by L Richardson
decision made to have a security stand-down, on the 7th of October for 7 hours”[26][27]. This shocking intelligence disclosure demands our immediate attention as Americans concerned with truth and sovereignty. On that fateful morning, approximately 3,000 Hamas terrorists breached the Gaza border into southern Israel, killing at least 1,200 people and taking some 240 hostages[28]. An estimated 360 people were massacred at an outdoor music festival near the border[28].
However, the question we must ask is how this happened despite Israel having arguably the most impenetrable borders in the world, combined with the exceptional intelligence and military strength of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)[29]. Furthermore, retired Special Operations personnel and intelligence experts, including Jeffrey Prather and General Flynn, agree that Israel must have ordered a stand-down that allowed Hamas to unleash terror inside its borders[29]. This inexplicable security lapse for exactly seven hours[26] cannot be dismissed as a mere coincidence or failure. I believe we’re witnessing a calculated deception designed to justify subsequent military actions while continuing to drain American taxpayer resources. As we examine the evidence together in this article, we’ll uncover how this apparent false flag operation not only betrays our constitutional principles but also undermines our national interests and sovereignty.
Background on October 7th: The Calculated Deception –
Image Source: The Jerusalem Post
Early on the morning of October 7, 2023, Hamas launched what military experts describe as one of the largest and deadliest terrorist attacks in modern history[30]. [31][32] The attack resulted in approximately 1,200 deaths and 252 kidnappings of mostly civilians[2].[32] Nevertheless, mounting evidence suggests this catastrophe was entirely preventable—and potentially deliberately allowed to happen.
The events, insider confirmations of the 7-hour IDF lapse, and how prior warnings were ignored to enable the attack, are a pretext for Gaza’s destruction.
The truth behind October 7 reveals a pattern of deliberate negligence that cannot be dismissed as mere incompetence. Strikingly, Israeli intelligence officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan, code-named “Jericho Wall,” more than a year before the attack occurred[2]. This approximately 40-page document outlined, point by point, exactly the devastating invasion that would eventually unfold, including details about rocket barrages, drones to disable border security cameras, and gunmen pouring into Israel en masse using paragliders, motorcycles, and on foot[2].
Despite possessing this blueprint for disaster, Israeli military and intelligence leaders dismissed the plan as “aspirational” and beyond Hamas’s capabilities[2]. This assessment persisted even as the terrorist organization meticulously followed the playbook that Israel already had in its possession.
The dismissal of crucial intelligence extended beyond the Jericho Wall document. In July 2023, just three months before the attack, a veteran analyst with Unit 8200, Israel’s signals intelligence agency, issued an explicit warning after Hamas conducted an intense, daylong training exercise that mirrored the blueprint[2]. When raising concerns, she was met with resistance from a colonel in the Gaza division who brushed off her analysis, calling the scenario “totally imaginative” [2].
Notably, the analyst invoked the lessons of the 1973 war, warning her colleagues: “We already underwent a similar experience 50 years ago on the southern front in connection with a scenario that seemed imaginary, and history may repeat itself if we are not careful” [2].
As October 7 approached, the pattern of ignoring warnings intensified. During the night before the attack, the IDF identified at least five anomalous signs of unusual Hamas activity[3]:
- Israeli SIM cards in the hands of Hamas Nukhba terrorists are being activated [33]
- Four other classified signs of Hamas preparation
- Several dozen SIM cards were activated simultaneously (compared to the usual pattern of only a few at a time)
- Suspicious Hamas movements along the border
- Unusual communications among Hamas operatives
Even with these clear danger signals, not a single officer interpreted them as indicating an imminent attack[3]. The IDF investigation later identified several critical failures behind this blindness, including:
- The entrenched perception that Hamas was in a “period of quiet” and focused on West Bank operations rather than Gaza
- The lack of a formal intelligence assessment meeting to evaluate the accumulating evidence
- The improper division of early warning responsibilities, resulting in no overlay between intelligence units
- A dysfunctional abundance of data, where no single officer had access to the complete intelligence picture
Most damning of all, Israeli officials now privately concede that “had the military taken these warnings seriously and redirected significant reinforcements to the south, Israel could have blunted the attacks or possibly even prevented them “[2].
On the morning of October 7 itself, the fatal pattern continued. At 6:20 AM, Hamas began firing rockets. Still, observation personnel dismissed this as routine, expecting “five minutes of shooting and then a break” [1]. At approximately 6:30 AM, despite direct visual confirmation of Hamas forces closing in on the border, the IDF failed to mount an effective response[1].
The IDF’s border defenses—long touted as impenetrable—failed catastrophically. The so-called “iron wall” had been viewed by Israeli military and citizens alike as unbreachable. Yet, Hamas fighters easily penetrated it at 60 different points[1]. As General Israel Ziv, former head of the IDF’s Operations Division, later admitted: “As you saw, two truckloads could come and push it. It was nothing. Even if there was a minefield of 50 or 60 meters over there, it would have delayed Hamas for a few hours” [1].
Even more inexplicable were the defensive failures at military installations like the Nahal Oz base, situated just one kilometer from the Gaza border[1]. Despite its strategic location, many military personnel there were inexplicably unarmed on October 7, contradicting standard protocols[1]. General Ziv confirmed that “during his service, there would never have been unarmed soldiers in border areas” [1].
Additionally, critical surveillance equipment was conveniently non-operational. The surveillance balloon at Nahal Oz, which should have provided 24-hour deep visibility into Gaza, was one of three along the border that were out of action[1]. As one insider noted: “The balloon in Nahal Oz didn’t work and no one was stressed, they were told it would be fixed on Sunday” [1].
The systematic nature of these failures points toward calculated inaction rather than coincidental negligence. Even Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas acknowledged the suspicious timing, stating that “The military action that Hamas carried out, at its own decision, on that day, October 7, gave Israel even more excuses and reasons to attack in the Gaza Strip” [4]. [34]
The consequences of this suspected false flag have been devastating for Gaza, with Israel launching a relentless military campaign that has killed tens of thousands while displacing over a million civilians. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has described the Gaza war as “an open wound that threatens to infect the entire region” [4]. [35]
As a result of these revelations, many military experts and patriots now question whether October 7 represents the most egregious example of deliberately ignored intelligence in modern history. The cascade of “failures” appears too systematic to be accidental, pointing instead to a calculated deception designed to provide the pretext needed for Gaza’s destruction.
The pattern mirrors a classic false flag template: obtain foreknowledge of an impending attack, systematically disable defenses, allow civilian casualties to generate public outrage, then launch a disproportionate military response that achieves long-held strategic objectives. Meanwhile, American taxpayers continue funding this foreign deception to the tune of billions while our own borders remain vulnerable.
For those who champion America First principles and constitutional liberty, these revelations demand an immediate reassessment of our entangling alliance with a regime that appears willing to sacrifice its own citizens for geopolitical gain.
Damning Evidence and Sources –
A disturbing pattern of evidence emerges upon examining the official statements, military resignations, and insider intelligence surrounding the October 7 attack. This mounting documentation points toward a calculated decision rather than mere intelligence failure, undermining mainstream narratives that drain American resources.
Compiled intel from Flynn’s statements, military resignations, and leaked details proving premeditation, while debunking mainstream spins as cover-ups that drain our treasury.
Former National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn, who possesses intimate knowledge of Israeli security operations, has openly questioned the official narrative. In his own words: “Something went wrong because… I have personally walked that border. I have been down in those areas and I know the details of how the Israelis, one of the most secure borders in the world, how they do their operations “[5]. Flynn explicitly rejected the notion that this catastrophic breach resulted from mistakes, stating: “Something broke down and it wasn’t because of errors “[5].
Flynn’s assessment carries exceptional weight given his background as former Defense Intelligence Agency Director and National Security Advisor. His military expertise and direct familiarity with Israel’s border security protocols make his assessment particularly credible. Furthermore, Flynn stated that the October 7th attack featured a 7-hour stand-down period. This timeframe aligns precisely with the duration of the Hamas incursion before the effective Israeli military response.
Equally damning, high-ranking Israeli military officials have now resigned, effectively acknowledging their role in what appears to be a premeditated failure. Israel’s top general, Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, became the highest-ranking official to resign over the attack, which represents the worst security failure in the country’s history[7]. In his resignation letter, Halevi admitted the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) had “failed in its mission to protect the citizens of Israel” [8]. [36]
His candid confession speaks volumes: “My responsibility for the terrible failure accompanies me every day, every hour, and will be so for the rest of my life” [8]. [36] This acknowledgment from Israel’s top military commander cannot be dismissed as mere oversight. It represents an admission of catastrophic negligence at a minimum—and potentially deliberate inaction.
The resignation cascade continued with Major General Yaron Finkelman, chief of the IDF’s Southern Command, who similarly stepped down, stating he had failed in his “duty to protect the Western Negev and its beloved, heroic residents” [8]. [36] Particularly revealing was his admission that this failure would be “etched into me for the rest of my life” [7].
Before these resignations, Aharon Haliva, head of Israeli military intelligence, had already resigned in April, writing: “I carry that black day with me ever since, day after day, night after night. I will carry the horrible pain of the war with me forever” [7]. [37] This pattern of senior military leaders falling on their swords suggests accountability for decisions that cannot be explained away as simple incompetence.
Yet perhaps most incriminating is what these officials aren’t saying. None has provided a credible explanation for how approximately 3,000 Hamas fighters managed to breach what was supposedly one of the world’s most secure borders, overcoming sophisticated surveillance systems, automated defenses, and rapid response protocols. The obvious question remains: Why did Israel’s military stand down for seven critical hours?
Consider these documented facts that mainstream media outlets conveniently downplay:
- Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s detailed attack plans more than a year before October 7, including specifics about rocket assaults, drone attacks on surveillance systems, and infiltration using paragliders[9]
- The New York Times itself reported that “Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision” [9]
- Israel’s Shin Bet security service explicitly warned the Prime Minister that Hamas was not deterred by Israel’s policies[9]
- Just hours before the attack, Shin Bet and IDF commanders discussed a possible threat to the Nova music festival near kibbutz Re’im—yet organizers received no warning[9]
- A BBC investigation revealed surveillance reports suggested Hamas was planning a significant operation, yet senior IDF officers repeatedly ignored these warnings[9]
These points demonstrate foreknowledge that can’t be dismissed as an intelligence failure. Indeed, a Haaretz investigation found that incompetence in the IDF’s higher ranks, including refusal to acknowledge Hamas’s preparations, was a significant factor[9]. The IDF had reduced funding and manpower dedicated to observing Hamas, focusing primarily on rocket sites while ignoring Hamas training, troop movements, and activities of the Hamas military leadership[9].
On the morning of the attack itself, fatal patterns continued. At 6:20 AM, Hamas began firing rockets, yet observation personnel dismissed this as routine[9]. Around 6:30 AM, despite visual confirmation of Hamas forces approaching the border, the IDF failed to mount an effective response[9].
The systematic nature of these failures points toward calculated inaction rather than coincidental negligence. Even Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas acknowledged the suspicious timing, stating that the October 7th attack “gave Israel even more excuses and reasons to attack in the Gaza Strip” [9]. [34]
Consequently, this evidence forms a compelling case that Israel exploited—or even facilitated—the October 7th attack as a pretext for its subsequent military campaign. This campaign has drained billions from American taxpayers while failing to achieve its stated objectives.
General Flynn himself has expressed growing American fatigue with the endless Israel focus: “The American people, they’re getting tired of it. They’re getting tired of this constant, you know, ‘Israel, Israel, Israel’” [5]. He further warned against deeper military entanglement: “We have got to remember a lot of history that people don’t want to bring up… So before we start making decisions about what we’re gonna do or not do, and this is in support of Israel, there’s a lot of soul-searching that needs to be done “[5].
Flynn astutely identifies how this situation draws America into costly foreign conflicts: “This is just going to continue to be a cycle of violence, a cycle of war, and it’s going to draw the United States into something that we can’t afford any longer” [5].
Given this wealth of evidence, the official narrative crumbles under scrutiny. The attack wasn’t a surprise; it wasn’t an intelligence failure; it wasn’t a border security breakdown. It appears increasingly likely that October 7 represents a calculated false flag operation designed to justify subsequent military actions while continuing to drain American taxpayer resources.
For those committed to America First principles, constitutional integrity, and fiscal responsibility, these revelations demand immediate reassessment of our $3.8 billion annual aid to Israel. Each dollar sent overseas represents resources diverted from pressing domestic needs—particularly securing our own borders and supporting American citizens.
Throughout history, entangling foreign alliances have repeatedly drained American blood and treasure. As the evidence mounts regarding Israel’s role in enabling the October 7th attack, patriots must ask: How many more billions will we sacrifice for a regime that appears willing to orchestrate violence for its geopolitical advantage?
Constitutional and Libertarian Imperatives: Why Cut Aid Now –
George Washington’s prescient warning against foreign entanglements stands as a cornerstone of American constitutional wisdom. In his farewell address, our first President cautioned that “the nation which indulges toward another a habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave” [10]. [38] This fundamental principle guided America’s foreign policy for over a century and a half following its founding[10]. Yet today, as evidence mounts regarding Israel’s manufactured October 7 crisis, we face a constitutional imperative to reassess our entangling alliance with this warmongering entity.
How endless support for this warmongering entity contravenes our Founders’ warnings against entangling alliances, fiscal responsibility, and individual freedoms—demanding we redirect funds to American priorities like border security.
Washington explicitly advised Americans to “steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world” [11]. [39] His caution against foreign entanglements stemmed from personal experience with the costly nature of wars[11]. Forthwith, this wisdom became enshrined as the Washington Doctrine of Unstable Alliances, a realist guide for US foreign policy that considered external alliances merely temporary measures of convenience, to be abandoned when national interest dictates[12].
Analogous to Washington’s era when America was young and vulnerable, our nation now carries $34 trillion in debt while facing urgent domestic problems[13]. Yet in fiscal year 2022 alone, we obligated $70.40 billion in foreign aid[14]. Of this amount, Israel received $3.30 billion, making it the second-largest single-country recipient behind only Ukraine[14]. This transfer of wealth contradicts our founding principles of fiscal restraint and non-interventionism.
Moreover, our Founders’ warnings weren’t mere suggestions—they represented constitutional imperatives designed to protect our Republic from foreign manipulation. The Constitution strictly limited federal powers, with no provision for massive foreign aid programs that drain our treasury. James Madison, the Father of our Constitution, emphasized that the powers delegated to the federal government are “few and defined.”
Balanced against our constitutional principles, our relationship with Israel represents precisely the “artificial ties” Washington warned would “implicate ourselves… in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities” [12]. [40] Given that Israel now stands exposed as potentially orchestrating the October 7th attack, this entanglement violates not only our Founders’ wisdom but fundamental American values of truth and justice.
Due to our government’s unconstitutional foreign aid schemes, American taxpayers finance a regime that appears willing to sacrifice its own citizens for geopolitical advantage. Important to realize that every dollar sent to Israel represents resources diverted from pressing domestic needs, particularly securing our own borders. While Congress debates sending billions overseas, our southern border remains vulnerable, with little funding for effective security measures.
