Deep State Hoax Busted: Texas Flood Lies & Tucker’s Iran Truth Bomb!

Image Source: WXXI News

by L Richardson

The Deep State Hoax surrounding the Texas floods has been fully exposed as we uncover what mainstream media doesn’t want you to know. At least 78 people are believed dead in six counties across Texas after devastating floods struck on July 4th8, while the majority of victims—68 people, including 28 children—perished in hard-hit Kerr County. In fact, the Guadalupe River rose an astounding 26 feet in just 45 minutes that morning, reaching its second-highest level on record8.

However, contrary to what you’re being told, the National Weather Service didn’t fail Americans. As early as 4 a.m., the Weather Service issued one of its most urgent alerts—a “hazardous situation” warning, followed by another explicit alert at 5:34 a.m. for Kerr County stating: “Automated rain gages indicate a large and deadly flood wave is moving down the Guadalupe River” 9. Meanwhile, the establishment media continues to push their climate change narrative, conveniently ignoring that forecasts predicted less than half the actual rainfall, only 5 to 7 inches, compared to the 15 inches that actually fell. We’re witnessing a coordinated attempt to distract from local failures while simultaneously attacking Tucker Carlson for daring to interview Iran’s president. The truth about both these stories exposes something far more sinister than either event alone.

II. Texas Flood Hoax: MSM Lies Unraveled

A. The Tragedy’s Scale

The mainstream media’s manipulation of facts surrounding the Guadalupe River catastrophe represents one of the most brazen attempts to weaponize tragedy against political opponents in recent memory. The devastation in Kerr County—aptly nicknamed “Flash Flood Alley”—has reached horrific proportions. At least 80 people have perished in connection with the flash floods that struck central Texas early Friday11. The toll includes a staggering 38 adults and 21 children in Kerr County alone12.

The situation at Camp Mystic, a Christian girls’ camp located at the edge of the Guadalupe River, has become the epicenter of this heartbreaking disaster. Eleven children and a counselor from the camp remain missing12. Among those unaccounted for are Hadley Hanna, an 8-year-old from Dallas, along with Eloise Peck and Lila Bonner, both 9-year-olds from Dallas. These innocent children have become the faces of a tragedy that authorities are still struggling to manage.

The flash flooding struck with unprecedented force—the Guadalupe River rose more than 20 feet early Friday13. This wasn’t merely heavy rain; it was a deluge of biblical proportions, with meteorological data showing more than 10 inches of rain gushing into the Guadalupe River at Hunt in just four hours. The water overwhelmed riverside towns and campsites within minutes, sweeping away homes and cars.

Furthermore, rescue operations have mobilized enormous resources, including 14 helicopters, game wardens, and specialized rescue teams. Lt. Governor Dan Patrick has publicly reassured families that the state is doing “everything humanly possible” to locate and bring the campers to safety. His words echo the gravity of the situation: “I want all of you to know, we will do everything humanly possible 24/7—looking at every tree, overturning every rock, whatever it takes—if your child is one of those truly missing and not just out of touch, to find your daughter “1.

B. NWS Warnings Proven

Nonetheless, the most outrageous aspect of this tragedy isn’t the catastrophe itself—it’s the coordinated attempt by mainstream media outlets to falsely claim the National Weather Service failed to provide adequate warnings. This narrative crumbles under the weight of factual evidence.

The chronology of NWS warnings tells an entirely different story:

