By L. Richardson
In February 2026, Alex Jones filed the §1983 counterclaim, a major step under a federal civil rights law that could potentially put an end to the deep state’s star-chamber war on heritage America’s free voice. This lawsuit allows Jones to seek damages and challenge the abuse of power, potentially restoring his reputation and guaranteeing accountability from those who overstepped legal bounds.
This travesty has occurred before my eyes from day one. The tyranny they let loose against the last unbowed voice of founding-stock America isn’t just attacking one man—it strikes at every principle our ancestors bled for at Lexington, Valley Forge, and beyond. (Historical references from the American Revolutionary War) Alex Jones isn’t the only target here. We need to decide if We the People still run our Republic or if we’ve handed it over to unelected bureaucrats and their private enforcers. (Court judgments and legal documents on file) To channel this force into meaningful action, I urge every citizen to contact their representatives to express their concerns and join local groups dedicated to protecting our constitutional rights.
The bomb: “On February 2026, Alex Jones fired the §1983 counterclaim that could end the deep state’s star-chamber war on heritage America’s free voice.”
The §1983 counterclaim Alex Jones just filed reveals what many of us knew: a coordinated attack to silence dissent under color of law. The Supreme Court coldly rejected Jones’ appeal and kept the crushing $1.40 billion judgment [1]. Jones has now fired back with legal weapons our Founders would recognize, standing up for his civil rights against state actors who turned our courts into weapons.
His filing raises several constitutional questions never before seen in the context of punitive administrative “Death Penalty Sanctions.” These sanctions ignored the burdens of proof and imposed billions in damages on a media defendant [2]. This goes beyond a legal move—it contests the star chamber they built to crush independent media.
The counterclaim states what patriots have long known: state courts violate our constitutional order when they allow private litigants to decide on truth, falsity, and the punishment of protected press speech.
The $1.436 billion Connecticut tyranny vs. the $49 million Texas disparity.
Numbers tell us how coordinated this attack really is. Connecticut slapped Jones with a massive $1.40 billion judgment [1]—likely the largest American libel case ever seen [1]. Texas looked at similar facts and came up with just $49 million [1]. To put this into perspective, the typical range for U.S. defamation awards is usually between hundreds of thousands and a few million dollars. This context underlines how extraordinary and unprecedented a 30-to-1 difference truly is. (Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook, 2024)
Connecticut’s judgment packed $965 million in compensatory damages [3]. Judge Barbara Bellis added another $473 million in punitive damages [3]. Each plaintiff got about $95.8 million [2]. Jones’ lawyers called it right—this “can never be paid” and kills a media defendant by decree [4].
Texas kept it to $49 million [5], though still too much. Such a huge gap only makes sense if someone wanted to silence one of America’s strongest independent voices. (Press, 2025)
The collusion: 15 plaintiffs (including an FBI agent) turned into state actors by a dishonest judge.
Looking at these plaintiffs reveals more collusion. (Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook, 2024) One of the 15 was an FBI agent who responded to Sandy Hook [3]—the same FBI that targets patriots while looking the other way at leftist violence. (Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook, 2024)
FBI agent William Aldenberg testified first in Connecticut [3]. He set an emotive tone that led to that billion-dollar verdict. This wasn’t random.
These plaintiffs weren’t just regular citizens. After Sandy Hook, they became prominent public figures pushing for gun control [2]. (Sandy Hook families settle with gun maker Remington for $73 million, 2022) President Barack Obama even invited some as his personal guests to his 2013 State of the Union—showing their public stance on gun control [2]. (Holpuch, 2013)
Judge Barbara Bellis made things worse. She ruled against Jones before trial [1] and denied him the right to defend himself. This “Death Penalty Sanction” meant plaintiffs didn’t need to prove falsity, fault, or actual malice [2]. She judged Jones liable without any proof [2].
This unprecedented move shows why the §1983 counterclaim matters. The Connecticut court abandoned its duty and allowed private litigants acting under color of law to determine the truth.
the Founders’ blood — “They didn’t die so gun-grabbers and federal allies could silence us forever.”
Our Founding Fathers didn’t spill blood at Bunker Hill just so gun-grabbers and their federal friends could shut up America’s heritage voices via judicial tyranny. The Bill of Rights came from patriots’ blood. They knew free speech—even controversial speech—served as the lifeblood of liberty.
James Madison saw this coming when he pushed for First Amendment protections. Connecticut’s court attacked press freedom, property rights (Fifth Amendment), protection from excessive fines (Eighth Amendment), and equal protection (Fourteenth Amendment).
This case gives courts a chance to clarify: state courts can’t impose procedural sanctions to impose liability when public figures sue the media for reporting on public matters [2]. Our Founders put these protections in place to stop exactly this kind of star-chamber justice.
If this case stands, broadcasters face an easy way around Sullivan and core First Amendment protections through Death Penalty Sanctions [2]. This goes beyond Alex Jones—it threatens the Republic our ancestors built. Consider, for example, a smaller podcast or independent blog that regularly explores controversial topics or challenges governmental narratives. If the precedent set by this case is allowed to stand, these platforms would be easily targeted with similar procedural sanctions, endangering their ability to communicate freely and potentially facing crippling financial penalties. (Judge appoints receiver to sell off Alex Jones’s Infowars assets to help pay Sandy Hook families, 2025) By personalizing the risk, the wider community of media voices can be galvanized to challenge and reverse this dire trajectory. It is critical that individuals who value independent media organize and connect. Forming community advocacy groups or networks can increase collective action, enabling shared resources and methods to support vulnerable platforms. Additionally, supporting alternative services through donations or subscriptions ensures they can continue delivering different opinions. (Political crowdfunding and resource mobilization for collective action: The keys to success, 2021) Engage with your community to host forums or discussions that raise awareness and empower action against judicial overreach. By collectively supporting independent media, we can maintain the principles on which the nation was established.
“This is OUR fight. Read on.”
If you’re citizens who value open debate and are the sons and daughters of pioneers who tamed this continent, this fight belongs to you. They’re coming for Alex Jones today, but tomorrow it could be any of us who questions authority. The deep state wants defiant voices gone forever. We won’t back down quietly.
Blood bought these rights. Our soil saw the sacrifice. Heritage America stands tall.
The next sections peel away layers of this constitutional crisis. You’ll see more about how federal agents, gun control activists, and an unruly judiciary worked together than most people know. The §1983 counterclaim acts as our last defense against the tyranny our Founders would spot right away.
This is OUR fight. Read on.
Key Takeaways
Alex Jones’ counterclaim unveils an assault on freedoms.
• Courts bypassed free speech protections.
• $1.4B vs. $49M judgment disparity.
While many view the concept of a ‘deep state’ with incredulity, it’s important to examine the evidence presented. Deep state fingerprints are evident: an FBI agent as lead plaintiff, Obama White House connections, and systematic deplatforming from YouTube to PayPal reveal a coordinated campaign to silence dissent.
• Mobilize now to protect independent media.
This case amounts to a critical battle for constitutional rights. If courts are able to undermine First Amendment protections, no voice is safe from destruction. Americans have to unite to reverse this threat.
The Constitutional Treason – Core Violations Exposed
Image Source: Alamy
The Supreme Court’s rejection of the constitutional nightmare cleared the path for a $1.436 billion judgment [3]. This verdict crushed core Bill of Rights protections. Jones’ §1983 counterclaim now reveals a constitutional violation that legal scholars might consider the most dangerous judicial overreach in modern First Amendment history. Comparing it to past cases, the infamous Korematsu v. United States case from the 20th century is a clear warning of how judicial decisions can undermine constitutional rights. Just as the Korematsu decision sanctioned unjust internment practices during World War II, this modern overreach stresses the possibility of courts going beyond their bounds, warranting watchfulness and remediation. (Court, n.d.)
The filing’s core message: Connecticut failed its sovereign judicial duty and allowed private litigants to control the truth/malice/punishment of protected press speech under color of law.
Jones’ counterclaim centers on an unprecedented judicial failure. The Connecticut court abandoned its duty to protect press freedom by issuing a “Death Penalty Sanction” against Jones. This sanction declared—without any evidence—that Jones made false statements with malice [3].
This unconstitutional move did more than punish Jones for discovery violations. The plaintiffs no longer needed to prove falsity, fault, and actual malice under proper evidence standards [1]. The court handed its non-delegable sovereign power to private litigants who then wielded state authority under color of law.
Connecticut Judge Barbara Bellis issued this default ruling because Jones “repeatedly failed to follow court rulings and turn over evidence” [3]. Constitutional law doesn’t allow procedural disputes to override First Amendment protections.
The judge let a jury decide only the amount Jones would pay [3]. They awarded $964 million in compensatory damages [6]. Judge Bellis added $473 million in punitive damages [6]. The total reached $1.436 billion [3].
A key quote states: “A State may not delegate to private litigants the power to determine the truth or falsity of protected speech…”
The counterclaim’s foundation depends on this vital principle: “A State may not delegate to private litigants the power to determine the truth or falsity of protected speech” [1]. This stems from the Supreme Court’s Sullivan ruling, which holds that judges, juries, and officials cannot impose truth tests on protected speech [1].
The Connecticut court ignored this through the Death Penalty Sanctions. Private litigants could determine truth, falsity, and punishment without meeting constitutional requirements. Jones’ Supreme Court petition stated clearly: “Authoritative interpretations of the First Amendment guarantees have consistently refused to recognize an exception for any test of truth…and especially one that puts the burden of proving truth on the speaker” [1].
This wasn’t justice – the court gave up its duty. Sullivan requires “clear and convincing evidence” of actual malice for public figures discussing public matters. The court declared Jones liable by decree [1]. This moved the state’s constitutional duties to private parties acting under color of law.
Broadcasters now face risks from this “new and easy means of bypassing Sullivan and its progeny through a Death Penalty Sanction that sidesteps core First Amendment protections” [1]. Press freedom in America faces catastrophic risks.
Multiple violations: 1st (press freedom silenced), 5th (property takings), 8th (excessive fines), 14th (equal protection outrage — 30-to-1 hush-money scam).
Constitutional violations go beyond the First Amendment and attack basic rights:
- First Amendment: The court blocked press freedom by declaring falsity and malice without proof [3]. This put a government-approved gag on protected speech about public matters. It violated the principle that “Authoritative interpretations of the First Amendment guarantees have consistently refused to recognize an exception for any test of truth” [1].
- Fifth Amendment: The $1.436 billion judgment [3] took property without due process. Jones never got a jury trial on liability [3]. The plaintiffs openly planned to “remove Jones from the airwaves” [3]—not just compensate for harm but take his livelihood and silence him.
- Eighth Amendment: This award—one of the largest in American libel history [3]—breaks the Eighth Amendment’s ban on excessive fines [3]. Jones told the court this was “a financial death penalty by fiat imposed on a media defendant” [3].
- Fourteenth Amendment: The 30-to-1 gap between judgments causes serious concerns. Texas had identical allegations but only a $49 million judgment [1], compared to Connecticut’s $1.436 billion [3]. This gap violates equal protection, denoting a “hush-money” scheme rather than real justice.
Jones’ counterclaim adds that he can’t be responsible for unrelated third parties [3]. The court still held him liable for his “listeners’” acts and statements [1]—an unconstitutional expansion that threatens every media personality in America.
The reality: “This is not law. This is the tyranny the Bill of Rights was written to destroy.”
This case shows exactly what our Founders feared. The Bill of Rights stops the government from silencing dissent. Courts can’t give private litigants power over truth in protected speech without undermining our Republic’s foundation.
Jones’ §1983 counterclaim functions as a constitutional defense. States cannot abandon their judicial duty and leave private litigants to decide the truth, notably in cases involving protected speech on public matters. Connecticut crossed this line.
This affects more than Alex Jones. This precedent creates a way to silence media voices that challenge authorized accounts. Courts can bypass First Amendment protections through procedures and private actors.
Our ancestors fought at Lexington and Concord for more than truth by judicial decree. The Bill of Rights wasn’t meant to allow courts to discharge their constitutional duties to politically motivated private litigants.
Connecticut’s actions betrayed constitutional principles and threaten American liberty. The §1983 counterclaim exposes this attack on our founding principles and calls for the restoration of constitutional order.
The Deep State Fingerprints – FBI, Obama Ties, Hush Money Exposed
The power structure’s fingerprints became clear after their legal actions against Alex Jones. A network of connections patriots long suspected lies beneath these “defamation” cases, now exposed with crystal clarity.
The players: FBI agent as client #1, Obama White House invites, DNC speeches, Sandy Hook Commission gun-grab push.
This planned attack reveals itself by its cast of characters. FBI Special Agent William Aldenberg is notable as the first plaintiff [7]. His role went beyond symbolism. He gave testimony at Jones’ civil trial about the Sandy Hook response [7], which established an emotional basis for the billion-dollar judgments that followed.
