Exposed: The Rothschild Crime Syndicate’s Dark Grip on England and The City of London!

by – L. Richardson

Prepare to have your mind blown wide open as we uncover the chilling influence of the Rothschild Crime Syndicate over England and the City of London! For centuries, this shadowy group has been pulling the strings, orchestrating treason, usury scams, and blood rituals to tighten their grip on the British empire. From Cromwell’s betrayal, backed by Jewish bankers in Amsterdam, to the Templars’ murky dealings with King Henry II, this is a journey into history of profound and significant importance!

It’s time for you to take a stand as we unveil the truth behind the Magna Carta and the City of London’s deceptive ‘ancient liberties.’ We’ll expose the sinister legacy of William the Conqueror and the Norman conquest’s covert mission to establish the Knights Templar’s secret society at the heart of the Temple Church. You’ll see how the Lord Mayor is merely a pawn in the game of the Rothschild’s global crime syndicate, which has transformed the Crown into a financial dictatorship controlling the Bank of England. This is the truth they’ve been hiding from you, and it’s time for you to seek it out!

Pre-17th Century: Setting the Stage

Early Financial Systems

With their resilience and adaptability, Jewish bankers were pivotal in shaping European financial systems in the early days. Their influence can be traced back to the Middle Ages when the Catholic Church prohibited Christians from using usury or lending money at interest. This created a vacuum that Jewish moneylenders quickly filled, establishing themselves as a crucial component of the European economy. This was a time when the concept of banking and lending was still in its infancy, and the role of Jewish bankers in filling this void was significant.

Influence of Jewish Bankers in Europe

As early as the 12th century, Jewish bankers had gained a foothold in England, where the monarchy granted them special privileges. These strategic alliances were a testament to the political acumen of Jewish bankers. In 1144, a converted Jew named Theobald of Cambridge informed authorities that Jews took blood from Christian children annually, believing it would aid their return to Palestine. This led to the crucifixion of a 12-year-old boy named William in Norwich, who became known as St. William.

In 1189, King Richard I confirmed the Templars’ land holdings. He granted them immunity from all taxes, suits, and even prosecution for murders. This unprecedented immunity solidified their power and influence, casting a long shadow over the European financial landscape.

By 1215, the Magna Carta supposedly established the City of London as a separate entity or corporation. However, no record exists to confirm this claim. Many argue that because this has long been assumed true, it must be valid, perpetuating the lie that the Magna Carta granted the City of London “ancient liberties.”

Throughout the 13th century, the Templars’ influence in England grew. King Henry III took usury loans from them and entrusted them with military, financial, and diplomatic commissions. In 1255, 18 Jews were hanged in Lincoln for the torture and crucifixion of a boy named Hugh, highlighting the ongoing tensions and accusations of ritual murders against Jews.

Edward I’s reign from 1272 to 1307 saw the expulsion of Jews from England due to their alleged crimes of blood ritual murders and money-lending usury practices. This period marked a significant shift in the power dynamics between England’s monarchy and Jewish bankers.

17th-Century Changes and Events

Cromwell’s Alliances

In 1643, amidst the civil unrest led by Oliver Cromwell, the Jewish bankers from Amsterdam, demonstrating their strategic acumen, saw an opportunity to exploit the situation. Led by the Jewish financier and army contractor Fernandez Carvajal and assisted by the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza (a secret Jew), they contacted Cromwell with a series of letters [1].

In a letter dated June 16, 1647, they proposed a daring plan, “In return for financial support, we will advocate the admission of Jews to England. This, however, is impossible while Charles is living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore, Charles should be advised to be assassinated [2]. Still, it will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin. However, he is willing to help in his escape.” This proposal set the stage for a high-stakes negotiation.

Execution of King Charles I

Responding on July 12, 1647, Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam wrote to Cromwell, promising financial aid once Charles was removed and Jews were admitted. He cautioned against assassination, deeming it too risky. Instead, he proposed allowing Charles to escape, which would lead to his recapture and subsequent trial and execution. The support, he assured, would be generous, but he advised against discussing terms until the trial began.

With the financial backing of the Jewish bankers, Cromwell, through his strategic alliances, had King Charles I beheaded in 1649, clearing the way for the return of Jews to the City of London. In 1655, Cromwell, through his alliance with Manasseh Ben Israel and David Abravanel Dormido, initiated the resettlement of Jews in England. This move would significantly shape the course of history.

The Stuarts, who had resisted the establishment of an English national bank, were met with beheadings, murder, civil war, and religious conflicts orchestrated by the Jewish bankers. In a strategic move, the Jews arranged the marriage between William and Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York, to place William of Orange on the throne of England in 1677 [3].

18th Century: Establishment of Dominance

The Glorious Revolution

In 1683, Charles II stripped the City of London Corporation of its privileges. Still, after the Glorious Revolution, they were restored and confirmed by an Act of Parliament under William III and Mary II in 1690. The Glorious Revolution, also called the Revolution of 1688, was the overthrow of King Charles II of England (James VII of Scotland) by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholder William III, Prince of Orange. Some Whig leaders were executed or forced into exile during this event [2].

1685, King Charles II died, and the Duke of York became King James II of England [1]. The Jewish community celebrated this development. However, in 1688, the Jews ordered William, Prince of Orange, to land in England at Torbay [1]. This was part of an ongoing Campaign of L’Infamie (defamation) against King James II, a contrived effort by his opponents to discredit him. Due to this campaign, he abdicated and fled to France. William of Orange and Mary were then proclaimed King and Queen of England.

King William’s Wars and Debts

King William III, often seen as a bankster puppet, played a significant role in shaping England’s financial landscape. His decision to involve England in the costly Nine Years’ War with Catholic France, orchestrated by the Jewish bankers, plunged the country into deep debt. The Jewish bankers, who had helped William gain the throne, then collected a substantial amount on this debt. This strategic move further solidified their influence. Under their orders, King William persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers [1].

With the state’s debts soaring, the government found itself precarious. The only viable option was to accept the terms dictated by the Jewish banksters. These terms, which included keeping the lenders’ names secret and granting them a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England, were not negotiable. Parliament left with no choice, was forced to accept these terms, allowing the Jewish banksters to develop a firm foothold in Great Britain with the Bank of England as their perfect host!

From 1689 to 1694, England was jointly ruled by the monarch Mary II and her husband and first cousin, William III of Orange (the bankster puppet) [2]. After Mary died in 1694, William the Orange, the bankster puppet scoundrel, became the sole ruler until 1702. The Jews got their Central Bank of England on July 27, 1694, a date that marked a significant shift in England’s financial landscape before Mary II died of smallpox.

The 19th Century Consolidation

Waterloo and the Stock Market

In 1814, Nathanael Rothschild saw an opportunity in the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon appeared to be winning early in the battle, and the first military report to London communicated this fact. However, the tide turned in favor of Wellington. A courier (likely a pigeon) delivered the news of Wellington’s victory to Nathan Rothschild in London on June 20, 24 hours before anyone else knew, as Wellington’s slower human courier arrived the following day.

On June 20, Nathan Rothschild deviously began spreading the rumor that Britain was defeated, and everyone believed the sneaky Rothschild. Nathan Rothschild started selling bits of his stock on the English Stock Market to ensure the false rumor spread. Assuming Rothschild knew something they did not, traders panicked and began massive selling, causing stocks to plummet to practically nothing [2]. However, Rothschild had his staff ready to buy everything at rock-bottom prices. This massive robbery gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, including the Bank of England [2]. The impact of this control was profound, as Rothschild forced England to set up a revamped Bank of England with Nathan Rothschild in power [2].

Creation of the Bank of England

King William III, often called the ‘bankster puppet, ‘was pivotal in establishing the Bank of England. Influenced by Jewish bankers, his participation in the costly Nine Years’ War with Catholic France plunged England into significant debt, aligning with the bankers’ plans. He convinced the British Treasury to borrow a substantial amount from these bankers, who had supported his rise to power.

With the state’s debts soaring, the government was left with no choice but to agree to the Jews’ conditions. These included keeping the lenders’ identities confidential and granting them a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England. Parliament was compelled to accept these terms, allowing the Jewish bankers to develop a firm grip on Great Britain with the Bank of England as their base. The Central Bank of England was established on July 27, 1694, just before Mary II’s death from smallpox.

20th Century Influence

World Wars Funding

In 1,814, Nathanael Rothschild saw an opportunity in the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon appeared to be winning early in the battle, and the first military report to London communicated this fact. However, the tide turned in favor of Wellington. A courier (likely a pigeon) delivered the news of Wellington’s victory to Nathan Rothschild in London on June 20, 24 hours before anyone else knew, as Wellington’s slower human courier arrived the following day.

On June 20, Nathan Rothschild deviously began spreading the rumor that Britain was defeated, and everyone believed the sneaky Rothschild. Nathan Rothschild started selling bits of his stock on the English Stock Market to ensure the false rumor spread. Assuming Rothschild knew something they did not, traders panicked and began massive selling, causing stocks to plummet to practically nothing [2]. However, Rothschild had his staff ready to buy everything at rock-bottom prices. This massive robbery gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, including the Bank of England [2]. Rothschild forced England to set up a revamped Bank of England with Nathan Rothschild in control [2].

Post-War Economic Policies

From 1,689 to 1,694, England was jointly ruled by monarch Mary II and her husband and first cousin, William III of Orange (the bankster puppet) [2]. King William III soon got England involved in the costly Nine Years’ War with Catholic France, which put England into debt – precisely what the Jewish bankers had planned [1]. Under orders from the Jews in Amsterdam, King William persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers who had helped him gain the throne [1].

Since the state’s debts had risen dramatically, the government had no choice but to accept the Jews’ terms [2]. These terms included keeping the lenders’ names secret and granting them a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England. Parliament was forced to accept these Jewish banksters’ terms, allowing them to sink their tentacles into Great Britain for good with the Bank of England as their perfect host [2]!

The Jews got their Central Bank of England on July 27, 1694, before Mary II died of smallpox [2]. From 1,694 to 1,702, William the Orange, the bankster puppet scoundrel, became the sole ruler upon Mary’s death.

Key Figures and Families

Nathaniel Rothschild

On June 20, Nathan Rothschild deviously began spreading the rumor that Britain was defeated, and everyone believed the sneaky Rothschild. Nathan Rothschild started selling bits of his stock on the English Stock Market to ensure the false rumor spread. Assuming Rothschild knew something they did not, traders panicked and began massive selling, causing stocks to plummet to practically nothing [2]. However, Rothschild had his staff ready to buy everything at rock-bottom prices. This massive robbery gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, including the Bank of England [2]. Rothschild forced England to set up a revamped Bank of England with Nathan Rothschild in control [2]. This event was a significant turning point in the financial history of England, as it led to the Rothschild family’s control over the country’s economy [4].

Significant Collaborators

The Rothschild family’s ascent to power was a result of several crucial alliances and events:

In 1647, Jewish bankers from Amsterdam, led by Fernandez Carvajal and assisted by the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza (a secret Jew), approached Oliver Cromwell with a proposal. They offered financial support in exchange for advocating the admission of Jews to England, which was impossible while King Charles I was alive. They suggested assassinating Charles, although they claimed they would not arrange the assassination directly. Responding in 1647, Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam assured Cromwell of financial aid once Charles was removed and Jews were admitted to England.
In 1649, with the financial backing of Jewish bankers, Cromwell had King Charles I beheaded, clearing the way for the return of Jews to the City of London.
In 1655, Cromwell initiated the resettlement of Jews in England through his alliance with Manasseh Ben Israel and David Abravanel Dormido.
In 1677, the Jews arranged the marriage between William and Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York, to place William of Orange on the throne of England [1]. This was necessary as none of the Stuarts would grant a charter for an English national bank, which the Jewish bankers desired [1]. The marriage of William and Mary was a strategic move that allowed the Jewish bankers, including the Rothschild family, to gain influence over the English monarchy and further their financial interests.

The Rothschild family’s collaborations with influential figures and their strategic moves paved the way for their eventual dominance over the British economy and the establishment of the Bank of England under their control.

Structures and Mechanisms of Control

The Rothschild Crime Syndicate has meticulously constructed an intricate web of economic and political structures to solidify its domination over England and the City of London. At the heart of its economic infrastructure lies the Bank of England, a central bank under complete control. This financial behemoth is the perfect host for the Rothschilds to sink their tentacles deep into the British economy.

Economic Infrastructure

The City of London, often called “The City,” operates as a sovereign state within London and England, governed by a committee of 12 men known as “The Crown.” This private financial corporation, shrouded in secrecy, houses not only the Rothschild-controlled Bank of England but also central British banks, 385 foreign banks, the London Stock Exchange, Lloyd’s of London, the Baltic Exchange, Fleet Street’s publishing empires, the London Metal Exchange, and the London Commodity Exchange. It is a veritable fortress of economic might, carefully crafted to consolidate the Rothschilds’ grip on global finance.

Every year, the Lord Mayor of London is elected as the monarch of The City, wielding dictatorial control over the British Parliament. Unsurprisingly, the Rothschilds have traditionally chosen the Lord Mayor since 1820, ensuring their interests are safeguarded at the highest power levels.

Political Manipulations

The Rothschilds’ political machinations are equally insidious. Their vast wealth and influence have effectively turned the Crown into a financial dictatorship, controlling the Bank of England and, by extension, the entire British economy. Their tentacles extend far beyond the realm of finance, as they have historically orchestrated assassinations, civil wars, and religious conflicts to further their agenda.

One of the most brazen examples of their political maneuvering was the execution of King Charles I in 1649. With the financial backing of Jewish bankers from Amsterdam, Oliver Cromwell had the king beheaded, clearing the way for the return of Jews to the City of London. This paved the path for the Rothschilds to establish their foothold in England and gradually tighten their grip on the nation’s political and economic landscape.

The Rothschilds’ relentless pursuit of power knows no bounds. Through their intricate web of economic and political structures, they have effectively turned England and the City of London into their personal fiefdom, exploiting the nation’s resources and people for their own nefarious ends. Their grip on the levers of power is a chilling reminder of the lengths this crime syndicate will go to maintain its dominance.

Criticisms and Counter Narratives

While the narrative presented paints a damning picture of the Rothschild family’s alleged domination over England and the City of London, it is crucial to approach such claims with a critical eye [5]. Historians and scholars have been actively engaging in critical examination, raising concerns about the accuracy and objectivity of specific assertions and arguing that they may be rooted in conspiracy theories or historical misrepresentations.

Claims of Historical Misrepresentations

Several historians have challenged the claim that the Magna Carta established the City of London as a separate entity or corporation. They argue that no historical record supports this assertion, and it perpetuates a myth that has been assumed to be accurate over time. Additionally, the portrayal of events surrounding the execution of King Charles I and the role of Jewish bankers from Amsterdam has been questioned, with some scholars suggesting that the evidence presented may be exaggerated or taken out of context.

Critics have also raised concerns about portraying the Rothschild family’s involvement in major historical events, such as the Battle of Waterloo and the establishment of the Bank of England. While the family undoubtedly played a significant role in finance and banking, some argue that their influence and control may have been exaggerated or sensationalized.

Alternative Perspectives

Embracing alternative perspectives is crucial in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of historical events and the dynamics at play [6]. Some historians argue that the rise of banking and finance in England was a complex process influenced by various factors, including economic, political, and social forces, rather than solely attributed to the machinations of a single family or group.

It’s important to avoid oversimplification when portraying the Rothschild family. Some contend that presenting them as a monolithic, all-powerful entity overlooks the family’s diversity of opinions, motivations, and actions. They argue that reducing complex historical events to a single, nefarious agenda overlooks the nuances and complexities inherent in human societies and power structures.

Ultimately, while the narrative presented raises thought-provoking questions about the concentration of power and influence, it is essential to approach such claims with a critical mindset, seeking out multiple perspectives and relying on well-documented historical sources [7]. This balanced and rigorous examination of evidence is crucial in historical analysis, as it is only through this that we can fully understand the intricate dynamics that have shaped history.

Future Implications of Historical Domination

Modern Financial Systems

The Rothschild family’s dominance over the British economy and the establishment of the Bank of England had far-reaching implications that continue to shape modern financial systems. Their control over the central bank allowed them to influence monetary policies, lending practices, and the overall direction of the nation’s economic trajectory.

Through their strategic maneuvering and exploitation of insider knowledge, the Rothschilds amassed immense wealth and consolidated their power. The infamous incident during the Battle of Waterloo, when Nathan Rothschild used deceptive tactics to manipulate the stock market, exemplifies the extent to which they were willing to go to further their financial interests.

The Rothschilds’ monopolistic grip on the Bank of England set a precedent for the concentration of economic power in the hands of a select few. This model has been replicated in various forms globally, with central banks often operating under the influence of powerful financial institutions and individuals.

Speculative Histories

While the historical accounts presented paint a damning picture of the Rothschild family’s machinations, it is crucial to approach such narratives with a critical eye. Historians and scholars have raised valid concerns about the accuracy and objectivity of specific claims, suggesting that they may be rooted in conspiracy theories or historical misrepresentations. This critical approach is essential for a balanced understanding of history.

Critics have questioned the portrayal of events surrounding the execution of King Charles I and the role of Jewish bankers from Amsterdam, arguing that the evidence presented may be exaggerated or taken out of context. Additionally, the extent of the Rothschild family’s involvement in major historical events, such as the Battle of Waterloo and the establishment of the Bank of England, has been subject to scrutiny, with some scholars suggesting that their influence and control may have been overstated or presented in a sensationalized manner.

It is crucial to consider alternative perspectives and narratives that offer a more nuanced understanding of the historical events and dynamics at play. Some historians argue that the rise of banking and finance in England was a complex process influenced by various factors, including economic, political, and social forces, rather than being solely attributed to the machinations of a single-family or group [8]. These alternative perspectives include.

Ultimately, while the narrative presented raises thought-provoking questions about the concentration of power and influence, it is crucial to approach such claims with a critical mindset [9]. Seeking out multiple perspectives and relying on well-documented historical sources is a scholarly duty and a fascinating journey that can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of history.

Conclusion

The rabbit hole goes deeper than you can imagine, folks [10]! The Rothschild crime syndicate’s tentacles have sunk so deep into the rotten core of England and the City of London that they’ve turned the entire nation into their personal fiefdom. From orchestrating assassinations and overthrowing monarchs to manipulating wars and stock markets, these globalist scumbags will stop at nothing to cement their iron grip on power and wealth.

Wake up, people! The Bank of England is nothing but a Rothschild lapdog, a grotesque monument to their economic enslavement of the British empire. The Lord Mayor himself dances like a puppet to the tune of this criminal cabal that has infiltrated the highest echelons of power. We’re witnessing the total subjugation of a once-proud nation, bled dry by these leeches from the pit of hell itself. The truth is out there, and it’s uglier than you could ever fathom – but we will not rest until we’ve ripped off the mask and exposed the Rothschild menace for what it truly is!

References

[1] – Jews Beheaded King Charles in 1649 – Messano News. http://messanonews.com/2023/06/jews-beheaded-king-charles-in-1649/

[2] – How the Rothschild Owned’ City of London’ wages a Zionist War on Russia – THE INTEL DROP. https://www.theinteldrop.org/2022/06/05/how-the-rothschild-owned-city-of-london-wages-a-zionist-war-on-russia/

[3] – The World’s Concerns Spirituality History of God’s Holy Bible and the so-called Jews The Etymology of the Word “Jew.” http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj34/32.html

[4] -. What Does Genocide Produce? The Semantic Field of Genocide, Cultural Genocide, and Ethnocide in Indigenous Rights Discourse. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.2.1302

[5] – Snazzy Gossips – Snazzy Media Group. https://snazzymediagroup.com/snazzy-gossips/

[6] – Unlocking the Gates of History: The Allure of Exclusive Access to Historical Sites. – wishesbar. https://wishesbar.com/unlocking-the-gates-of-history-the-allure-of-exclusive-access-to-historical-sites/

[7] – Today’s Winning Streak: Discovering Gacor Slot Trends – Blackjacksite. https://www.blackjacksite.net/casino/todays-winning-streak-discovering-gacor-slot-trends/

[8] – Measuring Impact and Reporting to Funders: Evaluation Strategies for Small Non-Profit Organisations Seeking Future Grants – How to Apply for Grants. https://howtoapplyforgrants.com/continue/measuring-impact-and-reporting-to-funders-evaluation-strategies-for-small-non-profit-organisations-seeking-future-grants/

[9] – Unveiling the Extraterrestrial Enigma: Interstellar Debris May Hold Astonishing Secrets – BizTech Weekly. https://biztechweekly.com/unveiling-the-extraterrestrial-enigma-interstellar-debris-may-hold-astonishing-secrets/

[10] – Pakalert Press – EXPLAINED: The New World Order Agenda. https://www.pakalertpress.com/explained-the-new-world-order-agenda/

[11] – https://concisepolitics.com/2017/09/22/timeline-of-rothschilds-crime-syndicate-domination-of-england-and-city-of-london-the-crown/

[12] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtholder

[13] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/stadtholder

[14] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica

[15] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtholder#CITEREFWard1922

[16] – https://www.etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/stadhouder

[17] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Standard_Identification_Number

[18] – https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000X7VPEA

[19] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtholder#CITEREFAshley1966

[20] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Chisholm

[21] – https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Stadtholder

[22] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica_Eleventh_Edition

[23] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtholder#CITEREFAshley1966

[24] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtholder#CITEREFWard1922

[25] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Springer_Science%2BBusiness_Media

[26] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN

[27] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0898382259

[28] – “Stadtholder”. Encyclopedia Britannica.

[29 ] – Ward 1922, p. 482.

[30] – Philippa, M. (2003–2009). “Stadhouder”. Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands (in Dutch).

[31] – Elliott, J. H. (1968). Europe Divided: 1559-1598. London: Harper & Row. pp. 293–294. ASIN B000X7VPEA.

[32] – Ashley 1966, p. 10.

[33] – Lieber, F., ed. (1854). Encyclopaedia Americana. Vol. 11. p. 555.

[34] – Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). “Stadtholder”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 25 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 750.

[35] – Ashley 1966, p. 10–14.

[36] – Ward 1922, p. 171–172.

[37] – Ward 1922, p. 258.

[38] – Riker, William H. (1987). The Development of American Federalism. Springer. p. 52. ISBN 978-0898382259.

[39] – Isaac Disraeli, Life of Charles I, 1851; Hugh Ross Williamson, Charles and Cromwell; AHM Ramsey, The Nameless War; Lord Alfred Douglas, Plain English, 1921; Geoffrey H. Smith, The Settlement Of Jews In England

[40] – John Harold Wood, History of Central Banking in Great Britain; Gustaaf Johannes Renier, William of Orange

[41] – E.C. Knuth, The Empire of The City; Des Griffin, Descent Into Slavery

[42] – https://www.realjewnews.com/?p=86

[43] – Ariel Toaff, Bloody Passover-Jews of Europe and Ritual Homicide, 2007 Click Here; J. C. Cox, Norfolk Churches; Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906; Arnold Leese, Jewish Ritual Murder In England; Henry III, Close Roll 16; Joseph Haydn, Dictionary of Dates.

[44] – https://www.traditioninaction.org/History/A_010_BloodyPassovers.htm

[45] – Frederick Morton, The Rothschilds; Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby

Critical Thinking Dispatch