by – L. Richardson
Explosive emails reveal Dr. Anthony Fauci’s top adviser worked to conceal information about risky coronavirus research funded by the NIH and suppress investigations into COVID-19’s origins 3 4. Fauci now faces a congressional grilling over allegations he misled legislators about the NIH’s involvement in gain-of-function research at China’s Wuhan lab and the subsequent cover-up of this dangerous, possibly pandemic-causing experimentation 3 4.
The House COVID panel’s probe uncovered how Fauci’s adviser deleted emails, used burner phones, and plotted ways to circumvent public disclosure rules to keep the public in the dark about Fauci’s pandemic deception 3 4. Whistleblowers claim Fauci fabricated many draconian COVID rules like 6-foot distancing and masking kids that lacked scientific basis, exposing his role in promoting unfounded policies that caused immense societal harm 1 4.
Fauci’s Bombshell Confession
In a stunning admission, former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci and former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins confessed that COVID-19 could have originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China 7 [37]. This bombshell revelation exposes their potential involvement in covering the truth about the pandemic’s origins to protect their reputations and avoid accountability for their mistakes 7.
Admissions of a Tyrant:
Fauci’s testimony before Congress unveiled a series of shocking admissions that shattered the narrative he had propagated throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 8:
- He confessed that the draconian guidance for 6-foot social distancing and masking children, which disrupted lives nationwide, “sort of just appeared” without any scientific basis 8.
- Fauci admitted he could not recall any supporting evidence for mandating masks on children. This policy caused immense psychological harm 8.
- He unequivocally agreed with every travel restriction imposed by the Trump Administration during the pandemic’s peak, contradicting his earlier criticisms 8.
- Fauci acknowledged that vaccine mandates could increase vaccine hesitancy, undermining public trust in health authorities 8.
- He conceded that the lab leak hypothesis, which he had initially dismissed as a “conspiracy theory,” is a plausible explanation for COVID-19’s origins 8.
- Fauci played semantics with the definition of “gain-of-function” research to avoid admitting that the NIH funded this dangerous experimentation in China 8.
- He claimed his staff had no conflicts of interest regarding COVID-19’s origins, despite his senior advisor’s close ties to the disgraced EcoHealth Alliance president 8.
- Fauci testified that he signed off on every NIAID grant without reviewing proposals and could not confirm if any oversight mechanisms existed for foreign laboratories funded by the NIH 8.
- Alarmingly, Fauci claimed he “did not recall” numerous critical issues and events surrounding the pandemic more than 100 times, raising concerns about his credibility and transparency 8.
Lack of Evidence for COVID Rules
Amid the COVID-19 crisis, the so-called public health elite, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, meticulously crafted a narrative to enforce a regime of baseless and draconian measures upon the American populace. These included the widely contested 6-foot social distancing rule and the morally questionable masking of our children—policies that Fauci later admitted were concocted without the backing of solid scientific evidence.
This exposé delves deep into the murky waters of deceit spun by Fauci and his associates, who not only misled Congress but the entire nation about the dangerous gain-of-function research that potentially unleashed this global pandemic from the lab benches of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As the mastermind behind the NIH’s funding of this risky endeavor, Fauci’s narrative crumbles under the weight of truth as he faces a reckoning before Congress to answer for his actions.
As we tear down the facade of “public health” that Fauci and his cronies have hidden behind, we reveal a story of manipulation, fear-mongering, and outright lies—a cautionary tale of how elite bureaucrats played God with our health and freedoms, all while covering up the true origins and risks associated with COVID-19. It’s time to demand transparency and hold these power-hungry manipulators accountable for their actions.
The Science Fiction of Pandemic Controls:
In a shocking admission, Dr. Anthony Fauci confessed that the draconian COVID-19 guidelines for 6-foot social distancing and masking children were not based on any scientific evidence whatsoever. 12 “It sort of just appeared that six feet is going to be the distance,” Fauci testified to Congress, characterizing the recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data.” 12 Former NIH Director Francis Collins also privately testified that he was unaware of any evidence behind the social distancing recommendation. 12
Experts have criticized the lack of scientific basis for these pandemic control measures. “We never did the study about what works,” said Andrew Atkeson, a UCLA economist, lamenting the absence of evidence surrounding the six-foot rule. 12 He warned that such unfounded measures might lead Americans to ignore public health advice during future crises. 12
The six-foot rule was “probably the single most costly intervention the CDC recommended that was consistently applied throughout the pandemic,” according to former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb. 12 Joseph Allen, a Harvard professor, called the six-foot rule “an error that had been propagated for several decades, based on a misunderstanding of how particles traveled through indoor spaces.” 12 He added that health experts often should have focused more on avoiding droplets than improving building ventilation and filtration. 12
Former CDC Director Robert Redfield admitted, “There was no magic around six feet. It’s just historically that’s what was used for other respiratory pathogens. So that really became the first piece” of a strategy to protect Americans in the early days of the virus. 12 These revelations expose the lack of scientific evidence behind Fauci’s draconian COVID rules, which caused immense societal harm and disruption without justification.
Negative Impacts of COVID Measures
As the world grappled with the spread of COVID-19, a narrative driven by fear and control was pushed onto the global stage, orchestrated by figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci. Under the guise of public safety, Fauci championed a slew of oppressive measures—social distancing, mask mandates for adults and even children, and economy-crushing lockdowns—all purportedly based on “science” that he later confessed was made up on the fly.
This section exposes the catastrophic impacts of these unscientific and authoritarian measures. We’ll delve into how Fauci’s directives not only failed to prevent the spread of the virus but inflicted severe damage on the fabric of society: crippling economies, exacerbating mental health crises, and stripping away fundamental human rights and freedoms [38]. The consequences of these draconian policies have left deep scars on communities worldwide, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable among us and setting dangerous precedents for government overreach.
As we peel back the layers of deception, we uncover a tale of manipulation and power that compromised the well-being of millions. This introduction sets the stage for a critical examination of the negative impacts wrought by COVID-19 measures, demanding accountability for those who misled the public and gambled with our lives [39].
Casualties of War on Freedom:
The draconian COVID-19 measures imposed by governments worldwide have severely eroded civil liberties and democratic values, with authoritarian regimes exploiting the restrictions to tighten their grip on power and suppress dissent. 15 Demonstrations have been outlawed, elections postponed, and activists subjected to even greater repression under the guise of a health emergency, the political ramifications of which will persist long after the pandemic subsides. 15
According to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), by November 2020, 61 percent of countries had implemented COVID-19 measures that were “concerning from a democracy and human rights perspective [40] [41].” 15 UN rights chief Michelle Bachelet warned that while some states adopted justifiable temporary measures, there were also “deeply worrying cases where governments appear to be using Covid-19 as a cover for human rights violations [41].” 15
Reporters Without Borders stated that the emergency measures adopted to tackle the pandemic “visibly contributed to a news and information lockdown” and resulted in journalists being detained and sometimes jailed [41]. 15 The US NGO Freedom House reported that “the condition of democracy and human rights has worsened in 80 countries” since the pandemic began [41]. 15 Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben argued that “the voluntary creation of a permanent state of emergency — even if it is not declared in the technical sense — has become one of the essential practices of contemporary states, including those that are supposedly democratic [41].” 15 He lamented, “We have become used to living without freedom.” 15
The restrictions on journalistic work were not a sudden attack on the media but a continuation of a worldwide trend evident for several years in authoritarian systems and established democracies. 16 For those who fear the free press and its watchdog function, the pandemic provided a pretext to tighten control under the guise of public health and create enduring facts [42]. 16
Assaults on freedom of expression, including freedom of the press, were linked to restrictions on other fundamental communication rights, such as freedom of information and assembly. 16 The infringements did not occur suddenly with the pandemic but fit into an emerging trend [42]. 16 Governments became creative in stopping the spread of criticism, doubts about their effectiveness, and unpleasant news by obfuscating, restricting access to information, and sanctioning alleged disinformation. 16
Not only were governments responsible for the interventions, but other actors also interfered with journalists’ work, impairing freedom of reporting. 16 Verbal or physical attacks on journalists, arrests, criminal investigations, restricting and denying access to information, and censorship were among the assaults on press freedom assessed by the International Press Institute’s COVID-19 Press Freedom Tracker. 16 Fake news regulation, used against allegedly false information, justified actions against media companies or individual journalists as part of broader emergency legislation allowing governments to bypass the usual legislative route. 16
Fauci’s Upcoming Congressional Testimony
The hour of accountability is upon us as Dr. Anthony Fauci, the controversial architect behind the nation’s COVID-19 response, is summoned to face a rigorous grilling by Congress. This crucial testimony is poised to strip bare the facade of authority and uncover the truth behind Fauci’s role in perpetuating what many see as one of the greatest deceptions in public health history. Accusations are rife that Fauci not only fabricated critical COVID-19 safety measures—such as the nonsensical six-foot distancing and unfounded masking of innocent children—but also misled Congress about the NIH’s murky involvement in dangerous gain-of-function research at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.
As Fauci steps into the congressional spotlight, he will confront a barrage of hard-hitting questions aimed at exposing potential cover-ups and manipulating scientific data that may have led to a global pandemic catastrophe. This testimony isn’t just a probing of Fauci’s actions; it’s a battle for the truth, demanding answers and accountability from a figure who wielded unprecedented influence over global health policies.
The stakes could not be higher as this explosive session promises to unravel the narrative that has dictated global pandemic responses and scrutinize the actions that may have compromised national and international safety. This introduction sets the stage for a historic confrontation that could reshape public trust and redefine the landscape of public health governance.
Day of Reckoning:
Congress is gearing up to grill Dr. Anthony Fauci in a high-stakes public hearing on June 3, 2024, marking a day of reckoning for the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director [43]. 19 20 Fauci, who retired from public service nearly a year and a half ago, will face intense scrutiny over his role in shaping the U.S. pandemic response, promoting questionable narratives about COVID-19’s origins, and overseeing policies that lacked scientific backing. 19 20
Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, who chairs the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, has been a vocal critic of Fauci’s approach. “Dr. Fauci was the figure; he was the guy who put himself in charge,” Wenstrup stated. 19 He accused Fauci of dismissing dissenting views, recalling Fauci’s infamous quote: “If you disagree with me, then you disagree with science.” 19 Wenstrup argued that actual science should consider all possibilities and build upon facts, not promote a single narrative. 19
The committee has already pressed one of Fauci’s former advisors about alleged transparency issues at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 19 Wenstrup expressed uncertainty about uncovering a “smoking gun” but raised concerns about two key topics: the true origins of COVID-19 in China and the motives behind pushing a singular narrative. 19
During a closed-door interview earlier this year, Fauci faced intense questioning about the lack of scientific evidence behind his draconian policies, such as the “6 feet apart” social distancing guidance. 20 Lawmakers are expected to zero in on this issue during the public hearing. Fauci admitted that the guidance “sort of just appeared” without supporting data. 20
The hearing also comes after Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis, which he initially dismissed as a “conspiracy theory,” should not be disregarded as a potential explanation for COVID-19’s origins. 20 This contradicts his earlier efforts to discredit the lab leak theory by publishing the infamous “Proximal Origin” paper. 20
As Fauci prepares to testify, the American public eagerly awaits answers about his role in shaping pandemic-era policies, his potential involvement in covering up COVID-19’s origins, and the systemic failures within the public health system he oversaw. 20 The hearing promises to be pivotal in holding Fauci accountable for his actions during the pandemic. 19 20
Allegations of Lying and Cover-up
Dr. Anthony Fauci, a name synonymous with the COVID-19 narrative, is now caught in the crosshairs of accountability as stark allegations of deception emerge. Accused of fabricating crucial pandemic policies and misleading Congress about the NIH’s shady involvement in gain-of-function research, Fauci’s once-unquestionable reputation is now under intense scrutiny. This testimony is more than just a procedural formality; it’s a pivotal moment in a broader battle against a corrupt cabal of power-hungry scientists and bureaucrats who played God with public health.
As Fauci prepares to face a barrage of questions from lawmakers, the public’s thirst for truth grows insatiable. The allegations suggest a dark tapestry of lies, including covering up the true origins of COVID-19 to protect vested interests and obscure potentially catastrophic lapses in judgment and ethics. This introduction prepares us to dive into the heart of the controversy, peeling back layer after layer of deceit to reveal how deep the roots of corruption may extend within our health institutions. With the world watching, this congressional testimony could mark the beginning of the end of Fauci’s era of influence.
A Web of Lies:
Explosive revelations suggest Dr. Anthony Fauci may have used his personal email account to conduct official government business during the COVID-19 pandemic, circumventing transparency and public disclosure rules [44]. 23 In a shocking email exchange, Fauci’s Senior Advisor, Dr. David Morens, admitted to using a “secret back channel” to communicate with Fauci outside the public eye, stating, “I can either send stuff to Tony on his private Gmail or hand it to him at work…He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.” 23
When questioned about Fauci’s potential use of personal email to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Dr. Morens concerningly testified, “I may have.” 23 These damning admissions raise serious concerns about public health officials purposefully concealing information and behaving as if they are unaccountable to the American people they serve. 23
Furthermore, in another email to the disgraced EcoHealth Alliance President, Dr. Peter Daszak, Dr. Morens referenced a “secret back channel” he would use to communicate with Dr. Fauci, further fueling allegations of a cover-up and lack of transparency. 23 Considering Dr. Morens was under the leadership of Dr. Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Select Subcommittee is deeply concerned that Dr. Fauci had knowledge of his Senior Advisor’s nefarious behavior and potentially engaged in similar misconduct himself. 23
These revelations paint a disturbing picture of a web of lies and deception spun by the highest-ranking public health officials during a crisis that profoundly impacted the lives of every American. 23 The potential use of personal email accounts and “secret back channels” to evade public scrutiny and oversight raises profound questions about the integrity of the pandemic response and the motives behind the draconian policies imposed on the nation. 23
Evidence of Gain-of-Function Research Funding
The damning evidence reveals that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants were unequivocally used to fund controversial gain-of-function (GOF) research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, despite Dr. Anthony Fauci’s denials [45]. 25 26 Richard Ebright, a professor at Rutgers University, stated that the released documents make it clear that assertions by Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins about not supporting gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement in Wuhan are “untruthful [45].” 25
Following the Money Trail:
Multiple sections of the grant proposals and progress reports explicitly show that the NIH grants funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. 25 Notably, page 28 and Figure 35 of the year four progress report on the first five-year grant term (1R01-AI110964) and page 3, Figure 6, of the proposal for a second five-year grant term (2R01-AI110964) reveal that the grants supported the construction of mutant SARS-related coronaviruses by blending different types together [46] [45]. 25 The result was a lab-generated virus capable of infecting human cells, with at least three exhibiting significantly higher viral loads in humanized mice, ranging from 10 to 100 times higher than the control virus [47]. 25
Furthermore, a 2018 joint funding application involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the EcoHealth Alliance proposed searching for bat coronavirus samples genetically close to SARS-CoV-1 and potentially bearing furin cleavage sites [48]. 25 If such viruses were not found, the researchers intended to manipulate SARS-like coronaviruses to increase their binding affinity to human lung tissue and possibly insert furin sites at the exact location as those found in SARS-CoV-2, a technique previously used by other researchers. 25 28
Although EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak claimed his work never involved gain-of-function research, journalists uncovered a proposal for a grant to conduct such research in 2018, which was denied but raised concerns about a potential cover-up. 28 Additionally, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic revealed that EcoHealth needed to have appropriately maintained an existing grant with the NIH, including not uploading updates or obtaining lab reports from Wuhan about the work being done with NIH funding. 28
Use of Burner Phones and Couriers
New evidence suggests that Dr. Anthony Fauci may have used his personal email account to communicate about official government business during the COVID-19 pandemic, evading transparency and public disclosure rules. 23 In a shocking email exchange, Fauci’s Senior Advisor, Dr. David Morens, admitted to using a “secret back channel” to communicate with Fauci outside the public eye, stating, “I can either send stuff to Tony on his private Gmail or hand it to him at work…He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.” 23
When questioned about Fauci’s potential use of personal email to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Dr. Morens concerningly testified, “I may have.” 23 These damning admissions raise serious concerns about public health officials purposefully concealing information and behaving as if they are unaccountable to the American people they serve. 23
Espionage Tactics in Public Health:
Furthermore, in another email to the disgraced EcoHealth Alliance President, Dr. Peter Daszak, Dr. Morens referenced a “secret back channel” he would use to communicate with Dr. Fauci, fueling allegations of a cover-up and lack of transparency. 23 Considering Dr. Morens was under the leadership of Dr. Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Select Subcommittee is deeply concerned that Dr. Fauci had knowledge of his Senior Advisor’s nefarious behavior and potentially engaged in similar misconduct himself. 23
These revelations paint a disturbing picture of a web of lies and deception spun by the highest-ranking public health officials during a crisis that profoundly impacted the lives of every American. 23 The potential use of personal email accounts and “secret back channels” to evade public scrutiny and oversight raises profound questions about the integrity of the pandemic response and the motives behind the draconian policies imposed on the nation. 23
Emails released last week by the U.S. House reveal how Anthony Fauci’s former top adviser worked to keep the public in the dark and thwart investigations into COVID’s origins. 30 Subpoenaed private emails from Dr. Fauci’s senior adviser, David Morens, show how NIH officials and EcoHealth President Peter Daszak sought to conceal their lapses. 30
Dr. Morens led the Daszak protection program. His subpoenaed emails show that he helped edit EcoHealth’s press releases and worked to restore its funding. 30 He also sought to thwart Freedom of Information Act requests by outside groups regarding the EcoHealth grant. 30 Dr. Morens’s emails showcase how government officials circled the wagons to protect themselves. 30 Dr. Morens, currently on administrative leave owing to the committee’s revelations of his potential federal records law violation, told lawmakers last week that his FOIA avoidance was “wrong” but denied knowledge that his emails constituted federal records under the law. 30 Regardless, he was clearly trying to conceal the Daszak grant background. 30
Conclusion
In the aftermath of the shocking revelations surrounding Dr. Anthony Fauci’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is evident that the American public has been subjected to a web of deception orchestrated by the highest-ranking public health officials [49]. The lack of scientific evidence behind Fauci’s draconian measures, such as the arbitrary six-foot social distancing and masking of children, has been exposed, shattering the illusion of credibility he carefully crafted. Furthermore, the disturbing allegations of Fauci’s involvement in funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, coupled with his efforts to suppress investigations into the origins of COVID-19, paint a picture of a public official more concerned with preserving his reputation than prioritizing transparency and accountability.
As Fauci prepares to testify before Congress, the nation eagerly awaits answers to the burning questions plaguing the pandemic response. The revelations of personal email accounts, burner phones, and “secret back channels” used to evade public scrutiny have shaken the foundation of trust in the institutions responsible for safeguarding public health. It is incumbent upon Fauci to provide a comprehensive and truthful account of his actions, addressing the allegations of misleading Congress and the potential cover-up of the NIH’s involvement in funding risky gain-of-function research. The consequences of his actions have reverberated throughout society, undermining civil liberties and eroding the very fabric of democracy under the guise of a health emergency. As the nation grapples with the aftermath of the pandemic, Fauci’s testimony represents a pivotal moment in restoring accountability and ensuring that such a blatant disregard for scientific integrity and transparency never occurs again [50].
References
[1] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShiwHR5OvtM
[2] – https://www.independent.org/issues/article.asp?id=13919
[5] – https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/may/28/tyranny-of-fauci-and-experts-covid-19-misinformati/
[9] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459733/
[10] – https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/hrpscovid
[11] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900658/
[12] – https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/06/02/six-foot-rule-covid-no-science/
[13] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081023/
[14] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9266157/
[15] – https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20201216-freedom-another-casualty-of-covid-19-pandemic
[16] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628134/
[17] – https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-reminder-dr-anthony-fauci-to-testify-tomorrow/
[18] – https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/02/fauci-covid-research-investigative-panel-00161109
[21] – https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/06/02/covid-committee-house-fauci/
[22] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655972/
[24] – https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fauci-rand-paul-shouting-match-wuhan-lab-research/story?id=78946568
[25] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/
[26] – https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024.05.01-SSCP-Report_FINAL.pdf
[27] – https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114270/documents/HHRG-117-GO24-20211201-SD004.pdf
[31] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11770/
[32] – https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence
[34] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149692/
[35] – https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/covid-19-crisis-management-call-arms-bill-cooper
[36] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331910/
[37] – (2024). United States: Senator Marshall Reacts to Dr. Fauci and Former NIH Dir. Collins Reversal on Legitimacy of Covid-19 Lab Leak Theory. MENA Report, (),.
[38] – More stringent policies to combat the COVID-19 epidemic are necessary as the situation worsens in São Paulo. The state government’s zigzag approach has failed to prevent the spread of the virus. It maintains it as the pandemic’s epicenter in Brazil – Solidary Research Network. https://redepesquisasolidaria.org/en/bulletins/bulletin-29-bulletins/more-stringent-policies-to-combat-the-covid-19-epidemic-are-necessary-as-the-situation-worsens-in-sao-paulo-the-state-governments-zigzag-approach-has-failed-to-prevent-the-spread-of-the-virus-and-m/
[39] – Beyond the Learning Fallacy – Breaking the Learning vs Performance Dichotomy in the Modern Workplace – NWORX. https://nworx.ai/beyond-the-learning-fallacy-breaking-the-learning-vs-performance-dichtomy-in-the-modern-workplace/
[40] – Women Candidates Face Difficult Path to Parliament. https://globalpressjournal.com/africa/uganda/women-candidates-face-difficult-path-parliament/
[41] – Freedom: Another Casualty of COVID-19 Pandemic | Breaking Asia. https://www.breakingasia.com/360/freedom-another-casualty-of-covid-19-pandemic/
[42] – More than just collateral damage. Ramifications of the pandemic for freedom of the press | Publizistik. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11616-021-00699-4
[43] – Fauci defends mask mandates, says could’ve done a better job explaining their importance | Just The News. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/kaitlan-collins-asks-dr-anthony-fauci-do-you-think-mask-mandates-were
[44] – Investigation: Ousted CNO nominee, Adm. Bill Moran’s contact with ‘Bad Santa’ was not misconduct. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/no-moran-misconduct/
[45] – Fauci Was ‘Untruthful’ to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research, New Documents Appear To Show – Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/fauci-untruthful-congress-wuhan-lab-research-documents-show-gain-function-1627351
[46] – NIH Director Steps Down Amid Growing Scandal About Covid-19 Origins – Yated.com. https://yated.com/nih-director-steps-down-amid-growing-scandal-about-covid-19-origins/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nih-director-steps-down-amid-growing-scandal-about-covid-19-origins
[47] – POLCAIR (Cairo) – CAO | Cyprus Insitute. https://cao.cyi.ac.cy/cairo/
[48] – (2024). United States: U.S. Senator Katie Britt Supports More Than $6.2 Billion in Alabama Investments, Critical National Defense Priorities, Conservative Wins. MENA Report, (),.
[49] – Cory Fleming, Wife, Bio, Age, Wiki, Married, Kids, Net Worth, Salary. https://exclusivetak.com/2023/12/cory-fleming.html
[50] – Sule, S. A., & Mulyanto, M. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Budget Performance in Nigeria: Pre and Post-Covid-19 Impact. The Es Accounting And Finance/The Es Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.58812/esaf.v2i02.222
[52] – https://www.infowars.com/author/8/
[54] – https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FINAL_Fauci-Memo.pdf
[55] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222086/
[57] – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/depression/index.html
[58] – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GPFRmvobAAApSyo?format=png&name=small
[59] – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GPFRo5TbwAAa-En?format=png&name=small
[61] – https://www.c-span.org/video/?535836-1/top-adviser-dr-anthony-fauci-testifies-covid-19-origins
Critical Thinking Dispatch 
Leave a comment