His presence as lead plaintiff sends a clear warning: anyone who questions government stories will face the full force of federal power. Jones pointed this out on X, stating that the Justice Department was looking into “illegal lawfare” against him [7].
The story gets more concerning. Many plaintiffs changed from regular citizens into gun-control supporters after the tragedy. President Obama’s invitations to several of them for his 2013 State of the Union address boosted their status and political connections. This move secured their positions as public figures who backed specific policy changes.
Court records show a clear pattern. Plaintiffs affiliated with government agencies filed lawsuits that bypassed constitutional rights through legal tricks. Jones called this “illegal lawfare” run by “the Democratic Party and the FBI” [7]. The counterclaim confirms what many thought: these weren’t just citizens seeking justice, but proxies pushing bigger agendas under the guise of law.
The 30-to-1 imbalance and cross-conveyed judgments: “Texas plaintiffs threatened to blow the whistle — so Connecticut paid hush money.”
Numbers alone show the scheme. Jones faces a $1.40 billion judgment in Connecticut [8] – one of the largest libel verdicts in American history. Similar allegations in Texas resulted in just $49 million.
This 30-to-1 difference for the same alleged offense speaks volumes.
Connecticut’s verdict breaks down this way: The jury awarded $964 million in compensatory damages [8]. Judge Barbara Bellis added $473 million more in punitive damages [8]. Her order awarded plaintiffs over $320 million in attorney’s fees, $1.5 million in non-taxable costs, and $150 million for alleged civil rights violations [8].
Texas showed what happens when different courts look at similar claims: their judgments were 30 times smaller. This huge gap points to something beyond justice – a planned effort to silence Jones while appearing legitimate.
Moving judgments between courts suggests a plan to avoid scrutiny. The massive Connecticut judgment provided enough money to quiet potential whistleblowers through settlements, after Texas plaintiffs threatened to expose the scheme. (Yang, 2025)
The plaintiffs’ attorney made it clear – they wanted to “strengthen the message” [8]. This admission showed their real goal was to punish speech, not to fix the harm. (Justice Integrity Report – Nov. 2024 (Pt. 5), 2024)
broader war: “They deplatformed him from YouTube to PayPal. Now they bankrupt him to erase the last defiant voice of founding-stock America.”
Jones’ story shows the peak of a long campaign to silence him everywhere. Starting before any court battles, the digital removal hit hard, with a sharp decline evident: Infowars saw its daily visits and video views plummet from nearly 1.4 million in the three weeks preceding August 2018 to about 715,000 thereafter, cutting the numbers in half practically overnight. (Burch, 2018) This substantial drop illustrates the financial harm that censorship can inflict, forming a concrete cost of these efforts against him. (Press, 2024) YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter kicked Jones off their platforms [9]. Apple removed Jones from its podcast service for alleged “hate speech” [9]. Spotify wiped all Jones’ content [9]. Apple removed the Infowars app from its App Store, cutting off one of the final paths for Mr. Jones to reach a mainstream audience [10]. PayPal dealt the hardest blow by ending its business with Jones in September after a “thorough investigation” [9]. This move crippled his finances. PayPal handled all Infowars payments, directly hitting Jones’ income from nutritional supplements and merchandise [9]. (PayPal cuts off Alex Jones’ Infowars, joining other tech companies, 2018) Jones sued PayPal for “viewpoint discrimination” [11], but the damage stuck.
Jones’ PayPal lawsuit stated the obvious: “It is at this point well known that large tech companies, located primarily in Silicon Valley, are discriminating against politically conservative entities and individuals, including banning them from social media platforms such as Twitter, based solely on their political and ideological viewpoints” [11].
Jones saw through this organized attack: “nothing less than a political ploy designed to financially sabotage an influential media outlet just weeks before the mid-term elections” [9].
Bankruptcy proceedings now threaten Infowars’ assets [8]. The Onion’s attempt to buy Infowars through a bankruptcy auction [8] shows how mainstream media mocks independent voices. They’re selling off Jones’ personal property too [8] – aiming for complete financial ruin. (Ingram, 2024)
The warning comes through loud and clear: Question approved stories and face systematic erasure from the digital world, legal persecution until bankruptcy, and complete silencing. This goes beyond defamation – it’s about destroying the last voice speaking for heritage America.
This multi-year, multi-pronged strategy aims to crush not just Jones but warn anyone who might question establishment narratives. From FBI involvement to tech bans to billion-dollar judgments – this campaign represents all-out war against founding-stock Americans’ free speech rights. (Press, 2024)
Alex Jones – The Poster Boy of Heritage Resistance
A powerful voice arose from deep in the heart of Texas, changing America’s power structure forever. Alex Jones’s story goes beyond being just a media figure — he’s a native son whose life experience embodies what many call the quintessential American spirit.
Born in Dallas, raised on Texas soil, lifelong 2A defender, InfoWars reaching tens of millions.
Alexander Emerick Jones was born on February 11, 1974, in Dallas, Texas [1]. His Texas roots run deep — he spent his early years in Rockwall, 25 miles east of Dallas [1], until his family moved to Austin. He played football at Anderson High School and graduated in 1993 [1].
His rise from local Austin media to national prominence commenced modestly. He got his first break at Austin’s community-access cable television station [6] with a live, call-in format show [1]. Jones moved to radio in 1996, where he hosted “The Final Edition” on KJFK (98.9 FM) [1].
The next few years saw Jones’s audience grow dramatically. His radio show aired on more than 150 stations nationwide by 2016 [6], with a self-reported daily audience of five million listeners [1]. His digital presence expanded just as impressively — he told The Washington Post in November 2016 that his video streams topped 80 million viewers in a single month [1]. The InfoWars website, which he started with his then-wife, Kelly Jones, in 1999 [1], got about 10 million visits in November 2016 [1], beating out mainstream media outlets like The Economist and Newsweek.
Jones has always shown a firm devotion to Second Amendment rights. MTV called him a “staunch Second Amendment supporter,” while London’s Daily Telegraph took a more critical position, labeling him a “gun-nut” [1]. His stance on gun rights caught national attention in 2013 during his heated CNN debate with Piers Morgan. Jones made his famous declaration: “1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms!” [1][12] — words that struck a chord with countless Americans worried about their constitutional rights.
Jones owns about 50 firearms [1], not simply as a collector, but as someone who lives the citizen-rifleman tradition dating back to the American Revolution.
“He’s not just a broadcaster — he’s the embodiment of the rifleman spirit that built this Republic.”
Jones stands out from other media personalities by combining state-of-the-art media with deeply held principles. He describes himself as a conservative, paleoconservative, and libertarian [1] — terms he uses interchangeably for his political philosophy.
He was quick to adapt to the changing digital world. Starting with public-access television, he saw radio’s potential before becoming a pioneer in internet broadcasting. By summer 2001, his message reached nearly 100 stations through a partnership with a libertarian-leaning syndication outfit [6].
InfoWars, launched in 1999, grew from a simple mail-order outlet for conspiracy-oriented videos [1] into what Britannica calls “one of the largest platforms in alternative media” [6]. Jones still reaches millions online [6], despite numerous attempts to silence him.
His influence reaches beyond broadcasting. Meeting political strategist Roger Stone in 2013 led to connections with Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign [6]. Stone introduced Jones to Trump during the 2016 campaign, creating a direct link between Jones’s audience and presidential politics [6].
Jones built his media empire as a self-made entrepreneur, staying independent from corporate control. His platform generated annual revenues up to $80 million [13], mostly from dietary supplements. This business model lets him maintain editorial freedom while growing his media operations.
They made him the face of resistance, so they targeted him first.
The campaign against Jones has been unlike anything seen before. His increasing influence made him a prime target for those wanting to control America’s information flow.
Platform bans kicked off the attacks. Major tech companies joined forces in 2018 to remove Jones. YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter banned him [3], Apple dropped his podcasts [3], and Spotify deleted all his content [3]. The final strike came when Apple removed the InfoWars app, cutting off “one of the final paths for Mr. Jones to reach a mainstream audience” [14].
Financial platforms joined in, too. PayPal cut ties with Jones after an “extensive investigation” [3], hurting his ability to process business payments. He called this “viewpoint discrimination” [3], pointing out that “large tech companies, located primarily in Silicon Valley, are discriminating against politically conservative entities and individuals…based solely on their political and ideological viewpoints” [3].
Jones showed amazing resilience at first. Traffic to his Infowars website and app actually jumped when Silicon Valley banned him [14]. He declared on air, “The more I’m persecuted, the stronger I get. It backfired.” [14]
The numbers tell a different long-term story. Infowars had nearly 1.4 million daily visits and video views in the three weeks before the August 2018 bans [14]. This dropped by about half to 715,000 in the three weeks after [14].
Jones became the first target because he represents something bigger than himself — he embodies resistance against growing centralized power. His strong defense of constitutional rights, especially the Second Amendment, made him a symbol for millions of Americans who feel their customs and principles are under attack.
The legal warfare against Jones goes beyond one man’s words — it sends a warning to anyone challenging accepted narratives. They hope to crush the independent media’s spirit by destroying Jones financially.
The Call to Arms – What Heritage America Must Do Now
The era of watching from the sidelines has ended. Americans must now act to protect their constitutional birthright. This §1983 counterclaim addresses legal paperwork and serves as our line in the sand against tyranny. Therefore, I urge you to contribute directly to the legal fund supporting this fight by donating $5 today. Your minor act of support will channel urgency into impact, helping safeguard our common values for future generations. In addition to financial contributions, there are many other important ways to support this cause. You can volunteer with organizations supporting free speech, contact your local and state officials to express your concerns, and spread awareness by sharing information about this case on social media and within your community. Each of these actions plays a vital role in amplifying our voices and ensuring lasting change.
Alex Jones’s counterclaim shows us a way to restore constitutional order, despite the organized attacks against him. Jones stated, “This counterclaim is about holding liable those who, through the misuse of state power, deprived me of my fundamental rights to free speech, due process, and equal protection” [8].
The Connecticut court’s actions transformed private litigants into state extensions and bypassed constitutional safeguards in a case about public discussion of a national tragedy [8]. This creates a dangerous precedent that puts every American’s liberty at risk.
HERITAGE AMERICA — THE CALL TO ARMS! 🇺🇸⚖️🔥
Real Americans, sons and daughters of the pioneers who shed blood for these sacred rights—your moment has come. Alex Jones has unleashed the §1983 counterclaim that exposes Connecticut’s star-chamber tyranny: a judge and 15 plaintiffs (including an FBI agent [7]) worked together to turn private litigants into state actors under color of law.
Read the full filing (link). Share everywhere. Tag @RealAlexJones. Search “Alex Jones §1983 Counterclaim.”
You need to take these steps now:
- READ THE FULL FILING on Infowars [8]
- SHARE everywhere — X, Gab, Telegram. Tag @RealAlexJones, who reaches 2.3 million followers [15]
- SEARCH “Alex Jones §1983 Counterclaim” to spread awareness
Jones’s X account serves as an essential co-communication channel [15], making your support there particularly powerful. This precedent will stand unless we act together.
“Blood bought these rights. Soil witnessed the sacrifice. Heritage America will not kneel. We the People — not them.”
The deep state failed when they tried to silence Jones by removing him from YouTube, Facebook, and PayPal [16]. Jones fights on because the American spirit of resistance lives in him.
Look at what’s at stake: $1.40 billion [15] in Connecticut versus $49 million elsewhere—a 30-to-1 gap that reveals their scheme. This shows an unconstitutional transfer of power to decide what counts as protected speech [8].
Blood bought these rights. Soil witnessed the sacrifice. Our Republic’s fate hangs in the balance.
We the People—not them.
FAQs
Q1. Alex Jones’ §1983 counterclaim challenges the Sandy Hook defamation ruling, citing violations of constitutional rights. It. It contends that the court gave private individuals too much power to determine what is true in protected speech cases. This is significant for all Americans because it touches wider issues of free speech and the role of the courts in preserving or restricting this fundamental right.
Q2. Why is there such a large disparity between the Connecticut and Texas judgments against Alex Jones? The Connecticut judgment was $1.4 billion, while the Texas judgment was $49 million for similar claims. This 30-to-1 disparity raised concerns about the consistency and equity of the judicial proceedings against Jones across different jurisdictions.
.
Q3. How has Alex Jones’ media presence been affected by recent events? Jones has been banned from major social media platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. His website, InfoWars, has also seen increased traffic, and he’s facing financial di difficulties as payment processors like PayPal have terminated their relationships with him.
Q4. What are the key constitutional issues raised in Jones’ counterclaim? The counterclaim argues that the court proceedings violated Jones’ First Amendment rights to free speech, Fifth Amendment rights to due process, Eighth Amendment protections against excessive fines, and Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection under the law.
Q5. How has Alex Jones’ career evolved over the years? Jones started in local Austin media before expanding to radio and then internet broadcasting. His InfoWars website grew to reach millions of viewers monthly, and he became known for his conservative political commentary and conspiracy theories, as well as his vocal support for Second Amendment rights.
References
[1] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones
[2] – https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-268/373909/20250905173307097_No. 25- Petition.pdf
[3] – https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/alex-jones-lost-infowars-new-era-right-wing-media-rcna180145
[4] – https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-rejects-alex-jones-appeal-14-billion/story?id=126509450
[5] – https://www.ksat.com/news/texas/2022/11/23/judge-backs-full-49m-jury-award-against-alex-jones-in-texas/
[6] – https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alex-Jones
[7] – https://abcnews.go.com/US/families-sandy-hook-victims-fbi-agent-file-defamation/story?id=55379036
[8] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-alex-jones-files-second-amended-counterclaim-in-bankruptcy-court-alleging-constitutional-violations-in-sandy-hook-defamation-judgment
[9] – https://finance.yahoo.com/news/paypal-cutting-off-alex-jones-195324750.html
[10] – https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/us/politics/alex-jones-business-infowars-conspiracy.html
[11] – https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45719245
[12] – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/08/alex-jones-piers-morgan-profile
[13] – https://apnews.com/article/alex-jones-infowars-d6299ea512cafd222dab580b30c151ee
[14] – https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/04/technology/alex-jones-infowars-bans-traffic.html
[15] – https://www.reuters.com/world/us/sandy-hook-families-want-seize-alex-jones-social-media-accounts-2024-06-13/
[16] – https://www.npr.org/2018/08/15/638849245/alex-jones-penalized-by-twitter
[17] – (January 11, 2024). Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/024c8397c26e7b504436cb4b761db3fa
[18] – Press, A. (October 13, 2025). Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones’ appeal of $1.4 billion defamation judgment in Sandy Hook shooting. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/ddcdede90c0c8d2710c768fd0ea9946f
[19] – (December 5, 2024). Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/024c8397c26e7b504436cb4b761db3fa
[20] – (January 1, 2024). Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/024c8397c26e7b504436cb4b761db3fa
[21] – (February 14, 2022). Sandy Hook families settle with gun maker Remington for $73 million. WTAE. https://www.wtae.com/article/sandy-hook-families-settle-with-gun-maker-remington/39092727
[22] – Holpuch, A. (February 11, 2013). Ted Nugent: ‘Demilitarised gun nut’ to attend Obama’s State of the Union. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/12/ted-nugent-barack-obama-state-union
[23] – (August 13, 2025). Judge appoints receiver to sell off Alex Jones’s Infowars assets to help pay Sandy Hook families. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/e4373ce5c5ff0206f5665e95dcc869e3
[24] – (2021). Political crowdfunding and resource mobilization for collective action: The keys to success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.120743
[25] – Court, U. S. (n.d.). Korematsu v. United States. https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-korematsu-v-us
[26] – Yang, M. (October 13, 2025). US Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones’ appeal over $1.4bn defamation penalty. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/14/alex-jones-supreme-court-appeal-rejected
[27] – (October 31, 2024). Justice Integrity Report – Nov. 2024 (Pt. 5). Justice Integrity Report. https://www.justice-integrity.org/news-reports/2103-nov-2024-pt-5
[28] – Burch, S. (September 3, 2018). Alex Jones Sees Traffic Plummet After Facebook and YouTube Bans. TheWrap. https://www.thewrap.com/alex-jones-traffic-plummet-facebook-youtube/
[29] – Press, A. (December 6, 2024). Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/07/connecticut-court-upholds-965m-verdict-alex-jones
[30] – (September 21, 2018). PayPal cuts off Alex Jones’ Infowars, joining other tech companies in doing so. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/paypal-cuts-off-alex-jones-infowars-joining-other-tech-companies-118092200691_1.html
[31] – Ingram, D. (December 10, 2024). Bankruptcy judge rejects The Onion’s bid to buy Alex Jones’ Infowars. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/11/bankruptcy-judge-rejects-the-onions-bid-to-buy-alex-jones-infowars.html
[32] – Press, A. (December 13, 2024). Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/024c8397c26e7b504436cb4b761db3fa
[34] – https://x.com/infowars/status/2022310867619237986?s=20
[35] – https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1MYxNllRWWvGw
[36] – https://x.com/BreannaMorello/status/2022071973308662090?s=20
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment