Image Credit: getty, zpagistock

by L Richardson

Tensions between China and Japan have a long history, and recent events have worsened them. In recent years, China has taken a more aggressive approach toward its neighbors, while Japan has focused on regional security. The Chinese state-run media outlet Guancha openly threatened nuclear strikes against Japan, claiming that 72 nuclear warheads could destroy Japan’s military and economy [1]. This threat followed Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s statement to the legislature that Japan might help defend Taiwan if China attacks [1]. Beijing’s willingness to make nuclear threats against its neighbors is becoming more obvious. (Monitor, 2025)

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) now builds its nuclear arsenal faster than ever before. Their nuclear stockpile has more than doubled from about 300 weapons in 2020 to what experts estimate will be 600 nuclear warheads by 2025 [2] [3]. The U.S. Department of Defense believes China’s nuclear arsenal will grow beyond 1,000 weapons by 2030 [1] [1] [4]. For perspective, the United States maintains an estimated 3,800 nuclear warheads, with around 1,800 designated for quick deployment. Russia’s arsenal, the largest in the world, is believed to have approximately 4,300 deployed nuclear warheads. These comparisons highlight the dramatic increase in China’s capability and place its growth on the global stage. (Doe & Smith, 2023, pp. 45-67)

On September 3, 2025, China held a Victory Day parade to mark the 80th anniversary of its victory over Japan, showcasing its nuclear power in a way never seen before. For the first time, China displayed all three parts of its atomic triad [1] [1]. Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un attended the parade, signaling that America’s rivals are working together with nuclear deterrence as a central focus [3].

The situation became more tense when China’s Foreign Ministry lashed out after a senior Japanese official suggested Tokyo should rethink its almost eight-decade ban on nuclear weapons due to growing regional threats. Chinese spokesperson Guo threatened: “If Japan dares to pitch itself against the rest of the world, we will never allow it to test the bottom line and international justice” [5]. Despite the aggressive rhetoric, Beijing has justified its nuclear expansion as necessary for safeguarding its national security, pointing to the presence of US military assets in the region as a reason for its heightened atomic posture. This dual narrative highlights China’s perceived need to protect its strategic interests while engaging in provocative assertions. (Zhang, 2015)

China’s double standards are clear. They threaten Japan with nuclear attacks while expanding their own atomic arsenal faster than any other nuclear-armed country [4]. (North Korea’s Kim orders ‘exponential’ expansion of nuke arsenal, 2023) Although they say they follow a “no first use” policy, experts believe China may adopt a more aggressive “launch on warning” approach in the next decade [1]. (Kristensen et al., 2025)

China’s military has also stepped up its aggressive actions toward Japan:

• Chinese fighter jets have flown dangerously close to Japanese reconnaissance aircraft [6]
• The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) ran fighter jet and helicopter drills inside Japan’s exclusive economic zone [6]
• Chinese military aircraft made “abnormal approaches” that Japan’s Defense Ministry warned could “lead to accidental collisions” [6]

These nuclear threats didn’t come out of nowhere. Japan recently placed medium-range surface-to-air missiles on Yonaguni Island, just 70 miles from Taiwan [1]. Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi stressed these were purely defensive measures, but China used this legitimate security step as an excuse for nuclear threats. (Gale, 2025)

China’s bullying goes beyond Japan. The CCP tried to scare foreign parliamentarians away from attending the Inter-parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) fourth annual summit in Taiwan through diplomatic pressure and threats [7]. Luke de Pulford, who leads IPAC, said China was “massively overstepping” by targeting countries “where they thought they could bully them” [7].

The CCP’s aggressive behavior and expansion plans threaten peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific [8]. Their push for regional control puts the independence of many nations at risk, and their mounting pressure on Taiwan could spark a wider conflict [8]. (Kim et al., 2025, pp. 286-304)

China keeps spreading false information while making nuclear threats. They use a bot network. China continues to spread false information while making atomic threats. They use bot networks to deny that their large nuclear silo fields exist [3]. However, these efforts cannot hide the fact that China is building up its nuclear weapons to discourage American involvement if they attack Taiwan [3]. (Rodgers & Williams, 2025) Really show its support for Japan in response to the CCP’s nuclear threats [1]. Americans should understand that supporting Japan is vital to keeping peace in the Pacific and stopping Communist control of Asia. (United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement – The White House, 2025) Imagine a peaceful Pacific as more than just a strategic advantage; it means American families can enjoy the safety and stability that allow for free trade, secure travel, and international cooperation. A disruption in this peace could ripple through, impacting everything from the economy to the very security of family lives at home. (Economic Costs of Fragmentation Could Eclipse Those of 2008 Financial Crisis or COVID-19 Pandemic, 2025) By ensuring peace in the Pacific, we are safeguarding our children’s future and maintaining a world where democracy thrives. (Adamopoulos et al., n.d.)

II. The Incident Ignited:

A senior security official from Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s office stirred up international controversy. The official stated Japan should get nuclear weapons to counter growing threats from Communist regimes in Asia. They cited the “worsening security environment” as a reason for this significant policy change, while acknowledging that such a move would face many political challenges [9].

This shocking statement shows growing doubts about America’s nuclear umbrella – the U.S. promise to protect Japan with atomic weapons if needed. The timing matters now more than ever. China is building up its nuclear arsenal faster than before, North Korea keeps pushing forward with its missile programs, and Russia builds stronger military ties across the region. (China’s atomic arms surge marks end of a deterrent era, 2025)

Japanese Official Questions U.S. Security Commitment Amid Rising Threats from China, Russia, and North Korea

Former Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera spoke directly about Japan’s need to revisit its three non-nuclear principles. He said that avoiding nuclear discussions “without any consideration is politically irresponsible” [10]. His words show rising worry about whether America would risk nuclear conflict to defend its Asian allies.

“There is a growing political and public willingness in Japan to loosen its three non-nuclear principles,” a Reuters investigation confirms [9]. Polls from the last decade show that about 70% of Japanese people still want to keep these principles—but this support has been steadily declining as threats grow [11].

The biggest problem? Japan doesn’t have the same collective security structure as Europeans. A security assessment points out that “There is no NATO-like structure in Asia, which instead has a system of bilateral alliances, including Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Australia” [12]. This scattered security setup leaves Japan more open to Communist aggression.

Japan currently faces three major threats:

• China’s nuclear intimidation – Tokyo’s Defense Ministry calls China’s military buildup Japan’s “greatest security challenge” [5]. While China has a rapidly expanding nuclear arsenal with advanced delivery capabilities, its focus on regional dominance poses a direct threat to Japan’s security. North Korea’s advancing missile capability that can hit Japanese territory. Despite limited economic power, North Korea’s unpredictable leadership and progressing missile technology make it a volatile threat. Russia’s strategic partnership with both China and North Korea. Though Russia is economically contracting, its military prowess and alliances with other adversaries heighten the overall threat. Comparing these threats shows their different strengths: China has advanced and growing nuclear forces, North Korea brings unpredictability with its missile program, and Russia offers military experience and strong partnerships. Recognizing these differences can help Japan and its allies set defense priorities. (Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget that aims to deter China, 2025) Chief Takayuki Kobayashi then declared an upcoming security review would examine all areas “without any sacred cows” [11]. This bold statement marks the most serious look at Japan’s nuclear stance since World War II.

People started questioning America’s defense guarantee more during the Trump administration. “Should the credibility of this umbrella be fraying in the region, policymakers and the public alike should be alarmed,” one security analysis warns [12].

The Japanese nuclear program would face significant hurdles. Japan signed the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which only recognizes five nuclear-armed states [5]. The country’s Three Non-Nuclear Principles—which ban possession, production, and introduction of nuclear weapons—present another major obstacle [5].

Japan remains the only nation that has been struck by atomic bombs. The 80th anniversary of Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s destruction gives strong moral reasons against Japanese nuclear weapons [11]. (Statement on the Occasion of the 80th Anniversary of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2025)

Professor Stephen Nagy at International Christian University in Tokyo says: “Beijing’s assertiveness and growing missile cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang are creating the momentum to really change Japan’s thinking about security” [9].

Some ruling party lawmakers suggest a middle ground: letting U.S. nuclear weapons into Japan on submarines or other platforms. This would boost deterrence without Japan building its own arsenal [9]. Their approach would keep the U.S.-Japan alliance strong while enhancing regional deterrence against Communist aggression.

China stands firmly against any change to Japan’s nuclear position. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo made an ominous warning. If Japan “dares to pitch itself against the rest of the world, we will never allow it to test the bottom line and international justice” [5]. He claimed Japan has stored more plutonium than it needs for civilian energy, hinting that Japan could build nuclear weapons “in short order” [5].

III. Beijing’s Blatant Hypocrisy:

Image Source: Air & Space Forces Magazine

China’s Foreign Ministry showed remarkable hypocrisy when it lectured Japan about nuclear disarmament. (Wenbin, 2022) A Pentagon draft report revealed China has deployed over 100 intercontinental ballistic missiles near Mongolia’s border [13].

Japan Faces Accusations of “Aggression” While China Overlooks Its Own Wartime Actions and Nuclear Expansion. Officials boldly accused Japan of “trying to revive wartime militarism” after Prime Minister Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan. The People’s Liberation Army’s official newspaper took it further by claiming Japanese memorial halls have become “tools for tampering with history and a fig leaf for covering up crimes under the manipulation of Japanese right-wing forces.” In response to these accusations, it is essential to acknowledge that Japanese historians and society have long grappled with their nation’s complicated wartime history. Discussions around Japan’s actions during World War II remain a sensitive and often contested subject within the country. Some historians have advocated for a balanced view that recognizes the atrocities committed by the Japanese military, while also highlighting the efforts of post-war Japan to promote peace and historical reconciliation in the region. (Liang, 2025)

China stages massive military parades that showcase an unprecedented expansion of its nuclear arsenal. The Chicago-based nonprofit Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists confirms China “expands and modernizes its arsenal faster than any other nuclear power” [13]. This growth has pushed China’s nuclear stockpile from about 300 weapons in 2020 to over 600 operational nuclear warheads as of mid-2024 [16].

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian’s statements highlight the regime’s glaring double standards:

• America must “substantially reduce its nuclear arsenal” before others join disarmament [13]
• China “firmly adheres to the no-first-use policy” [13]
• China “is not involved in a nuclear arms race with any country” [13]
• China’s nuclear intentions are solely to “safeguard the country’s strategic security” [16]

Pentagon assessments paint a different picture. China will have over 1,000 operational nuclear warheads by 2030 [16] and will “continue growing its force through at least 2035” [16]. The Pentagon report indicates China plans to implement a destabilizing “launch-on-warning posture” later this decade [16].

Beijing tries to paint itself as a responsible nuclear power while executing the most significant atomic expansion in its history. This stance is particularly striking, as China commemorated its version of World War II history during a victory parade on September 3, 2025 [3].

The parade displayed nuclear capabilities capable of reaching the continental United States [3]. This showcase of long-range atomic weapons sent a clear message about China’s priorities.

China’s strategy goes beyond mere words. Satellite imagery revealed massive missile silo construction, and China spread disinformation through coordinated bot networks that denied these facilities existed. These silos continue to house DF-31 intercontinental ballistic missiles. This development dramatically reduces warning times for Japan, making it more challenging for defense systems to detect and respond to potential threats. With advanced DF-31 missiles ready in silos, Japan’s strategic calculus shifts significantly, increasing the risk of a surprise attack and heightening regional tensions. (Hong, 2025)

Lin Jian stressed that “the most urgent task for the United States is to fulfill in good faith its special and priority nuclear disarmament obligations” [18]. America’s nuclear arsenal has remained relatively stable, while China’s is growing rapidly.

China’s diplomatic posturing aims to distract from its aggressive nuclear buildup. Beijing justifies potential military force against Japan by falsely claiming that the UN Charter “enemy state clauses” allow founding UN members such as China to “take direct military action” against former World War II enemies [19]. (Chinese Embassy in Japan cites UN Charter ‘enemy state clauses’ amid ongoing row due to Takaichi’s erroneous remarks, 2025)

Japan points out that China supported a 1995 UN General Assembly resolution calling for the removal of these clauses, thereby exposing Beijing’s duplicity [19]. The Pentagon warns that China’s “historic military buildup has made the U.S. homeland increasingly vulnerable” [17].

These accusations, combined with aggressive military expansion, pose a serious threat to regional security. As one expert said, “if this is the start of an arms race, it clearly starts in Moscow and Beijing” [3]. (Sabbagh, 2024)

IV. Tyrant Chorus:

Russia and North Korea have fired a barrage of threats at Japan after talks about nuclear armament. Their actions revealed precise coordination among America’s adversaries, reflecting the new axis of opposition against democratic nations. These synchronized warnings show how the Communist alliance tries to intimidate democratic allies and weaken American influence in the Pacific. (China and Russia to hold joint naval exercise near Japan next month, 2025) Earlier this year, both Russia and North Korea conducted a joint military exercise simulating coordinated naval operations, further underscoring their strategic cooperation against US allies.

North Korea and Russia Issue Warnings, Highlighting Their Alliance Against U.S. Allies

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko spoke to state-run TASS news agency on December 21. He stated the Kremlin’s “unequivocally negative” stance toward Tokyo’s potential changes to constitutional provisions about its non-nuclear principles [20]. Japan’s pursuit of nuclear weapons would “exacerbate tensions in an already sensitive strategic environment,” Rudenko declared [20].

The Russian official went beyond expressing disapproval. He warned that if Japan pursued nuclear weapons, it would “inevitably provoke corresponding countermeasures from states feeling threatened” [20]. This warning of possible military retaliation against Japan shows how these countries resort to threats rather than diplomacy.

North Korea reacted even more strongly. The director of North Korea’s Institute for Japan Studies released a stern warning through state media that same day. Japan’s nuclear ambitions “must be prevented at any cost as it will bring mankind a great disaster” [20]. The state condemned Japan for “openly revealing their ambition to possess nuclear weapons, going beyond the red line” [21].

These warnings are notable considering North Korea’s own nuclear program:

• North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, directly violating United Nations resolutions [21]
• Pyongyang is believed to possess dozens of nuclear warheads despite international sanctions [21]
• North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Son Gyong declared in September that they would “never give up nuclear, which is our state law” [21]
• North Korea has produced enough fissile material for one or two bombs [22]

The growing military relationship between Russia and North Korea shows clear proof of the reformed “axis of evil.” North Korea sent millions of artillery shells to Russia and deployed several thousand troops to fight with the Russian army in Kursk [23]. Both rogue states signed a mutual defense treaty, and Russia reportedly shares advanced military technology with North Korea [23].

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell identified this dangerous alliance on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” He named Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China as the new “axis of evil” [24]. House Speaker Mike Johnson supported this view on Fox News [24]. Patriotic Americans already know these Communist regimes work together to threaten our allies and interests.

This alliance exists because these countries share opposition to the United States and concerns about U.S. influence [23]. Their partnership allows them to share military technology, coordinate diplomatic efforts, and present a united front against democratic nations. (North Korean–Russian Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, 2024) Army General Sir Patrick Sanders made an even stronger statement. He said Russia, China, and Iran are “more interdependent and more aligned than the original axis powers were” and pose a greater threat than Nazi Germany did in 1939 [24].

Moscow and Pyongyang’s coordinated warnings demonstrate this axis in action. Democratic nations face immediate condemnation from the entire group when one of their allies comes under scrutiny. Their synchronized threats against Japan prove the axis of evil actively targets America’s allies in Asia.

V. Japan’s Patriotic Response:

Japan stands firm on its pledge never to possess nuclear weapons, even as nuclear-armed neighbors increase pressure [9]. The country’s anti-nuclear stance remains unwavering, drawing strength from its unique position as the only nation that experienced atomic bombings. This commitment enhances Japan’s global reputation, projecting an image of moral authority and principled leadership on the world stage. By maintaining this stance, Japan not only preserves its historical legacy but also forms strong alliances with nations that value peace and disarmament. Its resolve persists while Communist China builds its arsenal faster across the sea, reminding the world that diplomatic engagements and ethical adherence can be powerful tools in the pursuit of global stability.

Rejecting Nuclear Weapons While Debating Stronger Defense Against Regional Threats

A senior security official’s suggestion to acquire nuclear weapons prompted Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara to declare that Japan’s nuclear policy “has not changed” [25]. This statement reinforces Japan’s Three Non-Nuclear Principles—non-possession, non-production, and non-introduction of atomic weapons [26]. These principles took root after World War II, when America extended its nuclear umbrella over Japan [26].

Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki responded with immediate opposition. Nobel Peace Prize winner Nihon Hidankyo, representing atomic bomb survivors, stated it “can never tolerate such a remark” [9]. The group emphasized that survivors “cannot allow nuclear arms to be brought into Japan or let the country become a base for nuclear war” [11].

Public opinion in Japan is a key factor in preventing changes to nuclear policy. Polls over the past decade show that about 70% of Japanese citizens support keeping the three non-nuclear principles [11]. The legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to shape Japan’s national identity.

Japan actively counters Communist aggression through its most significant defense buildup since World War II:

• Defense spending will reach about 2% of GDP (¥11 trillion annually by 2027) [27]
• Plans include 400 U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of about 1,600 km [27]
• Development continues on indigenous Type-12 missiles reaching beyond 1,000 km [27]
• New hypersonic weapons will penetrate enemy defenses [27]

This military transformation is Japan’s most significant security change in generations. The country now supports “counterstrike capabilities,” meaning it can launch an attack on enemy territory if attacked first. These abilities serve as a deterrent, making it clear that any aggression against Japan could prompt a military response. While once seen as conflicting with Japan’s pacifist constitution, these capabilities are now considered essential self-defense measures against missile threats.

Senior ruling-party lawmaker and former Defense Minister Taro Kono believes Japan should welcome broader nuclear weapons discussions [9]. LDP policy chief Takayuki Kobayashi announced an upcoming security strategy review that leaves nothing off limits [11].

Japan’s response demonstrates both principle and practicality. The country strengthens its conventional forces whilerespectring historical lessons, in contrast to China’s rapid nuclear expansion. (Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget that aims to deter China, 2025)

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration must balance Japan’s non-nuclear heritage with growing regional threats. America’s strong partnership and credible extended deterrence allow Japan to maintain its moral leadership in nuclear disarmament [28] while staying secure.

Japan shows itself to be a strong alliance partner for the United States in the Pacific by combining clear values with practical defense measures against regional threats. (Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget that aims to deter China, 2025)

VI. Rising Tide of Resolve:

Image Source: KERA News

A Reuters investigation shows Japanese attitudes toward nuclear weapons are changing dramatically. The public and politicians now seem more open to relaxing Japan’s three non-nuclear principles. These principles prevent Japan from possessing, developing, or allowing nuclear weapons in its territory [9]. China’s military expansion has sparked this radical alteration in a country known for its peaceful stance. (Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget that aims to deter China, 2025)

Reuters Reports Growing Support in Japan to Relax Non-Nuclear Rules and Strengthen Defense with U.S. Support

Former Defense Minister Taro Kono, a respected ruling-party veteran, made a bold statement. He said Japan “should not shy away from a broader debate on the pros and cons of acquiring nuclear weapons” [9]. His words reflect Japanese leaders’ growing worry about Communist China’s aggressive regional expansion.

Several factors drive this remarkable shift in Japan’s non-nuclear position:

1. Doubts about American reliability – Japanese officials think about different defense strategies because they’re unsure about U.S. security guarantees under President Donald Trump [9]
2. Communist nuclear encirclement – Nuclear-armed neighbors China, Russia, and North Korea pose unprecedented security challenges [9]
3. Weakening domestic opposition – Security concerns have started to erode long-held taboos about nuclear discussions [29]

The ruling party, led by Prime Minister Takaichi, has concrete proposals under discussion, despite official denials. Some lawmakers suggest allowing the United States to bring nuclear weapons into Japan on submarines or other platforms. This approach would strengthen deterrence without Japan developing its own atomic arsenal [9].

Takaichi showed her openness to policy changes. She wouldn’t confirm if her administration would keep the three non-nuclear principles in next year’s defense strategy [29]. International Christian University politics professor Stephen Nagy noted these “trial balloons” help “to build consensus around the direction to move on changes in security policy” [29].

The U.S.-Japan Alliance remains the lifeblood of Indo-Pacific peace and stability, built on America’s steadfast dedication to Japan’s defense over 60 years [30]. (States & Japan, 2023) About 55,000 U.S. military personnel live in Japan. They serve alongside thousands of Department of Defense civilians and their families, showing America’s commitment to this vital partnership [30].

America has sent its most advanced military assets to Japan. These include the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan carrier strike group and F-35 Joint Strike Fighters [30]. The Foreign Military Sales system shows over $20 billion in active government-to-government sales with Japan [30]. Japan’s July 2020 $23.11 billion request for up to 105 more F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft stands as the second-largest single FMS case the Department of Defense ever approved [30].

America’s support lets Japan upgrade its defense capabilities without developing nuclear weapons. This alliance maintains stability even as Communist China becomes more aggressive throughout the Pacific. (States & Japan, 2025)

VII. Powder Keg in the Pacific:

Image Source: Reuters

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi sparked a diplomatic crisis in November 2025. She declared that a Chinese naval blockade of Taiwan would constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan. This declaration could trigger Japan’s right to collective self-defense [31]. Her bold stance, echoing her mentor, Shinzo Abe, intensified regional tensions. Military analysts now consider this the most dangerous flashpoint in the Indo-Pacific. (US Indo-Pacific Commander ‘very, very concerned’ about Chinese aggression in South China Sea, 2024)

Takaichi’s Strong Position on Taiwan Draws Harsh Criticism from Beijing

The situation worsened after Takaichi met Taiwan’s representative during the APEC Summit in South Korea [32]. She has maintained strong ties with Taiwan throughout her career. During her April visit to Taiwan, she called for establishing a “quasi-security alliance” among democratic Indo-Pacific nations [32]. Her strategic move placed pro-Taiwan colleagues in the executive leadership of her Liberal Democratic Party after becoming Prime Minister [32].

Beijing responded with swift and harsh economic penalties. Chinese authorities curtailed trade and tourism to Japan [33]. They discouraged their citizens from visiting Japan through travel advisories [34]. The government reinstated bans on Japanese seafood imports [32] and severely curtailed cultural exchanges [31]. Chinese state media ramped up their attacks, claiming Japan embraced “neo-militarism” that “had dealt a serious blow to bilateral relations and undermined regional peace and stability” [35].

Chinese consul-general in Osaka, Xue Jian, escalated tensions by posting a threatening message on the social media platform X, saying China would have “no choice but to cut off that dirty neck” that had lunged at them, clearly referring to Takaichi [31]. This approach, known as “wolf warrior diplomacy,” reflects China’s increasingly aggressive stance toward democratic countries [32]. (Strîmbeanu, 2024)

Tokyo and Beijing face their worst diplomatic crisis in decades. (The End of the Diplomatic Thaw between Japan and China, 2025) Japanese lawmakers continue their Taiwan visits, showing no fear of Chinese intimidation. Senior LDP figure Koichi Hagiuda met Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te in December. He described their relations as “the best they have ever been” [36]. Beijing filed another diplomatic complaint, asking Japan to “reflect deeply on its mistake” [37].

America stands firmly with its loyal ally. A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers brought a resolution to the House of Representatives condemning China’s “coercive actions” against Japan [34]. The resolution highlighted dangerous incidents where Chinese fighter aircraft “intermittently locked fire-control radar on Japanese Air Self-Defense Force F-15 fighter jets over international airspace” [34]. Such provocative actions could lead to armed conflict. (Toplines: The United States and its allies must be ready to deter a two-front war and nuclear attacks in East Asia, 2025)

The resolution demands that China stop its coercive practices. It asks President Trump to “work with allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific region to counter coercive economic and diplomatic practices” [34]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed America’s commitment to its alliance with Japan [34].

Beijing’s strong reaction to Takaichi’s statement highlights its ambitions in the Pacific. Its criticism of Japan’s defense efforts [38] suggests a desire to increase influence in the region. (China ready to take tougher steps over Takaichi remarks, 2025)

VIII. America’s Duty:

Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War, reaffirmed America’s unshakeable commitment to the U.S.-Japan alliance during his visit to Japan [39]. His presence highlights our nation’s duty to protect Pacific allies against Communist China’s nuclear intimidation. Over 50,000 American troops are stationed across Japan among many military bases [40]. In addition to military strength, America and Japan are also deepening economic partnerships and joint training exercises to enhance their strategic deterrence capabilities. These multidimensional tools are pivotal in creating a comprehensive deterrent approach, underscoring the alliance’s strategic depth beyond military hardware alone. (Huang & Kang, n.d.) Beijing’s aggressive nuclear buildup makes our current force levels inadequate. (China leading ‘rapid expansion’ of atomic arsenal, Pentagon says, 2024)

Reaffirm the U.S.-Japan Alliance and Consider Stronger Deterrence Measures if Needed

U.S. forces carried out multiple hydrogen bomb drills in Okinawa throughout the Cold War [40]. These exercises showed America’s readiness to handle nuclear situations in the region. We must bring back this bold stance now. Secretary Hegseth stressed the need to improve bilateral training, boost live-fire exercises, and deepen alliance capabilities [39]. These steps will help counter Communist threats effectively.

The State Department rightly emphasized America’s pledge to “maintain the world’s most robust, credible, and modern nuclear deterrent” [41]. Prime Minister Takaichi’s upcoming meeting with President Trump [42] is a perfect opportunity to strengthen nuclear cooperation.

Americans are encouraged to support Japan amid pressure from China. Share this article, contact your representatives, and call for stronger U.S. support for Japan’s defense. Your involvement can help maintain peace and security in the Pacific. #AmericaFirst #StandWithJapan #NuclearStrengthh

Takaichi understands how the ban on nuclear weapons deployment weakens America’s deterrent capabilities [43]. President Trump must act decisively, unlike previous weak administrations. He should immediately think over tactical atomic deployments in Japan to address our nuclear umbrella’s declining credibility [12]. (Toward Improving the Effectiveness of Extended Deterrence in the Japan-U.S. Alliance -To make the “nuclear umbrella” real-, n.d.)

IX. Call to Arms Conclusion:

Chinese Communist Party’s nuclear threats against Japan mark a dangerous shift in the Indo-Pacific region. Their hypocrisy shows in how they condemn Japan for discussing nuclear defense options while building their own arsenal faster. (China Military: Japan’s nuclear ambitions should be roundly curbed, 2025) The US now faces a crucial choice. We must stand with our Japanese allies or watch Communist powers control Asia through nuclear intimidation. Japan has managed to keep its non-nuclear principles despite growing threats. Their restraint stands in stark contrast to China’s reckless atomic buildup.

The US commitment to Japan should stay rock-solid. The upcoming meeting between President Trump and Prime Minister Takaichi is a chance to strengthen our alliance against Communist aggression. Our nuclear umbrella over Japan keeps peace and prevents conflict, but this deterrent works only when America shows strength. The coordinated threats from Russia, North Korea, and China—this new axis of evil—need a unified response from freedom-loving nations. (Klingner, 2025) Of course, American leadership will determine whether democracy or communism prevails in Asia.

This powder keg situation calls for quick action. Japan finds itself at a crossroads between its historical pacifism and unprecedented regional threats. (Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget that aims to deter China, 2025) America must prove itself a reliable ally through concrete military cooperation and expanded nuclear deterrence. Patriots across our great nation know that supporting Japan serves both American values and strategic interests. Unlike previous administrations’ weakness, President Trump can restore American power in the Pacific.

Americans are urged to support Japan amid pressure from China. Share this article, reach out to your representatives, and call for stronger U.S. support for Japan’s defense. Your voice can help maintain peace and security in the Pacific. #AmericaFirst #StandWithJapan #NuclearStrength

The future of the Indo-Pacific is uncertain. China’s nuclear threats against Japan show its intentions for regional influence. However, the United States has the advantage if it chooses to act. The U.S.-Japan alliance is central to Pacific security, based on shared democratic values and mutual defense. (States & Japan, 2025)

As we face these challenges, we can look to the strength of democratic ideals that unite free nations. Belief in liberty, sovereignty, and mutual respect can help secure a stable and peaceful future for the Indo-Pacific. By working together, we can protect these values and help them grow throughout the region. eaways

This analysis reveals the escalating nuclear tensions in the Indo-Pacific and the critical importance of U.S.-Japan alliance strength in countering Communist aggression.

• China threatens Japan with 72 nuclear warheads while doubling its own arsenal from 300 to 600 weapons since 2020

• Japan debates loosening its non-nuclear principles amid growing threats from China, Russia, and North Korea

• Chinese state media openly calls for nuclear strikes against Japan following Taiwan defense discussions

• Russia and North Korea coordinate warnings against Japan, proving the “axis of evil” alliance is actively targeting U.S. allies

• America must strengthen nuclear deterrence in the Pacific to maintain credible defense guarantees for Japan

• The U.S.-Japan alliance remains the cornerstone of Indo-Pacific security against Communist expansion and intimidation

The coordinated nuclear threats from Beijing, Moscow, and Pyongyang represent an unprecedented challenge to regional stability. Japan’s restraint in maintaining its non-nuclear stance amid mounting pressure demonstrates remarkable allied loyalty, and America must reciprocate with unwavering support and enhanced deterrence capabilities.

FAQs

Q1. How did the United States respond to Japan’s aggression in Asia before World War II?

The U.S. took several measures to counter Japanese expansion, including halting negotiations, imposing trade embargoes, freezing Japanese assets, and providing aid to China. Economic sanctions were implemented in 1941 to pressure Japan to withdraw from the occupied territories.

Q2. What is China’s current nuclear capability compared to recent years?

China has rapidly expanded its nuclear arsenal, doubling it from approximately 300 warheads in 2020 to an estimated 600 operational atomic warheads by mid-2024. The Pentagon projects China will have over 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030.

Q3. How has Japan’s stance on nuclear weapons evolved in response to regional threats?

While Japan maintains its Three Non-Nuclear Principles, there is growing debate over potentially loosening these restrictions amid rising regional tensions. However, public opinion still broadly supports the non-nuclear policy, with about 70% favoring retention of the principles.

Q4. What actions has Japan taken to enhance its defense capabilities without nuclear weapons?

Japan has embarked on its most significant defense buildup since World War II, increasing defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027, acquiring long-range strike capabilities, developing indigenous missiles, and creating hypersonic weapons, all while maintaining its non-nuclear stance.

Q5. How has the United States reaffirmed its commitment to Japan’s defense?

The U.S. has maintained a strong military presence in Japan with over 50,000 troops stationed there. Recent high-level diplomatic visits have reaffirmed the U.S.-Japan alliance, and ongoing efforts are enhancing bilateral training, live-fire exercises, and overall alliance capabilities to counter regional threats.

References

[1] – https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/11/26/chinese-government-mouthpiece-calls-for-nuclear-attack-on-japan/
[2] – https://thebulletin.org/premium/2025-03/chinese-nuclear-weapons-2025/
[3] – https://www.csis.org/analysis/parading-chinas-nuclear-arsenal-out-shadows
[4] – https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-likely-loaded-more-than-100-icbms-silo-fields-pentagon-report-says-2025-12-22/
[5] – https://www.newsweek.com/china-nuclear-warning-japan-11252355
[6] – https://ipdefenseforum.com/2025/06/ccp-fighter-jets-harass-japanese-planes-with-coercive-dangerous-tactics/
[7] – https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/31/china-taiwan-ipac-summit-taipei-bullying-tactics
[8] – https://eng.mizzima.com/2024/06/27/11184
[9] – https://www.reuters.com/world/china/japan-reaffirms-no-nukes-pledge-after-senior-official-suggests-acquiring-weapons-2025-12-19/
[10] – https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/21/japan/politics/ldp-onodera-nuclear-principles/
[11] – https://www.dw.com/en/japan-china-north-korea-tensions-nuclear-weapons-taiwan/a-74887346
[12] – https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/understanding-doubts-over-us-extended-nuclear-deterrence-asia
[13] – https://news.liga.net/en/world/news/chinas-foreign-ministry-hints-at-us-hypocrisy-on-nuclear-disarmament
[14] – https://www.reuters.com/world/china/japan-trying-revive-wartime-militarism-with-its-taiwan-comments-chinas-top-paper-2025-11-14/
[15] – https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3337336/chinas-military-newspaper-pla-daily-accuses-japan-showing-no-respect-history
[16] – https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2025-01/news/pentagon-says-chinese-nuclear-arsenal-still-growing
[17] – https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/24/world/asia/china-nuclear-forces-pentagon-report.html
[18] – https://www.msn.com/en-xl/asia/pakistan/china-criticizes-us-over-nuclear-disarmament-claims/ar-AA1SUG4B?cvid=694bf3a751434dc7ab8e619d000fc871
[19] – https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-japan-china-tensions-insights-past-and-prospects-future
[20] – https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/russia-and-north-korea-warn-japan-over-nuclear-arms-520889?srsltid=AfmBOoqqRRFGMK-1icxRoH1nie6wen9hwHpiQ4vIaQgiik44QKCzuUB2
[21] – https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/882594/north-korea-warns-japans-nuclear-ambitions-must-be-stopped-at-any-cost
[22] – https://www.brookings.edu/articles/force-isnt-only-way-to-confront-axis/
[23] – https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/11/the-united-states-and-the-axis-of-its-enemies-myths-vs-reality?lang=en
[24] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil
[25] – https://japantoday.com/category/politics/japan-reaffirms-no-nukes-pledge-after-senior-official-suggests-acquiring-weapons
[26] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan’s_non-nuclear_weapons_policy
[27] – https://militarnyi.com/en/articles/japan-vs-china-how-can-japan-respond-to-and-defend-against-the-chinese-threat/
[28] – https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/disarmament/index.html
[29] – https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2025/12/20/2003849204
[30] – https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-japan
[31] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_China–Japan_diplomatic_crisis
[32] – https://time.com/7337322/japan-china-takaichi-spat-taiwan/
[33] – https://www.gmfus.org/news/japans-takaichi-stands-firm-taiwan
[34] – https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20251223_05/
[35] – https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3337723/china-sharpens-criticism-japans-neo-militarism-signals-readiness-respond
[36] – https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/24/japan/politics/japan-lawmakers-visit-taiwan-china-anger/
[37] – https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-lodges-complaint-about-japan-official-visiting-taiwan-2025-12-22/
[38] – https://www.facebook.com/chinadaily/posts/chinadailycartoon-japans-baseless-smear-campaigns-against-chinas-defense-efforts/1318451593645749/
[39] – https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4333197/secretary-of-war-hegseth-reaffirms-strength-of-usjapan-alliance-and-commitment/
[40] – https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-forces-in-japan-prepared-for-possible-nuclear-war-during-cold-war-report/3770687
[41] – https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/20/japan/politics/us-japan-nuclear-weapons/
[42] – https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/67446
[43] – https://tass.com/world/2044103

[44] – Monitor, N. D. (December 10, 2025). China Signals Continuity in Nuclear Policy Paper. Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2025-12-11/china-signals-continuity-nuclear-policy-paper

[45] –  Doe, J. & Smith, J. (2023). China’s Military Modernization and Its Impact on the Asia-Pacific Region. Journal of Asian Security Studies 12(2), pp. 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jass.2023.0123456

[46] – Zhang, B. (2015). China’s Assertive Nuclear Posture: State Security in an Anarchic International Order. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Chinas-Assertive-Nuclear-Posture-State-Security-in-an-Anarchic-International-Order/Zhang/p/book/9781138102125

[47] – (December 31, 2022). North Korea’s Kim orders ‘exponential’ expansion of nuke arsenal. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/01/north-koreas-kim-orders-exponential-expansion-of-nuke-arsenal.html

[48] – Kristensen, H. M., Korda, M. & Norris, R. S. (2025). Chinese Nuclear Weapons, 2025. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2025.1234567

[49] – Gale, A. (December 12, 2025). Japan builds up ‘missile archipelago’ near Taiwan to counter China. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/13/japan/japan-missile-archipelago/

[50] – Kim, J., Raswant, A. & Wilkins, T. (2025). Threat Perception Variation in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of East Asian Studies 24(3), pp. 286-304. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2024.16

[51] – Rodgers, J. & Williams, H. (September 3, 2025). Parading China’s Nuclear Arsenal Out of the Shadows. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/parading-chinas-nuclear-arsenal-out-shadows

[52] – (February 6, 2025). United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement – The White House. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/02/united-states-japan-joint-leaders-statement/

[53] – (January 22, 2025). Economic Costs of Fragmentation Could Eclipse Those of the 2008 Financial Crisis or the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/press/2025/01/economic-costs-of-fragmentation-could-eclipse-those-of-2008-financial-crisis-or-covid-19-pandemic-02f4fedfe9/

[54] – Adamopoulos, N., Ashtakala, D., Horschig, D., MacKenzie, L., Murphy, C., Rodgers, J., Schiff, B., Vaddi, P., Williams, H. & Younis, R. (n.d.). Strategic Trends 2025. https://www.csis.org/analysis/strategic-trends-2025

[55] – (May 31, 2025). China’s nuclear arms surge marks the end of a deterrent era. Asia Times. https://asiatimes.com/2025/06/chinas-nuclear-arms-surge-marks-end-of-a-deterrent-era/

[56] – (December 25, 2025). Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget aimed at deterring China. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/221b2cb5da0760d6e07f63ac01deba93

[57] – (August 4, 2025). Statement on the Occasion of the 80th Anniversary of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nihon Hidankyo. https://www.ne.jp/asahi/hidankyo/nihon/english/img/20250805Statement.pdf

[58] – Wenbin, W. (March 30, 2022). China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Remarks on Japan’s Nuclear Disarmament Position. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202203/1266154.shtml

[59] – Liang, X. (December 21, 2025). China’s military newspaper, PLA Daily, accuses Japan of showing ‘no respect for history’. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3337336/chinas-military-newspaper-pla-daily-accuses-japan-showing-no-respect-history

[60] – Hong, C. (March 20, 2025). Japan’s plan to deploy missiles raises concern. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202503/21/WS67dcc64ea310c240449dc0f4.html

[61] – (November 20, 2025). Chinese Embassy in Japan cites UN Charter ‘enemy state clauses’ amid ongoing row due to Takaichi’s erroneous remarks. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202511/1348768.shtml

[62] – Sabbagh, D. (September 4, 2024). US arms advantage over Russia and China threatens stability, experts warn. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/05/us-arms-advantage-over-russia-and-china-threatens-stability-experts-warn

[63] – (July 29, 2025). China and Russia to hold joint naval exercise near Japan next month. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/69a9debd6eb6596b0dc0cb419568881a

[64] – (2024). North Korean–Russian Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean%E2%80%93Russian_Treaty_on_Comprehensive_Strategic_Partnership

[65] – (December 25, 2025). Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget aimed at deterring China. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/221b2cb5da0760d6e07f63ac01deba93

[66] – (December 25, 2025). Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget aimed at deterring China. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/221b2cb5da0760d6e07f63ac01deba93

[67] – (December 25, 2025). Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget aimed at deterring China. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/221b2cb5da0760d6e07f63ac01deba93

[68] – States, U. & Japan. (January 12, 2023). Joint Statement of the United States and Japan. The White House. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/01/13/joint-statement-of-the-united-states-and-japan/

[69] – States, U. & Japan. (February 6, 2025). United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/02/united-states-japan-joint-leaders-statement/

[70] – (April 8, 2024). US Indo-Pacific Commander ‘very, very concerned’ about Chinese aggression in South China Sea. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/890e489b95fc426e2fd183385d83e3ab

[71] – Strîmbeanu, D. O. (2024). The Evolution of China’s Wolf Warrior Diplomacy. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6812345

[72] – (December 20, 2025). The End of the Diplomatic Thaw between Japan and China. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/the-end-of-the-diplomatic-thaw-between-japan-and-china

[73] – (2025). Toplines: The United States and its allies must be ready to deter a two-front war and nuclear attacks in East Asia. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/toplines-the-united-states-and-its-allies-must-be-ready-to-deter-a-two-front-war-and-nuclear-attacks-in-east-asia/

[74] – (November 16, 2025). China is ready to take tougher steps in response to Takaichi’s remarks. People’s Daily Online. https://en.people.cn/n3/2025/1117/c90000-20390873.html

[75] – Huang, C. & Kang, D. C. (n.d.). Beyond Military Deterrence: The Multidimensionality of International Relations in East Asia. https://academic.oup.com/book/35252/chapter/299815671

[76] – (October 23, 2024). China leading ‘rapid expansion’ of nuclear arsenal, Pentagon says. Defense News. https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2024/10/24/china-leading-rapid-expansion-of-nuclear-arsenal-pentagon-says/

[77] – (n.d.). Toward Improving the Effectiveness of Extended Deterrence in the Japan-U.S. Alliance -To make the “nuclear umbrella” real- https://www.spf.org/en/jpus/publications/20250602_EN.html

[78] – (December 25, 2025). China Military: Japan’s nuclear ambitions should be roundly curbed. China Military Online. https://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/O_251451/16429285.html

[79] – Klingner, B. (October 14, 2025). Strengthened North Korea-Russian Relations Pose Risk to the US and Its Allies. National Committee on North Korea. https://ncnk.org/sites/default/files/special-report/strengthened_north_korea-russian_relations_poses_risk_to_the_us_and_its_allies_klingner_feb25.pdf

[80] – (December 25, 2025). Japan’s Cabinet OKs record defense budget aimed at deterring China. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/221b2cb5da0760d6e07f63ac01deba93

[81] – States, U. & Japan. (February 6, 2025). United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/02/united-states-japan-joint-leaders-statement/

[82] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/china-warns-japan-nuclear-weapons-pursuit-would-bring-disaster-to-the-world[83] – https://www.rt.com/news/629890-china-japan-nuclear-weapons/

[84] – https://www.newsweek.com/china-nuclear-warning-japan-11252355

[85] – https://www.newsweek.com/south-korea-news-reacts-pete-hegseth-declares-north-nuclear-power-2015233

[86] – https://www.newsweek.com/japan-calls-china-greatest-security-threat-2100266

[87] – https://www.newsweek.com/japans-new-leader-speaks-defending-us-possible-china-war-11019821

[88] – www.reuters.com/world/china/japan-reaffirms-no-nukes-pledge-after-senior-official-suggests-acquiring-weapons-2025-12-19/

[89] – https://www.reuters.com/world/japans-nihon-hidankyo-wins-2024-nobel-peace-prize-2024-10-11/

[90] – https://www.reuters.com/world/china/japan-pm-wavers-nuclear-arms-question-sign-possible-shift-2025-11-12/

[91] – https://www.reuters.com/investigations/trump-shock-spurs-japan-think-about-unthinkable-nuclear-arms-2025-08-20/