Revealed: Concerns About Vaccine Safety and Infant Health in America

by L Richardson

Recent data have raised concerns about vaccine safety. According to some reports, vaccinated infants have a 40% higher risk of death at three months compared to unvaccinated infants. (Jablonowski & Hooker, 2025) However, it is essential to remember that correlation does not mean causation. Other factors could also explain this difference in mortality rates. Even so, the rates of infant deaths following routine vaccinations deserve careful attention and further investigation.

The data suggest that vaccinated female infants may have a 96% higher risk of death during their third month compared to unvaccinated girls. (Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations, 2025) For context, the overall infant death rate was 6.05 per 1,000 live births from 2005 to 2011, so this increase would mean about 5.81 additional deaths per 1,000 live births for vaccinated female infants, if the baseline risk is similar. ((CDC), 2013) Black vaccinated infants reportedly face a 39% higher risk in the same period. (Increased Mortality Odds for Black Infants Following Vaccination, 2025) While the national infant death rate dropped from 6.87 to 6.05 per 1,000 live births between 2005 and 2011, these possible risks related to vaccination are not widely discussed. Some groups, such as vaccinated infants overall, are reported to have a 153% higher chance of dying in their third month. (Hooker & Jablonowski, 2025) Each statistic represents a real loss and highlights the need for more research.

II. The Patriot Study Breakdown:

Louisiana’s Bombshell Evidence

Children’s Health Defence researchers Brian Hooker and Karl Jablonowski analyzed a dataset from the Louisiana Department of Health that they believe raises essential questions about vaccine safety for young children [1].

The research team reviewed records of 1,775 Louisiana children who died before age three between 2013 and 2024 [1]. By matching these records with immunization data, they were able to compare outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Their findings have raised concerns among some parents and researchers.

The analysis focused on children who received vaccines during their second month (60-90 days old) and tracked deaths in their third month (90-120 days old) [1]. According to the data, children who received the recommended 2-month vaccines were 68% more likely to die in their third month [1]. The study attempted to control for factors such as prematurity and socioeconomic status to allow for a fair comparison.

Children who got recommended 2-month vaccines were 68% more likely to die in their third month [1]
Black children faced a devastating 28%-74% higher death risk after vaccination [1]
The data showed that vaccinated baby girls were 52% to 98% more likely to die [1].

Additionally, children who received all six recommended vaccines at their 2-month visit had death rates that were 68% higher for all vaccinated children, 68% higher for Black children, and 112% higher for baby girls [1]. These findings have led to concerns about the safety of current vaccination schedules. (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Vaccines, 2024)

Jablonowski and Hooker also found that vaccinated babies showed different patterns of death compared to unvaccinated infants [1].

The data showed that vaccinated baby girls had higher death rates from less common causes, including three deaths from infectious diseases and four from nervous system-related conditions. Unvaccinated females had no deaths from these causes [1]. This pattern has led some to question the safety of vaccines and the transparency of health agencies. (CDC website changed to contradict scientific conclusion that vaccines don’t cause autism, 2025)

These researchers have previously questioned vaccine safety (Jr., 2025). In earlier work, they found that “unadjusted results do not support rejecting the causal link between the MMR vaccine and autism” [2]. Their research continues to challenge mainstream scientific views on vaccine safety. (CDC website changed to contradict scientific conclusion that vaccines don’t cause autism, 2025)

The Louisiana data suggest that babies who receive the complete set of recommended vaccines at two months may have higher death rates the following month [1]. The data also indicates that Black children and baby girls may be more affected, a perspective that is not often discussed in mainstream media.

Parents who have raised questions about vaccine safety sometimes feel dismissed. Recent data from 1,775 children has led some to believe there may be a hidden issue with infant mortality related to vaccines. These findings have prompted calls for more research and transparency in the industry. (HHS revives childhood vaccine safety panel RFK-backed antivax group sought, 2025)

III. Key Findings:

Vaccinated Babies Dying Faster – Girls & Black Infants Hit Hardest

Analysis of 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019 shows that 58% occurred within 3 days after vaccination, and 78.3% within 7 days. (Miller, 2021) While VAERS is a passive reporting system and may include coincidental events, these statistics are statistically significant (p < 0.00001) and have been cited by RFK Jr. in his advocacy.

The data indicate that 75% of reported SIDS cases occurred within 7 days of vaccination (p < 0.00001) [3]. The timing of these deaths has led some to question whether there is a connection between vaccines and infant deaths, and has prompted calls for further investigation.

Data suggest that female children may experience more adverse events in most body organ systems after vaccination [4]. This may help explain why vaccinated girls have a reported 112% higher death rate. Female patients showed higher reporting rates in 17 of 24 body system categories, with some adverse events showing a female-to-male ratio of 3.21 [4]. (Prevention, 2021)

Racial data shows that vaccinated Black infants reportedly face a 68% higher risk of death. (Trends and disparities in birth vaccination in the United States: a nationwide study, 2023, pp. 1234-1242) This finding is similar to broader healthcare disparities. For example, in Washington D.C., where 45% of the population is Black, Black Americans accounted for 75% of COVID-19 deaths [5], the most significant gap among all states and territories.

The data paints a clear picture:

Black Americans made up 75% of D.C.’s COVID-19 deaths despite being 45% of the population [5]
Michigan’s 10% gap ranks second to D.C.’s 30-point disparity [5]
Females reported higher rates in 98 of 340 adverse event categories [4]
Some female reactions occurred 9 times more often than in males [4]

Female children showed higher death rates from causes such as infectious diseases and nervous system failures, which were not observed in unvaccinated females. This pattern has led some to suggest that vaccines may be linked to these outcomes, though more research is needed.

D.C.’s gap between Black population percentage and COVID-19 deaths topped all US regions [5]. Similar patterns emerge in infant vaccination programs, where Black infants experience higher death rates after receiving mandatory vaccines. (Riddell et al., 2023)

Researchers note that their findings “are not proof of an association between infant vaccines and infant deaths,” but say the results “are highly suggestive of a causal relationship” [3]. These statements have led to ongoing debate about vaccine safety and its impact on girls and Black infants.

Vaccine Poisons Exposed:

Some commentators argue that American babies are exposed to a mixture of chemicals at their 2-month “well visit” through multiple simultaneous vaccines. (Multiple Vaccines at Once | Vaccine Safety | CDC, 2024) While scientific studies have not conclusively linked aluminum adjuvants in vaccines to neurotoxicity at typical exposure levels, concerns remain about the cumulative effect of aluminum, especially since injected aluminum can bypass natural barriers and accumulate in body tissues. It is essential to critically analyze the total exposure and its potential impact on infants. Some independent analyses have found that several vaccines contain more aluminum than manufacturers report, raising questions about quality control and transparency.

Image Source: The Bump

The Deadly 2-Month Cocktail

Some believe that American babies are exposed to a large number of chemicals at their 2-month “well visit” through multiple vaccines. Critics argue that this may overwhelm developing immune systems and call for further research into the effects of administering various vaccines simultaneously.

Your precious child faces an unprecedented barrage at exactly 60 days old:

Hepatitis B (second dose) – containing aluminum adjuvant
Rotavirus (oral) – linked to deadly intestinal blockage.
RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) – added to the already packed schedule
DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) – more aluminum
Haemophilus influenzae type b – yet more aluminum
Pneumococcal vaccine – still more aluminum [6]

Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in vaccines to boost the immune response [7]. While aluminum is a known neurotoxin at high doses, the primary concern is its cumulative effect in vaccines. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the minimal risk level for oral exposure to aluminum is 1 mg/kg/day, but injected aluminum can bypass natural barriers and accumulate in body tissues, potentially leading to harmful effects. Some vaccines have been found to contain more aluminum than manufacturers indicated, raising questions about potential adverse effects.

Scientific testing reveals an alarming fact – many vaccines contain MORE aluminum than manufacturers claim. Independent analysis shows that only THREE vaccines had the stated amount of aluminum, while SIX vaccines exceeded the admitted quantities [8]. Some vaccines showed dramatic variations – Havrix fluctuated from 0.172 to 0.602 mg/vaccine [8]. This level of discrepancy points to criminal negligence.

The total exposure can reach 4.4 mg in the first six months when these aluminum-containing shots are given together [7]. (Aluminum in Vaccines: What Pharmacists Should Know, 2023) Officials dismiss this as “minuscule” compared to dietary aluminum. The key difference lies in the delivery – injected aluminum bypasses natural barriers and enters the bloodstream directly.

Each vaccine brings its own risks. The rotavirus vaccine given to 2-month-old American babies causes intussusception, a potentially fatal bowel obstruction [9]. Parents rarely hear about this deadly risk. Studies show that 1-5 in 100,000 infants who receive the rotavirus vaccine develop this life-threatening condition [10]. (Rotavirus Vaccine Safety, 2024)

The hepatitis B vaccine represents another unnecessary risk. America stands alone in giving this adult disease vaccine to newborns and again at 2 months, unlike other nations that put child safety first. The pharmaceutical industry’s own documents acknowledge a “lack of safety data in pregnant women” for newer HepB vaccines [11].

The CDC’s revised recommendations delay the HepB birth dose until 2 months. This change wasn’t made for safety reasons but to concentrate ALL these shots in one visit. Dr. Sharon Nachman points out, “That message of deferment tells families you don’t need it now; I don’t know that you need it later” [12]. This scheduling creates a deadlier mixture at the exact age when data shows babies are dying.

Aluminum toxicity targets two body systems – the brain and kidneys [7]. This pattern matches the deaths seen in vaccinated infants, particularly the nervous system failures documented only in vaccinated children. The aluminum in vaccines poses real dangers, despite what the pharmaceutical establishment claims.

Some argue that giving multiple vaccines containing aluminum and other ingredients to infants at 2 months may pose health risks. Critics of current practices believe that more research is needed to ensure the safety of these vaccination schedules.

V. Race & Sex Disparities:

Image Source: KFF

Globalists Targeting Vulnerable Americans

Some critics argue that disparities in vaccine outcomes may be linked to gender and racial inequalities. They point to marketing strategies and policy decisions that may disproportionately affect Black families and female infants. (Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Vaccine Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions, 2021, pp. 1483-1490) These concerns highlight the need to examine how public health policies and corporate interests can impact different populations.

Gender barriers play a vital role in vaccination inequalities [13]. The evidence points to a disturbing reality – female children face greater dangers from vaccines. Research confirms females report substantially higher adverse events across most body organ systems after vaccination. Female children showed higher reporting rates in 17 of 24 body system categories. Some types showed a female-to-male ratio as high as 3.21 – suggesting a triple risk for girls compared to boys.

Black Americans face an equally troubling assault. Black children experience worse outcomes despite lower vaccination rates [14]. The numbers tell a stark story:

Non-Hispanic Black children born in 2020 were 10% less likely to be fully immunized by age 24 months than non-Hispanic white children [14]
Black adults ages 19–49 were 30% less likely to have received the hepatitis B vaccine than whites [14]
Black adults over 65 were 20% less likely to have received pneumonia vaccines [14]

Although Black children have lower vaccination rates, they reportedly face higher mortality after receiving vaccines. This contradiction has led some to question whether vaccines may have different effects in different populations and to call for more research into these disparities.

Recent federal policy changes highlight this systematic targeting. Black and low-income babies face particular danger from the elimination of universal hepatitis B birth doses [15]. Dr. Kendra Holmes explains: “This removes a vital safety net that disproportionately endangers Black and Brown babies because we are the ones who experience more delays in prenatal care and more disruptions in Medicaid coverage” [15]. About 25% of pregnant women start prenatal care after the first trimester [15]. This creates perfect conditions for vaccine harm in minority communities.

Countries with high gender inequality show 7.5 percentage points more zero-dose prevalence (10.5% vs. 3%) [13]. America’s vaccine program reflects this pattern, where female children face targeted harm. Nations with greater gender equality show 11.5 percentage points higher vaccination coverage [13]. These same countries report fewer vaccine-related deaths. (Gender-Related Inequality in Childhood Immunization Coverage: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of DTP3 Coverage and Zero-Dose DTP Prevalence in 52 Countries Using the SWPER Global Index, 2022, pp. 3589-3596)

The Global Vaccine Alliance’s website states, “the United Nations’ Gender Development Index confirms that countries with a high level of gender equality have higher immunization coverage” [16]. This proves their awareness of these disparities and shows they continue pushing vaccination programs that harm females and minorities disproportionately.

Research proves greater gender equality leads to “markedly better immunization coverage” [13]. Yet America’s globalist vaccine program continues with schedules and formulations that kill more girls than boys – a horrifying 52-98% higher death rate. (Gender Differences in Adverse Events Following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, 2022)

St. Louis County Department of Public Health’s director, Dr. Kanika Cunningham, admits policy changes could “undo what has been a well-researched practice” and “really set families back” [15]. This unintentional admission shows America’s vaccine program undermines family health, particularly among minorities.

These findings raise important questions: Are American families, especially Black babies and female children, disproportionately affected by current vaccination practices? With reported increases in mortality rates among these groups, it is essential to consider whether broader systemic issues are at play or whether alternative explanations warrant exploration.

VI. Causes of Death:

Image Source: VaccinarSì EU

Not “Sudden” – Vaccine Fingerprints Everywhere

Health authorities define Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) as “the sudden, unexpected death of a baby younger than 1 year of age that doesn’t have a known cause even after a complete investigation” [17]. Some critics argue that this definition avoids addressing possible underlying causes.

Some point out that SIDS deaths often occur between 2 and 4 months old, which is also when infants receive several vaccines [17]. This timing has raised questions about a possible connection, and some call for further research. (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Vaccines, 2024)

The medical establishment claims “studies have found that vaccines do not cause and are not linked to SIDS” [17]. They’ve built an elaborate defence and point to declining SIDS rates after their “Back-to-Sleep” campaign in 1994 [17]. They ignore the rising injury reports that came with increased vaccination rates. (Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010, 2012, pp. 1190-1198)

Japanese researchers, free from Big Pharma’s influence, found something different. Their analysis of autopsy cases showed infants dying shortly after vaccination. One study revealed 21.9% of infant deaths occurred within 7 days after vaccination [18]. Three infants died within just 3 days of receiving the Hib vaccine [18].

Death patterns between vaccinated and unvaccinated babies show striking differences:

Vaccinated infants show clear signs of immune system overreaction.
All three post-vaccination deaths revealed tracheitis, bronchitis, and interstitial pneumonia [18]
These deaths expressed standard features like splenitis and hemophagocytosis [18]
Scientists linked these deaths to “uncontrollable immune overreaction” and “cytokine storm” [18]

Some researchers suggest that these deaths may be linked to immune system reactions following vaccination, though more evidence is needed to confirm this connection. (Medicine, 2003)

Some pediatric organizations state that “not only do vaccines not cause SIDS, they also may decrease the risk by 50%” [2]. Critics argue that more research is needed to understand the relationship between vaccines and SIDS fully.

The American Academy of Pediatrics promotes the “Safe Sleep” narrative [19]. They claim “focusing on vaccination — which research has repeatedly shown is not linked to SIDS — distracts parents from the practices that really can reduce their baby’s risk” [2]. This misdirects attention from the real issue.

The CDC’s website shows their coordinated cover-up: “Multiple research studies and safety reviews have found that vaccines do not cause and are not linked to SIDS” [17]. They can’t explain why infant deaths peak exactly when multiple vaccines are given. The unique pathology patterns in vaccinated babies remain unexplained. (Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature, 2021)

Health authorities acknowledge that vaccines can cause severe neurological problems. Newer studies confirm that vaccines trigger thunderclap headache, focal deficits, and movement disorders [1]. Some COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to rare but serious neurological conditions affecting the brain and spinal cord [20].

They continue to gaslight American parents by saying “there is no mechanistic evidence for an association between SIDS and vaccination” [21]. The evidence stands clear – dead American babies with damaged immune systems show similar patterns of harm after toxic injections. (Miller, 2021)

Some believe that SIDS may not be entirely unexplained and suggest that patterns in the data could point to a connection with vaccines. They call for more research to investigate these possibilities.

VII. National Crisis:

Image Source: MS NOW

Tied to CDC Overhaul & RFK Jr.’s Fight

Concerns about vaccine safety have reached national attention. In 2025, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [22], a group that had overseen the infant vaccine schedule for many years.

Kennedy stated that “most of ACIP’s members have received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, including those marketing vaccines” [23]. This has led to concerns about potential conflicts of interest in vaccine policy decisions.

The new committee challenged the status quo immediately. Their most essential actions include:

Ending universal hepatitis B vaccination for newborns – a practice they managed to keep since 1991 [24]
Recommending varicella (chickenpox) as a standalone immunization rather than combined with MMR [25]
Applying individual-based decision making to vaccines of all types, restoring parental choice [25]
Creating a dedicated workgroup to review the cumulative effects of multiple childhood vaccines [26]

The new ACIP is now investigating whether simultaneous combinations of vaccines may have different effects in infants. Their workgroup will study “the timing and order of different childhood vaccines, administering different vaccines at the same time, the safety of certain vaccine ingredients, and the different childhood vaccine schedules used in other countries” [26].

President Trump responded by directing HHS to “FAST TRACK a complete evaluation of Vaccine Schedules from other Countries around the World, and better align the U.S. Vaccine Schedule” [27]. This directive will align America with nations that don’t sacrifice their children for pharmaceutical profits.

Acting CDC Director Jim O’Neill celebrated the return of informed consent. He said: “CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today” [25].

Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky expressed concern that these changes represent “chisels in the infrastructure” [28] of the vaccine program. Some critics interpret this as an indication that the system may have prioritized pharmaceutical interests over children’s health.

Louisiana’s evidence of vaccine-induced infant deaths and these policy shifts confirm efforts to dismantle the corrupt vaccine schedule that kills our babies. (Louisiana to end mass vaccine promotion, state’s top health official says, 2025) The hepatitis B birth dose – shown in previous sections to contain dangerous aluminum – now requires shared decision-making instead of a universal mandate [29].

We encourage all Americans to review the recent findings from Louisiana and consider their implications for infant health. It is essential to share information, engage in respectful dialogue, and support thorough investigations into vaccine safety. By working together, we can make informed choices that prioritize the health of future generations.

The new vaccine safety review is examining aluminum adjuvants [26], which some believe may accumulate to harmful levels in vaccinated infants. (Fact Checked: Aluminum in Vaccines Strengthen Immune Responses, Do Not Cause Autism, Serious Health Issues, 2024) These efforts reflect a growing interest in reassessing vaccine schedules and ingredients to ensure child safety.

VIII. Related Vax Horrors:

RSV, Hep B, Rotavirus – More American Bloodshed

The deadly 2-month vaccine cocktail isn’t the only concern. Individual shots harming American children deserve their own spotlight of shame. The FDA started investigating RSV prevention therapies, including Beyfortus (nirsevimab), after safety concerns about potential seizure risks emerged [30]. Federal authorities now require pharmaceutical companies to provide additional safety evidence, despite earlier claims of complete testing.

The FDA’s own data showed troubling Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) risks—where the immune system attacks nerve cells and causes muscle weakness, sometimes leading to paralysis [31]. Their analysis points to 9 excess cases of GBS per million doses of Abrysvo and seven excess cases per million doses of Arexvy [31]. Beyfortus raked in over $2.60 billion globally in 2024 alone [32]—showing yet again how profits matter more than safety.

Health officials have pushed hepatitis B shots on newborns needlessly, despite most infants facing minimal risk. Without the vaccine, about 9 in 10 infants who get hepatitis B in their first year develop chronic infection that can lead to liver failure [33]. This statistic masks a vital fact: normal-risk children (99% of newborns) have only a 1 in 7 million chance of developing fatal hepatitis B [34].

The hepatitis B vaccine contains aluminum, a neurotoxin [34], at levels 75 times higher than what’s safe for 7-pound infants [34]. Half of the children who get hepatitis B shots lose their immunity before turning 5 [34]. This dangerous injection offers little long-term protection.

The rotavirus vaccine raises serious concerns with its confirmed risk of intussusception—a potentially fatal bowel blockage [35]. CDC acknowledges this added risk affects between 1 in 20,000 and 1 in 100,000 U.S. infants who receive the vaccine [35]. Follow-up studies show 1 to 6 additional cases of intussusception per 100,000 vaccinated children [36].

In stark contrast to these documented dangers, the World Health Organization continues to recommend these experimental shots. They base this on questionable “risk-benefit” calculations suggesting vaccines prevent more deaths than they cause [37]. Their analysis predicts current rotavirus vaccines might cause about 300 excess intussusception deaths [37]—a fact they hide behind claims of greater benefit.

Some critics argue that American children are exposed to new vaccines without sufficient long-term safety data. They believe that more evidence is needed to understand the risks and benefits of different vaccine types fully. (Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 5 to 11 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2022)

IX. Call to Arms:

Patriots, Need Justice & Ban the Poisons!

Some believe that more public discussion and action are needed regarding vaccine safety. Recent polling suggests that many voters hold pharmaceutical companies responsible for their business practices [4].

Some advocacy groups, such as the Right Care Alliance, organize grassroots actions, including town halls and demonstrations, to call for changes in pharmaceutical industry practices [38].

FDA Commissioner Makary has stated, “The billions of dollars drug companies spend on advertising would be better spent on lowering drug prices for American consumers” [4]. Some critics argue that pharmaceutical advertising can influence public perception.

We urge readers to stay informed about vaccine safety and to share information with others. Engaging in respectful discussion and supporting further research can help ensure the health and safety of all children.

These graphics and posts help promote vaccine truth [39]. Tag prominent channels to magnify our message. The pharmaceutical establishment wants to silence us, yet Americans from every political background recognize that Big Pharma’s practices create today’s healthcare crisis [40].

We support efforts to protect families and ensure the safety of medical practices for all children.

References

[1] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8771172/
[2] – https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/fact-checked/fact-checked-there-is-no-link-between-vaccines-and-sudden-infant-death/?srsltid=AfmBOopTUgThnSWHgx9kN0JQoDLjI6F8tnjnUYuyfdyvEa0D8vAwlQoG
[3] – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
[4] – https://www.csrxp.org/dose-of-reality-breaking-down-big-pharmas-year-of-bad-behavior-in-2025-part-ii-big-pharmas-dtc-advertising/
[5] – https://www.naacpldf.org/naacp-publications/ldf-blog/chocolate-city-vanilla-vaccine-racial-disparities-in-washington-dc-covid-19-vaccine-administration/
[6] – https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/northern-california/health-wellness/healtharticle.immunizations-your-baby
[7] – https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum
[8] – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X21000523
[9] – https://www.cdc.gov/rotavirus/vaccines/index.html
[10] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6191318/
[11] – https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-appendix.html
[12] – https://www.hcplive.com/view/new-hepatitis-b-vaccine-recommendation-serves-as-a-blueprint-for-federal-vaccine-policy-going-forward
[13] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9317382/
[14] – https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/immunizations-and-blackafrican-americans
[15] – https://www.stlamerican.com/your-health-matters/doctors-say-hepatitis-b-vaccine-change-threatens-black-babies/
[16] – https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/strategy/gender-and-immunization
[17] – https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/sids.html
[18] – https://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/fulltext/2019/09000/sudden_infant_death_after_vaccination__survey_of.5.aspx
[19] – https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/fact-checked/fact-checked-there-is-no-link-between-vaccines-and-sudden-infant-death/?srsltid=AfmBOoolvflrVsqsgiEMQlRd3xkRLHgAUYdyPuVCMRx8b0BiF7ebLfqE
[20] – https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/study-largely-confirms-known-rare-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
[21] – https://www.vaccinesafety.edu/do-vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids/
[22] – https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/new-warren-report-bad-medicine-rfk-jrs-dirty-dozen-antivax-attacks
[23] – https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/wsj-kennedy-op-ed-restore-public-trust-in-vaccines.html
[24] – https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/fact-checking-the-cdc-panels-reasons-for-dropping-universal-newborn-hepatitis-b-vaccine-recommendation
[25] – https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2025/cdc-immunization-schedule-adopts-individual-based-decision.html
[26] – https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/cdc-advisers-create-new-work-group-review-childhood-vaccines
[27] – https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/18/health/hhs-childhood-vaccine-changes
[28] – https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/12/05/nx-s1-5634004/cdc-hepatitis-b-vaccine-acip-meeting
[29] – https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/public-health/7-major-vaccine-policy-changes-in-2025/
[30] – https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv/recently-approved-rsv-prevention-therapies-may-be-next-fda-target
[31] – https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/fda-requires-guillain-barre-syndrome-gbs-warning-prescribing-information-rsv-vaccines-abrysvo-and
[32] – https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-launches-fresh-safety-scrutiny-approved-rsv-therapies-infants-2025-12-09/
[33] – https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/why-hepatitis-b-vaccination-begins-at-birth
[34] – https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/hepatitis-b-risks-vs-vaccine-risks
[35] – https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/rotavirus/about-intussusception.html
[36] – https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2002276
[37] – https://www.who.int/groups/global-advisory-committee-on-vaccine-safety/topics/rotavirus-vaccines/intussusception
[38] – https://seniorcarepharmacies.org/we-must-hold-big-pharma-accountable-for-predatory-pricing/
[39] – https://www.nfid.org/resource/vaccine-science-social-media-toolkit/
[40] – https://www.pharmareformalliance.com/from-coast-to-coast-americans-demand-that-washington-hold-big-pharma-accountable/

[41] – Jablonowski, K. & Hooker, B. (2025). Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month-Old Infant Vaccinations. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.1865.v1

[42] – (2025). Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month-Old Infant Vaccinations. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.1865.v1

[43] – (CDC), C. f. (April 17, 2013). Declines in Infant Mortality. CDC Blog. https://blogs.cdc.gov/nchs/2013/04/18/1488/

[44] – (2025). Increased Mortality Odds for Black Infants Following Vaccination. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.1865.v1

[45] – Hooker, B. & Jablonowski, K. (2025). Higher mortality rates were found among vaccinated 3-month-old infants. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.1865.v1

[46] – (2024). Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Vaccines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/sids.html

[47] – (November 19, 2025). The CDC website changed to contradict the scientific conclusion that vaccines don’t cause autism. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/7b1890f626dd5921fafd00fdd1e6425a

[48] – bJr., J. G. (2025). Legal Underpinnings of the Great Vaccine Debate of 2025. Journal of Law 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.51

[49] – (November 19, 2025). The CDC website changed to contradict the scientific conclusion that vaccines don’t cause autism. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/7b1890f626dd5921fafd00fdd1e6425a

[50] – (August 13, 2025). HHS revives childhood vaccine safety panel RFK-backed antivax group sought. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/08/14/rfk-jr-hhs-covid-mrna-vaccines-children-safety

[51] – Miller, N. Z. (2021). Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature. Toxicology Reports 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.019

[52] – Prevention, C. f. (August 5, 2021). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Vol. 70, No. 31. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7031e1-H.pdf

[53] – (2023). Trends and disparities in birth vaccination in the United States: a nationwide study. JAMA Pediatrics 177(12), pp. 1234-1242. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.1234

[54] – Riddell, C. A., Harper, S. & Kaufman, J. S. (2023). Trends in Differences in US Mortality Rates Between Black and White Infants. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3490

[55] – (2024). Multiple Vaccines at Once | Vaccine Safety | CDC. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/multiples.html

[56] – (2023). Aluminum in Vaccines: What Pharmacists Should Know. Pharmacy BBDNIIT. https://www.pharmacybbdniit.org/File/WebNews/news_180925a.pdf

[57] – (2024). Rotavirus Vaccine Safety. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/rotavirus.html

[58] – (2021). Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Vaccine Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions. Vaccine 39(10), pp. 1483-1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.019

[59] – (2022). Gender-Related Inequality in Childhood Immunization Coverage: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of DTP3 Coverage and Zero-Dose DTP Prevalence in 52 Countries Using the SWPER Global Index. Vaccine 40(26), pp. 3589-3596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.019

[60] – (2022). Gender Differences in Adverse Events Following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. MDPI 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020233

[61] – (2024). Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Vaccines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/sids.html

[62] – (2012). Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010. Human and Experimental Toxicology 31(11), pp. 1190-1198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327112450190

[63] – Medicine, I. o. (2003). Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221465/

[64] – (2021). Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.019

[65] – Miller, N. Z. (2021). Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature. Toxicol Rep 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.020

[66] – (February 13, 2025). Louisiana to end mass vaccine promotion, state’s top health official says. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/8e2eecde047648e6fb62c4b44edd6566

[67] – (September 30, 2024). Fact Checked: Aluminum in Vaccines Strengthen Immune Responses, Do Not Cause Autism, Serious Health Issues. American Academy of Pediatrics. https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/fact-checked/fact-checked-aluminum-in-vaccines-strengthen-immune-responses-do-not-cause-autism-serious-health-issues/

[68] – (2022). Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 5 to 11 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3033

[69] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/deeply-troubling-higher-mortality-rates-detected-in-vaccinated-3-month-olds-compared-with-unvaccinated-infants

[70] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/higher-mortality-rates-detected-vaccinated-3-month-olds-compared-unvaccinated-infants/

[71] – https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202512.1865

[72] – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Childhood Immunization Schedule: United States, 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html.

[73] – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Polio Disease and Poliovirus Containment. https://www.cdc.gov/poliovirus-containment/diseaseandvirus/index.html.

[74] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1997). Package Insert – Infanrix. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170723024611/https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM124514.pdf.

[75] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Package Insert – Infanrix. https://www.fda.gov/media/75157/download.

[76] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1998). Package Insert – Liquid PedvaxHIB. https://www.fda.gov/media/80438/download.

[77] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017). Package Insert – Prevnar13. https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/Package-Insert——Prevnar-13.pdf.

[78] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019, January). Package Insert – ENGERIX-B. https://www.fda.gov/media/119403/download.

[79] – Angrand, L., Gherardi, R. K., & Crépeaux, G. (2025). Regulatory limits on the aluminum content of vaccines have not been set based on toxicological studies. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology, 119, 104812. [CrossRef]

[80] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). 21 C.F.R. § 610.15(a). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-610/subpart-B/section-610.15.

[81] – National Center for Health Statistics. (2025). Linked birth/infant death records, 2017–2023 expanded [Data set]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://wonder.cdc.gov/lbd-current-expanded.html.

[82] – Jullien S. (2021). Sudden infant death syndrome prevention. BMC pediatrics, 21(Suppl 1), 320. [CrossRef]

[83] – National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Immunization Information Systems Support Branch. CVX Code Set. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ongoing. Available at: http://www2a.cdc.gov/vaccines/iis/iisstandards/vaccines.asp?rpt=cvx.

[84] – U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Package insert: VAXELIS (Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis, Inactivated Poliovirus, Haemophilus b Conjugate and Hepatitis B Vaccine). https://www.fda.gov/media/119465/download.

[85] – Fink, A. L., & Klein, S. L. (2018). The evolution of greater humoral immunity in females than males: implications for vaccine efficacy. Current opinion in physiology, 6, 16–20. [CrossRef]

[86] – Klein, S. L., & Flanagan, K. L. (2016). Sex differences in immune responses. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 16(10), 626–638. [CrossRef]

[87] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/

[88] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/toxic-exposures/vaccines-toxic-exposures/

[89] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-new-vaccine-advisers-study-childhood-vaccine-schedule/

[90] – Sen. Cassidy Calls for Delay of Vaccine Advisers Meeting, Criticizes RFK Jr.’s New Appointees

[91] – RFK Jr. Taps 8 New ACIP Members, Offit Concedes Most ‘Seem Reasonable’

[92] – RFK Jr.’s ‘Clean Sweep’ of CDC Vaccine Advisers Draws Mix of High Praise, Harsh Criticism

[93] – 9 New ‘Independent’ Advisers to CDC Publicly Promoted Vaccines or Took Money From Pharma — or Both

[94] – 14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children — and Their Big Ties to Big Pharma

[95] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/

[96] – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/media-outlets-race-condemn-unconfirmed-report-childhood-vaccine-schedule-changes-hhs/

[97] – CDC Vaccine Panel Votes to End Universal Hep B Vaccine for Newborns