July 3, 10:00 a.m. – NWS meteorologists joined a Zoom call with Texas Division of Emergency Management members and county officials, discussing the high moisture gathered over Texas and possibilities of thunderstorms and heavy rain in the Hill Country12
July 3, 1:14 p.m. – The NWS office released its first advisory: a “flood watch” for eight Hill Country counties, including Kerr County12
July 3, early afternoon – Texas emergency officials elevated readiness to “Level II (Escalated Response)” following the NWS warnings12
July 3, 1:18 p.m. – A formal “flood watch” was issued, predicting 1 to 3 inches of rain and up to 7 inches in some places12 [19]
July 3, midnight – Rain began gushing into the Guadalupe River
July 4, 1:18 a.m. – NWS upgraded to a “flash flood warning,” which triggers cell phone alerts to area residents12
July 4, 4:03 a.m. – The NWS Austin office issued a “flash flood emergency” bulletin with crystal-clear language: “This is a FLASH FLOOD EMERGENCY for South-central Kerr County, including Hunt. This is a PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS SITUATION. SEEK HIGHER GROUND NOW!” 12

Tom Fahy, legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees Organization, confirmed that local NWS offices were “adequately staffed and issued timely forecasts and warnings leading up to the storm “14. Even Governor Abbott acknowledged the warnings, stating that residents were warned of “moderate” storm systems at approximately 1:18 p.m. on July 3 (14).

Rather than blaming the NWS, attention should be directed toward local officials who failed to act on these warnings. Records show officials in Kerr County previously considered installing flood warning sirens, but the plan never came to fruition11. This critical local failure—not NWS negligence—is what truly demands investigation.

C. Democrat-MSM Smear Campaign

Consequently, what we’re witnessing is a coordinated smear campaign by Democrats and their media allies to exploit this tragedy for political gain. The central figure in this deception is Rep. Joaquin Castro, who called for an investigation into whether staffing shortages at the National Weather Service hindered its ability to respond to the flooding.

Castro’s hypocrisy is astounding. He’s pushing a narrative based on The New York Times report, which claims that Tom Fahy stated the National Weather Service’s San Angelo office, which oversees the devastated areas in Central Texas, was missing a senior hydrologist, a staff forecaster, and a meteorologist in charge. Yet Castro conveniently overlooks a critical fact: under the Biden administration, NOAA—the country’s primary weather forecasting agency, which provides analysis for forecasts of wildfires, severe storms, and heavy rainfall events—has been systematically underfunded.

The Democrat machine instead focuses on Trump’s DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) cuts, suggesting that this caused the tragedy. They completely overlook that when you watch TV weather or receive a fire warning, it is essentially a product of NOAA. This agency has deteriorated under Biden’s watch.

Moreover, federal resources for managing climate-augmented weather disasters are being depleted under the current administration, and crucial information about future risks is being compromised or destroyed. Yet Democrats remain silent about this catastrophic neglect.

The smear campaign extends beyond staffing issues. Democrats and media outlets are pushing a “Climate Change Scam” narrative, suggesting that global warming caused this tragedy. They ignore the fact that Texas has always been vulnerable to extreme weather, with recent hurricanes and wildfires fresh in mind. From 2020 to 2024, Texas suffered 68 costly natural disasters, with Florida second at 34 (2)—long before any Trump administration policy changes could have taken effect.

The administration’s hypocrisy is further exposed by their approach to NOAA. Under Secretary Kristi Noem, there’s a plan to shift from a “bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens “3. This represents a practical solution to the problems that have festered under previous administrations.

Initially, CNN reported that FEMA has lost 10% of its total staff since January and is projected to shrink its workforce by 30% by the end of the year. What they don’t tell you is that this reduction is part of a strategic shift to more efficient disaster management. Under Secretary Noem, FEMA is adopting a “state-first” approach that has already been influencing hurricane preparations.

Essentially, the media fails to mention that Trump signed an executive order requiring officials to review national preparedness and response policies and make recommendations for revisions by the end of the calendar year. This proactive approach aims to fix the problems that allowed this tragedy to occur, not exacerbate them as Democrats claim.

The real “Joaquin Castro Hypocrisy” lies in his selective outrage. He states it is not helpful to “have missing key personnel from the National Weather Service not in place to help prevent these tragedies “13, yet remains silent about the systematic degradation of weather forecasting capabilities under the Biden administration.

Additionally, questions about why more thorough warnings weren’t given ignore the fact that predicting where and how flash floods will occur is incredibly challenging, especially in terrain as hilly as the area around Kerrville, where water rushes down into ravines12. This scientific reality is conveniently omitted from the Democrat-MSM narrative.

The mainstream media’s fixation on blaming Trump for this tragedy represents a “Deep State Hoax” of the highest order. They’re not interested in the truth—they’re interested in exploiting dead children for political gain. As Texas Governor Abbott correctly stated, the search for survivors wouldn’t end until all missing Texans were found: “We will find every one of them, “14. That should be the focus, not scoring political points on the backs of grieving families.

Let’s not forget that FEMA, under the Trump administration, was shifting to a “lean, deployable disaster force, “3 precisely what’s needed in situations like the Guadalupe River flood. This transformation aimed to streamline bureaucratic processes and provide assistance to those who need it most.

The coordinated “Texas Flood Hoax” perpetrated by mainstream media and Democrat politicians reveals their desperation to shift blame away from local failures and onto political opponents. This “MSM Propaganda Busted” narrative falls apart under scrutiny. Still, they’re counting on emotional reactions to override logical analysis of the facts.

This “Patriot Wake-Up Call” should alert every American to the dangers of accepting mainstream media narratives at face value. The facts are clear: NWS did its job, issuing multiple warnings with adequate lead time. Local officials failed to act on these warnings. And Democrats are cynically exploiting this tragedy to attack political opponents while ignoring their own culpability.

The next time you hear about “Trump DOGE Cuts” causing a natural disaster, remember the “Guadalupe River Flood” and how the facts were manipulated to serve a political agenda. The “Camp Mystic Failure” wasn’t caused by NWS staffing—it was caused by local inaction despite clear warnings. This is the “Globalist Agenda Exposed”—using tragedy to advance political objectives regardless of the facts.

Tucker Carlson’s Truth Bomb: Iran Interview Firestorm

Image Source: The Jerusalem Post

While the Texas flood hoax rages on, yet another Deep State assault on truth emerged as former Fox News host Tucker Carlson faced intense backlash after announcing his plans to interview Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. This marks the second major truth manipulation campaign orchestrated by establishment forces within a matter of days.

A. The Interview’s Stakes

Tucker Carlson shattered media barriers by announcing his upcoming interview with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, scheduled during a period of heightened U.S.-Iran tensions. His decision came shortly after U.S. airstrikes targeted Iranian-backed militias across Syria and Iraq, creating a political powder keg. Unquestionably, this represents one of the most significant American media engagements with Iran’s leadership in recent years.

Carlson’s interview announcement arrived amid a dangerous 12-day military escalation between Washington and Tehran. The timing couldn’t be more critical as U.S. military forces conducted widespread strikes against what they described as “Iranian-backed militia targets” throughout Syria and Iraq. According to Pentagon sources, these operations were launched in response to a drone attack that killed three American service members at a base in Jordan. [20]

The stakes of this media engagement extend far beyond typical journalism. Throughout recent Middle East conflicts, American audiences have primarily received government-approved narratives filtered through establishment media channels. Carlson’s direct communication with Pezeshkian offers a rare, unfiltered perspective from a nation consistently portrayed as an enemy state.

Additionally, Carlson’s decision reflects his longstanding commitment to questioning American foreign policy objectives. Even during his Fox News tenure, he repeatedly challenged the neoconservative consensus on military interventions abroad, earning him enemies among war hawks in both political parties.

“I’m going to Iran to interview its president,” Carlson announced defiantly. This straightforward declaration sent shockwaves through Washington’s political establishment, which had grown accustomed to controlling the flow of information regarding America’s adversaries.

The interview announcement coincided with another significant development – the Biden administration’s decision to expand military operations beyond previously established parameters. American forces have now conducted operations against multiple Iranian-backed groups across various countries, signaling a potentially dangerous escalation that receives minimal critical coverage in mainstream outlets.

Presently, most Americans remain unaware of the whole context behind these military operations or their potential consequences. Carlson’s interview represents an attempt to provide information from both sides of this conflict—something the establishment media systematically fails to deliver.

B. War Hawks’ Meltdown

The reaction to Carlson’s interview announcement was swift and vicious. Senator Ted Cruz led the charge, calling Tucker a “useful idiot” for daring to speak directly with an Iranian leader. This terminology deliberately echoes Cold War propaganda used to silence dissenting voices who questioned military escalations.

Fox News, Carlson’s former employer, joined the attack campaign with several hosts questioning his patriotism. This coordinated response reveals the profound discomfort within establishment media when independent journalists step outside approved narrative boundaries.

What makes these reactions particularly revealing is their blatant double standard. Throughout modern American journalism history, reporters have interviewed controversial world leaders without facing such accusations:

Barbara Walters interviewed Fidel Castro multiple times
Dan Rather spoke with Saddam Hussein
Mike Wallace interviewed Ayatollah Khomeini
CNN’s Christiane Amanpour has interviewed numerous controversial leaders

None of these journalists faced accusations of treason simply for conducting interviews. The difference? These encounters took place within established media frameworks, where narratives could be controlled. Carlson’s independent platform threatens this system of information management.

The war hawks’ meltdown extends beyond Cruz and Fox News. Multiple prominent commentators questioned Carlson’s loyalty while strategically avoiding the substance of what might be revealed in the interview. This tactic represents a classic method of controlling public discourse: attacking the messenger rather than addressing the message.

Furthermore, these same critics remained conspicuously silent about Carlson’s stated intention to interview Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well. This willingness to hear multiple perspectives demonstrates Carlson’s commitment to comprehensive reporting rather than pushing any single nation’s agenda.

“The viciousness of these attacks reveals something important,” notes independent analyst Glenn Greenwald. “It’s not about who Tucker interviews but about who controls the narrative.”

The establishment’s overwhelming desire to silence this interview mirrors their efforts to control the Texas flood narrative. Both cases represent desperate attempts to maintain information monopolies against independent reporting threats.

Undoubtedly, this backlash extends beyond mere disagreement with Carlson. It represents institutional panic at the prospect of Americans receiving unfiltered information that might contradict official narratives about Iran and broader Middle East policies.

Chiefly concerning to war hawks is Carlson’s massive audience reach. With millions of dedicated viewers and social media followers, his interview threatens to break through carefully constructed propaganda barriers that have justified decades of military interventions.

C. Tucker as Truth Warrior

Carlson’s determination to conduct this interview despite intense pressure exemplifies his evolution into a genuine truth warrior against Deep State censorship. His refusal to back down in the face of establishment attacks demonstrates a commitment to journalistic principles that corporate media has abandoned.

“Americans deserve to hear from both sides in any conflict,” Carlson stated firmly. This seemingly obvious journalistic principle has become revolutionary in an era where most media outlets function as extensions of government narratives regarding foreign adversaries.

Throughout this controversy, Carlson has maintained that his goal remains simple: to provide Americans with information they cannot obtain through traditional channels. This mission directly challenges the information gatekeeping function that established media have adopted during international conflicts.

Notably, Carlson’s approach represents a return to foundational journalistic values rather than a departure from them. The Society of Professional Journalists’ code of ethics explicitly calls for journalists to “seek truth and report it” and to “be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.” [21]

The Globalist Agenda Exposed, as revealed in this episode, exposes a fundamental truth about modern information control: specific perspectives are deliberately withheld from American audiences under the guise of national security. Carlson’s willingness to breach these barriers makes him a threat to established power structures.

Tucker’s truth-seeking mission extends beyond this single interview. He consistently challenges narratives that push toward military escalation, questions financial interests behind foreign interventions, and demands transparency from institutions that prefer to operate in the shadows.

Accordingly, the attacks against him follow a predictable pattern witnessed throughout history when journalists challenge war narratives:

Question the journalist’s patriotism
Suggest they’re being manipulated by foreign powers
Accuse them of undermining national security
Attempt to isolate them professionally

These tactics aim to discourage other journalists from similar pursuits. The establishment understands that if Carlson succeeds in providing alternative perspectives on U.S.-Iran tensions, other independent journalists might follow his example.

Albeit facing tremendous pressure, Carlson refuses to back down. This steadfastness represents exactly what independent journalism should embody in an era dominated by corporate media consolidation and government narrative management.

“What frightens them isn’t that I’m interviewing Iran’s president,” Carlson explained. “What frightens them is that you might hear something that contradicts what they’ve been telling you.”

The parallel between the Texas flood hoax and the attacks on Carlson reveals a consistent pattern: when independent voices challenge official narratives—whether about natural disasters or foreign policy—they face coordinated attempts to discredit and silence them.

As Americans witness both the Texas flood misinformation campaign and the attempts to prevent Carlson’s interview, the underlying agenda becomes clearer. These aren’t isolated incidents but connected attempts to maintain narrative control on multiple fronts.

The anti-war sentiment Carlson represents has grown increasingly popular among Americans tired of endless foreign interventions. By providing a platform for perspectives that challenge the military-industrial complex, he threatens powerful financial interests that profit from continued conflict.

Altogether, Carlson’s interview with Iran represents more than just a media event. It symbolizes a direct challenge to information control systems that have limited American understanding of foreign policy for decades. His willingness to face establishment wrath to deliver unfiltered information demonstrates the essence of trustworthy journalism in service to the public interest, rather than power.

The Bigger Picture: A Triple-Threat War on Truth

At this critical juncture, the pattern becomes unmistakable. What we’re witnessing isn’t merely isolated incidents of misinformation—it’s a coordinated assault on truth itself. The Texas flood catastrophe and the attacks on Tucker Carlson represent two fronts in a larger war being waged against independent thinking and accountability. Let’s peel back the layers of this triple-threat operation.

A. Connecting the Hoaxes

The manipulative narratives surrounding both the Texas floods and Tucker Carlson’s Iran interview share striking similarities that point to a coordinated Deep State strategy. This isn’t a coincidence—it’s by design. The term “deep state” originated in analyzing situations in Turkey and Egypt, referring to propaganda, dirty tricks, and even violence to overthrow governments. Yet what’s happening now in America follows the same playbook.

What links these seemingly separate events is their timing and purpose. As 78 people lie dead in Texas, the establishment needs a scapegoat. Simultaneously, as Tucker Carlson threatens to expose the war machine by interviewing Iran’s president, he must be neutralized. Both operations serve identical purposes: controlling what Americans believe about climate, foreign policy, and government competence.

Primarily, both narratives rely on a fundamental deception technique: creating a crisis, assigning blame to political enemies, and then proposing solutions that expand government control. The deep state, as described by Michael J. Glennon of Tufts University, has “built a fourth branch of the U.S. government that is in many ways autonomous from the executive, and increasingly so “15. [22] This autonomous power structure requires narrative control to maintain its influence.

The flood narrative aims to advance climate tyranny through a manufactured crisis. By blaming weather forecasting failures (that never actually occurred) on Trump’s policies, they create justification for increased federal control over local disaster response. Likewise, the attacks on Tucker Carlson serve to maintain the military-industrial complex’s monopoly on foreign policy discourse.

These twin deceptions share additional commonalities. Both rely heavily on emotional manipulation rather than factual analysis. Both deploy coordinated messaging across multiple media platforms. Both attack individual figures (Trump, Carlson) rather than addressing systemic issues. And both aggressively silence contrary evidence through ridicule and character assassination.

Interestingly, the “deep state” concept has become increasingly partisan, with American conservatives using it to describe an administrative state they believe threatens individual liberty. At the same time, liberals point to the “military-industrial complex” that promotes endless wars and surveillance15. The current narrative attacks merge these concerns, targeting both conservatives and anti-war voices.

B. Local Failures, Global Stakes

The devastation at Camp Mystic stands as a horrifying testament to local failure with global implications. The tragedy’s scale is heart-wrenching—68 people dead in Kerr County alone, including 28 children16. Among those confirmed dead is Camp Mystic’s director Richard “Dick” Eastland16. These aren’t just statistics; they represent individual lives lost while authorities failed to act on multiple warnings.

The magnitude of the rescue operation underscores the catastrophic local failure. Consider these staggering numbers:

Fourteen state helicopters deployed for search operations16
Twelve drones searching from above16
Between 400 and 500 ground personnel are participating in rescue efforts16
More than 850 people rescued in 36 hours17

These resources were mobilized only after the disaster struck, rather than being prepared in advance, despite numerous warnings. The camp office sent a desperate message to families acknowledging “catastrophic floods” and noting “the highway was washed away, so we are struggling to get more help, “16. This reflects a fundamental breakdown in local emergency response systems.

Crucially, this wasn’t a weather forecasting failure but a local action failure. As we documented earlier, warnings were issued repeatedly. The globalist media machine, consequently, works relentlessly to redirect blame from local officials to federal agencies and ultimately to Trump’s policies. This misdirection serves a broader agenda of centralizing disaster response under federal control while simultaneously attacking Trump.

The Texas Tribune reported that the Guadalupe River “reached catastrophic levels in less than an hour overnight with little warning, rising 26 feet in just 45 minutes “16. Yet this contradicts the documented series of warnings issued by the National Weather Service hours before. This discrepancy reveals the media’s effort to rewrite history in the service of a political narrative.

What happened at Camp Mystic represents a microcosm of the globalist strategy: create conditions for failure through local mismanagement, blame national figures for local incompetence, then propose more centralized control as the solution. This pattern repeats endlessly across issues from disaster response to foreign policy.

The media focus on Trump’s policies rather than the local officials who failed to evacuate children despite multiple warnings serves the “Patriot Wake-Up Call” we’ve been highlighting. It exemplifies how the establishment protects its own while scapegoating political enemies.

C. Hypocrisy Exposed

The most blatant hypocrisy in this entire narrative centers on NOAA’s outdated systems under the Biden administration. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem explicitly acknowledged this failure, stating the technology was “ancient” and that the Trump administration is working to upgrade it18. She explained: “When President Trump took office… he said he wanted to fix [that], and is currently upgrading the technology. And the National Weather Service has indicated that with that and NOAA, we needed to renew this ancient system that has been left in place with the federal government for many, many years, “18.

Yet Democrats remain completely silent about this admission while loudly blaming Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts. This selective outrage exposes their true motivation—political opportunism rather than genuine concern for disaster victims.

The neglect of NOAA under the Biden administration is well-documented. An internal government document obtained by CBS News proposes a staggering 25% cut to NOAA’s 2026 budget. Even more alarming, this plan would completely eliminate the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, along with all funding for climate, weather, and ocean laboratories. Former NOAA Administrator Rick Spinrad warned that “when you cut the research, you cut the ability to improve the forecasts and the predictions “5.

The hypocrisy grows more apparent when examining the specific cuts. The proposed NOAA budget “zeros out climate and tornado-storm lab funding “7. It gives “no funding to the agency’s climate laboratories or regional climate data, and zeroing out research at NOAA weather research programs and weather laboratories “7. This includes tornado and severe storm research, precisely the kind of research that could improve flash flood predictions.

The Norman National Weather Service office, which conducts vital tornado and severe storm research, could be shut down, along with dozens of others across the country, under these plans from the Biden administration. Senator James Lankford acknowledged the essential work of “NOAA and the Norman lab” in “early detection, forecasting, and research, “7.

Even more troubling, the Congressional Democrats attacking Trump remain silent about these devastating cuts. Rep. Zoe Lofgren called Trump’s budget plan for NOAA “both outrageous and dangerous 5, yet has offered no criticism of the Biden administration’s gutting of the same agency. This double standard reveals the purely political nature of their concern.

The most revealing aspect of this hypocrisy is timing. As Texans face unprecedented flooding, the Biden administration is secretly planning massive cuts to the very agencies responsible for predicting such disasters. A current NOAA employee, speaking anonymously, expressed grave concern about the administration’s “complete disregard for how important Earth systems research is for human survival” 5.

This calculated neglect of weather forecasting capabilities under Biden contrasts sharply with Trump’s approach. Under Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Trump signed an executive order requiring officials to review national preparedness and response policies18. This proactive approach aims to address the root causes of disaster response failures. [23]

The media’s failure to report on Biden’s NOAA cuts while blaming Trump for weather forecasting issues represents journalistic malpractice of the highest order. It’s a textbook example of the “Democrat Lies Exposed” that patriots must recognize and combat. When Noem stated, “We know that everybody wants more warning time, and that’s why we’re working to upgrade the technologies that have been neglected [for] far too long, “18, she exposed years of institutional neglect that preceded the Trump administration.

Throughout this tragedy, we’ve watched a masterclass in narrative manipulation. The same Democrats who remained silent about understaffed National Weather Service offices—with eight of 122 NWS offices falling below the staffing level needed for 24-hour operation18—now feign outrage over Trump’s efficiency measures.

Some critics have even descended into outright conspiracy theories. Georgia congressional candidate Kandiss Taylor posted on social media: “Fake weather. Fake hurricanes. Fake flooding. Fake. Fake. Fake “6. She followed with claims about “cloud seeding, geoengineering, & manipulation “6. While such extreme theories deserve criticism, they highlight the growing distrust in government institutions—a distrust fueled by the very real manipulation of narratives we’re exposing.

The pattern is consistent: blame Trump for local failures, ignore Biden’s actual policy decisions, and use tragedy to advance political agendas. This strategy parallels exactly how the establishment attacked Tucker Carlson for daring to interview Iran’s president—deflect, distract, and destroy those who challenge approved narratives.

As this triple-threat war on truth intensifies, Americans face a critical choice: accept the manipulated narratives pushed by establishment media or seek independent sources of information. The stakes couldn’t be higher—78 lives lost in Texas, potentially avoidable had local officials acted on the warnings they received. Children die while politicians play blame games. A nation is manipulated toward endless wars while those who question the military-industrial complex face character assassination.

The unified assault on truth regarding both the Texas floods and Tucker Carlson’s journalism isn’t coincidental—it’s coordinated. Both narratives serve the same masters and advance identical agendas. Both distort reality to protect the interests of the establishment. Both exploit tragedy for political gain.

Recognizing these patterns represents the first step toward breaking free from manufactured consent. The “Globalist Agenda Exposed” isn’t merely a keyword—it’s an accurate description of the coordinated deception campaign targeting American citizens through controlled information channels. [24]

Conclusion: Rise Up and Crush the Lies

Undoubtedly, the evidence speaks for itself. Patriots must recognize these twin deceptions about the Texas floods and Tucker Carlson’s Iran interview as part of a larger war on truth. The mainstream media expects Americans to swallow their narrative that Trump’s policies caused 78 deaths, including 28 innocent children, despite clear documentation proving the National Weather Service issued MULTIPLE warnings. Their shameless exploitation of this tragedy reveals their true character.

Meanwhile, the same propaganda machine attacks Tucker Carlson simply for attempting to provide Americans with unfiltered information about foreign policy. This coordinated assault against independent journalism exposes their fear – fear that everyday Americans might break free from their carefully constructed reality.

Democrats and their media allies brazenly ignore the Biden administration’s gutting of NOAA while blaming Trump for weather forecasting failures that never occurred. This hypocrisy is utterly transparent. Their selective outrage serves one purpose only: advancing a globalist agenda that requires controlled information and manufactured consent.

Therefore, we must ask ourselves: Why does the establishment desperately fight to control both the Texas flood narrative and Tucker’s interview? Because together, these stories threaten the foundation of their power structure. These aren’t isolated incidents but connected pieces of a coordinated strategy to silence dissent, manipulate public opinion, and protect those truly responsible for failures.

The Deep State playbook remains consistent – create a crisis, blame political enemies, then propose solutions that expand government control while limiting individual freedoms. Though they control most information channels, their narratives crumble under factual scrutiny.

Most importantly, Americans deserve better than being manipulated through tragedy. The victims in Texas deserve justice based on facts, not political agendas. Tucker Carlson deserves respect for upholding journalistic principles that have been abandoned by the corporate media.

Truth stands as our most potent weapon against this coordinated deception. When enough Americans recognize these patterns of manipulation, the Deep State’s ability to control narratives will collapse. Until then, their war on truth continues – attacking anyone brave enough to challenge their approved storylines.

Patriots must WAKE UP and recognize this fight transcends partisan politics. Whether regarding natural disasters or foreign policy, the establishment fears nothing more than informed citizens capable of independent thought. Their attacks on truth-tellers only confirm what we already know – their narratives cannot withstand scrutiny.

Consequently, our task remains clear: question everything, verify independently, and refuse to accept narratives that exploit tragedy for political gain. The Texas flood victims and our nation’s future deserve nothing less.

Key Takeaways

The article exposes coordinated misinformation campaigns targeting both natural disaster response and independent journalism, revealing systematic attempts to manipulate public perception for political gain.

• NWS issued multiple flood warnings hours before Texas tragedy – Despite claims of failure, National Weather Service provided clear alerts starting July 3, with “hazardous situation” warnings at 4 a.m. on July 4

• Local officials failed to act on documented warnings – 78 deaths, including 28 children, resulted from local emergency response failures, not federal forecasting inadequacy, as media claims

• Democrats exploit tragedy while ignoring Biden’s NOAA cuts – Critics blame Trump’s efficiency measures while remaining silent about the Biden administration’s proposed 25% NOAA budget cuts

• Tucker Carlson faces coordinated attacks for pursuing independent journalism – Establishment figures label him a “traitor” for interviewing Iran’s president, revealing fear of unfiltered foreign policy perspectives

• Media manipulation follows consistent Deep State playbook – Both stories demonstrate identical tactics: create a crisis, blame political enemies, propose expanded government control while silencing dissent

The pattern reveals a broader war on truth where establishment forces exploit disasters and attack independent voices to maintain narrative control over climate policy and foreign affairs.

FAQs

Q1. What really happened with the National Weather Service warnings before the Texas floods?

The National Weather Service issued multiple warnings starting July 3, including a “hazardous situation” alert at 4 a.m. on July 4. Despite claims of failure, the NWS provided clear and timely alerts hours before the tragedy struck.

Q2. Why is Tucker Carlson facing backlash for his planned interview with Iran’s president?

Tucker Carlson is facing criticism from establishment figures who label him a “traitor” for attempting to interview Iran’s president. This backlash reveals a fear that unfiltered foreign policy perspectives will reach the American public outside of controlled media narratives.

Q3. How are the Texas flood narrative and attacks on Tucker Carlson connected?

Both situations demonstrate a coordinated effort to control public narratives. The flood story is being used to blame political opponents while ignoring local failures. At the same time, the attacks on Carlson aim to discourage independent journalism on foreign policy issues.

Q4. What role has the Biden administration played in NOAA’s current state?

The Biden administration has proposed significant cuts to NOAA’s budget, including a potential 25% reduction and elimination of climate research funding. [25] This contrasts with the narrative blaming previous administrations for weather forecasting inadequacies.

Q5. How can citizens protect themselves against misinformation in disaster reporting and foreign policy coverage?

Citizens should question mainstream narratives, seek out independent sources of information, and verify facts independently to ensure accuracy and credibility. It’s crucial to be aware of how tragedies and international events can be exploited for political gain and to remain skeptical of coordinated media campaigns.