Maricopa County Delays: Election Fraud Unfolding in Battleground States!

by – L. Richardson

The Maricopa County Election Delay: Battleground States Set the Stage for Election Fraud has become an urgent and pressing concern for many Americans. As results are delayed for weeks in Arizona’s Maricopa County, with Pennsylvania and Michigan following suit, suspicions of election manipulation are rising. This pattern of delays in crucial battleground states has raised immediate alarms about the integrity of the electoral process and the potential for fraud.

The 2024 Election Fraud Exposed series sheds light on the globalist plan, a term used to describe a group of influential individuals or entities with a vested interest in influencing global events to steal the upcoming election. From the Maricopa County Election Fraud Cover-Up to the UOCAVA overseas ballot fraud threat, a term used to describe potential fraud in handling ballots from overseas military and civilian voters, this article explores how election results are being delayed to hide fraud. It also examines how Georgia has blocked election delays, providing a model of resistance against the globalist siege on battleground states. By understanding these tactics, readers can arm themselves with knowledge to protect the republic’s future.

The Maricopa County Election Delay – A Repeat of Past Corruption

The 2020 and 2022 elections:

How Maricopa County was a hotspot for voting irregularities, including illegal recounts, machine failures, and shredded ballots.

Maricopa County has been at the center of election controversies in recent years. In 2020, the county faced accusations of voting irregularities, leading to multiple investigations and audits. Despite these efforts, no evidence of widespread fraud or irregularities emerged. However, the county’s election processes came under intense scrutiny, with some claiming that ballots had been improperly handled or destroyed. Similarly, in 2022, Maricopa County experienced significant issues on Election Day, further fueling concerns about the county’s role in the electoral process.

In 2022, Maricopa County experienced significant issues on Election Day. Tabulators at 60 voting centers could not read ballots due to printing problems 2. This caused voters to be frustrated and long wait times as election workers repeatedly attempted to feed ballots into malfunctioning machines. As a result, 16,724 ballots had to be transported to the county’s central election center for counting 2.

Current Situation:

Maricopa now claims results won’t be in for 10-13 days. Ask: Why does Argentina count faster than this key U.S. country?

The situation in Maricopa County has remained the same for the upcoming election. County officials have announced that it could take 10 to 13 days to fully tabulate the results 3. This extended timeline has raised concerns among voters and politicians alike. Jennifer Liewer, Deputy Elections Director, attributes the delay to longer-than-usual ballots and high voter turnout 3.

However, many questions still need to be answered to determine why a single U.S. country needs such an extended period to count votes when entire countries can produce results much faster. This stark contrast has fueled suspicions about the integrity of the election process in Maricopa County.

The case:

This isn’t an issue of logistics; it’s about controlling the narrative and delaying results to manipulate the outcome.

The prolonged vote-counting process in Maricopa County raises serious questions about the true nature of these delays. While officials cite logistical challenges, many believe these extended timelines are part of a broader strategy to control the narrative and potentially manipulate election outcomes.

The pattern of delays in battleground states like Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan has become a cause for concern. These delays allow those seeking to influence election results to do so under the guise of thorough vote counting. The extended timeline also allows for the potential introduction of questionable ballots or the “finding” of additional votes that could swing close races.

As patriots, we must remain vigilant and insist on transparency in the election process. The integrity of our republic depends on fair and timely election results, and we cannot allow delays to become a tool for potential fraud or manipulation. Our unwavering demand for transparency is crucial in ensuring the integrity of our elections.

Pattern of Delays in Battleground States

Pennsylvania and Michigan:

Both states are also signaling delayed results. Is this a coincidence? Or is it part of a coordinated effort by the globalists to drag out the process and create confusion?

The pattern of delayed election results isn’t limited to Maricopa County. Pennsylvania and Michigan, two crucial battleground states, also signal potential delays in reporting their results. In Pennsylvania, officials can start processing absentee ballots on Election Day morning. Vote totals can only be recorded after polls close at 8 p.m. 4. This situation will likely slow down the release of results from mail-in ballots.

Michigan, on the other hand, has made some progress. A new law allows absentee votes to be counted eight days before Election Day in most areas 4. However, the potential for delays still exists, especially in larger cities and counties.

These delays in battleground states raise serious questions about whether they’re merely coincidental or part of a coordinated effort to create confusion and potentially manipulate outcomes. The extended timelines allow those seeking to influence election results to do so under the guise of thorough vote counting, potentially altering the course of our nation’s future in a significant way.

In previous election cycles, delays were used to shift outcomes.

The 2020 presidential election is a stark reminder of how delays can impact election outcomes. Calling the results in several key states, including Pennsylvania, took days. Biden ultimately secured a narrow victory after most mail-in ballots were counted 4. This pattern of delayed results and subsequent shifts in vote totals has fueled suspicions and allegations of fraud.

In 2020, a ‘blue shift’—where later-counted ballots favored Democrats—was particularly pronounced due to the partisan divide over mail-in voting. This phenomenon, which results from the order in which different types of ballots are counted, led to accusations and counter-accusations in the days following the election, with some alleging that the shift indicated fraud rather than legitimate vote counting.

The critical role these states play in determining the presidency.

Pennsylvania and Michigan play crucial roles in determining the outcome of presidential elections. With its 19 electoral votes, Pennsylvania is often considered the tipping-point state 6. In 2020, the state clinched the presidency for Biden, albeit by a narrow margin of 1.2 percentage points 7.

With 15 electoral votes, Michigan is another critical piece of the “blue wall” that Biden rebuilt in 2020 7. The state’s diverse political landscape, including medium-sized cities and rural areas, makes it a challenging battleground where small shifts can significantly impact.

As we approach the 2024 election, the integrity of the voting process in these states is paramount. The potential for delayed results and shifting vote totals could again lead to confusion, allegations of fraud, and attempts to manipulate outcomes. It’s crucial for voters and election officials alike to remain vigilant and demand transparency throughout the entire election process.

Georgia:

A Model of Resistance

Georgia has successfully blocked attempts to delay their election results.

While some battleground states are grappling with potential delays, Georgia has emerged as a beacon of transparency and efficiency in the electoral process. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has taken a firm stance against any attempts to delay election results. He emphatically stated that, despite claims to the contrary, it will “absolutely not” take seven days to tabulate votes in Georgia 8.

Georgia’s commitment to swift and accurate vote counting is evident in its record-breaking early voting turnout. The state has been setting new records daily, with over 2 million voters casting their ballots before Election Day 9. This high early turnout demonstrates voter enthusiasm and allows for more efficient ballot processing.

Contrast Georgia’s transparency and swift response with Arizona’s shady practices.

The contrast between Georgia’s approach and the practices in states like Arizona is stark. While Maricopa County in Arizona claims it needs 10-13 days to count votes, Georgia has implemented measures to ensure rapid and transparent tabulation. Georgia’s emphasis on technological advancements and cooperation with other government agencies has resulted in what Raffensperger calls “the cleanest voter list in the entire country” 9.

Georgia’s success in maintaining election integrity extends to preventing non-citizen voting, with Raffensperger describing the state as a “model” in this regard 9. This level of preparedness and transparency contrasts sharply with the opaque and delayed processes seen in some other battleground states.

If Georgia can do it, so can the rest of the country!

Georgia’s proactive approach to election integrity is a powerful example for other states. By implementing robust systems and embracing transparency, Georgia has shown that it’s possible to conduct efficient, secure elections without unnecessary delays. The state’s success in blocking attempts to delay results and maintaining clean voter rolls demonstrates that timely and accurate election results are achievable with the right approach.

As patriots, we should demand the same level of efficiency and transparency from all states, especially in crucial battleground areas. Georgia’s model proves that swift, secure elections are possible, and we must push for similar standards across the nation to protect the integrity of our electoral process.

UOCAVA:

A New Frontier for Election Fraud

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) has become a focal point in the ongoing battle against election fraud [16]. While initially intended to protect the voting rights of U.S. citizens living abroad, including military personnel and their families, concerns have arisen about the potential exploitation of this law.

How the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) may be exploited.

UOCAVA requires states to allow certain groups of citizens to register and vote absentee in federal elections 10 [16]. However, the law’s provisions may be vulnerable to manipulation. Critics argue that the electronic transmission options for ballot requests and delivery, mandated by the MOVE Act amendment to UOCAVA, could be exploited by bad actors 10.

Lack of oversight and security risks tied to overseas ballots could be another avenue for fraud in 2024.

The Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) has identified potential risks associated with electronic voting systems 11. Unintentional errors and architecture-specific threats by malicious outsiders, such as denial of service attacks, constitute the most significant source of risk 11. These vulnerabilities could be exploited in the upcoming 2024 election, potentially impacting battleground states like Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

The larger globalist agenda of manipulating elections under the guise of legal provisions.

The concerns surrounding UOCAVA have become part of a larger narrative about election integrity. Some argue that globalist interests could exploit these vulnerabilities to manipulate election outcomes. The extended timelines for receiving and counting overseas ballots, particularly in battleground states, have raised suspicions about potential fraud 12.

Recent lawsuits filed by Republican groups in Michigan and North Carolina have questioned the eligibility of specific categories of overseas voters 12. These legal challenges reflect growing concerns about the potential for UOCAVA to be used for election manipulation.

As we approach the 2024 election, it’s crucial to address these concerns and ensure the integrity of the voting process for all Americans, both at home and abroad [17] [18]. The battle for the republic extends beyond our borders, and vigilance is required to protect the sanctity of every vote.

Expert Opinion:

What We Can Do to Stop This Fraud

As the battle for electoral integrity intensifies, experts emphasize the critical role of citizen engagement in safeguarding our democratic processes. Here are key actions we can take to combat potential fraud and ensure fair elections:

Demand Transparency:

Call for complete transparency in ballot counting.

Transparency is fundamental to maintaining public trust in our elections. Citizens must demand precise, accessible data on every aspect of the voting process. This includes comprehensive precinct-level data to increase voter participation and identify potential irregularities 13. We should push for implementing ballot tracking systems that allow voters to follow their ballots through each processing stage, enhancing confidence in the electoral system 13.

Challenge Delays:

Encourage people to question why results are delayed, especially in high-stakes battlegrounds.

Delays in reporting election results, particularly in battleground states, should be met with scrutiny. Citizens should actively question election officials about the reasons for any delays and demand regular updates. Experts recommend that officials release unofficial election counts, including detailed information about mail/absentee ballots, challenged and rejected ballots, and ballots eligible for curing, on at least a weekly basis after voting begins 13.

Support Legal Action:

Promote supporting legal teams fighting against delays and fraud in the courts.

Legal challenges play a crucial role in upholding election integrity. While some lawsuits may be politically motivated, others serve as essential checks on the system. Citizens should support legitimate legal efforts to ensure compliance with election laws and protect voting rights. However, it’s necessary to distinguish between valid legal challenges and those designed merely to sow confusion or distrust in the electoral process 14.

By taking these actions, we can help protect the integrity of our elections and resist attempts to manipulate results in battleground states like Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Remember, the future of our republic depends on the active participation of informed and vigilant citizens.

Conclusion:

The Battle for the Republic is NOW

The patterns of election delays in battleground states like Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan have raised serious concerns about the integrity of our electoral process. These delays, coupled with potential vulnerabilities in overseas voting systems, present a real threat to the fairness of our elections. Citizens must stay informed, demand transparency, and support legal efforts to challenge suspicious practices.

As frontline defenders of our republic, we must stay engaged beyond election night and keep up the pressure on officials. By staying vigilant, asking tough questions, and pushing for real-time data on ballot counting, we can help protect the sanctity of our votes. The battle for the future of our nation is happening now, and it’s up to us to stand firm against any attempts to manipulate election results.