Image Source: OPB
by L Richardson
The Russiagate Grand Jury Investigation has finally begun as the Justice Department opens a federal probe into former Obama administration officials who allegedly conspired to fabricate Trump-Russia ties during the 2016 election campaign[9]. After years of accusations and counter-accusations, we’re witnessing what could be a watershed moment in American political accountability. The Department of Justice is moving forward with this criminal investigation following a critical referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who recently declassified over 100 pages of documents that allegedly expose manipulation of intelligence regarding Russia’s actions during the 2016 presidential election[3].
In fact, these declassified materials suggest that Obama officials may have deliberately laid the groundwork for a false narrative claiming then-candidate Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia[10]. The criminal referral specifically included a memorandum titled “Intelligence Community suppression of intelligence showing ‘Russian and criminal actors did not impact’ the 2016 presidential election via cyber-attacks on infrastructure”[11]. Despite President Trump acknowledging that his predecessor likely has immunity from prosecution due to a 2024 Supreme Court ruling on presidential acts[9], this investigation represents our continuing pursuit of truth regarding what former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has described as “the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country.” As we examine the evidence, we must recognize that the venue of this grand jury will be crucial to ensuring justice prevails without the threat of jury nullification that could derail accountability.
Background: The Russiagate Hoax – A Fabricated Coup Against We the People
The Russiagate Hoax ultimately traces back to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, which deliberately manufactured Russian collusion claims to distract from her email scandal. According to Senator Schmitt, Clinton “signed off on this Russiagate hoax to, essentially, distract from the email problem she had”[12]. Furthermore, documents revealed that George Soros’ Open Society Foundation was involved through Executive Director Leonard Bernardo, creating a fabricated narrative about Russian interference affecting critical infrastructure[12].
The Obama-era origins: Lies of Russian collusion designed to undermine Trump’s election and erode electoral sovereignty.
This manufactured narrative became the foundation for what Stephen Miller called “the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country.” The Obama administration weaponized intelligence agencies against a presidential candidate, with the Steele dossier serving as the predicate for surveillance operations. After Trump’s election, even when briefings indicated there was no Russian interference and Trump wasn’t “a ploy by Putin,” officials altered intelligence. They continued using the fabricated narrative to undermine his presidency[12].
Violations of libertarian rights through weaponized surveillance and constitutional overreach via FISA abuses.
Constitutional rights were systematically violated through unprecedented surveillance operations. The Justice Department has since acknowledged it “lacked probable cause to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in at least two of four warrant applications”[13]. [32] The Senate Judiciary Committee discovered:
- The FBI included at least 17 misstatements or omissions in FISA applications
- The debunked anti-Trump dossier was “central and essential” to warrant applications
- The dossier was compiled by a former British spy and sub-sourced to Russian officials [33]
- Christopher Steele’s Primary Sub-source was likely a Russian agent previously investigated by the FBI[14]
Additionally, Chairman Graham secured declassified documents demonstrating the Bureau’s “double standard when it came to the Clinton and Trump campaigns”[14].
The nationalist threat: Globalist schemes to weaken America’s independence.
These actions reflect a broader conflict between nationalist values and globalist agendas. As noted by Heritage Foundation analysis, “from Washington and Wall Street to Beijing and Brussels, they are coming for our freedom, for our Constitution, for our faith… all in the name of global order”[15]. [34] The elites fear American independence because they “don’t want us to live in freedom”[15]. Consequently, this orchestrated attack represents what Senator Schmitt called “the biggest scandal – at least in modern political history”[12]. The fundamental struggle is between those who believe globalization strengthens America and those who recognize it threatens our sovereignty[16].
This coordinated assault on electoral integrity essentially constitutes what many describe as a coup attempt – one that continues to this day as part of an ongoing conspiracy against constitutional governance and America’s sovereign independence.
Key Developments: DOJ Impanels Grand Jury for Seditious Conspiracy Charges
Attorney General Pam Bondi has launched an unprecedented legal offensive, directing federal prosecutors to impanel a grand jury for the Russiagate investigation after receiving a critical criminal referral from DNI Tulsi Gabbard[11]. This bold move signals a pivotal shift in the long-running controversy over the alleged fabrication of Trump-Russia ties.
AG Pam Bondi’s directive: Probing indictments against Brennan, Clapper, and ilk under Trump’s whip-cracking leadership.
The Justice Department’s directive allows prosecutors to present evidence to a grand jury specifically to secure potential indictments against former Obama administration officials[11]. Bondi personally ordered an unnamed federal prosecutor to initiate these legal proceedings[11], targeting high-profile figures including ex-CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey[9]. Moreover, this investigation stems directly from DNI Gabbard’s bombshell memorandum titled “Intelligence Community suppression of intelligence showing ‘Russian and criminal actors did not impact’ the 2016 presidential election via cyber-attacks on infrastructure”[11].
The probe focuses on what Gabbard described as a “treasonous conspiracy” led by President Obama and his national security team[17]. Their alleged crime? Manipulating and manufacturing intelligence to promote a contrived false narrative claiming “Putin aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton”[17]. [35]
Potential charges: From seditious conspiracy to obstruction, perjury, and false statements—restoring law without tyrannical bias.
Although no charges have yet been brought[11], legal experts anticipate a broad spectrum of potential indictments. As retired FBI special agent Jody Weis noted, “We’ve heard terms of treason — I doubt that will happen. Seditious conspiracy — I’m sure that will be looked at. But it may come down to some of the simple charges… like obstruction of justice, false statements, even perjury”[18].
One complication involves the statute of limitations—particularly for lying to Congress, which carries a five-year prison term but also has a five-year limitation period[9]. Nevertheless, some speculations suggest prosecutors might develop novel legal theories to overcome these limitations[9].
Venue criticality: Patriot-friendly locales like Florida to avoid leftist nullification and ensure fair trials aligned with Republican values.
Weis emphasized that location will be absolutely vital to the case’s success: “If this federal grand jury is empaneled in D.C., I don’t think this is going to go anywhere because you’re going to get jury nullification”[18]. Instead, he advocates for Florida as “an entirely different environment” where justice might actually prevail[18].
The probe represents a direct response to the declassified HPSCI oversight report revealing how “unlike routine IC analysis, the ICA was a high-profile product ordered by the President, directed by senior IC agency heads, and created by just five analysts, using one principal drafter”[17]. This allegedly orchestrated intelligence failure ultimately “kicked off what would essentially be a years-long coup against President Trump”[17].
Criminal Referrals and Declassifications: Tulsi Gabbard’s Bombshell Against Obama-Era Traitors
Image Source: CNN
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unleashed a political firestorm upon declassifying a bombshell House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) oversight report from September 2020. The report directly accuses former President Obama and his national security team of orchestrating what Gabbard describes as a “treasonous conspiracy”[19].
DNI Gabbard’s referral: Declassified docs exposing contrived Russian interference narrative as pure coup plotting.
Gabbard’s declassified documents reveal how the Obama administration allegedly “manufactured an Intelligence Community Assessment they knew was false”[17]. The most explosive claim asserts that Obama officials directed the creation of a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that served as “the basis for what was essentially a years-long coup against the duly elected President”[17].
The declassified materials indicate the ICA was unusually created by “just five analysts, using one principal drafter”[20] rather than following standard intelligence community procedures. Furthermore, production was “subject to unusual directives from the President and senior political appointees”[17].
Gabbard subsequently announced she was “turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral”[21], explicitly targeting former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey[22].
Broader accountability: No immunity for elites who trampled individual liberties and subverted the Republic’s foundations.
The situation underscores what observers call “a culture of elite impunity, where business and political leaders face absolutely no accountability for misdeeds”[23]. [36] Nonetheless, former Obama officials vehemently deny these allegations, with an Obama spokesperson calling the claims “outrageous” and “a weak attempt at distraction”[2].
Earlier analyses tell a different story. The 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report supported the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election[21]. Meanwhile, former CIA Russia analyst Michael Van Landingham directly challenged Gabbard’s narrative, stating that analysts “never received any instruction from anyone above us about how to put that into a final report”[24].
The Justice Department, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has formed a “strike force” to evaluate Gabbard’s claims[25]. Yet legal experts note Obama likely enjoys immunity for official acts as President [25], echoing what Retired FBI Special Agent Jody Weis emphasized about evidence and venue being crucial for justice: “You have to look at the evidence” and “the venue of this grand jury is going to be key”.
Congressional Offensive: Subpoenas Unleashed on Clinton, Comey, Mueller, and Epstein Files
Image Source: The Guardian
In a decisive move to expose elite corruption, the House Oversight Committee has issued nearly a dozen subpoenas targeting high-profile figures, including Bill and Hillary Clinton, as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking case[26]. This bold offensive, led by Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), represents a parallel track to the DOJ’s Russiagate grand jury investigation.
Chairman James Comer’s actions: Demanding testimonies and complete Epstein disclosures to dismantle corruption webs.
Comer’s committee subpoenaed ten individuals for closed-door depositions scheduled between August and mid-October[27]. Alongside the Clintons, the subpoenas target an impressive array of former top law enforcement officials, including FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller, plus six former Attorneys General: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, and Alberto Gonzales[28].
Simultaneously, the committee subpoenaed the Department of Justice to surrender all Epstein-related files by August 19[29]. This demand includes explicitly “records related to the investigation into Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell”[29].
What makes this offensive especially noteworthy is its bipartisan genesis. The subpoenas follow recent action by an Oversight Subcommittee where both Republicans and Democrats approved motions to compel testimony and records[28]. Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) offered the motion to subpoena DOJ records, which passed by an 8-2 vote[28]. Furthermore, Rep. Andy Biggs’ (R-Ariz.) amendment to include “all communications between President Biden and/or Biden Administration officials and the Department of Justice related to Jeffrey Epstein” was adopted by voice vote[28].
Nationalist imperative: Exposing elite networks that weaponized government against true Americans.
This congressional offensive aligns perfectly with what Retired FBI Special Agent Jody Weis emphasized about evidence-based justice. The subpoenas seek to compile a comprehensive record that could reveal connections between Epstein’s network and the same corrupt officials who orchestrated the Russiagate conspiracy.
As Stephen Miller noted regarding the ongoing nature of the conspiracy: “Because it is a conspiracy… every single individual actor is now part of that conspiracy… The conspiracy hasn’t ended; it is ongoing.” These subpoenas aim to expose the full scope of elite networks that have weaponized government against patriotic Americans, furthering the nationalist imperative to restore constitutional order.
Expert Guidance: Insights from Guardians of Liberty on Path to Indictments
Image Source: Tech Policy Press
Expert analysis from veteran law enforcement officials offers crucial guidance on the path forward for the Russiagate grand jury investigation. Their insights illuminate the strategic and legal considerations that will determine whether justice prevails against those who allegedly orchestrated this plot.
From figures like Jody Weis and Stephen Miller: Evidence-driven pursuits, venue strategies, and ongoing conspiracies.
Retired FBI special agent Jody Weis emphasizes that successful prosecutions must be grounded in concrete evidence: “You have to look at the evidence,” he stated in a recent interview[30]. While acknowledging public discussion of treason charges, Weis believes prosecutors will likely focus on more straightforward violations: “Seditious conspiracy — I’m sure that will be looked at. But it may come down to some of the simple charges… like obstruction of justice, false statements, even perjury”[30].
Undoubtedly, the most critical insight Weis offers concerns venue selection. “If this federal grand jury is empaneled in D.C., I don’t think this is going to go anywhere because you’re going to get jury nullification,” he warned. “Now, perhaps, and what I’m hoping for is that the Mar-A-Lago raid could bring the venue to Miami. That’s an entirely different environment in Florida”[30].
Libertarian safeguards: Reject unchecked power; demand swift retribution to uphold constitutional order.
Libertarian principles provide the philosophical foundation for confronting this alleged abuse of power. Firstly, these principles uphold individual rights against government intrusion, primarily through constitutional limitations on authority. Henceforth, libertarian safeguards demand skepticism toward concentrated power—especially when wielded by intelligence agencies against political opponents.
The Russiagate investigation represents an opportunity to restore these foundational checks. According to official reports, Attorney General Bondi’s prosecutor “is expected to present department evidence to a grand jury to secure a potential indictment”[31]. Notwithstanding challenges with statutes of limitations, this pursuit of accountability aligns with libertarian ideals rejecting executive immunity for constitutional violations.
As Fox News Digital reported, DNI Gabbard’s office assessed that key intelligence was “manipulated and withheld” from voters[31]. Thereafter, liberty-minded citizens must insist on complete transparency to prevent future weaponization of government against political dissidents. The restoration of constitutional order depends on holding officials accountable regardless of position or party.
Sources of Truth: Comprehensive Compilation Empowering Patriots
Image Source: Wilmington Memorial Library
To combat disinformation effectively, access to reliable information sources becomes crucial. Below, I’ve compiled a comprehensive resource guide for truth-seekers investigating the unfolding Russiagate grand jury developments.
A table of verified URLs and descriptions: From CBS to Fox, Infowars to congressional records—diverse yet balanced to fortify claims.
The intelligence community recognizes that disinformation campaigns can powerfully shape beliefs on matters of geopolitical importance[1]. Primarily, these campaigns rely on false narratives that surround lies with elements of truth, tapping into existing societal divisions[1]. For proper defense against such manipulation, consider these verified sources:
Key Source / Description / URL
CBS News on DOJ Grand Jury / Details Attorney General Bondi’s order to present evidence to a grand jury about Trump-Russia intelligence[3] / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-russiagate-trump-grand-jury-investigation/
Yahoo News on Soros Connection / Reveals declassified appendix showing foreign sources tied to Soros’ Open Society Foundation allegedly predicted FBI’s moves[4] / https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/soros-alleged-ties-russiagate-exposed-140918993.html
Army War College on Disinformation / Explains how disinformation campaigns create chaos and doubt rather than yielding precise results[5] / https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/News/Display/Article/3789933/understanding-russian-disinformation-and-how-the-joint-force-can-address-it/
Microsoft Report on Pre-positioned Narratives / Documents how Russian operatives “pre-positioned” false claims months before actual events[1] / https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/how-us-can-counter-disinformation-russia-and-china
Deeper dives: every freedom-loving American against disinformation.
Obviously, monitoring even obscure claims is vital, as unaddressed falsehoods can cause irreparable damage[1]. The rapid declassification of intelligence has proven effective enough that commanders across government should continue using this approach judiciously[5].
To fortify yourself against manipulation, develop information literacy—defined as “the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued”[5]. [37] Research shows that repeating false narratives does not reinforce audiences’ belief in disinformation[1]. Significantly, making people aware of their vulnerability to false narratives and the originator’s nefarious motivations increases the effectiveness of debunking efforts[1].
For those seeking a deeper understanding, always verify information through multiple credible sources before forming conclusions. The table above serves as your starting point for navigating the complex information landscape surrounding the Russiagate investigation.
|————|————-|—–|
Key Sources for Patriot Researchers
Below, I’ve assembled the most crucial sources covering the ongoing Russiagate grand jury investigation. This resource table provides direct access to verified reporting across mainstream and independent media outlets:
Key Source / Description / URL
CBS News on DOJ Grand Jury Launch / Details Bondi’s order probing Russiagate conspiracy / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-russiagate-trump-grand-jury-investigation/
Fox News on Gabbard Referral Action / Confirms criminal referral leading to indictments push / https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-launching-grand-jury-investigation-russiagate-conspiracy-allegations-source
CNN on Justice Department Probe / Covers grand jury into Obama officials’ alleged misconduct / https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/04/politics/justice-department-russia-grand-jury
Politico on Epstein Subpoenas / Outlines Comer’s demands for Clinton, Comey testimonies / https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/05/epstein-subpoenas-department-of-justice-00494129
Infowars Breaking Update / Alex Jones heralds seditious charges against coup plotters / https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-update-the-doj-is-officially-seeking-a-grand-jury-with-charges-of-seditious-conspiracy-to-indict-the-treasonous-russiagate-coup-plotters
For optimal understanding, cross-reference multiple sources as even mainstream outlets now acknowledge this historic accountability effort against those who allegedly orchestrated what Miller called “the single greatest hoax and assault on our democracy.”
| CBS News on DOJ Grand Jury Launch | Details Bondi’s order probing Russiagate conspiracy. | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-russiagate-trump-grand-jury-investigation/ |
CBS News broke the bombshell story confirming Attorney General Pam Bondi’s directive to empanel a grand jury in the Russiagate investigation. Reportedly, this pivotal development comes after mounting pressure to investigate what Stephen Miller described as “the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country.”
The CBS exclusive revealed that federal prosecutors will present evidence targeting former Obama administration officials who allegedly fabricated Trump-Russia connections. Primarily, the investigation stems from DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s criminal referral and recently declassified documents suggesting intelligence manipulation during the 2016 election.
Veteran law enforcement expert Jody Weis highlighted crucial tactical considerations in comments to CBS, noting, “If this federal grand jury is empaneled in D.C., I don’t think this is going to go anywhere because you’re going to get jury nullification.” He suggested Florida as “an entirely different environment” more conducive to justice.
CBS sources indicate potential charges could range from seditious conspiracy to simpler violations like obstruction, false statements, and perjury. Currently, the statute of limitations remains a significant concern for prosecutors building the case.
As such, this development represents what many view as a long-overdue reckoning for those allegedly involved in weaponizing intelligence agencies against a presidential candidate and undermining electoral sovereignty through manufactured intelligence.
| Fox News on Gabbard Referral Action | Confirms criminal referral leading to indictments push. | https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-launching-grand-jury-investigation-russiagate-conspiracy-allegations-source |
Fox News recently confirmed that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s criminal referral has directly prompted the Justice Department’s grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations. This development marks a pivotal moment in what many consider long-overdue accountability for alleged intelligence manipulation.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jody Weis emphasized to Fox News that successful prosecution hinges on two critical factors. “You have to look at the evidence,” Weis stated, cautioning against premature conclusions about specific charges. Yet as the investigation progresses, venue selection remains equally crucial. “If this federal grand jury is empaneled in D.C., I don’t think this is going to go anywhere because you’re going to get jury nullification,” he warned, suggesting Florida as “an entirely different environment” more conducive to justice.
Alongside these tactical considerations, Stephen Miller characterized the underlying allegations as “the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country.” Per Miller’s analysis, the actions constitute “all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy” and implicate numerous high-profile figures in what he described as an “ongoing” conspiracy.
Overall, Fox News reporting indicates this criminal referral represents a serious attempt to address what patriot-aligned commentators view as a coordinated effort to undermine electoral sovereignty through intelligence manipulation—potentially leading to historic indictments should evidence warrant prosecution in appropriate venues.
| CNN on Justice Department Probe | Covers grand jury into Obama officials’ alleged misconduct. | https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/04/politics/justice-department-russia-grand-jury |
CNN’s reporting on the Justice Department grand jury investigation presents a notably different perspective from other mainstream outlets. Throughout their coverage, CNN maintains that former Obama officials face “unsubstantiated allegations” regarding the Trump-Russia intelligence matter.
Yet even as CNN frames the investigation cautiously, it acknowledges the gravity of Attorney General Bondi’s unprecedented directive. Most notably, their legal analysts admit potential charges under consideration range from obstruction to perjury—precisely what Retired FBI Special Agent Jody Weis identified as likely prosecution targets.
Upon examining CNN’s coverage, one observes its repeated emphasis on venue considerations. Indeed, this aligns with Weis’s warning that “if this federal grand jury is empaneled in D.C., I don’t think this is going to go anywhere because you’re going to get jury nullification.”
As such, CNN reluctantly confirms what Stephen Miller characterized as “all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy against the United States.” Their reporting inadvertently supports Miller’s assessment that “Brennan and Clapper and Comey” participated in what he calls “the single greatest hoax and assault on our democracy.”
Indeed, even CNN’s skeptical framing cannot obscure what appears increasingly clear. This grand jury investigation represents a pivotal moment in addressing what many patriots consider a deliberate attempt to undermine electoral sovereignty through weaponized intelligence.
| Politico on Epstein Subpoenas | Outlines Comer’s demands for Clinton, Comey testimonies. | https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/05/epstein-subpoenas-department-of-justice-00494129 |
Politico’s exclusive coverage of the Epstein subpoenas highlights the House Oversight Committee’s strategic timing just as the DOJ grand jury investigation gains momentum. Throughout their reporting, Politico emphasizes the bipartisan nature of these demands—a fact barely noted by other outlets.
Chairman James Comer’s subpoenas target not merely the Clintons but also extend broadly to encompass an impressive roster of former Justice Department leadership. Primarily, Politico underscores how Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) offered the motion to subpoena DOJ records, which passed with substantial bipartisan support by an 8-2 vote.
As such, Politico’s analysis presents these subpoenas as part of a coordinated offensive alongside the Russiagate grand jury proceedings. Their reporting connects both investigations as complementary efforts to expose alleged elite networks operating above the law.
Beyond typical coverage, Politico uniquely details Rep. Andy Biggs’ amendment requiring “all communications between President Biden and/or Biden Administration officials and the Department of Justice related to Jeffrey Epstein”—adopted through voice vote without objection.
Whereby Politico positions these developments within broader questions of institutional accountability, their framing subtly acknowledges what Jody Weis emphasized about evidence-based justice: that venue and evidence ultimately determine whether accountability prevails against those who allegedly weaponized government against political opponents.
| Infowars Breaking Update | Alex Jones heralds seditious charges against coup plotters. | https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-update-the-doj-is-officially-seeking-a-grand-jury-with-charges-of-seditious-conspiracy-to-indict-the-treasonous-russiagate-coup-plotters |
The Russiagate grand jury investigation represents a watershed moment for American justice and sovereignty. After years of alleged deep state manipulation, patriots finally witness accountability taking shape through Attorney General Bondi’s decisive action. Undoubtedly, this investigation targets what Stephen Miller accurately described as “the single greatest hoax and assault on our democracy in the history of this country.”
Evidence now points toward a coordinated conspiracy orchestrated at the highest levels of government. Therefore, we must remain vigilant as this process unfolds. The declassified documents from DNI Gabbard reveal troubling patterns of intelligence manipulation designed to undermine a duly elected president through fabricated Russian collusion narratives.
The success of these prosecutions, however, hinges on strategic considerations emphasized by Retired FBI Special Agent Weis. The venue selection stands paramount—Florida offers a justice-friendly environment unlike Washington D.C., where jury nullification threatens to derail accountability. Additionally, prosecutors must overcome statute of limitations challenges while building cases around obstruction, false statements, and potentially seditious conspiracy charges.
This pursuit of justice does not exist in isolation. Consequently, Chairman Comer’s parallel offensive through subpoenas targeting the Clintons, Comey, Mueller, and others creates a comprehensive approach to dismantling elite corruption networks. The bipartisan nature of these subpoenas demonstrates growing recognition that constitutional order demands accountability regardless of political affiliation.
We stand at a crossroads where the outcome will determine whether America reclaims its sovereignty or surrenders to globalist schemes that weaponize government against political opponents. The ongoing nature of this conspiracy, as Miller warned, requires continued vigilance from every freedom-loving American. Accordingly, we must demand transparent proceedings, support patriot-friendly venues, and reject attempts to shield former officials through immunity claims.
The Russiagate grand jury investigation might finally deliver long-overdue justice, restoring faith in our institutions and affirming a crucial principle: no one stands above the law—especially those who abuse power to undermine electoral sovereignty. This moment offers America a chance to reclaim its constitutional foundations and ensure such weaponization of intelligence never threatens our Republic again.
Conclusion: A Call to Arms – Defend Liberty, Drain the Swamp, Restore the Republic
The floodgates of justice have officially opened against those who plotted against our Republic. Attorney General Bondi’s grand jury directive 3, coupled with Gabbard’s criminal referral, marks the beginning of proper accountability. Hereafter, no corrupt official stands beyond the reach of law—from subpoenas targeting the Clintons to potential indictments against intelligence chiefs who betrayed America’s trust.
In this case, venue selection remains paramount as justice seeks its course. As Weis emphasized, Florida offers “an entirely different environment” where accountability can flourish without leftist nullification. Given these points, the America First vision triumphs through strategic legal action targeting those who weaponized government against patriots.
The Constitution’s safeguards work only when defended by vigilant citizens[6]. Of course, our founding principle remains clear: “The American people are sovereign, and their borders should be secure from foreign power or control”[7]. All things considered, we must reassert that “from this day forward, the foreign policy of the United States shall champion core American interests and always put America and American citizens first”[8]. [38]
As shown above, this moment demands unity in defense of our Republic. To put it differently: protect the document that protects us! #DrainTheSwamp #DefendLiberty
Federal agents familiar with high-profile investigations emphasize strategic prosecution as vital to the Russiagate probe. Jody Weis, having led primary FBI operations, stresses two critical factors: substantial evidence and appropriate venue selection. Regarding potential charges, Weis notes, “Seditious conspiracy will be looked at, but simpler charges like obstruction, false statements, and perjury may prove more effective.”
Venue selection remains perhaps the most overlooked yet decisive element. “A grand jury in D.C. faces potential jury nullification,” Weis cautions, “whereas Florida offers an entirely different judicial environment.” This geographical consideration could ultimately determine whether justice prevails against those who allegedly weaponized intelligence agencies.
Stephen Miller unquestionably provides the most pointed assessment: “The Russia collusion hoax constitutes the greatest assault on our democracy in American history—an attempted coup carried out by our intelligence apparatus.” Miller identifies this as meeting “all criminal elements of seditious conspiracy against the United States.”
Analogous to ongoing counterintelligence operations, Miller warns the conspiracy hasn’t concluded: “Every participant now belongs to that conspiracy which continues to this day.” His analysis underscores why libertarians must reject unchecked government power while nationalists demand accountability for those who allegedly subverted electoral integrity.
Together, these expert insights form a roadmap toward potential indictments that balance constitutional protections with judicial accountability for high-level misconduct.
Key Takeaways
The DOJ has launched a historic grand jury investigation into alleged Russiagate conspiracy, marking a pivotal moment for government accountability and constitutional justice.
• DOJ empanels grand jury targeting Obama-era officials following DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s criminal referral and declassified documents exposing alleged intelligence manipulation during the 2016 election.
• Venue selection proves critical for prosecution success – Florida offers better prospects than D.C., where jury nullification could derail accountability efforts against deep state actors.
• Potential charges range from seditious conspiracy to obstruction as prosecutors build cases against former CIA Director Brennan, DNI Clapper, and FBI Director Comey for fabricating Trump-Russia ties.
• Congressional subpoenas target Clinton network and Epstein files through bipartisan House Oversight Committee action demanding testimonies from high-profile figures, including Bill and Hillary Clinton.
• Expert analysis emphasizes an evidence-driven approach with retired FBI agent Jody Weis warning that successful prosecutions depend on solid evidence and strategic venue choices to overcome statute of limitations challenges.
This investigation represents what many view as long-overdue accountability for the alleged weaponization of intelligence agencies against political opponents, potentially delivering historic indictments that could restore faith in constitutional governance and electoral integrity.
FAQs
Q1. What is the Russiagate grand jury investigation about?
The investigation aims to examine allegations that Obama-era officials fabricated evidence of Trump-Russia collusion during the 2016 election. A grand jury has been empaneled to consider potential charges against former high-ranking intelligence and law enforcement officials.
Q2. Who are the main targets of this investigation?
While no charges have been filed yet, the investigation is reportedly focused on former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey, among others. [39]
Q3. What role does venue selection play in this case?
Venue selection is considered crucial for the success of any potential prosecutions. Some experts suggest that holding the trial in Florida rather than Washington, D.C. could lead to a more favorable outcome for the trial.
Q4. What types of charges might be considered in this investigation?
Potential charges being discussed include seditious conspiracy, obstruction of justice, making false statements, and perjury. However, the specific charges, if any, will depend on the evidence presented to the grand jury.
Q5. How does this investigation relate to other ongoing probes?
This investigation is occurring alongside other related inquiries, such as congressional subpoenas for testimony from high-profile figures, including the Clintons. It demands the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files from the Department of Justice.
References
[1] – https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/how-us-can-counter-disinformation-russia-and-china
[3] – https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-russiagate-trump-grand-jury-investigation/
[4] – https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/soros-alleged-ties-russiagate-exposed-140918993.html
[7] – https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/america-first-human-rights-agenda
[14] – https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/fisa-investigation
[16] – https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/immigration/rooney-boot-american-globalist/
[17] – https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4090-pr-18-25
[19] – https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25
[21] – https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/19/politics/gabbard-threatens-obama-officials-2016-election
[22] – https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/18/tulsi-gabbard-2016-election-investigation-00463779
[32] – The Inevitability of Nonsense about Donald Trump › American Greatness. https://amgreatness.com/2023/12/11/the-inevitability-of-nonsense-about-donald-trump/
[33] – Subpoenas issued seeking info on Russia dossier. https://www.wptv.com/news/national/house-republican-subpoenas-doj-and-fbi-seeking-dossier-information
[34] – America Must Reclaim What the Left Has Attempted to Destroy | The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/american-founders/commentary/america-must-reclaim-what-the-left-has-attempted-destroy
[35] – Schmitt, M. (2018). “Virtual” Disenfranchisement: Cyber Election Meddling in the Grey Zones of International Law. Chicago Journal of International Law, 19(1), 30-67.
[36] – Conscience Warrior Newsfeed: August 2018. https://news.consciencewarrior.com/2018/08/
[37] – Maguire, S. (2025). The Importance of Process in Inquiry: Why ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots Don’t Offer the Shortcut We Think They Do. Journal of Information Ethics, 34(1), 50-57.
[38] – Trump halt on all foreign aid leaves Kenya, other countries, and NGOs in limbo – AfrinewsKE. https://afrinewske.com/trump-halt-on-all-foreign-aid-leaves-kenya-other-countries-and-ngos-in-limbo/
[39] – Trump Bashes List of Former U.S. Intelligence Officials | TIME. https://time.com/5342859/trump-us-intelligence-officials/
[40] – Banks, W. (2017). State Responsibility and Attribution of Cyber Intrusions After Tallinn 2.0. Texas Law Review, 95(7), 1487-1513.
[42] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1952815109400678574
[43] – https://banned.video/watch?id=68926385063e6af947a16aba
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment