by L Richardson
Deep State indictments loom as justice finally approaches those who have undermined our great nation. In the past week, we’ve witnessed the remarkable impact of putting America First policies into action. For the first time in recent memory, our nation’s capital has gone seven days without a single murder[7]. At the same time, robberies dropped by 46% and carjackings plummeted by an astonishing 83%[7]. These dramatic improvements in public safety coincide with approximately 400 National Guard members reporting for duty in Washington, DC[8], with a total of 800 expected by the end of the week [8].
The restoration of law and order in DC stands as robust evidence that constitutional approaches to governance work. Furthermore, this success story represents just one front in our ongoing battle to defend liberty and sovereignty. We patriots must recognize the connection between these security triumphs, the coming Deep State accountability, and the ongoing threats to our freedoms. In fact, authorities have made 103 arrests since August 78, including suspects wanted for murder and gun offenses. On Tuesday alone, they made 43 arrests and seized 24 firearms[8].
Above all, these developments signal a turning point in our fight to drain the swamp and restore the rule of law. As we’ll explore throughout this article, the threads connecting Deep State corruption, successful crime reduction strategies, and government overreach all point to one conclusion – when we stand firm on constitutional principles, America wins. The wheels of justice are turning, and we the people must remain vigilant in defense of our Republic.
Deep State Indictments: Holding Traitors Accountable
Image Source: ABC News – The Walt Disney Company
Evidence mounts daily suggesting that justice will soon arrive for key figures behind what patriots have long recognized as the Russia hoax. Former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stand at the center of what may become the most significant accountability moment in modern American history. [11]
The walls are closing in on Deep State operatives who weaponized our intelligence agencies against a duly elected president. According to critical intelligence revelations, former CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred evidence of “potential wrongdoing” to the FBI, which subsequently opened criminal investigations of John Brennan and James Comey for their roles in the Russia interference narrative. These investigations stem from their involvement in the intelligence assessment regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Specifically, these alleged indictments focus on how Brennan, Comey, and Clapper handled intelligence information during and after the 2016 election. The apparent charges center on their roles in perpetuating what many patriots now recognize as a manufactured crisis designed to undermine President Trump’s administration from its inception.
Notably, Ratcliffe made formal referrals to the Justice Department for former Obama administration officials following the release of intelligence information about the 2016 election[10]. This decisive action represents the first serious attempt to hold accountable those who misused their positions of power to advance a political agenda rather than serve the American people.
Patriots, rise up and defend our Republic! 🚨 The Deep State is crumbling, and we must hold them accountable! Watch the Infowars Sunday Briefing with Nick Sortor at https://www.infowars.com/ for the unfiltered truth on looming indictments.
The allegations against these former intelligence officials are not based on speculation but rather on substantial declassified evidence. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released the formerly Classified Appendix to John Durham’s 2023 Special Counsel report, which contains critical information exposing a reported Clinton campaign plan to falsely tie President Trump to Russia[1]. [12]
This “Durham annex” details:
- Potential election influence by a foreign government regarding Hillary Clinton
- False statements to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA court) regarding FISA renewal applications for Carter Page [13]
- The FBI’s failure – under Comey’s leadership – to investigate intelligence that the Clinton campaign may have created the Russia collusion hoax[1]
According to the declassified appendix, “It is a logical deduction [redacted] [Julianne] Smith was, at minimum, playing a role in the Clinton campaign’s efforts to tie Trump to Russia,” and that the communications reviewed “certainly lend at least some credence that such a plan existed “[1].
Furthermore, the FBI received intelligence in July 2016 regarding a possible Clinton Campaign Plan, including documents with purported emails allegedly sent by Leonard Benardo, Senior Vice President of Soros’ Open Society Foundations[1]. This intelligence provided specificity on the plan to smear then-candidate Donald Trump by falsely linking him to Russia.
Perhaps most damning, multiple high-ranking U.S. officials were briefed on this matter, including an August 3, 2016, briefing in the White House by CIA Director John Brennan to President Obama, Vice President Biden, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and FBI Director Comey[1]. [14] Despite this awareness, “the FBI appears to have dismissed the [intelligence information] as not credible without any investigative steps actually having been taken to either corroborate or disprove the allegations “[1].
The FBI subsequently secured a FISA warrant and multiple renewals to surveil Carter Page despite lacking probable cause and relying on false information[1]. This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions. It represents one of the biggest political scandals in American history.
The fundamental principle at stake in these Deep State indictments strikes at the heart of our constitutional Republic. The Constitution embodies the axiom that no one is above the law – a principle illustrated by “the care it takes to grant immunities from the law expressly and with relatively precise contours, rather than by implication and with striking imprecision” [2]. [15]
Our system of government functions only when accountability applies to all citizens, regardless of position or power. The prospect of indictments against former high-ranking intelligence officials reinforces this bedrock principle. The Constitution provides no exemption from criminal accountability for those who abuse their power.
Additionally, allowing a four or eight-year reprieve from justice for those who commit crimes to gain office would be fundamentally unjust[2]. Such a system would create “an unacceptable likelihood that a criminally inclined, power-hungry office-seeker will be tempted to violate criminal laws to ensconce himself in the presidency “[2]. [15]
Essentially, these indictments represent the restoration of constitutional order – holding accountable those who attempted to subvert our electoral process and democratic institutions. The Constitution itself defeats any argument that high officials stand above justice when one considers “its structure and underlying premises “[2].
From a libertarian perspective, these indictments represent a crucial check on government power. When intelligence agencies operate without accountability, they threaten the very liberties they claim to protect. The alleged actions of Comey, Brennan, and Clapper represent precisely the kind of government overreach that libertarians have long warned against.
The declassified evidence shows that the FBI provided false and misleading information to the FISA court in pursuit of surveillance authorizations[1]. This represents a direct violation of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures – a cornerstone of libertarian principles. [16]
Moreover, the apparent political motivations behind the Russia investigation exemplify the dangers of weaponized government agencies. As the Durham annex concludes, “FBI was fully alerted to the possibility that at least some of the information it was receiving about the Trump campaign might have its origin either with the Clinton campaign or its supporters, or alternatively, was the product of Russian disinformation” [1].
Consequently, these indictments could begin restoring trust in institutions that have been severely damaged by political weaponization. As Senator Grassley stated, “This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history” [1].
The shift away from oral intelligence briefings to written updates by then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe was criticized as “a significant step toward the erosion of congressional oversight, the politicization of intelligence and the expansion of executive overreach” [3]. Nevertheless, this change was made to prevent leaks and ensure intelligence information “is not misunderstood nor politicized “[3].
The Russia Hoax narrative has been central to understanding the alleged abuses of power. While former special counsel Robert Mueller maintained that his investigation “was not a witch hunt” and “was not a hoax” [4], declassified documents tell a different story. According to these documents, the Obama administration may have “manufactured intelligence” to create the 2016 Russian election interference narrative[1].
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claims to have uncovered “overwhelming evidence” that former President Barack Obama and others in his administration manipulated intelligence to “lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump” [5]. The Durham annex supports this claim, detailing how intelligence was handled and the FBI’s failure to investigate the Clinton campaign’s potential creation of the Russia collusion narrative[1].
The pursuit of Constitutional Justice represents the core purpose of these indictments. Our system requires equal application of the law, regardless of position or power. The constitutional design should not be understood to leave an “escape route for presidents who tunnel their way into power by criminal means “[2]. By the same token, those who abuse their positions within intelligence agencies must face consequences for undermining our electoral system.
Elite Overreach has become increasingly apparent as declassified documents reveal the coordinated efforts to undermine a duly elected president. The CIA did not interview Clapper for its review, nor did it speak with Brennan or Comey. Yet, Ratcliffe publicly accused all three men by name of manipulating intelligence[9]. According to a CIA spokesperson, “At CIA, we have a sacred duty to speak truth to power.” [17] Still, the agency’s review “found that when career professionals raised legitimate tradecraft concerns, those in power purposely dismissed these concerns “[9].
This pattern of elite overreach extends beyond these specific individuals. “Dozens and dozens of whistleblowers, FBI agents coming to us, talking about what is going on, the political nature at the Justice Department” [6] highlights the systemic nature of the problem. [18] The overreach of intelligence agencies threatens the very foundations of our Republic and must be checked through proper constitutional mechanisms.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, then chaired by a Republican, conducted a two-year-long investigation that “actually responds to many of the important questions about process, tradecraft, and analytical integrity” [9]. However, this investigation is not mentioned in the eight-page CIA Note that formed part of the basis for Ratcliffe’s accusations[9].
A thorough review of the CIA Note reveals that it “is focused mainly on process and does not attempt to relitigate the original assessment. But in commissioning it and then deciding to release it, Ratcliffe all but ensured that it would be used for political ammunition more than critical reflection” [9].
The decision-making around the Steele dossier’s inclusion in the assessment “may well be a focus of the FBI’s criminal investigation” [9]. This infamous dossier, which the Comey-led FBI used to obtain FISA warrants on Carter Page, was a “Clinton campaign creation,” according to the declassified documents[1].
Despite competing narratives, these emerging indictments represent a critical moment for our Republic. Either we will restore the rule of law and hold accountable those who abused their power, or we will continue down the path of elite immunity from consequences. As patriots, we must demand complete transparency and full accountability – nothing less will suffice to restore confidence in our institutions.
National Guard Restores Order: Trump’s Triumph in DC
Image Source: Reuters
The National Guard’s deployment in our nation’s capital stands as a testament to effective leadership and decisive action. [19] Within days of their arrival, Washington, DC, has undergone a remarkable transformation from crime-ridden chaos to renewed order and safety. This triumph represents exactly what happens when strong leaders prioritize the safety of American citizens over political correctness.
The numbers don’t lie, patriots! Washington, DC, has experienced zero murders in over ten days since the National Guard deployment began. This exceptional achievement stands in stark contrast to the lawlessness that previously plagued our capital city. Alongside this milestone, robbery rates have plummeted by 46% and carjackings have nosedived by an astounding 83%. These dramatic improvements in public safety coincide directly with approximately 400 National Guard members reporting for duty in Washington, DC, with a total of 800 expected by the end of the week.
Even more impressive, authorities have made 103 arrests since August 7, including suspects wanted for murder and gun offenses. On Tuesday alone, they made 43 arrests and seized 24 firearms. This overwhelming success clearly demonstrates that proper law enforcement, backed by military precision and discipline, delivers results that soft-on-crime liberal policies never could.
The deployment has expanded beyond initial expectations, with Guard members now assisting in areas previously unplanned. Initially authorized to support Metro Police with traffic control and security at transportation hubs, their mission has grown to include:
- Securing critical infrastructure
- Supporting surveillance operations
- Enhancing police presence in high-crime areas
- Assisting with administrative functions to free up police officers for patrol duties
One need only look at the before-and-after statistics to understand the magnitude of this achievement. Before the Guard’s arrival, DC residents lived in fear, with carjackings occurring daily and violent crime spiraling out of control. Now, citizens report feeling safe enough to walk their neighborhoods after dark for the first time in years.
Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/400-national-guard-members-descend-upon-dc-expanded-crime-crackdown-expected-wednesday-night
Fox News reported extensively on this remarkable success story, providing critical details about the operation that mainstream media outlets have largely ignored or downplayed. According to their reporting, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser initially requested National Guard assistance for the city, marking a significant reversal from her previous resistance to federal intervention.
The operation began with approximately 400 National Guard members reporting for duty in Washington, DC, with plans to double that number to 800 by the end of the week. These Guard members primarily came from Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia itself, all answering the call to restore order to our nation’s capital.
Initially, the Guard’s role was limited to supporting Metro Police with traffic control and security at transportation hubs. Yet the scope quickly expanded as their effectiveness became apparent. Guard members now assist with security at critical infrastructure and transportation hubs throughout the District, freeing up police officers to focus on direct crime-fighting activities.
This expanded role has proven highly effective, as evidenced by the dramatic drop in crime statistics across multiple categories. The comprehensive approach ensures that the entire city benefits from increased security presence, not just selected neighborhoods or districts.
Primarily, what makes this operation different from previous attempts to curb DC crime is the coordinated approach between federal and local authorities. Unlike past liberal attempts at crime reduction that focused on “root causes” while ignoring immediate danger, this operation prioritizes removing dangerous criminals from the streets immediately.
Patriots across America can take immense pride in seeing our nation’s capital secured through strong, decisive leadership. For too long, Washington, DC, has symbolized the disconnect between elite politicians and everyday Americans – a city where lawmakers work behind secure barriers. At the same time, citizens face rising crime and deteriorating conditions.
The National Guard deployment represents a return to fundamental American values: protecting citizens, upholding law and order, and taking decisive action rather than endless deliberation. This success story exemplifies the America First approach to governance – placing the safety and security of American citizens above all other considerations.
The stark contrast between the previous lawlessness and the current order demonstrates what happens when leaders prioritize results over rhetoric. Unlike the endless task forces, studies, and “community initiatives” favored by liberal administrators, this approach recognized the immediate need for boots on the ground and a show of force against criminal elements.
What’s particularly noteworthy is how quickly these improvements manifested. Within days of the Guard’s arrival, crime statistics began falling dramatically. This immediate impact underscores that many of our nation’s problems don’t require complex, expensive, multi-year solutions – they need the political will to take direct action and enforce existing laws.
Given these points, the National Guard’s success in DC represents a blueprint that could be implemented in other crime-plagued cities across America. From Chicago to San Francisco, American citizens are crying out for the same decisive action that has transformed our nation’s capital.
The message is unmistakable: When America puts Americans first and employs the full resources of our military and law enforcement communities to protect citizens, we succeed. This nationalist approach to governance – prioritizing the safety and security of our own people – delivers results that globalist policies consistently fail to achieve.
The National Guard’s triumph in Washington, DC, perfectly illustrates the Republican and libertarian principle that government’s primary role should be protecting citizens’ life, liberty, and property. This focused approach to governance – concentrating resources on core responsibilities rather than endless expansion into new domains – delivers tangible results for everyday Americans.
Unlike the bloated bureaucracies and ineffective social programs favored by the left, this operation demonstrates the effectiveness of targeted intervention. By deploying resources specifically to address crime and protect citizens, the operation achieves maximum impact without unnecessary expansion of government powers.
It is essential to realize that this approach doesn’t represent big government – it represents effective government. The distinction lies in focusing government action on its constitutional responsibilities rather than expanding into areas better left to private citizens and organizations. When government concentrates on its proper role – maintaining order and protecting citizens – it succeeds in ways that benefit all Americans.
The Guard’s deployment embodies the constitutionalist view that the federal government has a legitimate role in ensuring domestic tranquility and providing for the common defense. [20] These core functions, explicitly outlined in our founding documents, represent the proper focus of government action.
Furthermore, this success story demonstrates how federalism works at its best – with local, state, and federal authorities cooperating to address challenges that cross jurisdictional boundaries. The crime wave in DC wasn’t just a local problem; it affected our nation’s capital and threatened the safety of visitors from across America.
This cooperative approach, respecting the proper roles of different levels of government while enabling them to work together effectively, stands in stark contrast to the top-down mandates and federal overreach that characterize liberal governance. Instead of imposing one-size-fits-all solutions, this operation adapted to local conditions while providing crucial federal resources.
The results speak for themselves: dramatic crime reduction, increased public safety, and renewed confidence among citizens. These outcomes weren’t achieved through massive new spending programs or expanded entitlements, but through focused action in the specific domain where government intervention is most appropriate and legitimate.
The National Guard deployment in Washington, DC represents one of the most successful domestic security operations in recent memory. With approximately 400 Guard members already on duty and another 400 expected shortly, this operation has achieved results that years of liberal policies failed to deliver.
The transformation in DC Safety has been nothing short of remarkable. From a city where residents feared carjackings and random violence to one where citizens can walk freely without constant fear, Washington has experienced a renaissance of public safety. This dramatic improvement didn’t require years of planning or billions in spending – it only needed the political will to take decisive action.
This Crime Crackdown stands as evidence that addressing crime doesn’t require abandoning constitutional principles or civil liberties. By focusing on removing violent offenders from the streets and establishing a visible security presence, authorities have created an environment where law-abiding citizens can thrive while criminals face swift consequences.
The operation’s success vindicates Trump’s Policies that prioritize law and order, border security, and protecting American citizens. The approach to DC’s crime wave mirrors the broader philosophy that the government’s primary responsibility is protecting its citizens from threats both foreign and domestic. [21]
Before the Guard’s arrival, DC had become emblematic of the failures of progressive governance – rising crime, deteriorating infrastructure, and declining quality of life despite massive government spending. The rapid transformation following the National Guard deployment demonstrates that these problems were never intractable; they merely required the right approach and leadership.
Above all, the National Guard’s success in Washington, DC, represents a roadmap for addressing similar challenges across America. By focusing government action on core responsibilities, deploying resources effectively, and prioritizing results over ideology, we can restore safety and security to communities nationwide.
As the nation witnesses this dramatic turnaround, more Americans are recognizing the effectiveness of these approaches compared to the failed policies of the past. The undeniable success in our nation’s capital stands as robust evidence that when we return to fundamental principles of governance and prioritize the safety of American citizens, we achieve remarkable results.
The Deep State Indictments now looming over former intelligence officials represent another front in the same battle – holding accountable those who abused their power while restoring the rule of law. Together with the National Guard’s triumph in DC, these developments signal a return to constitutional governance and genuine accountability after years of corruption and decline.
Newsom’s California Landgrab: A Conspiracy Turned Reality
While Deep State Indictments loom and the National Guard restores order in DC, another threat to liberty unfolds on the West Coast. Governor Gavin Newsom’s actions in California reveal how government overreach begins with seemingly benevolent intentions, yet ultimately threatens fundamental property rights.
In what patriots across America recognize as a dangerous precedent, California’s government has implemented post-wildfire policies that effectively grant the state unprecedented control over private property. Under the guise of “protection” and “environmental conservation,” these regulations enable government officials to restrict rebuilding efforts and dictate land use following natural disasters.
The strategy follows a predictable pattern: First, devastating wildfires strike California communities. Afterward, instead of supporting rapid rebuilding, state agencies impose complex environmental reviews and restrictive zoning changes. Finally, many property owners—financially exhausted and unable to navigate bureaucratic hurdles—surrender their land to government-aligned entities at severely reduced values.
This systematic approach represents nothing less than a strategic land grab executed through regulatory means. Homeowners who have lost everything to natural disasters find themselves facing not just the destruction of their property but also the effective confiscation of their land rights through impossible compliance requirements.
Evidence from Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newsom-cracks-down-predatory-wildfire-investors-2015073
Ironically, Governor Newsom recently signed legislation supposedly protecting wildfire victims from “predatory investors.” According to Newsweek, this new law prevents investors from purchasing fire-damaged properties below market value—yet simultaneously empowers the government to control these same properties through regulatory action.
This legislation creates a facade of consumer protection while consolidating state control over vast areas of private land. The timing could not be more suspect—as California experiences unprecedented wildfire seasons, the state positions itself to determine the future of enormous swaths of valuable property.
The pattern becomes clear when examining the aftermath of recent disasters. Following major wildfires, California’s environmental agencies typically impose new restrictions that make rebuilding prohibitively expensive or outright impossible for average property owners. These regulations often cite “climate resilience” or “environmental protection” as justification—concepts that sound noble but effectively transfer property control from citizens to the state.
From a libertarian perspective, these policies represent a fundamental violation of property rights—the cornerstone of individual liberty. When the government can effectively seize control of private land through regulatory means, no property is truly secure.
The entire premise of these regulations rests on the flawed assumption that government bureaucrats know better than individual property owners how land should be utilized. This centralized planning approach mirrors socialist systems where the state, not individuals, makes decisions about resource allocation and property use.
Furthermore, these policies create perverse incentives. Rather than improving fire prevention measures or infrastructure, the state benefits from disasters by expanding its control over valuable land. This represents the worst form of government overreach—one that potentially profits from citizen suffering.
As libertarian principles clearly establish, property rights form the foundation upon which all other freedoms rest. Without secure ownership of physical assets, individuals become dependent on government favor rather than protected by constitutional rights.
From a constitutionalist perspective, although states possess certain powers over land use within their borders, these powers remain limited by both federal and state constitutions. The Fifth Amendment explicitly protects against taking private property without just compensation—a protection California circumvents through regulatory rather than direct seizure.
Likewise, a nationalist viewpoint recognizes that American sovereignty begins with individual citizens’ control over their own property. When elites in Sacramento can effectively nullify property rights through regulatory fiat, they undermine the very foundation of American independence and self-determination.
This conflict exemplifies the growing divide between coastal elites and everyday Americans. While ordinary citizens value independence, self-reliance, and constitutional protections, progressive officials increasingly view private property as something to be managed or controlled by government experts rather than individual owners.
The California Landgrab occurring through these post-fire policies reveals how government expansion often occurs incrementally rather than through obvious seizures. By gradually restricting property rights through layers of regulation, the state achieves control without triggering constitutional protections against takings.
What many dismissed as a Conspiracy theory regarding government land control has manifested into observable reality. The mechanism isn’t black helicopters or direct confiscation but rather the steady accumulation of regulatory barriers that make private ownership increasingly burdensome until surrender becomes inevitable.
The tension between legitimate state rights and unconstitutional overreach plays out dramatically in this scenario. While states maintain authority to regulate for public safety, this authority cannot extend to de facto property seizure without compensation or due process.
Patriots across America must recognize this California model as a potential template for nationwide property control. Only through vigilant defense of constitutional protections can we prevent this regulatory land grab from spreading beyond California’s borders to threaten liberty throughout our Republic.
Conclusion: Rise Up, Defend the Republic
Patriots across America witness a pivotal moment in our nation’s history. The looming Deep State indictments, successful National Guard deployment in DC, and exposure of California’s regulatory land grab collectively signal one undeniable truth – constitutional principles work when actually enforced. These developments, though seemingly separate, undoubtedly form part of the same battle between liberty and government overreach.
Evidence now overwhelmingly suggests that justice approaches for those who weaponized our intelligence agencies against a duly elected president. Meanwhile, the dramatic crime reduction in our nation’s capital proves that decisive action, rather than endless deliberation, solves real problems facing American citizens. DC’s transformation stands as a powerful testimony that America First policies deliver tangible results – zero murders in over ten days speaks volumes.
Consequently, we must recognize California’s regulatory land grab as another front in this same war against our liberties. Though cloaked in environmental protection language, these policies essentially undermine fundamental property rights through bureaucratic means rather than direct seizure.
The pattern becomes crystal clear. When we uphold constitutional limits on government power, America thrives. When we allow unelected bureaucrats and coastal elites to dictate policy, our freedoms erode. The constitutional balance requires constant vigilance against those who would sacrifice liberty for control.
Above all, these three issues highlight the urgent need for patriots to remain engaged. Our Republic faces threats not just from foreign adversaries but from within – from those who view constitutional constraints as outdated obstacles rather than essential protections. 🇺🇸 Share this explosive story on X with #DrainTheSwamp, #AmericaFirst, and #LibertyRising to awaken the nation! Stand for the Constitution, liberty, and justice—spread the word NOW and fight elite overreach! 🦅
The wheels of justice turn slowly but grind exceedingly fine. [22] Patriots must stand ready as Deep State indictments approach, supporting constitutional governance wherever threatened. Our vigilance today secures liberty for generations tomorrow. The battle continues, but truth and justice will eventually prevail. America depends on it.
References
[2] – https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/yes-constitution-allows-indictment-president
[3] – https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/01/opinion/national-intelligence-briefings-House-senate.html
[5] – https://www.factcheck.org/issue/russia-investigation/
[6] – https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/115294/text
[7] – https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/david-marcus-dc-just-had-murder-free-week-yes-dems-trump-did
[9] – https://www.theatlantic.com/national-security/archive/2025/07/cia-note-russia-hoax/683464/
[11] – (2018). There is a Blue America and a Red America, two banks on either side of a vast river of disinterested people — and with a handful of purple bridges across the banks. Florida Times Union, (), 1.
[12] – (2017). United States: Senate Judiciary Committee Progress Report for the 114th Congress. MENA Report, (), n/a.
[13] – This is how VPNs are useless against the FBI. https://www.wearethemighty.com/intel/this-is-how-vpns-are-useless-against-the-fbi/
[14] – #Obamagate: The Phony Scandal We Need To Take Seriously – NewsHounds. https://www.newshounds.us/_obamagate_phony_scandal_take_seriously_051420
[15] – Yes, the Constitution Allows Indictment of the President | Lawfare. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/yes-constitution-allows-indictment-president
[16] – The Landmark Case of Mapp v. Ohio and Its Impact on the Fourth Amendment – Free Essay Example – 667 Words | PapersOwl.com. https://papersowl.com/examples/the-landmark-case-of-mapp-v-ohio-and-its-impact-on-the-fourth-amendment/
[17] – Why I’ve decided to join the Labour party, then immediately resign | Books | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/mar/12/alexei-sayle-why-i-have-decided-join-labour-party-then-immediately-resign
[18] – Charlie Pierce: Jim Jordan Boasted about “Whistleblowers” But All He’s Produced Is a Stream of Hot Air | STEPHANIE MILLER SHOW. https://www.stephaniemiller.com/charlie-pierce-jim-jordan-boasted-about-whistleblowers-but-all-hes-produced-is-a-stream-of-hot-air/
[19] – Home. https://www.kokodaholdings.com/
[20] – What is the difference between ensuring domestic tranquility and providing for the common defense? – Answers. https://www.answers.com/american-government/What_is_the_difference_between_ensuring_domestic_tranquility_and_providing_for_the_common_defense
[21] – Is Cia A Government Agency – Secret services. https://www.doubleagentspy.com/is-cia-a-government-agency/
[22] – (2024). Ukraine: Andrii Sybiha participated in a ministerial meeting of the member states of the Joint Investigation Team on the shoot down of Flight MH17. MENA Report, (),.
[23] – Blegen, E. (2023). Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll: Effectively and Equitably Moderating Vice and Illegal Content Online. Vanderbilt Law Review, 76(4), 1265-1298.
[25] – https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1959729464964763895
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment