Image Credit: banne.video
by L Richardson
Concerns about Dearborn Sharia law are mounting as the city undergoes a dramatic demographic shift. According to the 2023 census, Dearborn’s population is now 55% Muslim[27], transforming what was once the heart of Ford’s American industrial dream into a flashpoint for cultural and religious tensions.
We’re witnessing an alarming situation in Michigan where mosque loudspeakers broadcast the Islamic call to prayer twice daily for about two minutes[28], often exceeding 70 decibels[29] despite city ordinances stating that noise in residential areas cannot exceed 55 decibels at night or 60 decibels during the day[29]. Meanwhile, the Muslim Brotherhood, which has historically been a hugely malignant force since its founding in Egypt in 1928[30], continues to spread its ideology throughout America with the stated goal of establishing a global Islamic caliphate ruled by Sharia law[31].
In this critical exposé, we’ll examine how Dearborn has become ground zero for these concerning developments, explore the rapid growth of Islamic influence across America (with Texas alone seeing forty-eight new mosques in just two years[27]), and highlight how patriots are standing up to defend our constitutional freedoms against ideologies that threaten the very foundation of our Republic.
II. Historical Glory vs. Current Conquest: How Henry Ford’s Heartland Fell to Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration
- “The judges in Dearborn are using and allowing Shariah law to be used. Also in England… in France and in Germany, the use of Shariah law is being allowed as well.” — Leo Berman, Texas State Representative.
Henry Ford’s vision of an American industrial utopia began to take shape in 1915, when he surveyed a stretch of farmland near the Rouge River. **His ambition transformed three small communities into what would become modern Dearborn**[32]. The construction of Ford Motor Company’s Rouge plant began in 1917, growing into what Vanity Fair called “the most significant public monument in America” by 1927[32].
Ford wasn’t content with merely building factories. He orchestrated a political consolidation of three communities—Fordson, Dearborn Township, and the original Dearborn—to create the modern city we know today. While publicly claiming he wasn’t involved, Ford secretly initiated and pushed for the merger, even offering to build new police headquarters, fire departments, and hospitals if citizens approved[32].
His ultimate vision? As historian Heather Barrow wrote, Ford wanted “to turn it into a suburb for the masses, one fitting for American wage earners and capable of turning workers from any background into good citizens”[32]. Ford’s industrial complex jolted once-sleepy towns into bustling centers with well-paying jobs, thousands of homes, and modern infrastructure.
Yet beneath this narrative of American industrial greatness lay troubling contradictions. The same Henry Ford who paid revolutionary wages of $5 a day also published one of America’s most notorious antisemitic publications. From 1920 to 1927, Ford sponsored The Dearborn Independent, which circulated to at least 900,000 readers by 1926[33]. The paper regularly printed antisemitic propaganda, including republishing “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a proven hoax document claiming Jews were conspiring for world domination[33].
Ford’s antisemitism wasn’t limited to America. In Germany, his articles were republished as books. Heinrich Himmler—a Nazi Party leader—praised Ford as “one of our most valuable, important, and witty fighters.” At the same time, Hitler himself called Ford “the only single great man” in America[33]. These ideological connections foreshadowed how Dearborn would later become ground zero for other cultural tensions.
Furthermore, Dearborn’s early history reveals another dark chapter. Under Mayor Orville Hubbard, who held office from 1942 to 1978, the city actively discouraged African Americans from settling there. Hubbard openly declared that “it was against the law for a Negro to live in his suburb” and boasted to the Montgomery Advertiser that “Negroes can’t get in here. Every time we hear of a Negro moving in, we respond quicker than you do to a fire”[34].
As a result, Dearborn developed as a predominantly white community for decades. However, significant demographic shifts were already underway. The earliest Arab immigrants to settle in Dearborn’s Southend neighborhood in the 1920s were primarily Muslims from southern Lebanon who came to work in Ford’s auto plants[1].
Life near “the world’s largest industrial complex” wasn’t easy for these immigrant communities. Nevertheless, they established vital cultural institutions. Unlike European ethnic groups, who had churches and business districts scattered around Detroit, Arab American Muslims built mosques and markets essential to their community[1].
Subsequently, when US immigration laws relaxed in the 1960s, these established Arab American enclaves welcomed relatives and countrymen fleeing turmoil abroad. The 1967 Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and the Yemeni civil war brought new waves of migrants[1]. The Lebanese civil war of 1975 accelerated this demographic shift[1]. Essentially, what began as a trickle became a flood.
By the 1980s, this mix of first- and second-generation Arab Americans expanded beyond the Southend into other East Dearborn neighborhoods. New mosques opened, and Arab entrepreneurs invested in previously neglected commercial areas[1]. The transformation of Dearborn had begun in earnest.
Fast forward to today, and the results are striking. Dearborn now has a population of over 100,000 people, with the highest concentration of Arabs in the United States[2]. In 2023, Dearborn officially became the first Arab-majority city in the US, with 55% of its residents claiming Middle Eastern or North African ancestry[34]. The city now hosts the largest mosque in North America and proportionally the largest Muslim population in the United States[34].
This demographic revolution culminated politically in 2021, when Abdullah Hammoud became the city’s first Arab American and Muslim mayor at age 35, and he won reelection in November 2024[2]. His leadership represents the complete transformation of Henry Ford’s vision of an industrial American heartland.
In recent years, tensions have emerged as some see this transformation as threatening. Michigan gubernatorial candidate Anthony Hudson initially planned a protest in Dearborn, calling it an “American Crusade” against “Muslim infiltration” and “Sharia Law”[3]. However, after visiting three local mosques, Hudson changed his position, stating he found only hospitality and acknowledging that many narratives about Dearborn were false[3].
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has actively defended the community, arguing that “Sharia as a concept has been misunderstood and used to ostracize Muslims in society”[2]. Yet incidents continue to inflame tensions. In October 2024, a 7-year-old Muslim girl named Saida was attacked at a playground, suffering a knife wound to her neck. Although the 73-year-old attacker wasn’t charged with hate crimes, many in the Muslim community believe they were targeted for their faith[4].
The situation has grown increasingly tense. In November 2025, anti-Islam demonstrators clashed with residents in downtown Dearborn[5]. One protester was heard saying, “This is why Dearborn, Michigan, needs to be cleared out of Muslims,” while attempting to burn a Quran[5]. Local resident Abbas Abou Khodr intervened to prevent the burning, stating, “Even if they were going to burn the Bible or any books, I will protect it… We live in peace, we love everyone, this is Dearborn, this is for everyone”[5].
Undoubtedly, Dearborn stands at a crossroads. The city that Henry Ford built as his industrial showcase—once the world’s most advanced manufacturing center—has undergone a complete cultural and demographic transformation. The America First vision that Ford championed, albeit with his deeply flawed prejudices, has given way to something entirely different.
The question facing patriots across America today is whether this transformation represents the positive multiculturalism claimed by its defenders or something more concerning for those who cherish traditional American values and constitutional liberties. From Henry Ford’s assembly lines to heated confrontations over religious texts, Dearborn’s story continues to unfold as a microcosm of America’s changing identity.
III. Alarming Evidence: Streets Renamed for Pro-Hamas Radicals, “Death to America” Chants, and Foiled ISIS Plots
Image Source: Michigan Advance
The threat of radical extremism in Dearborn moved from theoretical to tangible in October 2025 when FBI agents thwarted what they described as a “major ISIS-linked terror plot” set to unfold on American soil. This wasn’t mere speculation or partisan fear-mongering – it was a coordinated attack plan with weaponry, targets, and timing already established by radicalized individuals living among us.
Federal authorities arrested multiple suspects following raids in Dearborn and nearby Inkster, Michigan. The main defendants – Mohmed Ali and Majed Mahmoud – were charged with “receiving and transferring, and attempting and conspiring to transfer, firearms and ammunition knowing and having reasonable cause to believe that the firearms and ammunition would be used to commit a Federal crime of terrorism”[6]. A third suspect, 19-year-old Ayob Nasser of Dearborn, was later apprehended and charged with conspiring to provide material support to ISIS[7].
The arsenal seized during these raids should alarm every freedom-loving American:
- AR-15 style rifles
- Shotguns
- Handguns
- 1,600+ rounds of ammunition
- Body armor
- Tactical assault equipment[6]
Notably, one defendant purchased a “forced reset trigger” specifically designed to increase a weapon’s rate of fire[8]. This wasn’t mere gun ownership – it was tactical preparation for mass casualties.
The plot’s sophistication extended beyond weaponry. Recorded communications revealed the suspects specifically surveilled “numerous bars and restaurants, including three bars/clubs” in areas intentionally attracting LGBTQ+ community members[6]. The timing appeared set for Halloween, with FBI investigators noting that references to “pumpkin” in encrypted messages served as code for the attack date[6].
Most chilling? These weren’t lone wolves but part of a broader network. The defendants shared “extremist and ISIS-related materials that encourage attacks” through encrypted messaging apps[9]. One conversation referenced conducting “the same thing as France” – an apparent nod to the 2015 Paris terror attacks that killed at least 130 people[8].
The Justice Department didn’t mince words about the gravity of this foiled plot. US Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr. described it as “chilling allegations of their radical Islamic terror plot” and pledged to “follow the tentacles where they lead”[7]. Indeed, the tentacles appear widespread – authorities have subsequently made related arrests in New Jersey, Washington state, and elsewhere, all linked to this ISIS-inspired network[9].
Equally concerning, this radicalization is accelerating among younger Americans. NYPD Deputy Commissioner Rebecca Weiner observed, “young people are increasingly drawn into extremism,” and described this case as “exactly the power of the internet comes to conventional terrorism activity”[9]. The FBI Special Agent in Charge emphasized they “will continue to investigate, arrest, and disrupt all attempts or plots to do harm to our residents or to anyone within the United States”[7].
Simultaneously, Dearborn’s municipal leadership has demonstrated troubling sympathies. In September 2025, two street signs honoring Arab American leader Osama Siblani appeared on Warren Avenue[10]. When local resident Ted Barham objected at a city council meeting, likening it to naming a street “Hezbollah Street or Hamas Street” due to Siblani’s controversial statements, Mayor Abdullah Hammoud launched into a fiery rebuke[10].
The controversy centers on Siblani’s past statements regarding terrorist organizations. While Siblani claims his words were taken out of context, he acknowledged saying that under international law, people have “the right to fight back against your oppressor, your occupier in all means”[10]. Furthermore, Siblani has stated that “many in the Middle East feel that Hezbollah and Hamas are freedom fighters, not terrorist groups”[10].
At a separate event, a Christian minister named Shane Rife questioned Mayor Hammoud’s appearance at a rally where Siblani praised Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah as a “hero”[11]. Rife directly challenged the mayor: “Where is your allegiance? Is your allegiance to the United States or is your allegiance to Hezbollah?”[11]
The unrest extends beyond Dearborn’s borders. Following Hamas’s attack on Israel, Islamophobic incidents nationwide have surged dramatically. The Council on American-Islamic Relations recorded 8,658 complaints in 2024, an all-time high[4]. Concurrently, a recent report found that more than half of American Jews say they faced antisemitism in the past year[4].
Regrettably, Dearborn officials have often focused more on criticizing those sounding alarms than addressing the documented extremism in their midst. Mayor Hammoud referenced past controversies involving anti-Islam pastor Terry Jones, who once burned the Quran, seemingly to deflect attention from the serious questions about Siblani’s Hamas and Hezbollah sympathies[12].
Security professionals have noted disturbing trends across faith communities nationwide. Carl Chinn of the Faith-Based Security Network observed: “No matter what level of violence you look at, violence against faith-based organizations is increasing”[4]. For Dearborn specifically, the threats have been explicit – last month, a mosque in neighboring Dearborn Heights received a call from a Texas man threatening to burn down Dearborn and its mosques[4].
The timing of these developments couldn’t be more critical. As America witnesses increasing radicalization through social media, encrypted apps, and peer influences, Dearborn’s situation represents the front line of a national security challenge. The foiled ISIS plot, coupled with public officials who appear more concerned with silencing critics than condemning extremism, creates a powder keg scenario that demands immediate patriotic action.
IV. Leadership in Action: Gov. Abbott’s Bold Texas Stand – Designating Terrorists and Banning Land Grabs
Image Source: Office of the Texas Governor – Texas.gov
While Michigan grapples with extremism, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has taken historic action against organizations he identifies as threatening American sovereignty. In November 2025, Abbott boldly designated both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as “foreign terrorist organizations” and “transnational criminal organizations”[13].
This landmark designation isn’t merely symbolic. It authorizes heightened enforcement against these groups and their affiliates throughout Texas. Most significantly, it expressly prohibits both organizations from purchasing or acquiring land within the state’s borders[13].
Governor Abbott’s proclamation leaves no room for ambiguity about his motivation: “The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world’”[13]. His statement further condemns “actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment” as “unacceptable”[13].
This decisive action represents the first time an American governor has formally classified these organizations as terrorist entities. The designation provides state law enforcement with expanded authority to investigate their activities and curtail their influence within Texas borders.
Naturally, CAIR didn’t accept this designation quietly. The organization immediately filed a lawsuit against both Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, challenging the constitutionality of the governor’s proclamation[14]. In their legal challenge, CAIR explicitly rejected Abbott’s characterization of their organization as a “successor organization” to the Muslim Brotherhood[14].
CAIR’s litigation director Lena Masri framed the lawsuit as “our first step towards defeating Governor Abbott again” and warned that “no civil rights organizations are safe if a governor can baselessly and unilaterally declare any of them terrorist groups”[14]. Their legal filing mentions previous victories against Abbott, noting they have “beaten Greg Abbott’s attacks on the First Amendment before”[14].
The organization further disputes claims that they supported Hamas attacks, stating in their lawsuit that they “condemned the attack and others perpetrated by Hamas”[14]. This contradicts Abbott’s assertion that CAIR’s executive director “publicly praised and supported Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack against Israel”[14].
Beyond targeting specific organizations, Texas has implemented broader measures restricting foreign ownership of property. A sweeping new law, effective September 1, 2025, prohibits entities from countries deemed national security threats from purchasing or acquiring real property [15]. This includes:
- Governmental entities from designated countries
- Companies controlled by the governments of designated countries
- Organizations headquartered in designated countries
- Companies owned or controlled by individuals from these countries[15]
The law’s reach extends comprehensively across virtually all property types:
- Commercial and industrial properties
- Agricultural land
- Residential properties
- Minerals and subsurface rights
- Water rights and groundwater[15]
This legislation reflects growing concerns about foreign influence, particularly from nations identified as security threats in Annual Threat Assessments from the U.S. Director of National Intelligence[15]. Initially targeting China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, the law grants the governor authority to expand this list[15].
Violations trigger severe penalties. The Texas Attorney General can investigate suspected violations, bring legal action against unlawfully acquired property, and seek appointment of a receiver to divest the interest[15]. Civil penalties can reach $250,000 or 50% of the property’s market value, whichever is greater[15]. Furthermore, individuals knowingly violating this law may face state jail felony charges[15].
The enforcement mechanism provides extraordinary powers. Upon finding a violation, Texas courts must issue an order divesting the offending party of their property interest, refer the case for criminal prosecution, and hold them liable for civil penalties[16].
Abbott’s stance mirrors growing concerns nationwide about foreign influence. His administration has positioned these measures as essential safeguards for national sovereignty and constitutional principles. As the governor declared, “These radical extremists are not welcome in our state”[13].
Critics view these measures as overreaching and potentially discriminatory. The pending litigation from CAIR represents just the first challenge, with the organization having previously won three cases against Abbott’s “moves to crack down on anti-Israel speech”[14].
The Texas approach exemplifies one state’s response to perceived threats from foreign ideologies. By designating specific organizations as terrorist entities and broadly restricting foreign property ownership, Texas has established the nation’s most comprehensive framework for countering what its governor identifies as extremist influence.
This proactive stance offers one potential model for addressing concerns about radical ideologies gaining footholds through property acquisition and organizational presence. The ongoing legal battles will ultimately determine whether these measures withstand constitutional scrutiny or require modification.
V. Constitutional Imperative: Why Sharia Violates Our Bill of Rights and Threatens Libertarian Liberties
- “Actions guided by a person’s belief in what God wills for him is not anything that can be endorsed by the state.” — Dawud Walid, Executive Director, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Michigan.
The US Constitution stands as America’s supreme legal authority—a sacred document our Founders designed to protect individual liberties from tyrannical control. Yet many patriots remain unaware of how Sharia law fundamentally contradicts these core constitutional principles. The conflict isn’t merely theoretical—it represents an existential challenge to American freedoms.
Fundamentally, Sharia rejects several bedrock constitutional premises. First among these: the revolutionary American idea that citizens possess the inherent right to make laws for themselves[17]. Our democratic Republic, governed by the Constitution, establishes that sovereignty lies with the people—not with religious texts or clerical authorities. Under Sharia, nonetheless, divine law supersedes human-made law, creating an irreconcilable conflict with our constitutional system.
Moreover, Sharia poses direct challenges to multiple protections in the Bill of Rights. Consider freedom of conscience and expression—cornerstones of American liberty. Sharia law traditionally prohibits criticism or analysis of Islamic doctrines[17], running directly counter to First Amendment protections. Additionally, Sharia’s historical punishment systems include amputations for theft, lapidation for adultery, and public flagellation—practices that plainly violate Eighth Amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.
Congressman Randy Fine recently introduced the “No Sharia Act,” addressing precisely these conflicts. As he explained: “Let me be crystal clear: Sharia law has no place in the United States of America”[19]. His legislation specifically “prohibits the application of Sharia in the United States where it would violate constitutional rights”[19]. This approach recognizes both religious freedom and constitutional supremacy.
Henceforth, Americans must understand the distinction between private religious practice (protected by our Constitution) and attempts to implement religious law as government policy (prohibited by our Constitution). The First Amendment protects complete freedom of religious belief and practice—so long as adherents respect others’ rights[20]. Consequently, observant Muslims, like all Americans, can practice their faith privately without constitutional conflict.
The genuine concern arises when religious laws seek to override civil authority. As documented in source materials, “no religious law can supersede state or federal law”[20]. The Constitution’s Article VI Supremacy Clause requires that the Constitution “shall be the supreme Law of the land”[17]. This principle applies equally to all religious traditions, regardless of whether Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or any other faith.
Throughout American history, religious communities have practiced their traditions within constitutional boundaries. Catholics, Jews, Baptists, Amish, Buddhists, Quakers, and others follow their sacred laws privately[20]. Whenever religious practices conflict with civil law, American jurisprudence has established clear boundaries. For instance, courts prohibited Mormon polygamy despite religious claims[20].
Critics often dismiss concerns about Sharia as mere prejudice. Such dismissals ignore substantial evidence from Sharia advocates themselves. The subversion campaign known as “civilization jihad” explicitly “seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework”[17]. These aren’t radical fringe interpretations—they represent mainstream Sharia doctrine that “constitutes the threat to the US Constitution and the freedoms it enshrines”[17].
From a libertarian perspective, these conflicts highlight the crucial distinction between voluntary religious practice and coercive legal systems. Libertarian principles support both freedom of conscience and freedom from coercion. As one libertarian source notes, government “should have no voice whatever in personal matters of religious beliefs and values”[21]. Ideas “should be communicated by the voluntary method of persuasion, not forced upon people by the coercive method of government”[21].
Proponents of Sharia often claim their system simply governs personal matters like prayer, dietary restrictions, and marriage. In reality, traditional Sharia extends far beyond these domains into criminal law, economics, and governance. Even advocates acknowledge Sharia’s controversial elements, including inheritance rules giving women half the share of men, punishments like amputation and flagellation, and restrictions on religious minorities[18].
The conflict becomes particularly evident in the context of equal protection under the law. Our Constitution guarantees equal treatment regardless of gender or religion. Traditional Sharia, comparatively, establishes different legal standards for men versus women and Muslims versus non-Muslims[17]. These distinctions flatly contradict America’s constitutional commitment to equality before the law.
Our Founders wisely established separation between religious authority and civil government—not to diminish faith but to protect both religious and civic spheres. This separation prevents religious persecution and thereby establishes the conditions for genuine religious liberty. America’s constitutional system doesn’t oppose any religion—it opposes any attempt to implement religious law through government authority.
Patriots who defend constitutional principles aren’t attacking religious freedom—they’re protecting it. True religious liberty requires freedom both to practice faith and to be free from others imposing their faith through government power. By maintaining constitutional supremacy over all religious legal codes, America preserves liberty for believers and non-believers alike.
The constitutional imperative remains clear: All Americans must uphold the Constitution as our supreme law, rejecting any ideology—religious or secular—that seeks to replace it with systems incompatible with our founding principles.
VI. Nationalist Call to Arms: Deport Threats, Secure Borders, and Reclaim Our Republic – No More Weakness!
After years of weak leadership, America finally has a president who’s taking decisive action against those threatening our national sovereignty. The new administration has immediately implemented sweeping changes to immigration enforcement, including expanded biometric collection, visa restrictions, and renewed deportation efforts [22].
The threat is real and immediate. The administration has acknowledged that millions of illegal aliens have crossed our borders, with many engaging in “hostile activities, including espionage, economic espionage, and preparations for terror-related activities”[23]. Truthfully, this infiltration extends beyond our physical borders into ideological battlegrounds like Dearborn, where Sharia Law threatens our constitutional Republic.
Federal authorities are currently implementing aggressive measures to combat this crisis. New executive orders enable the “Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to set priorities” that protect Americans’ safety and national security[23]. These actions demonstrate a renewed commitment to America First principles.
Patriots, the time for silence is over—our Republic hangs in the balance! As true Americans who cherish our Constitution, individual liberties, national sovereignty, and traditional values, we must act NOW to halt this foreign conquest and put America First. Contact your representatives and demand a federal ban on the Muslim Brotherhood, immediate deportations of radical threats, and ICE raids on Sharia enclaves like Dearborn.
The new administration has allocated $45 billion through September 2029 for detaining immigrant adults and families[24]. Additionally, approximately $32 billion has been provided for immigration agents and enforcement and deportation operations [24]. To secure our borders, more than $75 billion in enforcement and surveillance funding has been dedicated to border communities [24].
Actions every American patriot must take immediately:
- Support local and state law enforcement working with federal authorities “to perform the functions of immigration officers”[23]
- Demand your governor follow Texas Governor Abbott’s lead in designating foreign terrorist organizations.
- Report suspicious activities to border security agencies, who understand that “ensuring effective border security and management is essential for preventing and countering the flow of suspected terrorists”[25]
Throughout the country, we’re seeing unprecedented Republican support for strong immigration measures. A record high 83% of Republicans consider large numbers of immigrants and refugees a critical threat to America[26]. In fact, a majority of Republicans (57%) support detaining undocumented immigrants in camps while they await immigration hearings[26].
The administration is taking appropriate action to “encourage aliens unlawfully in the United States to voluntarily depart as soon as possible”[23]. Yet ultimately, more aggressive measures may be needed. Officials are establishing contracts “to construct, operate, control, or use facilities to detain removable aliens”[23].
For too long, America’s generosity has been abused by those seeking to undermine our way of life. Their presence has “cost taxpayers billions of dollars at the Federal, State, and local levels”[23]. We must restore our nation’s immigration laws, which are “critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States”[23].
Remember: Dearborn Sharia Law is merely a preview of what happens when patriots fail to defend their homeland. We must secure our borders, deport threats, and reclaim our Republic—with no more weakness!
VII. Rallying Cry Conclusion: Unite Conservatives – Share Now to Save America First!
The transformation of Dearborn from Henry Ford’s American industrial vision to what some describe as ground zero for Sharia Law influence serves as a stark warning for patriots nationwide. Undoubtedly, the foiled ISIS plots, street renamings honoring controversial figures, and demographic shifts detailed throughout this exposé demonstrate how quickly American communities can change when constitutional vigilance falters. The alarming evidence cannot be dismissed as mere speculation; instead, it demands immediate attention from freedom-loving Americans coast to coast.
Governor Abbott’s bold action designating organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist entities offers a blueprint other state leaders should follow. His decisive stance protecting Texas from ideological threats demonstrates what authentic constitutional leadership looks like. Meanwhile, the fundamental incompatibility between Sharia law and our Bill of Rights remains crystal clear – religious liberty thrives only when the Constitution stands as our supreme law.
Americans must recognize that these challenges represent an existential threat to our Republic’s founding principles. Though critics attempt to dismiss legitimate concerns as prejudice, the documented evidence speaks for itself. Patriotic citizens, therefore, must stand firm against ideologies seeking to undermine our constitutional freedoms, regardless of whether these threats emerge from foreign or domestic sources.
The time for passive acceptance has ended. Share this article far and wide, tag @realDonaldTrump and @GregAbbott_TX, and join the fight to reclaim our freedoms—your voice can spark the revolution to save our nation! #AmericaFirst #NoSharia #DefendTheConstitution #MAGA #BanMuslimBrotherhood
True defenders of American principles understand that preserving our constitutional Republic requires both vigilance and action. Patriots across the nation must unite to protect our borders, uphold the rule of law, and ensure no foreign ideology supersedes the supreme law established by our Founding Fathers. The battle for America’s soul continues daily across communities like Dearborn – yet through determined resistance and unwavering commitment to traditional American values, we still have time to reclaim our Republic before constitutional liberties slip away forever.
References
[4] – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/08/arab-americans-michigan-dearborn-trump
[8] – https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/03/us/dearborn-fbi-raid-terror-attack-skepticism
[9] – https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/16/us/isis-radicalization-us-terror-plot
[14] – https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/20/cair-texas-lawsuit-terrorist-designation-00663140
[15] – https://www.jw.com/news/insights-texas-foreign-ownership-real-property-law/
[18] – https://www.openglobalrights.org/islamic-and-un-bills-of-rights-same-d/
[19] – https://fine.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=88
[20] – https://ing.org/resources/a-closer-look-at-sharia-in-the-united-states/
[21] – https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/reflections-freedom-religion
[22] – https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/trump-reinstates-immigration-policies/
[25] – https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/cct/border-security-and-management
[30] – https://www.heritage.org/terrorism/commentary/should-the-muslim-brotherhood-be-labeled-terrorists
[34] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dearborn,_Michigan
[35] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/dearborn-rouses-nation-out-of-sharia-slumber
[36] – https://banned.video/watch?id=691f7cc45658b2107e2a2773
[37] – https://x.com/NewsBowne/status/1991609289929376026?s=20
[38] – https://www.heritage.org/terrorism/commentary/should-the-muslim-brotherhood-be-labeled-terrorists
[39] – https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25515932
[40] – https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26487092?print=true
[42] – https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/us/politics/trump-muslim-brotherhood.html
[43] – https://www.cruz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Bills/20151103_MuslimBrotherhoodTerroristDesignation.pdf
[46] – https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/01/277792.htm
[47] – file:///C:/Users/DavisD/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/4VHMHHXV/The%20Charter%20of%20Allah:%20The%20Platform%20of%20the%20Islamic%20Resistance%20Movement%20(Hamas),%20trans.%20Raphael%20Israeli,%20https:/fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/880818.htm
[48] – https://www.investigativeproject.org/6126/trump-continues-obama-dhs-policy-of-engaging-cair
[49] – https://www.lawfareblog.com/should-muslim-brotherhood-be-designated-terrorist-organization
[51] – https://www.cruz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/muslim_brotherhood_bill_text.pdf
[52] – https://heritageaction.com/
[53] – https://www.heritage.org/staff/victoria-coates
[54] – https://www.heritage.org/staff/robert-greenway
[58] – https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/us-regions/midwest/michigan
[60] – https://www.foxnews.com/media/
[61] – https://www.foxnews.com/us/michigan-city-may-ban-lgbtq-flags-public-property-judge-rules
[62] – https://www.foxnews.com/us/israel-compared-nazis-isis-dearborn-sermon-you-need-to-reeducate-the-jews
[65] – https://subscribe.blazetv.com/
[66] – https://get.blazetv.com/sara/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=theblaze-smartlink
[67] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trFhcims0y8
[68] – https://www.theblaze.com/tag/faith
[70] – https://dailycaller.com/2025/11/19/dearborn-michigan-allahu-akbar-protesters-jake-lang-nick-shirley/
[72] – https://x.com/nickshirleyy/status/1990918047063027890?s=20
[74] – https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/protestors-community-activists-clash-in-dearborn/
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment