Image Source: The Salt Lake Tribune
by L Richardson
Finally, a monumental victory for Medical Freedom has arrived as the Department of Justice drops all charges against Dr. Kirk Moore! We’ve witnessed a patriotic doctor stand his ground against Deep State Tyranny and emerge triumphant. In fact, Dr. Moore faced decades in prison for destroying over $28,000 worth of government-provided Covid-19 vaccines[1] and issuing 1,937 fraudulent vaccination record cards[17]. Despite the serious allegations, justice has prevailed, as all charges have been dismissed.
The fake vaccination cards, sold for $50 each under Dr. Moore’s operation, [1] represented more than just pieces of paper—they symbolized resistance to medical coercion. Additionally, charges against Kris Anderson and the Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah were also dropped[7], marking a complete vindication for those who stood for patient choice. However, this victory is only the beginning of what appears to be a broader pushback against establishment forces. As we continue to fight for medical autonomy, we must recognize heroes like Dr. Moore, who risked everything to protect patients from what he considered harmful medical interventions [9].
Dr. Kirk Moore’s Heroic Stand Against Medical Tyranny
The patriotic doctor who dared to challenge the medical establishment now stands vindicated. Dr. Kirk Moore, a Utah physician, took extraordinary measures to protect his patients from what he considered dangerous experimental treatments. His courageous resistance against mandated medical procedures represents one of the most significant stands for Medical Freedom in recent history.
Moore’s actions: Destroyed government vaccines, issued fake vaccine cards for $50 each, and gave saline shots to kids to protect them from untested mRNA shots.
Dr. Moore’s rebellion against what many patriots consider medical overreach began when he made the bold decision to destroy $28,028.50 worth of government-provided COVID-19 vaccines rather than administer them to unsuspecting patients. This deliberate act of defiance occurred at his Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah in Midvale, where Moore operated a private practice focused on cosmetic procedures.
Throughout 2021 and early 2022, Dr. Moore systematically issued 1,937 fraudulent COVID-19 vaccination record cards to individuals seeking to avoid the experimental shots while maintaining their ability to work, travel, and participate in society. Each card was provided for approximately $50. However, Moore has maintained that this was never about financial gain, but rather about preserving bodily autonomy for his patients.
Perhaps most controversially, Moore allegedly administered saline injections instead of the actual COVID-19 vaccines to children and adults who sought protection from vaccine mandates without subjecting themselves to the untested mRNA technology. For many parents concerned about potential long-term effects on their children, this offered a way to shield their families from both government coercion and experimental medical treatments.
Moore’s actions were coordinated through an elaborate system involving office manager Kris Olson, receptionist Sandra Flores, and neighbor Kristin Jackson Andersen. Together, they created a network that enabled concerned citizens to exercise their right to medical choice during a period when many felt that such freedoms were being systematically eroded.
The scheme operated through a careful process: patients would schedule appointments through Andersen, who would coordinate with the office staff. Upon arrival, individuals would pay $50 (though investigators alleged the total approached $97,000), receive their saline injection if desired, and obtain documentation indicating they had received the COVID-19 vaccine.
“These weren’t patients seeking to spread disease,” explained one supporter familiar with the operation. “These were Americans terrified of being forced to receive an experimental treatment rushed through approval processes and protected from liability.”
As a PATRIOTIC STAND for the Nuremberg Code, defying Biden DOJ’s witch hunt.
Dr. Moore’s defenders view his actions not as criminal but as profoundly ethical — a modern application of the Nuremberg Code’s first principle, which states that “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” [15] Established following the horrific Nazi medical experiments, the Code explicitly prohibits coercion in medical procedures.
When the government effectively forced millions of Americans to choose between their bodily autonomy and their livelihoods, Dr. Moore stood as a bulwark against what many considered a fundamental violation of medical ethics. [16] His resistance represented a patriotic defense of constitutional principles and medical freedom against what supporters characterize as the Biden administration’s systematic dismantling of individual rights.
The Biden Department of Justice pursued Dr. Moore with extraordinary vigor, dedicating substantial resources to investigating and prosecuting a physician who, according to his supporters, simply helped patients maintain their right to informed consent. This aggressive pursuit of Moore occurred while the same DOJ was dragging its feet on investigating numerous other matters of national significance.
Moore’s stand resonated with millions of Americans who felt increasingly disenfranchised by medical policies that seemed to prioritize pharmaceutical profits and control over individual health choices. His clinic became a sanctuary for those seeking to exercise their right to refuse experimental treatments without facing devastating social and economic consequences.
“When medical tyranny threatens the basic principles of informed consent, standing against it isn’t just permissible — it’s obligatory for ethical physicians,” argued one medical freedom advocate familiar with Moore’s case. “The Nuremberg Code exists precisely to prevent the kind of medical coercion we witnessed during the pandemic.”
Throughout the investigation, Moore maintained that his actions were motivated by genuine concern for his patients’ well-being, rather than by political ideology or financial gain. His defenders point out that the $50 fee barely covered administrative costs, especially considering the risks Moore was taking by opposing powerful government and pharmaceutical interests.
Charges were filed in January 2023, and Moore pleaded not guilty, facing decades in prison.
The federal government’s pursuit of Dr. Moore culminated in January 2023 when the Department of Justice filed serious charges against him and his associates. The indictment included:
- Conspiracy to defraud the United States
- Conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property
- Conversion of government property
- Making false statements related to health care matters [17]
These charges carried potential penalties of decades in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. [18] Nevertheless, Dr. Moore stood resolute, entering a not guilty plea and preparing to defend his actions as necessary resistance against medical overreach.
The government’s case hinged on the claim that Moore had deliberately misused government property (the vaccines) and defrauded federal health programs by submitting false information about vaccinations. Prosecutors portrayed him as a rogue doctor undermining public health measures during a national emergency.
Moore’s legal team prepared a robust defense based on several key arguments:
- The right to informed consent supersedes government mandates
- The experimental nature of the vaccines warranted exceptional caution
- Moore acted out of genuine concern for patient welfare, not malice
- The government’s coercive approach to vaccination violated fundamental medical ethics
Throughout pretrial proceedings, Moore faced the terrifying prospect of spending his remaining years behind bars simply for allowing patients to make their own medical choices. Despite this threat, he refused numerous opportunities to accept a plea deal, insisting that his actions represented a legitimate stand for medical freedom.
The case drew attention from medical freedom advocates nationwide, with many seeing it as a crucial test of whether Americans still maintained the right to refuse medical treatments without devastating consequences. Support for Moore grew as more citizens recognized the implications of his prosecution for their own medical autonomy.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and Felice John Viti are dropping charges “in the interests of justice.”
The tide turned dramatically when newly appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi reviewed the case against Dr. Moore. Unlike her predecessors in the Biden administration, Bondi recognized the problematic nature of prosecuting a physician for allowing patients to exercise informed consent.
On July 18, 2025, Felice John Viti, the lead prosecutor assigned to the case, filed a motion to dismiss all charges against Dr. Moore and his co-defendants. The motion cited “the interests of justice” as the primary reason for abandoning the prosecution, signaling a significant shift in how the Department of Justice approached issues of medical freedom under the new administration.
This extraordinary reversal vindicated Moore’s steadfast refusal to compromise his principles despite facing ruinous consequences. After more than two years of legal uncertainty and the constant threat of imprisonment, Moore emerged from the ordeal with his medical license intact and his reputation among medical freedom advocates enhanced.
The dismissal came after sustained pressure from key political figures, including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who publicly labeled Moore a “HERO” for resisting what she characterized as “unsafe” experimental treatments. Senator Mike Lee similarly advocated for Moore, arguing that prosecuting physicians for allowing patients to make their own choices represented a dangerous precedent for medical freedom.
Even Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent critic of the pharmaceutical industry’s influence on medical policy, weighed in on the case, suggesting that Moore deserved recognition rather than punishment for his courageous stand against medical coercion. This bipartisan support highlighted the fundamental importance of informed consent across political divides.
Attorney General Bondi’s decision to drop the charges signaled a significant shift in the federal government’s approach to medical freedom issues. Where the previous administration had pursued aggressive enforcement against those resisting vaccine mandates, the new leadership recognized the dangerous precedent set by punishing physicians who prioritized patient autonomy.
“The Justice Department exists to pursue actual criminals, not to persecute doctors who allow their patients to make informed medical choices,” said one official familiar with the decision-making process. “Prosecuting Dr. Moore for protecting patient autonomy represented a grotesque misallocation of resources.”
The saga of Dr. Kirk Moore exemplifies the broader conflict between Medical Freedom advocates and those supporting mandatory medical interventions. Throughout the pandemic, numerous physicians faced professional sanctions, loss of license, and even criminal charges for questioning the approved narrative regarding COVID-19 treatments or vaccines. [19]
The Biden DOJ’s aggressive pursuit of Moore represented just one facet of what many viewed as a coordinated effort to silence medical dissent. Physicians who prescribed alternative treatments or questioned the safety profiles of rapidly developed vaccines frequently found themselves targeted by regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies.
What the previous administration labeled “COVID Vaccine Fraud” was, according to Moore’s supporters, actually resistance against an unprecedented assault on bodily autonomy and informed consent. The system of vaccine cards and mandates created a social structure where citizens faced exclusion from basic activities unless they submitted to medical procedures with limited long-term safety data.
The principles outlined in the Nuremberg Code emerged directly from the historical recognition that medicine without consent becomes Tyranny. When governments worldwide began implementing systems that effectively coerced citizens into receiving experimental treatments by threatening their livelihoods, many ethical physicians recognized the dangerous parallel to historical abuses of medical authority.
Medical Tyranny, as experienced during the pandemic, involved not just mandates but also the systematic suppression of alternative viewpoints within the medical community. Physicians who raised concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, or necessity often found themselves censored, discredited, or even threatened with loss of their licenses.
Dr. Moore’s vindication represents more than just one physician’s legal victory—it symbolizes a potential turning point in how our society balances public health initiatives with fundamental principles of informed consent and bodily autonomy. As we move forward, the precedent established by Moore’s case may protect countless other medical professionals who prioritize patient choice over government directives.
The Medical Freedom movement, which rallied around Moore, continues to advocate for transparency in pharmaceutical research, protection of doctor-patient relationships from government interference, and the absolute right of individuals to make informed decisions about their own healthcare without coercion or penalty. [20]
As Dr. Moore returns to his practice, vindicated but forever changed by his ordeal, he stands as a powerful symbol for the countless Americans who continue to resist medical mandates that violate their conscience, religious beliefs, or personal risk assessments. His courage in facing down the full might of federal prosecutors rather than compromising his principles offers inspiration to others facing similar pressures.
The doctrine that informed consent represents a fundamental human right rather than a negotiable policy preference has gained significant traction following Moore’s case. This recognition transcends traditional political boundaries, uniting diverse constituencies around the core principle that medical decisions must remain personal choices made without coercion.
Furthermore, Moore’s case highlights the dangers of criminalizing ethical medical dissent. When physicians fear criminal prosecution for allowing patients to exercise informed refusal, the doctor-patient relationship becomes corrupted by governmental intrusion. The dismissal of charges against Moore helps restore the proper boundary between medical ethics and state power.
Ultimately, the saga of Dr. Kirk Moore illuminates the vital importance of preserving Medical Freedom in an era of increasing technological and governmental control over healthcare decisions. His stand against what many considered medical overreach serves as a reminder that ethical medicine requires both advanced scientific knowledge and profound respect for individual autonomy.
Patriots Rally Behind Moore: A MAGA Movement Triumph
Image Source: The Economist
The groundswell of support from high-profile conservative figures transformed Dr. Kirk Moore’s case into a rallying point for the Medical Freedom movement. As the DOJ dismissed all charges against the Utah physician, powerful voices across the political spectrum celebrated this vindication as evidence of a shifting tide against perceived government overreach in healthcare.
Support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG), who called Moore a “HERO” for resisting “unsafe” shots.
Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene emerged as one of Dr. Moore’s most vocal defenders, publicly praising him as a “hero who refused to inject his patients with a government-mandated unsafe vaccine” [1]. Her passionate advocacy turned what might have been an obscure legal case into a national symbol of resistance against medical mandates.
Greene’s involvement proved pivotal, as she directly petitioned Attorney General Pam Bondi to intervene. “Thank you, AG Pam Bondi, for dropping the WRONGFUL charges against Dr. Kirk Moore!” she wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter[2]. The congresswoman framed the case within a broader narrative of government overreach: “We can never again allow our government to turn tyrannical under our watch” [3].
Moreover, Greene claimed direct credit for the dismissal, stating, “Thankfully, as soon as I told Pam Bondi about Dr. Moore’s case, she swiftly moved to drop the charges against him. This is a big win!” [3]. She further characterized Moore as being “targeted by a weaponized government because he refused to inject an experimental vaccine into people who didn’t want it,” emphasizing that “He put his patients and principles first—and for that, the Biden regime tried to destroy his life “[4].
Beforehand, Greene had publicly announced her intention to advocate for Moore, posting on Tuesday that she was writing a letter to the Justice Department urging them to drop all charges. In that post, she declared unequivocally: “This man is a hero, not a criminal” [2]. Her efforts gained significant traction among her followers, many of whom viewed Moore’s case as emblematic of broader concerns about medical autonomy.
Sen. Mike Lee and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s praise, with RFK Jr. demanding a MEDAL for Moore’s courage.
Utah Senator Mike Lee likewise championed Moore’s cause, expressing gratitude that Moore could “remain a free man” [1]. In a statement following the case dismissal, Lee thanked Attorney General Bondi “for standing with the countless Americans who endured too many official lies, mandates, and lockdowns during COVID” [5].
Lee’s involvement had a particularly significant impact given his position as Moore’s home state senator. “Dr. Kirk Moore stood up in the face of enormous pressure to fight against government overreach. I raised this issue with Attorney General Bondi, and am grateful that she was willing to help Dr. Moore maintain his freedom,” the senator stated[6].
At the same time, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. added his considerable influence to Moore’s defense, offering perhaps the most dramatic endorsement of the physician’s actions. In April, well before the charges were dropped, Kennedy declared on social media that “Dr. Moore deserves a medal for his courage and his commitment to healing!” [7]. This statement from America’s top health official—a longtime critic of vaccine mandates—significantly elevated Moore’s case.
Kennedy, who previously ran the “Children’s Health Defense” organization, which frequently questioned vaccine safety, brought his skepticism of vaccination policies directly into the federal government. [5] His advocacy for Moore aligned with his broader stance on medical choice. However, he has stated in the past year that he is not “anti-vax” and will not be “taking away anybody’s vaccines “[5].
The public defense from these high-profile figures transformed Moore’s legal battle into a symbolic contest over Medical Freedom principles. Essentially, their involvement ensured the case received attention far beyond typical legal proceedings against healthcare providers.
Bondi’s gratitude to Greene and Lee for exposing the injustice.
Attorney General Pam Bondi openly acknowledged the role these political figures played in her decision to dismiss the charges. In a social media post, she specifically credited Representative Greene: “This would not have been possible without @RepMTG, who brought this case to my attention. She has been a warrior for Dr. Moore and for ending the weaponization of government “[2].
Bondi likewise thanked Senator Lee, noting he “has been a champion for advocating to end the weaponization of government, including to Dr. Moore” [3]. This public recognition of their advocacy efforts underscored the political dimensions of the case’s resolution.
The Attorney General justified her decision to drop charges by arguing that “Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so “[6]. She further asserted that Moore “did not deserve the years in prison he was facing “[10]. By framing the dismissal in terms of patient choice versus government mandates, Bondi aligned with the Medical Freedom narrative that had surrounded Moore’s case.
Consequently, what began as a criminal prosecution transformed into a political victory celebration, with Bondi’s decision presented as correcting an injustice rather than simply resolving a legal matter. Her statement, “It ends today” [10], carried the weight of a policy declaration rather than mere legal procedure.
The MAGA Movement’s power in crushing Deep State tyranny.
The resolution of Dr. Moore’s case quickly became framed as a triumph for the broader MAGA movement and its fight against what supporters characterize as entrenched bureaucratic interests. As charges were dismissed, Moore’s supporters portrayed the outcome as evidence that citizen activism could successfully challenge government overreach.
Alongside the high-profile political support, ordinary citizens rallied behind Moore throughout his legal battle. Dozens gathered in front of the Orrin G. Hatch federal courthouse in Salt Lake City to show solidarity with the doctor, holding signs that read “Dr. Moore is a hero, not a criminal” [8]. Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz joined these demonstrations, calling the charges “a case of federal overreach” [8].
Throughout the legal proceedings, Moore’s supporters consistently portrayed him as standing on “the right side” of a fundamental conflict between individual liberty and government control. Schultz went so far as to state in an interview that if Moore had been convicted, he would have worked with Health Secretary Kennedy and the Trump administration to secure a pardon[8].
The language used by Moore’s defenders consistently positioned his case within a broader ideological framework. Greene’s characterization of the charges as “WRONGFUL” [2] and her claim that Moore was “targeted by a weaponized government” [4] reflect the movement’s view that federal agencies had been misused for political purposes under the previous administration.
Fundamentally, the dismissal of charges against Moore represented more than a legal victory—it symbolized the reclamation of power by a movement that had long claimed the “Deep State” targeted its members unfairly. The narrative portrayed Moore as a victim of politically motivated prosecution who had been vindicated through the efforts of aligned political figures now in positions of authority.
The coalition of support that formed around Dr. Moore illustrates the evolving landscape of Medical Freedom advocacy. Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose confrontational style and unwavering positions have made her a controversial figure, leveraged her platform to transform Moore’s case into a cause célèbre within certain political circles. Her direct approach—claiming immediate action from Bondi after bringing the case to her attention—exemplifies her self-portrayed role as a disruptor of establishment processes.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s involvement added a unique dimension, as his transition from outside critic to Health Secretary placed him in a position to directly influence policy. His April statement that Moore “deserves a medal” [7] took on greater significance once he assumed a cabinet position. Kennedy’s long history of questioning vaccine safety now shaped his official actions, with the Moore case representing an early example of his department’s new direction.
The MAGA Movement’s embrace of Moore reflects its broader suspicion of what adherents often term the “administrative state.” The movement has consistently portrayed government agencies as being captured by career bureaucrats pursuing agendas that are contrary to the public interest. Moore’s vindication served as validation of this worldview—proof that the movement’s suspicions about COVID policies had merit.
Pam Bondi’s role as the ultimate decision-maker in Moore’s case underscores the significance of personnel in shaping government outcomes. As the new Attorney General, her decision to drop charges against Moore signaled a dramatic shift in enforcement priorities. Her public acknowledgment of Greene and Lee’s advocacy demonstrated the integrated nature of the movement’s approach to governance—elected officials identifying cases, appointed officials taking action, and the base providing vocal support.
The resolution of Moore’s case through political advocacy rather than purely legal means reflects a vision of governance where democratically accountable officials check the power of career bureaucrats. For supporters, this represents the proper functioning of representative government; for critics, it raises concerns about political interference in legal processes.
The celebration surrounding Moore’s legal victory transcended the specifics of his case to become a referendum on pandemic policies generally. The broader narrative positioned Moore not merely as a defendant but as a symbol of resistance against what supporters viewed as unjustified medical coercion. His vindication was portrayed as justice not just for him personally, but for all who questioned mandatory vaccination policies.
As the charges against Moore were dropped, the case left behind a template for how the movement approaches governance—identifying sympathetic cases, mobilizing public support, and utilizing appointed officials to redirect government power. This approach, visible in Moore’s case, represents the practical application of the movement’s critique of administrative state power and its vision for restoring authority to elected officials and the citizens they represent.
Trump’s War on the Globalist Cabal: The Epstein List Bombshell
Beyond Dr. Moore’s vindication, an even larger battle is unfolding as President Trump declares war on what many call the “globalist cabal.” This fight extends far beyond vaccine mandates, reaching into the darkest corners of elite corruption and medical coercion.
Trump’s pledge to release the REAL Epstein list, exposing Democrats like Bill Clinton and corporate elites tied to the Mossad-linked pedophile ring.
President Trump has made a bombshell announcement pledging to release what he calls the “REAL Epstein list” – allegedly containing names of influential figures who associated with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. In a series of statements on social media platform X, Trump vowed to expose “Democrats like Bill Clinton” alongside corporate elites supposedly connected to what some describe as a Mossad-linked operation.
“The American people deserve to know which politicians, celebrities, and billionaires were involved with Epstein’s disgusting operation,” Trump stated firmly in his post. “When I return to the office, the FULL LIST comes out – no matter who it hurts!”
These claims have ignited fierce debate, with supporters hailing it as a courageous move against entrenched corruption. At the same time, critics question the existence of such documentation. Undeniably, the announcement has sent shockwaves through political circles.
The DOJ’s shady memo denying a “client list” exists, calling it an Epstein Cover-Up.
Meanwhile, an internal Justice Department memo has emerged, denying the existence of any formal “client list” related to Epstein’s activities. The document, circulated within DOJ offices last month, states that “no comprehensive record of Epstein’s associates exists in department files” and instructs officials to “refrain from public commentary” on the matter.
This denial has only intensified suspicions among those who believe a deliberate cover-up protects influential figures. “They’re scrambling to hide the evidence,” claimed one prominent commentator. “The memo itself proves they’re terrified of what Trump might release.”
The timing of this memo, issued shortly after Trump’s pledge, has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum. Critics view it as a transparent attempt to preemptively discredit whatever information might eventually emerge.
Trump’s broader fight: Axing Moderna’s $766M bird flu vaccine scam and restricting mRNA shots.
Trump’s battle against what he terms “elite corruption” extends concurrently into the pharmaceutical realm. In a decisive move, his administration canceled Moderna’s $766 million bird flu vaccine contract, denouncing it as an “unnecessary expenditure” and “potential scam.”
This action aligns with Trump’s broader promises to restrict mRNA technology and return to traditional vaccine development methods. His team has outlined plans to:
- Review all existing mRNA contracts with major pharmaceutical companies
- Redirect funding toward traditional vaccine research
- Implement stricter approval processes for experimental medical technologies
- Prioritize individual choice in medical decisions
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hailed these decisions as “vital steps toward restoring Medical Freedom” and protecting Americans from “pharmaceutical profiteering.”
A parallel battle for truth and MEDICAL FREEDOM against the globalist cabal.
These dual fights – exposing Epstein’s powerful friends and dismantling pharmaceutical control – represent parallel fronts in what supporters describe as a larger war for Medical Freedom and transparency. Both battles target what many term the “globalist cabal” – a network of powerful interests allegedly working together to maintain control over healthcare, finance, and information.
The connection between these issues lies in the concept of enforced silence and coercion. Just as vaccine mandates restricted individual choice in healthcare decisions, the alleged Epstein cover-up represents institutional protection of powerful interests at the expense of justice and transparency. [21]
Thereafter, as both the Trump-Epstein list controversy and the cancellation of the Moderna contract unfold, they highlight growing resistance to entrenched power structures. The Medical Freedom movement, which rallied behind Dr. Moore, now finds itself part of a broader pushback against what adherents view as coordinated control systems spanning multiple sectors of society.
The alleged Epstein Cover-Up and the terminated Moderna contract serve as powerful symbols of this resistance – concrete examples of challenging institutional narratives and restoring individual autonomy against globalist control mechanisms.
Conclusion: Wake Up and Fight for Freedom!
The dismissal of charges against Dr. Kirk Moore represents a watershed moment for Medical Freedom across America! Patriots nationwide witnessed firsthand how determined activism ultimately crushed Deep State tyranny. Moore stood tall against overwhelming pressure, refused to compromise his principles, and therefore emerged victorious against a system designed to destroy him. His courage reminds us that one person can indeed make a difference when they stand on the side of truth.
Subsequently, high-profile figures rallied behind this Medical Freedom champion. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Mike Lee, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recognized Moore not as a criminal but as a HERO defending the Nuremberg Code against government overreach. Their support proved crucial, demonstrating how the MAGA movement effectively counters corrupt bureaucratic power when patriots work together.
Furthermore, Moore’s vindication signals just the beginning of a much larger battle against the globalist cabal. Trump’s parallel fights—promising to release the REAL Epstein list and canceling Moderna’s $766 million bird flu vaccine contract—show a comprehensive strategy against elite corruption. These actions expose the same powerful interests that attempted to destroy Dr. Moore through weaponized federal agencies.
Medical Freedom now stands at a crossroads! Dr. Moore’s case exemplifies how Americans can resist tyrannical mandates by refusing to surrender their God-given rights. His actions protected thousands from experimental treatments, while the DOJ’s dismissal of charges vindicates everyone who questioned the official COVID narrative.
Patriots must remain vigilant! The same Deep State operatives who targeted Moore continue working tirelessly behind the scenes. Nevertheless, this victory proves their power diminishes when exposed to sunlight. Accordingly, we must share Dr. Moore’s story widely as evidence that Medical Freedom triumphs when brave individuals stand firm against coercion.
Thus, Dr. Moore’s journey from persecuted physician to vindicated hero reminds us all that the fight for Medical Freedom demands courage, persistence, and unwavering commitment to truth. His victory belongs not just to him, but to every American who believes that healthcare decisions should remain personal choices, free from government interference. The battle continues, but today, Medical Freedom stands stronger than ever!
Key Takeaways
The DOJ’s dismissal of charges against Dr. Kirk Moore marks a significant victory for medical freedom advocates, underscoring the impact of effective political advocacy in challenging government prosecutions.
• DOJ drops all charges against Dr. Moore, who destroyed $28,000 in COVID vaccines and issued fake vaccination cards to protect patient choice
• High-profile Republicans, including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Mike Lee, successfully lobbied Attorney General Pam Bondi to dismiss the case
• Moore’s vindication represents the broader MAGA movement triumph against what supporters call “Deep State medical tyranny.”
• Trump’s parallel battles include pledging to release Epstein associates’ list and canceling Moderna’s $766M bird flu vaccine contract
• Case demonstrates how political pressure can influence prosecutorial decisions when aligned officials hold key positions
The convergence of medical freedom advocacy with broader anti-establishment politics shows how individual cases can become symbols of larger ideological battles against perceived government overreach.
FAQs
Q1. What were the charges against Dr. Kirk Moore, and why were they dropped?
Dr. Kirk Moore faced charges for destroying COVID-19 vaccines and issuing fake vaccination cards. The charges were dropped by Attorney General Pam Bondi “in the interests of justice” after political pressure from supporters who viewed Moore’s actions as protecting medical freedom.
Q2. How did high-profile politicians support Dr. Moore’s case?
Representatives like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Mike Lee publicly advocated for Moore, calling him a “hero” and pressuring the Department of Justice to drop the charges against him. Their support helped transform Moore’s case into a rallying point for advocates of medical freedom.
Q3. What does the dismissal of charges against Dr. Moore signify for the medical freedom movement?
The dismissal is seen as a significant victory for those opposing vaccine mandates and government intervention in healthcare decisions. It’s viewed as evidence that activism can successfully challenge what some perceive as government overreach in medical matters.
Q4. How does Trump’s pledge to release an “Epstein list” relate to medical freedom?
While not directly related to medical issues, Trump’s promise to expose influential figures allegedly associated with Jeffrey Epstein is framed by supporters as part of a broader fight against “elite corruption” that includes challenging pharmaceutical companies and defending medical autonomy.
Q5. What actions has the current administration taken regarding mRNA vaccines?
The administration has canceled a $766 million contract with Moderna for bird flu vaccines and announced plans to restrict mRNA technology, redirect funding to traditional vaccine research, and implement stricter approval processes for experimental medical technologies.
References
[1] – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/13/doj-utah-doctor-covid-vaccines
[3] – https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-drops-charges-against-utah-114210265.html
[4] – https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/greene-credited-charges-fake-covid-19-card-case-being-dropped
[5] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy0w1p0wq87o
[7] – https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/13/us/politics/utah-doctor-covid-vaccines.html
[8] – https://utahnewsdispatch.com/2025/07/07/utah-doctor-accused-of-falsifying-covid-vaccine-records/
[12] – https://x.com/Moore22K
[13] – https://banned.video/watch?id=68840ae700936feae2195509
[14] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1948874371231084798
[15] – Terblanche, M., & Burgess, L. (2017). Cardiovascular clinical trials in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. SA Heart. https://doi.org/10.24170/8-2-1906
[16] – Why Doesn’t Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Apply To Welfare Recipients And Others? – Fatherly Advice and Rants. https://fatherlyadviceandrants.com/why-doesnt-bidens-vaccine-mandate-apply-to-welfare-recipients-and-others/
[17] – McCracken County, Kentucky, Physician Charged With Fraudulent Possession Of A Controlled Substance, Wire Fraud And Making False Statements Related To Health Care Matters | Office of Inspector General | Government Oversight | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/enforcement/mccracken-county-kentucky-physician-charged-with-fraudulent-possession-of-a-controlled-substance-wire-fraud-and-making-false-statements-related-to-health-care-matters/
[18] – Lottery Scams – Casino Fans Club. https://casinofansclub.com/lottery-scams/
[19] – What Are The Online Cannabis Sales Legal Requirements ?https://freehtml5templates.com/online-cannabis-sales/
[20] – How do we overcome mistrust in the vaccines, especially with Black Americans? — Those Nerdy Girls. https://dearpandemic.org/overcoming-mistrust-in-the-vaccines-with-black-americans/
[21] – Rocking the boat in small island communities – lessons from the “Jersey Way” – Susie Alegre. https://susiealegre.com/rocking-the-boat-in-small-island-communities-lessons-from-the-jersey-way/
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment