to transparency and democracy, we can help ensure Ukraine emerges from this conflict stronger, more accountable, and firmly anchored in Western institutions.

Conclusion:

Patriots must understand what’s truly at stake here. Trump’s peace initiative stands as our best chance to end this devastating conflict that has claimed 45,100 Ukrainian lives. Indeed, Zelensky’s dangerous pivot toward nuclear weapons threatens not just regional stability but global peace.

Public opinion aligns with Trump’s vision – 50% of Americans support a swift end to this conflict. Therefore, we must act decisively against Deep State forces pushing for endless war. Their agenda crumbles as casualties mount and support wanes.

Above all, transparency demands our attention. House investigations reveal critical oversight gaps in Ukraine funding, while Zelensky’s delayed elections raise serious democratic concerns. These issues require immediate citizen response through vocal support for peace talks and proper accountability measures.

The path forward requires an unwavering commitment to truth and action [60]. Undoubtedly, Trump’s direct approach to peace negotiations offers hope, whereas conventional diplomacy has failed. Together, we must stand firm against nuclear escalation and support initiatives that prioritize peace over perpetual conflict.

The choice lies before us – continue down Zelensky’s path of nuclear ambitions and endless war or embrace Trump’s vision for immediate peace talks and American leadership. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and the time for action is now.

Legal Disclaimers/Warnings:

This article presents an analysis based on publicly available information and media reports. Given the complex nature of international conflicts, readers must carefully consider this content.

Disclaimer:

The content herein is for informational and discussion purposes only. It does not advocate for or against any actions by any state or individual.

This content serves primarily as a platform for discussion and analysis5. Generally, the information provided should not be considered professional advice or official policy positions. Reliance on this content is at the reader’s own discretion and risk. The article aims to present multiple viewpoints while maintaining factual accuracy4.

Warning:

This article contains potentially controversial opinions. Readers should critically assess all information and not use it as the sole basis for decision-making.

Similarly to other complex geopolitical discussions, this article contains statements that may generate debate6. Alternatively, readers should:

Verify claims through multiple credible sources
Consider various perspectives on the conflict
Understand that social media posts often contain false or misleading claims
Recognize that passionate voices may not always present accurate information

Note:

Quotes and statements are used for analysis and may not reflect current or official positions. Always verify official matters with primary sources for accuracy.

The analysis presented draws from various media reports and public statements7. Critical evaluation remains essential as social media and news coverage often contain inaccuracies or biased interpretations8. Ultimately, readers should:

Consult multiple viewpoints and sources
Verify information through official channels
Consider the context and timing of statements
Understand that digital provenance isn’t always clear

This article represents an analytical perspective on current events, utilizing publicly available information to examine complex international situations4. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions or policies of any government or organization5. Readers should approach all content critically and seek additional verification from authoritative sources [61].

References

[1] – https://raelyntan.com/write-blog-disclaimer/

[2] – https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/zelenskyys-victory-plan-ukraine-makes-sense-it-has-little-chance-being-implemented

[3] – https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/16/russia-ukraine-wartime-deaths

[4] – https://libguides.umflint.edu/topics/current

[5] – https://termly.io/resources/articles/disclaimer-examples/

[6] – https://www.quora.com/Can-you-give-some-examples-of-absurd-and-or-controversial-opinion-pieces-that-have-been-published-in-major-newspapers-or-magazines

[7] – https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/factchecking-claims-about-the-conflict-in-ukraine/

[8] – https://libguides.library.cpp.edu/ukraine-russia-war

[9] – https://apnews.com/article/trump-putin-russia-ukraine-6c5a098488e64cd7643a89f4aaacd249

[10] – https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-wants-meet-putin-soon-ensure-end-ukraine-war-2025-01-23/

[11] – https://www.rferl.org/a/trump-strategy-end-ukraine-war-months-kellogg/33299246.html

[12] – https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy-announces-its-total-military-casualties-first-time/

[13] – https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/trumps-promise-end-ukraine-war-day-meets-harsh-realities-rcna188167

[14] – https://www.visionofhumanity.org/amid-talk-of-victory-forced-peace-casualties-keep-rising-in-ukraine-war/

[15] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

[16] – https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/kremlin-says-zelenskyy-s-demand-for-nuclear-weapons-bordering-on-madness-/3472590

[17] – https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/ukraine-nuclear-weapons-and-security-assurances-glance

[18] – https://carnegieendowment.org/programs/nuclear-policy/proliferation-news/zelenskys-demand-nato-or-nuclear-weapons-proliferation-news-102224

[19] – https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/02/05/zelenskyy-ukraine-needs-nuclear-weapons-if-nato-entry-takes-decades/

[20] – https://www.dw.com/en/can-ukraines-zelenskyy-stay-in-power-without-an-election/a-68789736

[21] – https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2024-05-20/president-until-end-war-volodymyr-zelenskys-term-office-extended

[22] – https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/02/02/trumps-envoy-kellogg-pushes-for-ukrainian-elections-in-2025-after-potential-ceasefire/

[23] – https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-freak-out-us-russia-push-election/

[24] – https://www.reuters.com/world/us-wants-ukraine-hold-elections-following-ceasefire-says-trump-envoy-2025-02-01/

[25] – https://kyivindependent.com/over-45-000-ukrainian-soldiers-killed-since-start-of-war-zelensky-says/

[26] – https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/02/1146842

[27] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yv75nydy3o

[28] – https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-human-cost-of-russias-illegal-war-is-appalling-uk-statement-to-the-osce

[29] – https://news.gallup.com/poll/654575/americans-favor-quick-end-russia-ukraine-war.aspx

[30] – https://www.csis.org/analysis/can-trump-persuade-putin-make-peace-ukraine

[31] – https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/11/25/wide-partisan-divisions-remain-in-americans-views-of-the-war-in-ukraine/

[32] – https://news.gallup.com/poll/653495/half-ukrainians-quick-negotiated-end-war.aspx

[33] – https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/the-us-deep-state-decided-to-allow-ukraine-to-strike-deep-into-russian-territory/

[34] – https://www.aa.com.tr/en/russia-ukraine-war/putin-reiterates-russias-readiness-to-compromise-with-ukraine/3429554

[35] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_negotiations_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

[36] – https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-warns-west-not-let-ukraine-use-its-missiles-hit-russia-2024-05-28/

[37] – https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-nuclear-doctrine-us-ukraine-strike-russia-war-west-rcna180740

[38] – https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/russia-indicates-talks-with-u-s-over-ukraine-are-intensifying-8cee6dc8

[39] – https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-says-new-elections-ukraine-are-necessary-2025-02-03/

[40] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2ldpnyewx1o

[41] – https://news.uchicago.edu/story/whats-future-war-ukraine

[42] – https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/10/16/ukraine-zelensky-victory-plan-russia-war-nato/

[43] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAOSY2xIcxc

[44] – https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/tucker-piers-morgan-debate-foreign-aid-hate-speech/id1719657632?i=1000687571301

[45] – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13669877.2024.2447254?src=

[46] – https://www.politico.eu/article/volodymyr-zelenskyy-ukraine-europe-russia-war-media/

[47] – https://strikesource.com/2023/03/14/propaganda-analysis-how-russian-media-portrays-ukraines-zelensky/

[48] – https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022/perceptions-media-coverage-war-Ukraine

[49] – https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1478639/full

[50] – https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/ukraine_reporters_threats_zelensky.php

[51] – https://www.aspeninstitute.de/digital-program/digitalization-and-democracy/disinformation-and-the-role-of-influencers-in-times-of-conflict/

[52] – https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/02/02/russia-ukraine-through-the-eyes-of-social-media/

[53] – https://budget.house.gov/press-release/icymi-house-republicans-demand-transparency-on-ukraine-funds

[54] – https://www.transparency.org.uk/ukraine-reflections-building-transparent-accountable-nation

[55] – https://internationalpolicy.org/publications/maintaining-transparency-in-us-security-assistance-to-ukraine/

[56] – https://www.brookings.edu/articles/safeguarding-ukraines-democracy-during-the-war/

[57] – Ukraine, Nuclear Weapons, and Security Assurances at a Glance | Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Ukraine-Nuclear-Weapons?fbclid=IwAR34y0s9VJc8reC7H7PxWDZ7s7Mpuc–Qy-Qg7IkJ2b6c4-hVQgcGESPLPY

[58] – No casualties among Ukrainian soldiers in Donbas. https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-defense/2430774-no-casualties-among-ukrainian-soldiers-in-donbas-hutsuliak.html

[59] – You searched for Fashion – All Exclusive News. https://allexclusivenews.com/search/Fashion/

[60] – Low Dose Naltrexone For Prostate Cancer Care. https://oasismedicalinstitute.com/low-dose-naltrexone-prostate-adenocarcinoma/

[61] – Kodrzycki, Y. K. (1994). Defense Downsizing: The Economic Impacts in New England. https://core.ac.uk/download/217050842.pdf

[62] – Peters, M. A. (2019). The ‘crooked timber’ of humanitarianism. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1575173

[63] – Stronski, P. (2020). There Goes the Neighborhood: The Limits of Russian Integration in Eurasia. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – Papers, (), n/a.

[64] – Irons, L. (2023). Web Briefs. Journal of Information Ethics, 32(1), 107-113.

[65] – Peters, P. (2024). Research to Practice: Transitioning to College for Twice-Exceptional Students. Parenting for High Potential, 13(3), 15.

[66] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/trump-forcing-zelensky-to-hold-peace-talks-with-russia-but-zelensky-just-wants-nukes

[67] – https://www.economist.com/europe/2024/05/16/volodymyr-zelenskys-five-year-term-ends-on-may-20th

[68] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so2KTN0F6i8

[69] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCJRwlH948E

[70] – https://banned.video/watch?id=63c0821cb0641c14270bb933

[71] – https://kyivindependent.com/i-consider-him-an-enemy-zelensky-says-hes-ready-to-sit-opposite-putin-in-peace-talks/

[72] – https://kyivindependent.com/tag/donald-trump/

[73] – https://kyivindependent.com/tag/russia/

[74] – https://kyivindependent.com/tag/vladimir-putin/

[75] – https://kyivindependent.com/tag/ukraine/