The border security crisis exemplifies this misallocation of resources. When Speaker Mike Johnson attempted to include border security provisions with foreign aid packages in April 2024, the effort failed spectacularly[15]. Republicans accurately noted that “Republicans continue to campaign on securing the border and then refuse to use any leverage to actually secure the border” [16]. One congressman lamented, “We should get it signed into law, but the only way to force Democrats to do it is to use leverage “[16].
Under those circumstances, Americans face a stark choice: continue funding foreign deception or redirect those resources to genuine national priorities. The libertarian perspective remains clear—government has no constitutional authority to extract wealth from citizens for foreign distribution while neglecting core duties like border protection.
The numbers tell a sobering story:
- Israel receives $3.30 billion annually from American taxpayers[14]
- Total foreign aid constitutes about 1% of federal spending[14]
- America carries $34 trillion in national debt[13]
- Border security legislation consistently fails while foreign aid passes[16]
In light of the constitutional imperative for limited government, the endless flow of American resources to Israel represents a profound breach of our founding principles. Whereas our Founders envisioned a Republic focused on securing rights at home, today’s foreign policy establishment prioritizes entangling alliances abroad.
Together with fiscal irresponsibility, this arrangement undermines individual liberty. As the government expands its foreign commitments, it necessarily expands its domestic reach—increasing taxation, surveillance, and regulation to fulfill international obligations. For liberty-minded Americans, this presents an unacceptable trade-off.
The case grows stronger when examining the Washington Doctrine’s pragmatic wisdom. By maintaining “as little political connection as possible” with foreign nations while “extending our commercial relations” [12], America thrived for generations. In contrast, today’s permanent alliances drain our resources while compromising our strategic independence.
At the present time, with Israel’s false flag operation exposed and evidence mounting of its deliberate October 7 stand-down, constitutional principles demand immediate reconsideration of our aid policies. The question isn’t whether we should cut aid, but why we haven’t already done so. For this purpose, we must reaffirm our commitment to America First principles that prioritize our citizens, our borders, and our constitutional liberties.
From time to time, nations must reassess their alliances based on changed circumstances and emerging facts. Given these points, maintaining the status quo with Israel contradicts both our founding wisdom and our national interest. As Washington advised, we must not allow “passionate attachments” to override reasoned judgment[10].
Essentially, our unconstitutional support for Israel represents not just fiscal irresponsibility but a fundamental departure from the limited government principles that defined early America. By the same token, redirecting these resources to genuine national priorities like border security would represent a return to constitutional governance.
If we fail to heed these warnings, we risk perpetuating what Jefferson called “entangling alliances” that compromise our sovereignty and deplete our resources. At this instant, with America’s debt soaring and domestic needs mounting, the constitutional and libertarian case for cutting aid to Israel has never been stronger. For all these reasons, immediate action to sever this unconstitutional relationship represents not just good policy but a return to founding principles.
Broader Implications: Zionist Manipulation and America First –
Beyond the October 7 deception lies a far more troubling reality: our entanglement with Israel systematically undermines American sovereignty while fueling endless Middle Eastern conflicts. The United States-Israel relationship has evolved from initial support for establishing a Jewish homeland in 1948 to a lopsided partnership that serves the interests of a foreign power at the expense of American priorities.
How Israel’s actions drag us into quagmires, erode sovereignty, and fuel globalist agendas, urging Republicans to unite against this genocidal rogue state.
At the core of this manipulation lies the unprecedented financial burden on American taxpayers. Israel stands as the largest cumulative recipient of US foreign aid, having received a staggering $150 billion in non-inflation-adjusted assistance as of February 2022[17]. [41] Currently, Israel receives approximately $3.8 billion annually from American coffers[18], making it the second-largest single-country recipient behind only Ukraine[18]. This massive transfer of wealth represents resources diverted from critical domestic needs like securing our southern border.
The extraordinary political protection America provides Israel extends far beyond mere financial support. The United States has wielded its United Nations Security Council veto power 42 times specifically to shield Israel from international condemnation – representing more than half of all American vetoes[17]. This diplomatic shield enables Israel to act with impunity while simultaneously undermining America’s global standing and moral authority.
Correspondingly, America pays a steep price for this one-sided relationship. As the Cato Institute notes, “what exactly the United States gets in return for this unidirectional relationship remains unclear “[18]. Formerly touted benefits like intelligence sharing and regional stability have been overwhelmingly outweighed by the costs. The past year of conflict in Gaza has “made clear the numerous negative effects of the relationship, namely how Washington’s emphatic embrace of Israel has undermined its strategic position in the Middle East while damaging its global image” [18]. [42]
The influence driving this imbalanced policy cannot be explained through rational national interest analysis. Henceforth, we must confront the uncomfortable reality documented by researchers John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt: “the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy is its intimate relationship with Israel” which “although often justified as reflecting shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives” is “due primarily to the activities of the ‘Israel Lobby’” [19]. [43] [44] This Lobby has effectively secured “a stranglehold on the U.S. Congress” through its “ability to reward legislators and congressional candidates who support its agenda, and to punish those who challenge it “[20]. [45]
Throughout decades of manipulation, the Israel lobby has “managed to divert US foreign policy as far from what the American national interest would otherwise suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that US and Israeli interests are essentially identical “[20]. [45] This deception has dragged America into endless conflicts while enabling Israeli expansion at Palestinian expense.
The manipulative tactics extend to multilateral institutions, where Israel demands American withdrawal whenever facing accountability. After UNESCO recognized Palestinian heritage sites, the Trump administration pulled out, citing “anti-Israel bias” [21]. The State Department explicitly stated: “UNESCO’s decision to admit the ‘State of Palestine’ as a Member State is highly problematic, contrary to U.S. policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization” [22].
To this end, the Israel lobby portrays any criticism of Israeli policy as antisemitism, particularly through smearing the term “globalist” as antisemitic[23]. This calculated conflation serves to silence legitimate criticism of Israel’s influence over American foreign policy and its connections to international power structures that undermine national sovereignty.
Fortunately, Americans are increasingly recognizing this manipulation. Recent polling reveals a dramatic shift in public sentiment:
- Support for Israel has reached historic lows, with Americans siding with Israelis over Palestinians by a mere 37% to 32% margin – down from 61% to 13% after October 7 [24]
- A majority of Americans (53%) now hold an unfavorable opinion of Israel, up from 42% in 2022[25]
- Even among Republicans, unfavorable views of Israel have risen from 27% in 2022 to 37% in 2024[24]
- Most remarkably, right-leaning voters under age 50 are now about evenly split in their views of Israel[24] [46]
This shift reflects growing recognition that Israel has become a strategic liability rather than an asset. As the Cato Institute concludes, “the special relationship with Israel does virtually nothing for the United States while actively undermining US strategic interests and often doing violence to the values that Washington claims to stand for “[18]. [47]
Notwithstanding decades of propaganda portraying Israel as a crucial American ally, the October 7th false flag operation and subsequent Gaza campaign exposed the dangerous reality of this relationship. Washington’s “subsidies for Israeli policies have insulated Israel from the costs of those policies” [18], enabling ever more extreme actions while dragging America deeper into regional conflicts.
The shift in Republican opinion is particularly significant, with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson recently declaring America should “drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars” [24]. This reflects an awakening to the false premise that American and Israeli interests align. As Mearsheimer and Walt argue, “when the Lobby succeeds in shaping US policy in the Middle East, then ‘Israel’s enemies get weakened or overthrown, Israel gets a free hand with the Palestinians, and the United States does most of the fighting, dying, rebuilding, and paying “[20]. [45]
In the meantime, Israel’s actions in Gaza have become increasingly difficult to defend. According to US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, approximately 25,000 women and children alone had been killed in Gaza[18]. The situation has become so dire that America has been forced to airdrop aid into Gaza and deploy troops to build a pier to circumvent the Israeli blockade – all while continuing to fund the very regime creating this humanitarian catastrophe[18].
On balance, American interests are systematically undermined by this relationship. Israel’s actions trigger regional conflicts that threaten to draw America into larger wars, from Lebanon to the Red Sea[18]. Even worse, our continued backing of Israel’s brutal campaign has “tarnished Washington’s image as a lodestar of liberal values, making a mockery of claims about a U.S.-led ‘liberal international order’” [18]. [48]
For genuine America First patriots, the conclusion is inescapable: this manipulative relationship must end. As Republicans increasingly question blind support for Israel, the time has come to reclaim our sovereignty, redirect resources to American priorities, and reject the globalist agenda that has entangled us with this rogue state. The October 7th false flag merely represents the latest and most brazen example of how Israel manipulates American policy to serve its own interests at our expense.
Conclusion: Rally for Reclamation –
Throughout this examination of the October 7th attack, we have uncovered a disturbing pattern of deliberate negligence that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence or failure. General Michael Flynn’s revelation about a “7-hour stand-down” aligns perfectly with the timeline of Hamas’s incursion before any effective Israeli response materialized. The cascade of high-ranking Israeli military resignations further confirms accountability for decisions that defy explanation as simple incompetence.
America stands at a critical crossroads. Our Founders explicitly warned against entangling alliances that would drain our resources and compromise our sovereignty. George Washington’s prescient guidance to “steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world” echoes with renewed urgency today. [49] Nevertheless, we continue sending billions annually to a regime that appears willing to sacrifice its own citizens for geopolitical advantage.
The constitutional case for cutting aid grows stronger daily. Every dollar sent to Israel represents resources diverted from securing our own borders and addressing pressing domestic needs. Our $34 trillion national debt demands fiscal restraint, not endless foreign commitments that violate our founding principles of limited government.
Public opinion has shifted dramatically, with support for Israel reaching historic lows even among traditionally pro-Israel Republicans. This awakening reflects growing recognition that our relationship with Israel systematically undermines American interests while fueling endless Middle Eastern conflicts.
The October 7th false flag operation merely represents the latest example of how America has been manipulated into supporting foreign agendas at our own expense. Undoubtedly, the time has come to reclaim our national sovereignty, redirect our resources to American priorities, and reject the globalist agenda that has entangled us with this rogue state.
Fellow patriots must unite to demand an immediate end to this unconstitutional aid. Our liberty, sovereignty, and fiscal future depend on breaking free from these artificial ties that Washington warned would “implicate ourselves in the ordinary vicissitudes” of foreign politics. The path forward remains clear: cut aid to Israel, secure our own borders, and put America First – as our Constitution intended.
References
[1] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7825rk8j9o
[2] – https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/30/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-attack-intelligence.html
[6] – https://www.instagram.com/daizygedeon/reel/DMlx-oZTORB/?hl=fr
[8] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz6pdqv6xyyo
[9] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_7_attacks
[10] – https://history.state.gov/milestones/1784-1800/washington-farewell
[12] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Doctrine_of_Unstable_Alliances
[13] – https://freedomhouse.org/article/freedom-focused-foreign-policy-good-united-states-good-world
[14] – https://www.crfb.org/blogs/breakdown-foreign-aid-obligations
[15] – https://www.npr.org/2024/04/17/1245290743/johnson-ukraine-israel-aid-motion-to-vacate-border
[16] – https://dondavis.house.gov/media/in-the-news/us-house-votes-down-border-bill-favored-conservatives
[17] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93United_States_relations
[18] – https://www.cato.org/commentary/israel-strategic-liability-united-states
[19] – https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy
[20] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy
[21] – https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-again-to-pull-us-out-of-woke-unesco-citing-anti-israel-bias/
[23] – https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/globalist
[24] – https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/13/politics/republicans-israel-support-analysis
[29] – https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-31-jeffrey-prather-michael-flynn-israel-stood-down.html
[31] – Beyond Protection: In the Wake of the Moscow Domodedovo Airport Terrorist Attack (ARI). https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/beyond-protection-in-the-wake-of-the-moscow-domodedovo-airport-terrorist-attack-ari/
[32] – Daring Israeli Rescue Mission Secures Release of Hostages in Rafah. https://newsgpt.ai/2024/02/12/daring-israeli-rescue-mission-secures-release-of-hostages-in-rafah/
[33] – Netanyahu’s office admits ignoring Hamas warning hours before October 7 attack. https://www.evil.news/2025-03-05-netanyahu-ignored-hamas-warnings-before-oct7-attack.html
[34] – Does the PA even want to govern Gaza? – AIJAC. https://aijac.org.au/australia-israel-review/does-the-pa-even-want-to-govern-gaza/
[35] – Arab League calls for UN peacekeepers in Palestinian territories – AL-Monitor: The Middle Eastʼs leading independent news source since 2012. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2024/05/arab-league-calls-un-peacekeepers-palestinian-territories
[36] – Israel’s military chief resigns over October 7, 2023, failure – GoLanding News. https://www.golanding.store/2025/01/21/israels-military-chief-resigns-over-7-october-2023-failure/
[37] – IDF intel chief Haliva announces resignation – http://www.israelhayom.com. https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/04/22/idf-intel-chief-haliva-announces-resignation/
[38] – (2009). Guilty by stereotypic association: Country animosity, brand prejudice, and discrimination. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9097-y
[39] – It’s George Washington’s Birthday. Reminder – “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.”, -G.W. – The Mad Jewess. https://themadjewess.wordpress.com/2022/02/21/its-george-washingtons-birthday-reminder-it-is-our-true-policy-to-steer-clear-of-permanent-alliance-with-any-portion-of-the-foreign-world-g-w/
[40] – Mørk, A. (2012). Separate but Equal? John F. Kennedy, Europe and the Declaration of Interdependence. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/50679947.pdf
[41] – Re-Evaluating US Military Aid To Israel – The Hills Times. https://thehillstimes.in/editorial/re-evaluating-us-military-aid-to-israel
[42] – Wednesday, March 27, 2024. https://snafuhall.com/2024/0327.html
[43] – Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2006). The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891198
[44] – Stephen Walt, Harvard KSG, Israel lobby, censorship – Center on Capital & Social Equity. https://inequalityink.org/2024/04/28/stephen-walt-harvard-ksg-israel-lobby-censorship/
[45] – RMG #SayItAgainSunday: The Propaganda Wolf in Journalism’s Clothing: The American Media Hits Mute Bu. https://www.rhymesmediagroup.com/post/2018/09/16/rmg-sayitagainsunday-the-propaganda-wolf-in-journalism-s-clothing-the-american-media-hits
[46] – Americans Divided on How Things Are Going in Afghanistan. https://news.gallup.com/poll/147011/Americans-Divided-Things-Going-Afghanistan.aspx
[47] – Gaza | Page 3 | Jgg’s Civil War Talk, Debate, Learn and Discuss. https://www.jggscivilwartalk.online/index.php?threads/gaza.8461/page-3#post-53295
[48] – Israel is a strategic liability for the United States – Attention to the Unseen. https://attentiontotheunseen.com/2024/03/29/israel-is-a-strategic-liability-for-the-united-states/
[49] – It’s George Washington’s Birthday. Reminder – “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.”, -G.W. – The Mad Jewess. https://themadjewess.wordpress.com/2022/02/21/its-george-washingtons-birthday-reminder-it-is-our-true-policy-to-steer-clear-of-permanent-alliance-with-any-portion-of-the-foreign-world-g-w/
[51] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1953165738467873145
[52] – https://banned.video/watch?id=6893a44a92c099306a1e1307
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment