Trump Crushes Big Pharma: Hep B Vaccine Removal Saves American Kids! 🇺🇸

Image Credit: SERGII IAREMENKO/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY / Getty

by L Richardson

https://twitter.com/ChildrensHD/status/1996970857084662200?s=20

My eyes couldn’t believe what I saw in President Trump’s bold statement about the CDC vaccine committee’s decision. Trump praised the committee that day. He celebrated their “excellent decision to END their Hepatitis B Vaccine Recommendation for babies, the vast majority of whom are at NO RISK” [1]. This historic change stands as an America First victory against decades of federal health overreach and pharmaceutical control over our innocent children.

American newborns received hepatitis B shots within hours of birth for more than 30 years. Families faced this requirement even though the disease spreads through sexual contact or contaminated needles [2]. Trump’s announcement pointed out this medical nonsense, noting these helpless infants face almost no risk of getting this adult vice-related illness [1].

The Presidential Memorandum: Freedom for American Families

Trump celebrated this win with immediate action. The CDC advisory committee made its decision, and he signed a Presidential Memorandum within hours. He directed the Department of Health and Human Services to thoroughly evaluate childhood vaccine recommendations [3]. This quick response shows his steadfast dedication to putting American families first and questioning the excessive vaccine schedule that has weighed down our nation’s children.

“The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule long required 72 ‘jabs,’ for perfectly healthy babies, nowhere near what other Countries in the World require, and nowhere near what’s necessary,” Trump stated powerfully [2]. “In fact, it is ridiculous! Many parents and scientists have been questioning the efficacy of this ‘schedule,’ as have I!”

Striking Down Big Pharma’s Grip on Our Children

Big pharmaceutical companies made huge profits from mandatory vaccination policies. At the same time, average Americans had little input about their children’s medical treatments. The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted 8-3 to recommend hepatitis B at birth only when mothers test positive for the virus [2]. This decision finally matches what many other developed nations already do [1].

This patriotic move represents what Trump calls a return to “COMMON SENSE” [1]. Our government’s approach to health freedom badly needed this change. Most developed countries only give this vaccine to newborns whose mothers test positive for the infection. Yet, the universal birth dose recommendation continued here [1].

Defending Constitutional Liberty Through Medical Freedom

Trump’s memorandum ordered his administration to “FAST TRACK” this review of global vaccination practices [4]. This shows his determination to challenge the medical establishment’s universal approach to children’s health. He tasked HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with comparing American practices with those of other developed nations that suggest lower childhood vaccination rates [5].

The results could change everything. Committee member Retsef Levi, an MIT Sloan School of Management professor, noted this marks “a fundamental change in the approach to this vaccine.” Parents will now “carefully think about whether they want to take the risk of giving another vaccine to their child” [2].

This position supports a core American belief – parents should make health decisions for their children, not government bureaucrats. Nobody cares more about a child’s well-being than their own family.

Putting American Health Independence First

Trump reinforced his dedication to making America healthy again: “I have just signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Health and Human Services to ‘FAST TRACK’ a comprehensive evaluation of Vaccine Schedules from other Countries around the World, and better align the U.S. Vaccine Schedule, so it is finally rooted in the Gold Standard of Science and COMMON SENSE!” [2]

The CDC advisory panel’s choice marks a significant change in our nation’s approach to medical freedom. Some members of the medical establishment protested [2]. Still, Trump expressed complete faith that “Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the CDC, will get this done, quickly and correctly, for our Nation’s Children” [2].

This win against unnecessary medical mandates for newborns reminds us that freedom remains the lifeblood of our Republic. Trump challenged the status quo and questioned long-standing practices. He struck a blow against medical tyranny and gave back parental rights to American families.

This decision acknowledges a fundamental truth: blanket mandates that ignore individual circumstances run counter to American liberty. People claimed the previous universal recommendation would “make sure no at-risk infant falls through the cracks” [2]. Instead, it forced countless families to give their healthy newborns a vaccine against a disease that mainly spreads through adult behaviors.

Trump’s directive to review and potentially reduce mandatory vaccines shows a return to constitutional principles of limited government and individual liberty. This comes after years of expanding childhood vaccination schedules. The America First health policy takes shape right before us, as we reclaim our medical independence and reject the excessive requirements placed on American children compared to those in other countries worldwide.

II. Constitutional Thesis: Upholding Freedoms Against Unjust Mandates

Our Republic stands on a sacred principle that has guided America from the start: the government’s power must be limited, and individual freedoms must be protected at all costs. The CDC made a big move by ending blanket Hepatitis B vaccination recommendations for newborns. This decision marks a return to the constitutional values that make our nation what it is.

The 10th Amendment’s “police powers” clause gives states—not federal agencies—the primary responsibility for creating and enforcing laws that promote health and safety [6]. The Supreme Court has repeatedly backed this constitutional provision. While federal agencies can guide vaccine policies, they can’t force or remove vaccine requirements nationwide [7]. This landmark Hep B decision shows a proper balance of power that honors our founding document.

American families have carried a heavy load for decades. The childhood vaccine schedule calls for 72 shots, far fewer than other developed nations require. This excessive schedule raises medical questions and attacks the constitutional principles of limited government and a parent’s right to choose.

Vaccine mandates have become more political recently. During the COVID-19 pandemic, conservative views were linked strongly to concerns about vaccine efficacy, safety, and resistance to government-imposed requirements [7]. Many Americans with strong religious beliefs showed less trust in health officials, regardless of their political views [7]. This goes beyond party lines—it touches the core American values of freedom and choice.

The Supreme Court has recognized state authority to create vaccine laws under their general police powers throughout our history. Justice John Marshall Harlan’s landmark 1905 ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts confirmed that states could enact vaccine laws to protect citizens [6]. But even this ruling set limits on government power—it never expected the federal overreach we’ve seen lately.

Nations differ in their vaccine recommendations, and with good reason, too. Each country has unique population needs, disease threats, demographics, health systems, and government structures [8]. Trump’s call to review our vaccine schedule makes sense on both medical and constitutional grounds. It respects America’s unique needs rather than imposing global health policies on our children.

Secretary Kennedy’s actions to protect parental rights perfectly align with these constitutional principles. His office launched an investigation into a school that broke the law by vaccinating a child without parental consent and ignored a religious exemption under state law [9]. Kennedy made it clear: “When providers ignore parental consent, violate exemptions to vaccine mandates, or keep parents in the dark about their children’s care, we will act decisively” [9].

HIPAA’s Privacy Rule states that parents are their minor children’s personal representatives with legal authority to make healthcare decisions [9]. Bureaucrats and pharmaceutical interests have undermined this fundamental right for too long by pushing vaccines without proper respect for parental authority or religious objections.

Our constitutional system of checks and balances has always settled the tension between individual liberty and public health measures. The Supreme Court showed this by striking down the Biden administration’s OSHA vaccine mandate. The Court’s conservative majority put it simply: “The question before us is not how to respond to the pandemic, but who holds the power to do so” [28, 29].

Civil liberties have limits, but mandatory vaccination needs proper justification. It must minimally impact rights and prove necessary for stated goals [10]. The blanket Hep B recommendation for all newborns—whatever their risk status—failed this constitutional test of proportionality and necessity.

Conservative lawmakers fought back against federal overreach. They passed laws blocking employer and school mandates, as well as vaccine passports [6]. By August 2021, at least 14 states had such laws in place, standing up for their 10th Amendment rights [6]. This grassroots push for medical freedom shows the deep American belief that health decisions belong to individuals and parents—not distant bureaucrats.

Studies show that age, religious beliefs, education levels, and other social factors shape vaccine attitudes independently of political views [7]. Our vaccine policy must respect these different viewpoints rather than forcing one-size-fits-all mandates that violate constitutional freedoms.

President Trump’s bold move to review our national vaccine schedule marks a historic return to constitutional order. It puts power back where it belongs: with parents making informed choices for their children. This goes beyond a single vaccine—it reclaims our founding principles and rejects medical tyranny in all its forms.

III. Point 1: Exposing the Hep B Scam—High Risks, Zero Benefits for Most Babies

https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1997068861515182173?s=20

Big Pharma’s influence over our health agencies becomes crystal clear in the way they’ve handled the Hepatitis B vaccine’s hidden dangers. Health bureaucrats continue to push this unnecessary shot on newborns, our most vulnerable citizens, while they systematically downplay safety concerns.

https://twitter.com/LeslieManookian/status/1996384703390388450

Mainstream media stays silent about the disturbing story told by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The system has logged 20,231 reports following Hepatitis B vaccines. Children under 2 years of age account for more than half (51%) of these cases [11]. The numbers paint an even grimmer picture – among 4,444 reports specifically tied to single-antigen Hepatitis B vaccines, 303 (6.8%) were severe cases, including 45 deaths [11]. 45 American children potentially lost to an unnecessary vaccine that mainly protects against adult behaviors.

https://twitter.com/liz_churchill10/status/1997091639521616256?s=20

Nervous system disorders top the list of serious adverse events reported in infants under one month old [11]. Despite this, federal health officials keep telling us this injection suits day-old babies with developing immune systems.

https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1996998926008713327?s=20

Scientists have identified aluminum adjuvants in the Hep B shot as potentially harmful neurotoxins. Research confirms aluminum adjuvants are present in hepatitis B vaccines [12], yet scientists “do not fully understand” their mechanisms [13]. Dr. Evelyn Griffin, an OB/GYN who serves on three ACIP work groups, points out a crucial gap: only one peer-reviewed study has examined aluminum levels in infants’ blood after vaccination, using a small sample and without long-term follow-up [13].

Current FDA aluminum exposure limits raise red flags because “appropriate testing was not performed,” Griffin adds [13]. Recent studies suggest that aluminum buildup warrants our attention as a “warranted concern” [13]. These warnings come from medical professionals on the very committees making vaccine recommendations.

Aaron Siri didn’t mince words when he addressed the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The attorney blasted the Hepatitis B vaccine licensing studies as “underpowered” and “industry-funded” [13]. He highlighted how rushed clinical trials lead to recommendations based on insufficient data, making it impossible to spot long-term health issues.

“You can’t find what you’re not studying,” Siri stated plainly [13]. “A product given to a baby or infant often won’t reveal its neurological, immunological, or developmental effects until you’ve tracked that child for at least a few years.”

The case for universal vaccination falls apart under close examination. Proponents claim the birth dose stops transmission from infected mothers to newborns. The CDC’s own numbers show only 16% of expecting mothers miss hepatitis B testing [14]. This small percentage doesn’t justify exposing millions of low-risk infants to a vaccine with uncertain long-term safety.

Big Pharma wants to hide these Hep B risks from you:

Kennedy and other vaccine critics target the birth dose specifically, questioning its link to autism [5]
Single-antigen Hep B vaccines commonly cause dizziness and nausea (8.4% each) [11]
Incorrect product storage leads the list of vaccination errors with single-antigen Hep B [11]

Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, backed Siri’s comparison of pre-1986 and post-1986 vaccine schedules, noting how the law now shields doctors and manufacturers from responsibility for “the vast vaccine injuries they have caused” [13]. This 1986 legislation removed vaccine maker liability, creating pure profit potential without accountability.

This issue strikes at the heart of our constitutional rights. Forcing this vaccine on all newborns, regardless of risk, attacks parental rights and bodily autonomy. Kennedy’s panel emphasized how pushing Hep B shots for all newborns violates core American principles of informed consent through medical coercion.

The movement against universal Hep B vaccination has gained such momentum that Dr. Joseph Hibbeln and Dr. Cody Meissner on Kennedy’s committee questioned whether concerns about the birth dose stemmed from mere “speculation,” given the lack of documented harm [15]. Dr. Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s vaccine division director, has signaled his willingness to review vaccine schedules [5] – showing that top officials now take these scientific concerns seriously.

Regulatory capture explains what we see today – pharmaceutical companies control the agencies meant to regulate them. The universal Hep B birth dose has filled vaccine manufacturers’ coffers for decades while exposing countless newborns to unnecessary medical risks.

Trump’s strong opposition to this medical overreach goes beyond good health policy – it restores constitutional principles by returning power to parents. They can now make informed decisions about their children’s health without corporate influence or government pressure.

IV. Point 2: Trump’s Nationalist Leadership and RFK Jr.’s Fast-Track Reforms

Image Source: KFF Health News

Trump demonstrated strong leadership when he signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Health and Human Services to review global vaccination practices. This bold move is the lifeblood of his America First approach to protecting children’s health.

“I have just signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Health and Human Services to ‘FAST TRACK’ a comprehensive evaluation of Vaccine Schedules from other Countries around the World, and better arrange the U.S. Vaccine Schedule, so it is finally rooted in the Gold Standard of Science and COMMON SENSE!” Trump declared [16].

Secretary Kennedy and Deputy Secretary O’Neill must review other developed nations that report lower child immunization rates [16]. The numbers tell a clear story. The United States suggests vaccination for 18 diseases, while Denmark recommends only 10, Japan 14, and Germany 15 [16]. American children bear this extra burden because of wasteful bureaucratic overreach that conservatives have fought against.

Trump’s words about the current system are crystal clear: “They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies it’s a disgrace. I don’t see it. I think it’s awful,” he said at a White House event. “It looks like they’re pumping into a horse” [17]. His straightforward language strikes a chord with millions of American parents who question the growing number of childhood vaccines.

HHS is changing how it develops vaccine recommendations under Kennedy’s leadership. Kennedy has rebuilt the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) from scratch [18]. This bold action tackles the pharmaceutical industry’s decades-long influence on health policies.

“The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,” Kennedy wrote [18]. “It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons” [18]. The committee members received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies that market vaccines [18].

Trump’s team isn’t stopping at advisory committee reforms. They’ve already stopped recommending annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters for all children [16]. Deputy Secretary O’Neill’s statement that “Informed consent is back” [19] shows a radical alteration toward healthcare freedom—a core Republican value.

“CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today,” O’Neill stated [19]. This puts conservative principles into action by moving away from one-size-fits-all rules toward customized medicine.

The America First Global Health Strategy, released on September 18, presents a clear vision that aligns with Trump’s priorities [20]. The strategy points out that previous U.S. aid didn’t target recipient governments’ main infectious disease concerns [20]. Moreover, it aims to work with these governments on health assistance priorities they both agree on [20].

Trump’s approach stands out because of its quick timeline. The strategy aims to complete bilateral agreements with countries that receive the most U.S. health-related foreign aid in just three months [20]. This fast pace shows authentic executive leadership without endless bureaucratic delays.

The American Academy of Pediatrics claims vaccine recommendations are “largely similar across developed countries” [16]. Still, evidence shows the U.S. schedule stands alone. The Presidential Memorandum calls for updates to U.S. vaccine schedules if other countries’ recommendations prove superior [16].

Kennedy’s reforms come from his steadfast dedication to transparency and scientific integrity. “The problem isn’t necessarily that ACIP members are corrupt,” Kennedy explained. “The problem is their immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy” [18]. His answer is clear: “A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science” [18].

American children have faced excessive vaccination schedules while pharmaceutical companies have made huge profits. Trump’s decisive action and Kennedy’s implementation mark the most important reform of our health bureaucracy in decades. They put America First by prioritizing children’s well-being over industry profits.

V. Point 3: Addressing the COVID Booster Backlash—Freedom Over Force

Image Source: Los Angeles Times

Trump’s relationship with vaccines shows the sort of thing I love about principled leadership that puts freedom first. Many conservatives expected him to completely reject COVID-19 vaccines. His nuanced position shows a deeper connection to American liberty than simple opposition would suggest.

During a candid interview with conservative commentator Candace Owens, Trump called the COVID vaccine “one of the greatest achievements of mankind” [21]. He takes credit for vaccines developed under Operation Warp Speed, saying, “I came up with a vaccine, with three vaccines, all are very, very good” [21]. This praise sometimes puts him at odds with his supporters.

The tension became clear during his appearance in Dallas with Bill O’Reilly. Trump got booed after revealing he had received a COVID booster shot [21]. He stood firm and responded to the crowd, “Don’t, don’t, don’t… That’s all right. It’s a very tiny group over there” [22].

Trump remains America’s strongest voice against vaccine mandates. On his first day back in office, he signed an Executive Order explicitly prohibiting federal funds from supporting COVID-19 vaccine mandates in schools [23]. This move delivered on his campaign promise: “I will not allow schools to impose COVID vaccine mandates…” [23].

Trump’s position shows how personal freedom should never be sacrificed to public health bureaucracy. His Executive Order states that vaccine mandates “pressure students into making COVID-19 vaccine decisions based on government coercion, rather than on their own informed choices” [23].

His team worked hard to repair the damage caused by previous mandates. VA Secretary Doug Collins pointed out, “The Biden Administration’s authoritarian COVID mandates upended the lives and livelihoods of thousands of service members and Veterans” [24]. Trump’s executive action gave back GI Bill benefits to veterans discharged for refusing the vaccine [24].

Mainstream media often misses Trump’s focus on choice. Even while supporting vaccines, he made it clear: “The ones that get very sick and go to the hospital are the ones that don’t do the vaccine, but it’s still their choice” [21]. He believes that while he chose vaccination, others must have the freedom to choose differently.

This view aligns with concerns raised by prominent physicians about potential risks. Medical organizations reject the idea of “turbo cancer” from mRNA vaccines [25]. Trump’s anti-mandate stance lets Americans evaluate risks without government pressure.

Critics who call Trump inconsistent miss the fundamental conservative principle: Operation Warp Speed created options for Americans during a pandemic. Mandates, however, cross constitutional lines and violate personal rights.

Conservative leaders throughout history knew that freedom means letting citizens make questionable choices. Trump said at the Operation Warp Speed Vaccine Summit, “Every American who wants the vaccine will be able to get the vaccine” [26]. This stressed voluntary participation over forced compliance.

His executive actions show a leader who knows parents should have the final say in health decisions. The school mandate ban notes that “with COVID-19 vaccine mandates threatening educational opportunities for students, parents are being forced into a difficult position: comply with a controversial mandate or risk their child’s educational future” [23].

Previous administrations took a different path. They pushed one solution for everyone. Trump champions the actual American value of individual liberty by creating medical choices without forcing medical rules on people.

VI. To Be Sure: Balancing Views in Our Free Republic

Our national vaccine debate needs to acknowledge a fundamental truth: Not all vaccinations are wrong. Vaccines like Hepatitis B can provide real protection against severe disease for certain at-risk groups. President Trump chose to receive a COVID booster—a personal medical decision he made as an American citizen based on his unique health needs.

The key difference that defines our constitutional Republic is clear: Voluntary medical choices stand far apart from government-imposed requirements.

Vaccine policies require us to understand that civil liberties have limits—they don’t allow harm to others [27]. Despite that, any limits on bodily autonomy need proper justification. Blanket mandates that ignore individual circumstances violate constitutional principles of limited government.

Recent polls show troubling trends in parents’ attitudes: about 17% of parents now skip or delay recommended childhood vaccines, up from 10% in 2023 [28]. Republican parents show the most significant change, with 26% now skipping or delaying vaccines, compared with 13% in 2023 [28]. People resist more as government pressure grows.

Government coercion reduces people’s willingness to get vaccinated—economists call this the “crowding-out effect” [29]. When authorities force compliance, they destroy the personal motivation behind voluntary health choices.

The Supreme Court has upheld states’ power to create specific vaccine requirements through their police powers [6]. The federal government faces strict constitutional limits in this area. At least 14 states have passed laws that block various vaccine mandates [6], which shows their rightful defense against federal overreach.

True conservatives know that freedom means more than just avoiding restrictions—it means having real choices. Vaccine policy should focus on education and voluntary participation instead of punishment and force.

President Trump’s approach shows this balance perfectly. He sees vaccine development as an achievement but defends individual liberty against government mandates. This principled position honors our Constitution’s promise of freedom, ensuring Americans stay citizens—not subjects—in our great Republic.

VII. Rousing Conclusion: Rise Up for MAHA and a Sovereign America

Trump has taken bold steps against the Hepatitis B vaccine mandate, marking a turning point for American liberty. American families have endured decades of pharmaceutical overreach that forced their newborns to undergo questionable medical procedures. We now have a President who stands against this control and puts our children’s health before Big Pharma’s profits.

The CDC’s landmark decision to stop blanket Hep B recommendations validates what parents already knew – healthy newborns have almost no risk from a disease that spreads mainly through adult behaviors. This transformation returns decision-making power to parents who understand their children’s needs best.

Trump’s Presidential Memorandum tells HHS to review global vaccination practices, showing his steadfast dedication to putting Americans first. Past administrations simply followed the recommendations of pharmaceutical companies. Now we ask why American children must get 72 shots when children in other developed nations receive nowhere near that number. Secretary Kennedy at HHS brings promise of transparency, scientific integrity, and valid informed consent.

Vaccines might help certain high-risk groups, but mandates go against core American principles of liberty and limited government. Our Constitution establishes a republic in which people make informed choices about their health. Distant bureaucrats should not impose blanket medical requirements under any circumstances.

Stand up, fellow patriots! Let’s protect our sacred Constitution, support parental rights, and put America First. Share this piece everywhere to reveal Big Pharma’s influence and back Trump’s MAHA reforms. Ask your representatives to support vaccine choice, tag @realDonaldTrump and @RobertKennedyJr, and join our fight for a healthier Republic! 🇺🇸 #MAHA #NoMandates #AmericaFirst #VaccineFreedom #ConstitutionStrong

This victory marks just the beginning. The fight against medical control continues on many fronts, from school mandates to workplace requirements. With Trump’s leadership and our united voice, America can reclaim its health sovereignty and restore parental rights nationwide. True freedom means making medical choices without government pressure – a principle worth defending at every level.