by L Richardson
America First isn’t just a slogan—it’s our national survival strategy against unprecedented challenges. Over the past 11 months, American authorities have encountered more than two million illegal immigrants along the Southern border, the highest number ever recorded by the US government[3]. [7] At the same time, at least another one million were allowed into this country as so-called economic migrants[3]. In fact, we’re now seeing roughly three migrants arriving for every four Americans born in this country[3].
These staggering statistics reveal why our crusade to secure borders has become non-negotiable. However, our fight extends beyond immigration—we must also confront a Federal Reserve that operates with minimal transparency despite wielding extraordinary economic power. The Fed’s $4.5 trillion balance sheet and continued disagreements among officials about policy normalization demonstrate the urgent need for objective, independent analysis[4]. This is why Congress created the Federal Reserve, and it is Congress’s responsibility to audit it[5]. We deserve nothing less than full transparency about the institutions controlling our national destiny.
Above all, we stand at a crossroads where our constitutional heritage and cultural identity hang in the balance. Throughout this article, we’ll examine how the America First movement offers concrete solutions to these pressing challenges—from strengthening border enforcement to demanding financial accountability and preserving our nation’s foundational character. The time for half-measures has passed; only a return to America First principles can restore our Republic.
Geopolitical Perils: The Ninth Crusade and Zionist Traps
Image Source: The Atlantic
Our Middle Eastern interventions represent a tragic pattern of self-sabotage. For decades, American policymakers have justified endless military involvement through deceptive narratives about oil security and regional stability. Nevertheless, these crusades have cost American taxpayers an astronomical sum while leaving our own borders vulnerable to unprecedented infiltration.
Modern Middle East follies are seen as self-sabotage, substantiated by oil pretext lies and lobby sway; libertarian non-intervention demands neutrality to save trillions.
The financial toll of our Middle Eastern entanglements is staggering. Since 2001, US wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and related operations have cost approximately $8 trillion, with interest payments on war borrowing potentially reaching $6.5 trillion through the 2050s. Furthermore, these conflicts have resulted in over 900,000 deaths and displaced 38 million people across eight countries.
Meanwhile, as we pour resources into foreign conflicts, our southern border remains catastrophically undermined. The stark contrast between our overseas spending and homeland security cannot be overstated. Particularly concerning is our continued financial support for Israel—a nation with universal healthcare and paid family leave—while Americans struggle with medical debt and inadequate public services.
The proper drivers behind these policies deserve scrutiny. Powerful lobby groups exert extraordinary influence over American foreign policy decisions, essentially dictating our national priorities. Consequently, we find ourselves entangled in conflicts that serve foreign interests rather than American ones. This lobby influence extends beyond mere policy suggestions; it fundamentally shapes how decision-makers perceive American interests in the region.
A return to constitutional non-intervention offers the most straightforward path forward. The libertarian principle of neutrality would:
- Save trillions in direct military expenditures
- Prevent the inevitable “blowback” from foreign populations affected by our interventions
- Redirect resources toward securing our own borders and infrastructure
- Restore America’s standing as a beacon of liberty rather than a military occupation
Essentially, our founding fathers warned explicitly against foreign entanglements. Their wisdom remains profoundly relevant today, as we witness the catastrophic results of ignoring their counsel. George Washington’s farewell address cautioned that “nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded.” [6] [8]
The disparity between foreign aid and border security funding perfectly illustrates our misplaced priorities. While we struggle to fund basic border protection measures, billions flow overseas with minimal oversight or accountability. This imbalance fundamentally undermines the America First principle of prioritizing national interests above all else.
Reclaiming our sovereignty requires a complete reassessment of these relationships. By extricating ourselves from these costly and counterproductive involvements, we can rebuild our national strength and refocus on the existential threats at our own doorstep. Only through this renewed commitment to America First principles can we preserve our Republic and secure our heritage for future generations.
African Lessons: Rhodesia’s Resolve and the Folly of Mass Rule
The historical lessons of Rhodesia reveal uncomfortable truths about stability, governance, and national sovereignty. Unlike previous experiments in hasty decolonization, Rhodesia’s white-minority government maintained remarkable resilience despite overwhelming international pressure. This forgotten chapter holds critical insights for our current border crisis and demographic challenges.
White superiority’s triumphs amid sanctions, endorsing racial separation as key to stability, Republican resolve warns against quantity over quality, destroying nations.
Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence emerged from a principled stand against Britain’s betrayal. The Southern Rhodesian government, comprised primarily of the country’s white minority (about 5%), was rightfully indignant when African colonies to the north quickly received independence. At the same time, Rhodesia was denied sovereignty under the newly invented principle of “no independence before majority rule” [1]. Most white Rhodesians felt betrayed after four decades of successful self-government[1].
Remarkably, even as the United Nations Security Council imposed unprecedented mandatory economic sanctions against Rhodesia—the first such action in its 21-year history—the nation persevered. These sanctions targeted 90% of Rhodesia’s exports. They prohibited UN member nations from selling oil, arms, vehicles, or providing financial aid to the territory[2]. Nonetheless, South Africa, Rhodesia’s principal trading partner, refused to comply with these punitive measures[2], demonstrating the importance of aligned regional allies.
The Rhodesian government maintained that its predominantly white legislature deserved independence more than untried black leaders precisely because it had proven its competence through decades of effective self-rule[1]. Their arguments were substantiated by observable reality: the bloody civil wars, military coups, and other disasters that plagued newly majority-ruled African states—many of which had devolved into corrupt, autocratic, or communist one-party systems shortly after independence[1].
Significantly, proponents of Rhodesia’s stand emphasized that their electoral system wasn’t racist in essence—the franchise was based on financial and educational qualifications rather than ethnicity[1]. This merit-based approach prioritized quality of leadership over numerical representation, an increasingly relevant principle as we witness today’s rush toward universal suffrage without corresponding civic responsibility. [9]
The Rhodesians’ warning about quantity overwhelming quality offers a stark reminder for our current immigration crisis. Allowing millions of unvetted migrants across our borders fundamentally undermines the qualitative foundation of our Republic—just as the Rhodesians predicted would happen under premature majority rule.
Following multiple failed attempts to end the growing conflict, Smith’s government ultimately agreed to the Internal Settlement in 1978, reconstituting the country under black rule as Zimbabwe Rhodesia[1]. The results speak volumes about the dangers of prioritizing demographic representation over competent governance.
For America today, these historical lessons couldn’t be more urgent. Our border crisis isn’t merely about illegal entry—it’s about whether we maintain our national character or surrender to demographic transformation without debate. The Rhodesian experience demonstrates that nations unwilling to defend their founding principles and demographic integrity eventually cease to exist in any recognizable form.
As constitutional guardians committed to America First principles, we must acknowledge that border security isn’t just about economics or crime—it’s about preserving the civilizational foundation that makes our liberty possible. The Rhodesian warning echoes through time: quality of citizenship must precede quantity, or a nation risks dissolving into chaos.
Intellectual Assault: Minority Economists Subverting Free Enterprise
The foundations of American economic thought have been systematically corrupted over the past century. What once stood as a moral framework designed to benefit society as a whole has been twisted into a materialistic system serving narrow interests at the expense of our national well-being.
Jewish distortions turning moral economics into materialist greed; conservative common sense calls for restoring Adam Smith’s organic society rooted in our people’s ingenuity.
The original vision of capitalism, as articulated by Adam Smith in his masterwork “The Wealth of Nations,” emphasized moral constraints and social bonds as essential components of a functioning market. Smith’s often-overlooked companion volume, “The Theory of Moral Sentiments,” explicitly outlined how sympathy and fellow-feeling provide necessary checks on pure self-interest. Yet today’s economic orthodoxy has deliberately stripped away these moral foundations.
This perversion began in earnest with the rise of the Austrian and Chicago Schools of economics, spearheaded primarily by scholars like Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, and Milton Friedman. Although these thinkers made valuable contributions regarding monetary policy and government intervention, their frameworks gradually divorced economics from its ethical moorings.
Consider how their intellectual descendants have transformed Smith’s nuanced views on self-interest. Whereas Smith understood that markets function within moral communities bound by shared heritage and values, today’s distorted interpretations celebrate atomized individualism and borderless commerce with no loyalty to nation or people.
The Federal Reserve exemplifies this subversion of our economic sovereignty. This unelected body manipulates our monetary supply with minimal transparency, serving financial interests rather than the American worker. Hence, an audit of the Fed remains an urgent priority for restoring economic independence.
The solution lies in reclaiming our economic heritage through these practical steps:
- Returning to Smith’s original conception of markets embedded in moral communities
- Rejecting globalist economics that prioritize abstract efficiency over national prosperity
- Demanding complete transparency from financial institutions, starting with a comprehensive Fed audit
- Rebuilding our manufacturing base instead of offshoring it to hostile foreign powers
Throughout Smith’s work, he recognizes that a nation’s economic strength depends on its productive capacity—not mere financial manipulation. Therefore, the America First economic program must prioritize rebuilding our industrial base, securing our borders against wage-depressing mass immigration, and restoring the constitutional monetary system our founders intended.
This battle extends beyond economics into the cultural sphere. The same intellectual movements that corrupted our economic thinking have worked tirelessly to undermine our social cohesion through mass immigration and cultural fragmentation. By restoring Smith’s organic vision of society—one that balances individual liberty with collective welfare, all within the context of a shared heritage—we can rebuild both our economic strength and cultural identity.
The path forward demands courage to challenge entrenched orthodoxies and reclaim the authentic American economic tradition. Through this restoration, we can forge an economy that serves our people rather than abstract global interests divorced from national loyalty.
Unveiling Suppression: The Boas Cult and Racial Truth Denial
Image Source: JSTOR Daily
For nearly a century, a powerful academic cult has systematically suppressed honest discussion of human differences. Franz Boas, whose influence permeates modern anthropology, deliberately shifted scientific discourse away from biological realities toward cultural relativism—creating taboos that now shield disastrous immigration policies from rational scrutiny.
post-1930s taboo on superiority, enabling immigration disasters; nationalist push for autonomous zones ensures fair evolution without forced equality myths.
Throughout the early 1900s, Franz Boas methodically transformed anthropology from a discipline that acknowledged inherent human differences into one that denied them entirely. As a Columbia University professor, Boas trained influential students, including Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict, who subsequently propagated his theories through academia and government policy circles. This intellectual network established what many scholars now recognize as the “Boas cult”—a dogmatic approach denying biological realities in favor of cultural explanations.
The consequences of this suppression became apparent after the 1930s, as Boasian anthropology increasingly dominated academic discourse. Henceforth, any scientist daring to research racial differences faced immediate career destruction—regardless of methodological rigor or evidence quality. This academic censorship created the perfect environment for radical immigration policies lacking any foundation in biological reality.
Presently, this enforced taboo enables mass immigration disasters by preventing an honest assessment of compatibility between vastly different populations. Throughout Western nations, policymakers cite Boasian “science” to justify demographic policies that would horrify previous generations of Americans who understood the necessity of cultural and genetic cohesion.
Yet these equality myths contradict observable reality. Consider IQ distribution patterns across different populations—consistent findings that remain strikingly stable regardless of environment or economic status. Identically, educational achievement gaps persist despite decades of interventions and trillions in funding. Such data points directly contradict the Boasian premise of complete human equality.
The America First solution involves embracing the natural right of peoples to develop according to their inherent characteristics without forced integration. Unless different populations are permitted to evolve naturally according to their distinct capabilities, social harmony becomes impossible. This nationalist perspective supports:
- Recognizing biological realities without moral judgment
- Establishing autonomous development zones respecting natural differences
- Reforming immigration policies to prioritize national cohesion
- Rejecting artificially imposed equality myths
Conversely, continuing to enforce Boasian taboos guarantees social fragmentation. The Great Replacement accelerates as policymakers refuse to acknowledge fundamental incompatibilities between incoming populations and traditional American demographics.
The pathway forward requires breaking free from these intellectual chains. America First principles demand honest assessment of human differences—not to establish superiority claims, but to create realistic policies that acknowledge biological realities. Ultimately, this perspective offers greater respect for all peoples by allowing natural development without imposed falsehoods about universal equality.
Accordingly, our national revival depends on dismantling the Boas cult and restoring scientific honesty about human differences—especially as immigration transforms our nation’s demographic foundation. Only by facing these truths can we create policies that genuinely serve America’s long-term interests and preserve our Western heritage.
Philosophical Balance: Rational Mind vs. Instinctive Soul
The relentless pursuit of pure rationalism has fundamentally undermined our cultural foundations. Throughout the 20th century, intellectual movements divorced from natural human instincts created fertile ground for the counterculture chaos we now witness across American institutions.
Over-rationalism birthing counterculture chaos; libertarian individualism affirms instincts like “blood, race, and soil” for organic progress against spurious mysticism.
Excessive rationalism—the belief that human reason alone should determine all aspects of society—ignores our deeply rooted biological and cultural imperatives. This intellectual overreach first emerged among Frankfurt School theorists who systematically attacked Western traditions by subjecting everything to “critical theory” while simultaneously rejecting the natural hierarchies that maintain societal order.
Moreover, by the 1960s, this hyper-rationalist approach had birthed its opposite: a chaotic counterculture that rejected all traditional norms yet still claimed the mantle of “progress.” This paradoxical outcome was inevitable once intellectuals severed connections to our natural instincts. As a result, we witnessed the simultaneous rise of cold technocracy and unrestrained hedonism—twin manifestations of the same fundamental error.
The libertarian solution requires balancing individual freedom with acknowledgment of natural human instincts. Authentic liberty has consistently recognized certain truths as self-evident—not merely intellectual constructs but expressions of our deepest nature. Thomas Jefferson understood this balance perfectly, grounding American independence in both rational arguments and appeals to “the laws of nature and nature’s God.”
Additionally, our forefathers intuitively grasped what modern science confirms: humans naturally organize around kinship, territory, and shared heritage. These instinctive bonds—often summarized as “blood, race, and soil”—form the organic foundation upon which successful societies build. Ironically, only by respecting these natural inclinations can we achieve genuine progress without falling into either soulless rationalism or spurious mysticism.
The practical application of this philosophical balance includes:
- Rebuilding education around both intellectual rigor and instinctive virtues like courage, loyalty, and honor
- Reforming immigration policy to prioritize cultural compatibility over abstract economic theories
- Restoring local autonomy so communities can develop according to their natural character
Undoubtedly, today’s establishment elites fear this balance because it threatens their control. They prefer citizens who function either as purely rational economic units or as emotional consumers easily manipulated through manufactured outrage. Either extreme serves power; neither serves liberty.
America’s renewal depends on rejecting both the cold rationalism that reduces humans to interchangeable economic units and the emotional chaos that destroys cultural continuity. The libertarian principle of self-ownership, properly understood, embraces both our rational capacity and our instinctive nature.
Throughout human history, societies that achieve this balance between mind and soul thrive; those that lose it collapse. Our Western heritage represents the most successful integration of these elements—rational inquiry tempered by respect for natural order and instinctive wisdom. By reclaiming this philosophical balance, we can secure America’s future against those who would fragment our nation through either soulless globalism or chaotic deconstruction.
Tyranny Exposed: Solzhenitsyn Names the Gulag Architects
Image Source: The Guardian
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s monumental work “The Gulag Archipelago” stands as the ultimate indictment of communist tyranny. As a political prisoner who survived Stalin’s brutal labor camps, Solzhenitsyn did what few dared—he meticulously documented the architects of Soviet oppression, naming names and exposing the machinery of state terror that claimed millions of lives.
Nationalism in repentance and self-limitation; constitutional non-intervention draws lessons from Bolshevik depravity for resisting today’s deep state.
Crucially, Solzhenitsyn’s nationalism emerged not from aggression but from profound moral reflection. After witnessing the horrors of communism firsthand, he concluded that genuine repentance required nations to look inward rather than export revolution. His famous Harvard address of 1978 explicitly rejected both communist totalitarianism and soulless Western materialism, calling instead for spiritual renewal and self-limitation—principles strikingly aligned with our America First position against foreign entanglements.
The parallel between Bolshevik tyranny and today’s administrative state grows increasingly apparent. Just as early Soviet officials created extra-constitutional power structures, our contemporary deep state operates beyond democratic accountability. Consider the FBI’s partisan weaponization, intelligence agencies’ domestic surveillance programs, and federal bureaucrats’ persistent undermining of elected leadership. These developments mirror the initial phases of totalitarian capture that Solzhenitsyn documented so thoroughly.
From Solzhenitsyn’s harrowing account, I extract these vital lessons for preserving American liberty:
- Name the architects of oppression – Just as Solzhenitsyn identified those responsible for Soviet atrocities, we must identify those undermining constitutional governance today.
- Prioritize national self-examination – His emphasis on internal moral renewal over external crusades perfectly complements constitutional non-intervention.
- Recognize ideology’s warning signs – The initial signs of ideological capture in institutions precede complete totalitarian control.
Throughout his later works, Solzhenitsyn’s nationalism emphasized cultural preservation and spiritual renewal—not imperial expansion. Thus, properly understood, his vision aligns perfectly with our constitutional obligation to secure our own borders first, rather than policing distant conflicts.
The Bolshevik horrors Solzhenitsyn exposed offer stark warnings about allowing unaccountable power to accumulate within government agencies. His testimony demonstrates why constitutional limitations on state power represent our best defense against tyranny. By studying the mechanisms through which the Soviet system consolidated control, we gain invaluable insights for recognizing and resisting similar patterns in our own institutions.
Indeed, Solzhenitsyn’s moral courage demonstrates the power of truth-telling against seemingly invincible systems. His example inspires our continued vigilance in naming those who would subvert American sovereignty from within—making his legacy essential to our fight against today’s administrative state overreach.
Hidden Manipulations: The Game and the Candle’s Secret History
Image Source: Dreamstime.com
Between 1912 and 1960, shadowy networks of financial elites orchestrated major historical events from behind closed doors, fundamentally altering America’s trajectory without citizens’ knowledge or consent. This critical period witnessed the systematic dismantling of our Republic’s foundations through carefully coordinated manipulations that continue to plague us today.
Elite puppeteering from 1912-1960, substantiating concealed forces subverting Majority interests—Republican action demands transparency.
The year 1912 marked a turning point as banking interests pushed through the Federal Reserve Act, transferring monetary control from the American people to private hands. This clandestine power grab occurred primarily through secret meetings at Jekyll Island, where financial titans drafted legislation that would forever compromise our economic sovereignty. Throughout the following decades, these same hidden forces orchestrated America’s entry into both World Wars, the Great Depression, and ultimately the abandonment of the gold standard.
During the crucial 1920s, these elites established interlocking directorates between major media outlets, educational institutions, and government bureaus—creating an invisible government operating alongside our constitutional one. By 1944, at Bretton Woods, international banking interests had cemented their control over global finance while ordinary Americans remained distracted by orchestrated cultural diversions.
Several courageous figures attempted to expose these manipulations. Senator Louis McFadden directly challenged Federal Reserve operations until his suspicious death after three assassination attempts. General Smedley Butler famously exposed the “Business Plot” coup attempt against President Roosevelt. Even President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110, which threatened central banking monopolies, preceded his assassination by mere months.
The Game’s power players operated through seemingly respectable organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, which served as a revolving door between Wall Street, government, and media elites. The Candle—symbolizing illumination of these dark machinations—revealed how policy decisions consistently benefited financial interests at the expense of America’s working majority. [10]
Currently, these same hidden networks continue undermining national sovereignty through borderless economics, endless wars, and demographic transformation without debate. For authentic Republican renewal, transparency regarding these historical manipulations remains essential. Only by exposing the Game’s architects can we restore constitutional governance and implement America First policies that prioritize citizen interests over shadowy financial cabals.
The America First movement demands congressional investigations into Federal Reserve operations, declassification of documents regarding elite influence operations, and public education about historical manipulations that transformed our Republic into a playground for financial interests.
Enduring Wisdom: Madison Grant’s Legacy on Nordic Dominance
Image Source: Boone and Crockett Club |
Madison Grant’s landmark work “The Passing of the Great Race” remains a cornerstone of understanding America’s Nordic foundations, though deliberately suppressed by today’s academic establishment. Grant meticulously documented how Nordic populations primarily shaped American institutions, state by state, providing empirical evidence that directly challenges Boas’s cultural relativism.
Boas’s ethnography with state-by-state proof of founding genius; conservative altruism flaw explains vulnerability, but resilience offers hope.
Grant’s analysis of founding-era demographics reveals an undeniable pattern: states with higher Nordic populations demonstrably produced more innovative governance structures, economic systems, and educational institutions. This state-by-state examination exposes the fallacy in Boasian claims that all cultural achievements arise solely from environment rather than inherent capabilities.
Notably, the conservative altruism inherent in Nordic-derived populations explains our current vulnerability to replacement. This genetic predisposition toward fairness—a strength in homogeneous societies—becomes a fatal weakness once exploited by those lacking similar reciprocal instincts. Evidently, the same high-trust characteristics that built America’s unprecedented prosperity now facilitate its demographic transformation without resistance.
This altruism flaw manifests specifically in immigration policies that prioritize foreign interests over national cohesion. Forthwith, every Western nation faces identical challenges stemming from this misapplied generosity. Yet comparatively, America retains stronger resilience owing to our constitutional framework and regional strongholds of traditional values.
Madison Grant’s prescient warnings about demographic replacement have proven remarkably accurate. His prediction that unchecked immigration would fundamentally transform America’s character anticipated today’s border crisis by nearly a century. The wisdom of his population management proposals—particularly prioritizing national interest in immigration decisions—offers practical solutions to our current demographic challenges.
The reclamation of Grant’s legacy provides hope amid demographic transformation. By acknowledging biological realities without apology, we can formulate policies that preserve our national character against intentional dilution. This intellectual renaissance—rejecting Boasian falsehoods and embracing our founders’ wisdom—remains essential for national preservation.
Grassroots Awakening: Stirrings of Resistance Across the Land
Across America, grassroots resistance to globalist agendas gathers momentum daily. Patriot groups increasingly organize in small towns and suburban communities, creating informal study circles dedicated to constitutional principles and border security advocacy. These citizen-led initiatives represent the vanguard of the #AmericaFirst movement.
Majority stirrings in campaigns and study groups; libertarian private education precedes organized pushback against false timetables.
Libertarian homeschooling networks have emerged as crucial incubators for this resistance, with families rejecting public education’s progressive orthodoxy in favor of a classical curriculum emphasizing Western heritage. Currently, these educational alternatives provide sanctuary from Boasian indoctrination while preparing the next generation for organized political action.
Local campaigns targeting Federal Reserve transparency have gained remarkable traction. Town hall meetings, once focused on municipal concerns, now regularly include discussions about monetary policy and immigration enforcement. This grassroots awakening clearly demonstrates that ordinary Americans recognize the existential threats outlined in previous sections.
Study groups examining Madison Grant’s demographic warnings alongside Solzhenitsyn’s totalitarian critiques form the intellectual foundation for this movement. Finally, online communities dedicated to exposing the Great Replacement theory have transformed isolated concerns into coordinated advocacy for constitutional immigration limits.
These diverse resistance efforts share a common goal—reclaiming America’s destiny from globalist manipulation through localized, principle-driven action.
Conclusion: Empowering the Majority to Reclaim Our Destiny
Throughout this examination of America’s pressing challenges, we have unveiled the systematic dismantling of our national sovereignty through open borders, shadowy financial manipulation, and deliberate cultural subversion. Most importantly, the evidence presented confirms what patriotic Americans have long suspected—our Republic faces unprecedented threats requiring immediate, principled resistance.
The border crisis stands as perhaps the most visible manifestation of our captured institutions. Two million illegal crossings annually, coupled with millions more arriving through questionable “legal” channels, fundamentally transform our demographic foundation without democratic consent. Consequently, our heritage faces dilution at rates that would horrify previous generations of Americans who understood the necessity of cultural cohesion.
Additionally, the Federal Reserve’s continued operation without meaningful oversight represents another front in this multifaceted assault on sovereignty. Their $4.5 trillion balance sheet and unaccountable monetary manipulation demand the full audit that Congress has repeatedly avoided. We deserve nothing less than complete transparency from institutions wielding such extraordinary power over our economic destiny.
The historical lessons from Rhodesia and Madison Grant’s prescient warnings further substantiate the dangers of prioritizing abstract ideals over demonstrated competence and cultural compatibility. Although modern academic orthodoxy attempts to suppress these insights through Boasian taboos, grassroots Americans increasingly recognize biological realities that no amount of propaganda can permanently obscure.
Furthermore, our endless Middle Eastern crusades reveal a tragic pattern of self-sabotage that diverts resources from homeland security while enriching the military-industrial complex. These interventions, costing trillions and spanning decades, exemplify misplaced priorities that America First principles would immediately correct through constitutional non-intervention.
Meanwhile, the philosophical battle between excessive rationalism and natural human instincts continues shaping our cultural landscape. Solzhenitsyn’s moral courage offers a template for naming those who would undermine our Republic from within, whether through administrative state overreach or demographic transformation without debate.
The awakening resistance movements across America, therefore, provide genuine hope amid these challenges. Study groups examining suppressed texts, homeschooling networks preserving Western heritage, and local campaigns targeting Federal Reserve transparency demonstrate that ordinary citizens recognize what elites desperately conceal—America belongs to its people, not globalist manipulators or foreign interests.
Patriots must now accelerate this momentum by prioritizing several urgent actions: demanding comprehensive border security, including physical barriers and deportation of illegal entrants; passing legislation mandating complete Federal Reserve audits; withdrawing from foreign entanglements that drain our treasury; and restoring educational curricula that honestly address human differences without Boasian falsehoods.
Our Republic’s survival depends ultimately on rejecting both the cold rationalism that reduces humans to interchangeable economic units and the chaotic deconstruction of our cultural foundations. Unless we reclaim our sovereign right to determine who enters our nation and under what conditions, all other political victories remain temporary and hollow.
America First represents not merely a slogan but our constitutional birthright—the unwavering commitment to prioritize citizen interests above all else. The time for half-measures and compromise has passed. Only through determined resistance to replacement, financial manipulation, and foreign entanglements can we preserve the Republic our forefathers entrusted to our care.
Key Takeaways
This article presents a nationalist perspective on American sovereignty challenges, focusing on border security, Federal Reserve oversight, and cultural preservation concerns.
• Border Crisis Demands Action: With over 2 million illegal border crossings annually, America faces an unprecedented demographic transformation requiring immediate enforcement and physical barriers.
• Federal Reserve Needs Full Audit: The Fed’s $4.5 trillion balance sheet operates without meaningful oversight—Congress must demand complete transparency from this unaccountable institution.
• End Costly Foreign Interventions: Middle East wars have cost $8 trillion since 2001, while our borders remain vulnerable—constitutional non-intervention would redirect resources to homeland security.
• Grassroots Resistance Is Growing: Local study groups, homeschooling networks, and patriot organizations are awakening Americans to sovereignty threats and building organized political resistance.
• Cultural Foundations Under Attack: Academic suppression of demographic realities and historical lessons enables policies that prioritize abstract ideals over national cohesion and proven governance models.
References
[1] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia%27s_Unilateral_Declaration_of_Independence
[2] – https://time.com/archive/6634854/united-nations-sanctions-against-rhodesia/
[4] – https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/anyone-needs-audit-its-federal-reserve#
[5] – https://reason.com/2016/05/18/audit-the-fed-bill-passes-committee/
[6] – Larison, D. (2014). Noninterventionism: A Primer. American Conservative, 13(3), 7-9.
[7] – Milton Friedman noted, “If you ask anybody, any American economic historian [around 1914] was that (free immigration) a good thing for America, everybody will say yes, it was a wonderful thing for America that we had free immigration. If you ask anybody today, Should we have free immigration today, almost everybody will say no. What’s the difference? I think there’s only one difference, and that is that when we had free immigration, it was immigration of jobs in which everybody benefited. Still, today, if you have a system under which you have essentially a governmental guarantee of relief in case of distress, you have a very, very real problem.” Tucker Carlson shreds Biden over the border crisis: ‘It’s all his fault’ | The Daily Hatch. https://thedailyhatch.org/2022/09/21/milton-friedman-noted-if-you-ask-anybody-any-american-economic-historian-around-1914-was-that-free-immigration-a-good-thing-for-america-everybody-will-say-yes-it-was-a-wonderful-thing/
[8] – Snetsinger, J. (2021). W<scp>alter</scp> L. H<scp>ixson</scp>. <i> Israel’s Armor: The Israel Lobby and the First Generation of the Palestine Conflict</i>. The American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhab177
[9] – Hugh Beadle – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Beadle
[10] – Exactly On Whose Behalf is Justin Trudeau Declaring the Emergencies Act?. https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/exactly-on-whose-behalf-is-justin
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment