Is Governor Newsom’s Land Grab the Start of America’s Descent into a UN Smart City Nightmare?

by – L. Richardson

The Patriots need to hear this. Governor Gavin Newsom’s alarming land grab plan reveals what many have warned about. This goes beyond property seizure – it ties directly to UN-backed smart cities that could change our American way of life. A nightmare scenario unfolds that puts every property owner’s rights at stake. So Alex Jones has come forward and just needs a federal criminal investigation into what he sees as actions of a psychotic leftist death cult. This isn’t some conspiracy theory – the evidence stands right before us. But we, as Americans, have the power to take action and protect our property rights from this unprecedented attack on our sovereignty. We need this investigation for justice, for the truth to come out.

The LA Fire Bombshell – Predictions Come True

New findings show a troubling pattern of organized land buying throughout California. A mysterious group, Flannery Associates, has spent close to USD 1 billion to become Solano County’s biggest landowner24. Governor Newsom’s executive order has banned “unsolicited undervalued offers” to buy properties in 15 fire-damaged ZIP codes25.

The Smart City Takeover Begins

The evidence suggests a calculated strategy. Flannery Associates has bought 55,000 acres since 2018 and focused on family-owned farmland26. Government officials worry about these purchases, especially when Travis Air Force Base is nearby.

These land grabs perfectly fit the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Smart Cities. This agenda envisions cities of all sizes challenging national sovereignty and metropolitan regions competing with nation-states for political and economic power. For example, New York’s yearly budget exceeds that of 160 countries. The connection here is that the acquired land will likely be used to develop these ‘smart cities, ‘which could alter our traditional American way of life.

The Globalist Blueprint Shown

American cities are changing according to a well-arranged plan. Over the last several years, cities have become vital to what they call ‘neoliberal economic governance.’ This plan, which advocates for minimal government intervention in economic matters, is being implemented in cities across the country, altering the financial landscape and potentially threatening property rights.

Cities now act as independent power centers. Some have police forces bigger than national law enforcement in 115 countries27
Metropolitan regions build cross-border strategic collaborations and integrate transportation and energy infrastructure27
Large and medium-sized cities have grown tenfold since the 1950s

Newsom’s executive order reveals his actual plans. He prevents property owners from getting legitimate offers while claiming to protect fire victims29. This matches the UN’s vision of “people-centered smart cities”30 – their way of hiding their control agenda.

The numbers are enormous. Silicon Valley billionaires backing Flannery Associates have invested USD 800 million in their land buying plan26. They want to build a new mega-city east of Fairfield and override local zoning protections26.

Property rights face threats beyond California’s borders. These “global cities” represent a radical alteration in political power28. Urban centers make their own rules now. They shape international relations and challenge traditional national sovereignty27.

The Truth Behind the Fire

Federal investigators have found troubling patterns in the Los Angeles fire investigations. The U.S. Supreme Court’s guidelines for fire investigations need specific warrants and protocols31. Questions about how teams followed these procedures during the recent catastrophic events still linger.

Evidence and predictions – connecting the dots between the fires and the land grab

Los Angeles fire investigators face challenges never seen before. Fire crews went into buildings first under ‘exigent circumstances.’ Later investigations just need strict compliance with search warrant requirements31. Teams must get additional criminal search warrants when they find arson as the cause31. This process raises serious questions about how these investigations were handled.

The official story says extreme weather conditions caused these fires32. A look at the water infrastructure shows troubling inconsistencies. The Palisades reservoir sat empty during critical firefighting operations33, which undoubtedly hurt emergency response efforts. Water systems faced four times the expected demand for 15 straight hours33. The infrastructure could not handle this pressure.

The role of federal aid in this scheme – a double betrayal

The federal government poured massive resources into recovery:

USD 750 million in federal funds, including USD 33 million paid directly to residents34
USD 2.5 billion from state funds for recovery efforts34
USD 550 million to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers34

These vast numbers need a closer look. History shows that disaster relief attracts fraud. The Government Accountability Office reports USD 2.4 trillion in wrong payments from emergency assistance programs since 200334. During Hurricane Katrina, about 20% of individual assistance requests turned out fraudulent, leading to USD 2 billion lost to fraud34.

The post-wildfire recovery program has four phases: Fire Suppression Repair, Emergency Stabilization, Burned Area Rehabilitation, and Restoration35. These programs need careful monitoring. The Bureau of Indian Affairs warns that some wildfire incidents damaged areas so severely that they required special intervention35, which could lead to fund misuse.

The risk of fraud looks worse than USD 250 billion in total damages34. Teams must act quick with emergency stabilization, often before the first major post-fire storm hits. This rush creates perfect conditions for exploitation. Pressure to give out funds quickly builds while many victims can’t show proper papers34.

The federal response to other disasters is similar. The Federal Emergency Management Agency raised cost-sharing to 100% for both California wildfire victims and Hurricane Helene victims2. This created an illusion of fair treatment while helping larger-scale property acquisitions through disaster relief programs.

These events match earlier predictions about systematic attacks on private property rights. The post-wildfire recovery process now works like a trojan horse. It lets the government control vast pieces of land while claiming to help with emergencies and rehabilitation.

The DOGE Investigation – CIA’s Betrayal of Trump

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) investigation has revealed an unprecedented betrayal within America’s intelligence community. Elon Musk, appointed by President Trump to lead DOGE, quickly discovered disturbing evidence about mishandled classified information36.

Breaking News on CIA’s Coup Attempts – The USAID Connection

Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats needed answers after Trump let DOGE access sensitive data. This data contained Americans’ personal information, classified documents, and intelligence partner information36. The investigation then uncovered USAID’s true nature. This humanitarian aid organization has been working as a front for CIA operations37.

This deception runs deep. Here’s what USAID has done over the decades:

Trained thousands of military personnel in Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand1
Spent USD 1 million on French-speaking LGBTQ groups in Africa
Allocated USD 47,020 for a transgender opera in Colombia3
Invested USD 425,622 in Indonesian coffee companies

President Trump praised Musk for exposing USAID’s activities. He called the agency “a disaster” run by “radical left lunatics”3. The investigation showed USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives now rivals the CIA in hi-tech propaganda programs37.

Implications for national security and American democracy

The CIA’s pushback against Trump’s leadership raises red flags. Senior officials during Bolton’s White House tenure asked the CIA to help stage a coup in Venezuela. The agency refused, citing insufficient assets4. CIA Director Gina Haspel specifically stayed away from Latin American operations.

The DOGE investigation exposed a severe weakness. The agency gave an unclassified list of its employees to another Trump administration department5. This move could have exposed agents hired in the past two years.

This poses serious risks to national security. Such details usually stay secret to protect CIA employees’ safety and mission success. Their exposure could put lives at risk5. This discovery questions the agency’s dedication to protecting its operatives.

USAID faces accusations of meddling in the domestic politics of nations worldwide. Bolivia kicked out USAID officials in 2013 for alleged government conspiracy1. Russia did the same in 2012, blaming USAID’s grants for influencing political processes1.

The potential damage is massive. Senators warned that spy agencies in Russia, China, Iran, and other nations would find this information extremely valuable36. This breach could hurt efforts to stop terrorism and other U.S. threats36.

These findings support concerns about deep-state operations in our intelligence community. The CIA’s history with regime change runs deep. The Washington Post reported 72 attempted government changes during the Cold War alone6.

Call to Arms

The disturbing revelations about the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s failures need action now. Mayor Bass confirmed that 20% of city hydrants were dehydrated. Firefighters had no choice but to stop using hydrants during critical emergency response7.

The Urgent Need for a Federal Criminal Investigation – Direct Appeal to President Trump

Governor Newsom’s request to investigate reveals how deep this crisis goes. Firefighting efforts took a serious hit when water pressure was lost, and water supplies from the Santa Ynez Reservoir became unavailable7. Newsom’s executive order stops property owners from receiving legitimate offers on their land.

The executive order shows its true colors through its selective application to specific ZIP codes in Los Angeles County8. This targeted approach points to a coordinated effort to control property deals in areas that raise serious constitutional concerns about property rights.

How You Can Help – Sharing information, contacting representatives, and joining the fight

Taking action right now is vital. Here’s how patriots can join the fight:

Contact Your Representatives:

- Find your congressional district representative through the House website
- Call the U.S. House switchboard at (202) 224-31219
- Ask state and territorial legislators10
- Connect with local elected officials through city and county channels10

The grassroots movement against innovative city initiatives has already shown accurate results. Urban communities create their versions of smart cities through grassroots efforts and alliances with radical social movements11. This resistance faces significant challenges as Information and Communication Technology benefits remain uneven, especially when you have working-class communities11.

Power dynamics within traditional innovative city frameworks deserve our attention. These frameworks often exclude communities from broader brilliant city benefits, especially those offered by the public and private sectors. This isolation shows we need a more inclusive approach that protects property rights while ensuring environmentally responsible community development.

The Department of Real Estate and other state agencies must notify the public about their rights under the law8. California law makes it a misdemeanor to violate a Governor’s order during a state of emergency8. This legal framework creates both challenges and opportunities in our fight.

Property rights battles go beyond individual communities. Reports of lost water pressure to local fire hydrants during the fires show just one part of a more significant attack on our freedoms7. The reported lack of water supplies from the Santa Ynez Reservoir needs a full investigation7.

We must stand against this direct attack on property rights and community sovereignty. The evidence paints a clear picture of infrastructure failures and suspicious executive orders that threaten the foundation of private property ownership in America.

Protecting Our Land and Freedom

American property rights’ constitutional foundations protect us against government overreach. Our Founding Fathers knew that private property was the foundation of prosperity and freedom12.

Legal and Constitutional Arguments Against the Land Grab

The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause protects Americans from government property seizures without fair compensation12. The Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause extends these protections against state intrusions13.

Property rights include three essential elements:

The right to acquire property
The right of exclusive use
The right to dispose of property as one sees fit13

California’s asset forfeiture laws just need strict probable cause requirements14. The government can’t seize assets without linking them to criminal activity15. California passed Senate Bill 443 to protect citizens better against unjust forfeitures14.

The Supreme Court has expanded its interpretation of “public use” beyond its original meaning12. This broader interpretation allows government entities to seize private property for alleged “public benefits” – a dangerous precedent that allows private-public collusion against individual rights12.

Rallying the American Spirit – We won’t be controlled by globalists.

American politics has fundamentally changed in the last decade, with the rejection of globalization16. While economists claim globalization helps the United States, Americans strongly disagree16.

Americans believe we need a stronger manufacturing sector. People had to choose between higher prices to strengthen American manufacturing or curb climate change, and 62% chose manufacturing16.

The anti-globalist movement understands a vital truth: global marketplace expansion creates more poverty while benefiting an ever-richer minority17. Governments lose credibility when they give in to violent demonstrators because this weakens democracy17.

California’s self-defense laws protect property rights. Property owners can use reasonable force to protect their property from immediate harm18. The Castle Doctrine lets people use lethal force against home intruders who pose a real threat19.

We must act now to fight against globalist land grabs. The evidence shows that political decisions, not economic factors, cause poverty17. Developing nations saw their life expectancy double during the free-market-dominated latter half of the twentieth century17. Statism and socialism, not capitalism, have ruined economies worldwide17.

Americans need to stand together against this unprecedented attack on property rights. The anti-globalist movement lacks solid ideas or facts to support its claims17. This fight is about preserving individual liberty, protecting private property, and protecting American sovereignty from international control.

Conclusion:

Patriots, we face a critical moment in history. Our investigation has revealed a disturbing network of lies connecting Governor Newsom’s land grab scheme, mysterious fires, and deep state operations. These events tell a straightforward story—globalist forces want to take away our constitutional rights through UN-backed smart cities.

The evidence speaks volumes. Flannery Associates pours billions into land grabs, LA fires coincide with suspicious infrastructure failures, and USAID operates as a CIA front. This is no coincidence. These coordinated attacks threaten American sovereignty.

These globalist operatives show no respect for constitutional protections. Our founding fathers made property rights sacred, yet Newsom and his allies plot to bypass these protections with emergency powers and executive orders.

We can’t stay silent, fellow Americans! President Trump and Elon Musk raised red flags through the DOGE investigation. Our battle goes on. You must contact your representatives, spread this information, and support local property rights groups. Staying quiet means giving up.

Our nation hasn’t faced such danger since 1776. Notwithstanding that, we have truth and justice on our side. We will work together to expose this UN smart city scheme, defend our property rights, and save the American dream for future generations. Let’s take action now – our land, freedom, and fight!

Legal Disclaimers and Warnings:

This investigative report contains materials that require careful consideration of legal implications and responsibilities. You must understand your rights and obligations when you participate with this information.

Disclaimer:

“This article represents the personal opinions and interpretations of the author. All information presented should be independently verified. References to investigations, predictions, and plans are based on the information available at the time of writing.”

Our research and analysis rely on available data20. You should note that market conditions and property values have risks, variables, and uncertainties that can affect predictive statements. Information changes regularly, and we can make improvements or modifications anytime21.

This investigation covers topics of vital public interest. You should not treat any information as legal, financial, or investment advice without independent verification20. The choice of legal services and representation remains an important decision that shouldn’t rely only on advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise20.

You can spot forward-looking statements through words like “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or similar terms21. New risks and uncertainties might surface, making it hard to predict all possible outcomes21.

Warning:

“Some might consider the views expressed here controversial or alarmist. They are intended to stimulate dialog and action regarding significant issues of national importance. Readers are encouraged to engage in responsible discourse, respect legal processes, and refrain from illegal activities.”

This investigation presents matters of profound national importance. The content wants to spark thoughtful discussion about property rights and governmental actions22. Traditional assumptions about property rights and government authority need fresh examination.

Disclaimers become legally binding only when they are fair, reasonable, and available to affected parties22. State laws take precedence, and disclaimers that violate them won’t stand in court22. Citizens must stay within legal boundaries during public discourse or action.

Critical considerations for readers:

All illustrations and examples serve solely illustrative purposes21
Past performance does not guarantee future outcomes21
Market rates depend on various factors with risks and uncertainties21
Independent analysis and consultation with legal advisors remain essential21

Public discourse often contains deep-rooted ideas about national security23. We reject narratives that suggest peace for some must come at the cost of justice for others23. Our focus remains on collective well-being, where communities can control resource decisions23.

These materials give narrators the principles to reframe discourse around national security23. Security-based measures often delay rather than solve fundamental conflicts over power and resources23. Your actions should focus on long-term solutions instead of quick fixes.

History shows that security-based solutions rarely solve political problems23. These approaches waste public resources and typically delay crises rather than resolve them23. You must learn from these patterns when you evaluate current situations and proposed solutions.