by – L. Richardson

Exile, a punishment from ancient civilizations, transformed Australia by transporting 162,000 convicts between 1788 and 1850. Today, we face a similar crisis in our streets, with violent criminals being arrested dozens of times – some racking up an astounding 30 to 42 arrests. Our nation stands at a crossroads, watching repeat offenders cycle through our justice system while public safety crumbles around us. It’s time to restore public safety and reassure our citizens. The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Historically, societies from Rome to Britain have used exile not just as punishment but as a practical solution to protect their citizens. In fact, the British successfully transported these criminals in 806 ships, turning their problem into a solution that ultimately built a nation. We must now consider whether this time-tested approach could be our answer to America’s growing criminal plague, particularly when our current system fails to deter career criminals who repeatedly threaten our communities.

Historical Precedence:

Exile Through the Ages

Ancient Greece pioneered systematic exile through ostracism, where citizens could vote to banish influential individuals who threatened state stability. Throughout the 5th century BC, Athenians gathered in midwinter to decide on holding an ostracism vote, subsequently requiring at least 6,000 votes against a person for banishment9. Notably, archeologists discovered 8,500 pottery ballot fragments from 471 BC, revealing this democratic process in action10.

Subsequently, Rome refined exile into a sophisticated legal mechanism. Roman citizens facing capital charges could voluntarily leave the jurisdiction before sentencing, subsequently receiving an official “denial of water and fire” decree that formalized their banishment11. Furthermore, this system evolved under the principate into formal deportation and relegation penalties, establishing graduated levels of exile based on offense severity.

Throughout medieval times, exile continued as a practical alternative to execution. Between 1180 and 1350, thousands of English criminals sought refuge in churches, subsequently accepting exile rather than face death12. This practice demonstrated how societies balanced justice with mercy, leading to more structured approaches.

The British penal transportation system marked a pivotal advancement in exile’s evolution. From 1788 to 1868, British authorities transported 162,000 convicts to Australian colonies13. The First Fleet of eleven ships arrived at Botany Bay in 1788, establishing Sydney as the initial settlement13 [41]. Consequently, additional penal colonies emerged in Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania) in 1803 and Queensland in 1824.

The Australian experiment proved remarkably successful. Most transported convicts were sentenced for petty crimes, with thieves comprising 80% of all transportees13. Once emancipated, many former convicts integrated successfully into colonial society, some achieving prominent positions. By 2007, approximately four million Australians could trace their ancestry to these transported convicts13.

The Modern Crisis:

America’s Crime Wave

Recent FBI data reveals a complex picture of America’s crime landscape. Overall, violent crime decreased by 3.0% in 2023. Nevertheless, the United States still spends nearly $300 billion annually to police communities and incarcerate 2.2 million people15. Significantly, the economic burden extends far beyond direct costs – for every dollar spent on corrections, incarceration generates an additional ten dollars in social costs16.

The justice system’s effectiveness remains questionable. Accordingly, studies show that a 10% increase in incarceration leads to only a 2% decrease in crime15. The system primarily affects minority communities, with black men comprising about 13% of the general population but approximately 35% of those incarcerated.

Key crime statistics paint a concerning picture:

• One in three black men born today faces incarceration in his lifetime, compared to one in seventeen white men17
• Most violent crimes go unreported, with only 41.5% of violent crimes reported to police18
• The clearance rate for reported crimes stands at just 36.7% for violent crimes and 12.1% for property crimes18

Trump’s administration has proposed significant policy shifts from Biden’s approach. The former president reversed Biden’s executive order that had eliminated Justice Department contracts with private prisons19. Trump advocates for deploying military might against drug cartels and promises to “take down the gangs” that distribute narcotics locally20.

The economic impact remains substantial, with federal, state, and local governments spending $282.10 billion on law enforcement and corrections in 2021 – the highest since 1980. Undoubtedly, this financial burden affects taxpayers directly, as the aggregate cost of incarceration approaches one trillion dollars annually16.

Recent trends show some improvement. The Council on Criminal Justice reports that eleven tracked offenses decreased in the first half of 2024. However, while progress exists, the systemic challenges of high incarceration rates, racial disparities, and economic costs continue to demand comprehensive solutions. We must address the root causes of crime, not just its symptoms, to make a difference in our society [42].

Trump’s Exile Proposal:

The Details

The proposed criminal exile program is a bold response to America’s ongoing battle with repeat offenders. Under this initiative, violent criminals with multiple convictions would face permanent removal from U.S. territory, marking a departure from traditional incarceration methods. This could lead to a safer and more secure society, offering hope for a better future. The potential benefits of this program are significant, providing a ray of hope in the fight against crime.

The proposal outlines three primary components:

• Mandatory exile for individuals with three or more violent felony convictions
• Establishment of offshore detention facilities through international agreements
• Implementation of a streamlined deportation process for convicted non-citizens

Moreover, the program aims to address prison overcrowding by relocating approximately 25% of the current violent offender population. Alternatively, this would free up substantial resources currently allocated to long-term incarceration.

From a legal standpoint, the proposal requires careful constitutional consideration. Constitutional scholars emphasize that any exile program must align with the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Similarly, international law considerations demand compliance with human rights treaties and extradition agreements.

The moral framework supporting this initiative rests on two fundamental principles. First, society’s right to protect law-abiding citizens takes precedence over rehabilitating career criminals. Second, the financial burden of maintaining violent offenders should not fall indefinitely on taxpayers.

The proposal addresses due process requirements through careful analysis by establishing a multi-tier review system. Federal courts would thoroughly examine each case, ensuring constitutional rights remain protected. Additionally, the program includes provisions for appeal procedures and humanitarian considerations.

The moral imperative behind this proposal stems from a fundamental duty to protect American communities. By removing persistent violent offenders, neighborhoods could experience renewed safety and security. Likewise, the resources currently spent on housing these individuals could be redirected toward crime prevention and community development programs.

Economic and Social Benefits

First and foremost, the financial burden of America’s current prison system weighs heavily on taxpayers. Annual costs reach $80.7 billion for public prisons and jails, plus $3.9 billion for private facilities23. The average price per inmate is $31,286 annually24, creating an unsustainable strain on public resources.

Cost Savings:

How exile can save taxpayers billions currently spent on incarceration

The current system’s financial inefficiency becomes apparent through these stark numbers:

• Direct prison costs exceed state budgets by 13.9%
• Prison phone calls and commissary purchases cost families $2.9 billion annually23
• Justice system expenditures have grown by 310% between 1982-2012

As a result of these mounting expenses, approximately 4,000 companies now profit from mass incarceration23, creating a cycle of financial exploitation that affects both taxpayers and incarcerated individuals. In addition to direct costs, the system generates substantial hidden expenses, as each dollar spent on corrections creates an additional ten dollars in social costs.

Public Safety:

Ensuring your neighborhoods are safe for your children, your elderly, your future

The effectiveness of exile in enhancing public safety has a historical precedent. For instance, Project Exile demonstrated remarkable success, with homicides declining by 33% in its first year of implementation and an additional 21% reduction the following year25. Throughout this period, armed robberies decreased by 30%.

Ultimately, the economic impact extends beyond immediate cost savings. The current system imposes substantial financial burdens on families, with formerly incarcerated individuals facing a 27% unemployment rate23. Through exile implementation, communities could redirect resources toward prevention and reentry programs, as evidenced by recent initiatives allocating $250,000 in grant funding for such purposes26.

The Department of Justice’s nearly $75 million commitment to reduce recidivism27 could be reallocated to more effective programs. Studies indicate that five out of six state prisoners are rearrested within nine years of release27, highlighting the current system’s ineffectiveness in preventing repeat offenses.

National Identity Restoration

Border security statistics paint a stark picture of America’s current crisis. Under Biden’s administration, Border Patrol recorded 43,674 arrests of illegal aliens with criminal backgrounds, marking a 99% increase from previous years28. Evidently, these numbers reflect a fundamental shift in national security priorities.

Back to Basics:

Reclaiming our national strength and pride by securing our borders and streets

The Southwest border, stretching nearly 2,000 miles, faces unprecedented challenges29. Criminal organizations have established multi-billion dollar operations, explicitly targeting vulnerable entry points29. By October 2023, agents were apprehending approximately 47 illegal aliens with serious criminal histories daily28.

The surge has direct implications for community safety. Above all, 617,000 criminal illegal aliens now await case outcomes while living in American communities, up from 407,983 in January 2023. Law enforcement officials across the nation report disturbing trends:

• Rising residential thefts by transnational gangs28
• Border-related crime reaching historic highs28
• Increased violent crimes in metropolitan areas28

Contrast with Current Policy:

Trump vs. Biden –

a choice between strength and weakness

The policy divide between administrations couldn’t be more apparent. Unlike current approaches, Trump’s administration demonstrated effective border control through decisive action. In contrast, Biden’s policies have led to approximately 2 million aliens entering unchecked, their backgrounds and intentions unknown28.

Local law enforcement bears witness to these policy failures. Primarily, one New York County official testified about increased crime from organized gangs connected to Mexican cartels28. Sheriff Michael Bouchard of Oakland County highlighted the direct correlation between open borders and rising crime rates28.

The FBI’s response involves 12 border corruption task forces staffed with approximately 120 special agents29. However, the current administration’s non-enforcement directives have restricted Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s ability to arrest criminal illegal aliens28.

The stakes extend beyond mere statistics. Drug trafficking, human smuggling, extortion, and corruption represent an existential threat to American communities29. The solution requires returning to fundamental principles of national security and law enforcement effectiveness, ensuring that American streets once again belong to law-abiding citizens.

Addressing Opposition and Legal Concerns

Critics of criminal exile raise fundamental concerns about its implementation and fairness. Defense attorneys point out that black defendants and families have carried a disproportionate burden in similar programs, with data showing 15 of the first 19 defendants in Rochester’s federal public defender’s office being black30. Primarily, opposition centers on the program’s potential impact on minority communities, where one in three black men already faces lifetime incarceration30.

Leftist Reaction:

They call it inhumane, but what’s cruel is allowing crime to fester.

Robert Wagner, a federal public defender, describes previous strict sentencing programs as “essentially locking up a large segment of the African-American community under draconian sentencing principles “30. Alternatively, proponents argue that enhanced prison penalties for gun crimes receive widespread support across the political spectrum31. Former Mayor Johnson addresses racial concerns directly: “I want you to understand who their victims are: almost totally other young black men” 30.

Legal Disclaimer:

“Any implementation of such policy would need to pass through extensive legal scrutiny to ensure it aligns with human rights and constitutional laws.”

The constitutional framework demands a rigorous examination of any exile proposal. Key legal requirements include:

• Compliance with the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment32
• Adherence to international human rights treaties and obligations33
• Protection of due process rights and constitutional guarantees34

Simultaneously, legal experts emphasize that constitutional challenges must follow specific procedures. The court must certify to appropriate attorneys general when statutes face questioning35. Ultimately, before rejecting any constitutional challenge, courts must allow a 60-day intervention period for attorney general response35.

Recent examples from other nations demonstrate the risks of misusing exile policies. In Cuba, authorities have used exile as a tool of repression, with over 1,400 people detained and more than 700 remaining behind bars33. Indeed, any American implementation would require strict oversight to prevent similar abuses.

The U.S. Attorney’s office maintains that prosecution decisions focus solely on violent crime, never considering race30. William Hochul Jr., U.S. Attorney for New York’s Western District, states emphatically: “We have never targeted anyone based on race. We follow the facts and follow the law “30.

Constitutional challenges to criminal charges typically involve rights surrounding stops, statements, searches, seizures, warrants, and probable cause34. These protections remain fundamental to American justice, requiring any exile program to establish comprehensive legal frameworks ensuring constitutional compliance.

Trump’s Vision for a Safer America

From day one, Trump’s administration pledged decisive action to restore American safety and prosperity. The comprehensive plan encompasses immediate executive orders targeting border security, economic revival, and public safety36. Indeed, Trump’s vision extends beyond conventional approaches, promising to marshal cabinet powers to defeat inflation and reduce living costs37.

Immediate Action Plan:

“On day one, we’ll start cleaning up our streets.”

The administration’s first-day agenda focuses on three primary objectives:

• Launch the most extensive deportation program in American history36
• Terminate all open-border policies36
• Implement immediate drilling initiatives to reduce energy costs36

During the initial phase, Trump plans to direct cabinet members to utilize their full authority to combat inflation and reduce costs37. Henceforth, the administration will establish a new Department of Government Efficiency to restore federal competence37. The plan includes signing executive orders to stop government censorship and restore free speech37.

Trump immediately targets manufacturing revival through a 15% Made in America Corporate Tax Rate38. Soon thereafter, the administration aims to cut energy and electricity prices by 50% within twelve months38. The plan establishes special zones on federal land with minimal taxes and regulations to attract industries from other countries38.

Long-term Goals:

Restoring peace, order, and the American dream.

The administration’s extended vision focuses on rebuilding American strength through three fundamental strategies39:

1. Restoring the Warrior ethos
2. Rebuilding military capabilities
3. Reestablishing deterrence

Trump’s manufacturing renaissance strategy includes appointing a Manufacturing Ambassador to convince major producers to relocate to America38. Thus, the administration expects a mass exodus of manufacturing from countries like China, South Korea, and Germany to American states38.

The long-term vision emphasizes American workers’ interests, prioritizing good wages and domestic production. Otherwise, manufacturers seeking tax breaks must commit to American production and workforce. This approach aims to create millions of jobs while establishing the United States as a manufacturing powerhouse.

Regarding public safety, Trump pledges to restore fair, equal, and impartial justice under constitutional law37. The administration will focus on defending the homeland on the ground and in the air. Additionally, the plan includes working with allies to deter aggression from potential adversaries.

The vision encompasses comprehensive economic reforms, including expanded research and development tax credits for U.S.-based manufacturers38. These initiatives aim to build state-of-the-art facilities necessary for America’s position as an industrial superpower38. Primarily, the focus remains on ensuring American workers receive good wages while maintaining competitive advantages in global markets38.

Call to Action

Fundamentally, America’s safety crisis demands immediate attention, with recent data showing homicides increasing by 30% in 2020. Primarily, the surge continues with an additional 16% rise in the first half of 2021, creating an unprecedented challenge for law enforcement and communities nationwide.

“We must act now, or we lose America forever.”

The stark reality confronts us daily: 8,400 killings annually devastate American communities40, with Black Americans and Latinos bearing a disproportionate burden of this violence. Straightaway, we must acknowledge that conventional approaches have failed – research shows a mere 10% increase in incarceration yields only a 2% decrease in crime40.

The current system’s ineffectiveness becomes glaringly apparent through these alarming statistics:

• Only 41.5% of violent crimes get reported to police40
• A mere 36.7% of reported violent crimes result in arrests40
• An astounding 12.1% of property crimes lead to resolution40

“Stand with Trump, shout from the rooftops, let’s make America safe again!”

Alternatively, proven solutions exist. Violence reduction programs targeting specific individuals, places, and social interactions have demonstrated dramatic success40. Generally, these initiatives require sustained community engagement and support to maintain long-term effectiveness.

The path forward demands collective action. Research conclusively shows that certainty of consequences, not severity of punishment, deters crime1. Ultimately, every state harbors communities disproportionately impacted by violent crime, occasionally stemming from historical under-resourcing1.

To achieve meaningful change, Americans must:

1. Support evidence-based solutions proven to reduce violence effectively
2. Demand accountability from law enforcement and justice systems
3. Invest in prevention programs showing positive returns
4. Build trust between communities and justice systems

The time for action arrives now. Data confirms that prevention offers the highest return on investment1, though these returns require patience and persistence. Building effective public safety solutions demands close collaboration with affected communities, tailoring strategies to unique challenges, needs, and cultural priorities2.

Americans overwhelmingly recognize the urgency – 91% of voters consider “keeping communities safe” extremely or very important3. The path forward requires unity in purpose and action, transforming this shared concern into concrete change.

The stakes could not be higher. Every delay costs lives, destroys families, and undermines our national fabric. Creating lasting and inclusive public safety requires a broader vision of accountability2, avoiding past mistakes while investing in infrastructure and services that foster well-being for systematically neglected communities suffering most from crime.

Conclusion

History proves exile works. Ancient civilizations used it effectively, Britain transformed Australia through it, and now America stands ready to implement this proven solution. Therefore, Trump’s exile proposal offers a practical path forward, addressing our safety crisis and economic burden.

Indeed, the numbers tell a compelling story—replacing our $80.7 billion annual prison costs with a more efficient exile system would free up resources for community development and crime prevention. Above all, removing career criminals from our streets would restore safety to our neighborhoods, protect our families, and preserve our way of life.

Critics may question the approach, but the facts remain clear—our current system fails to deter repeat offenders while draining taxpayer resources. Indeed, successful historical examples demonstrate how exile can transform problems into solutions, just as Britain’s transportation of criminals helped build Australia into a thriving nation.

America faces a pivotal moment. Our communities deserve protection, our tax dollars demand better allocation, and our nation requires stronger borders. Trump’s vision provides clear solutions: immediate action on criminal deportation, manufacturing revival through strategic tax policies, and restored law enforcement effectiveness.

Ultimately, this battle for America’s future demands our immediate engagement. Each delay costs lives and undermines our national security. Standing together, supporting proven solutions, and demanding accountability from our justice system will restore peace to our streets and pride to our nation. The choice is clear – continue with failed policies or embrace bold, proven solutions prioritizing American safety.

Legal Disclaimer:

The United States Constitution and international law establish strict parameters for any criminal justice reform. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that criminal sentences must align with due process requirements4. Hence, any exile program would need a comprehensive legal review to ensure constitutional compliance.

The United Nations Human Rights Due Diligence Policy mandates that support security forces must respect international humanitarian, human rights, and refugee law5. Notwithstanding political rhetoric, these fundamental protections remain non-negotiable. The policy requires human rights risk assessments and the adoption of mitigating measures before implementation5.

Constitutional Safeguards and Due Process

The Fifth Amendment explicitly prohibits deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process6. Fundamentally, this means:

• Every accused person must receive fair hearings
• Decisions must be based on accurate information
• Defendants must have opportunities to challenge evidence
• Constitutional rights must be protected throughout the proceedings

The Supreme Court emphasizes that due process demands current prevailing standards of impartiality6. Furthermore, parties must have opportunities to present evidence and understand opposing claims. These protections extend to all individuals within U.S. jurisdiction, regardless of citizenship status.

International Law Compliance

The United Nations framework establishes additional requirements. Any detention or imprisonment affecting human rights must follow strictly defined legal procedures. The Secretary-General’s policy requires:

1. Clear indication of intent for indefinite detention
2. Special justification for extreme measures
3. Compliance with international humanitarian law
4. Protection of refugee rights

Implementation Requirements

The Department of Justice maintains rigorous standards for criminal proceedings. Judicial review remains mandatory for administrative or executive actions affecting constitutional rights6. Additionally, courts must allow a 60-day intervention period for attorney general response before rejecting constitutional challenges6.

Recent legal precedents demonstrate the complexity of criminal justice reform. The web of restrictions affecting housing and employment opportunities already creates significant challenges8. These existing barriers highlight the need to consider any additional measures that might further marginalize affected populations.

Human Rights Considerations

The United Nations emphasizes that human rights risk assessment must be integrated into:

• Strategy setting
• Program development
• Resource mobilization
• Implementation monitoring
• Evaluation processes5

Any exile proposal would require thoroughly examining its impact on vulnerable populations. Current data shows disproportionate effects of criminal justice policies on minority communities8. Alternative approaches must be considered to prevent perpetual punishment and ensure fair treatment.

The views expressed herein represent opinion-based discussion points requiring extensive legal review. All policy suggestions, including criminal exile proposals, must undergo thorough constitutional analysis and comply with federal and international law. No implementation can proceed without proper due process protections and unwavering respect for human rights.

References

[1] – https://projects.csgjusticecenter.org/tools-for-states-to-address-crime/5-ways-states-can-reduce-violent-crime/

[2] – https://www.americanprogress.org/article/improving-public-safety-through-better-accountability-and-prevention/

[3] – https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/06/crime-policing-and-the-2024-election/

[4] – https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-5-6-1/ALDE_00013767/

[5] – https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/humanrights/hrddp.html

[6] – https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-05/12-procedural-due-process.html

[7] – https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/body-principles-protection-all-persons-under-any-form-detention

[8] – https://journals.law.harvard.edu/crcl/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2020/10/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-788.pdf

[9] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/ostracism

[10] – https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-athenians-voted-kick-politicians-out-if-enough-people-didnt-them-180976138/

[11] – https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-7206

[12] – https://discovery.princeton.edu/2015/11/19/life-among-strangers-exile-in-the-middle-ages/

[13] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convicts_in_Australia

[14] – https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-releases-2023-crime-in-the-nation-statistics

[15] – https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/the-economic-costs-of-the-u-s-criminal-justice-system/

[16] – https://nicic.gov/weblink/economic-burden-incarceration-us-2016

[17] – https://www.vera.org/publications/for-the-record-unjust-burden

[18] – https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/24/what-the-data-says-about-crime-in-the-us/

[19] – https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/trump-reverses-biden-order-eliminated-doj-contracts-private-prisons

[20] – https://reason.com/2024/05/23/trumps-anti-crime-agenda-contradicts-his-criticism-of-bidens-legislative-record/

[21] – https://usafacts.org/state-of-the-union/crime-justice/

[22] – https://counciloncj.org/crime-trends-in-u-s-cities-mid-year-2024-update/

[23] – https://www.prisonpolicy.org/research/economics_of_incarceration/

[24] – https://www.vera.org/publications/price-of-prisons-what-incarceration-costs-taxpayers

[25] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Exile

[26] – https://www.vpm.org/2023-09-21/revisiting-project-exile

[27] – https://www.ojp.gov/archives/ojp-blogs/2019/reducing-recidivism-released-offenders-improves-public-safety

[28] – https://homeland.house.gov/2024/03/18/a-new-crime-wave-is-sweeping-the-nation-chairman-green-pens-new-op-ed-on-border-crisis-crime-connection/

[29] – https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/newss-crime-on-the-southwest-border/view

[30] – https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/homicide-in-rochester/

[31] – https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/problems/gun_violence/PDFs/Raphael_Ludwig_2003.pdf

[32] – https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-exile-us-criminals-b2687309.html

[33] – https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/07/11/prison-or-exile/cubas-systematic-repression-july-2021-demonstrators

[34] – https://www.krbarrettlaw.com/constitutional-challenges-to-criminal-charges

[35] – https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_5.1

[36] – https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/11-things-trump-day-1-presidency-rcna184423

[37] – https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/transcript-read-trumps-full-second-inaugural-address

[38] – https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-my-plan-make-america-affordable-again-bring-back-american-dream-opinion-1961727

[39] – https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4040940/secretary-hegseths-message-to-the-force/

[40] – https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/addressing-violent-crime-more-effectively

[41] – January | Dorian Cope presents On This Deity. https://www.onthisdeity.com/january/

[42] – Beaty, R. (2024). Beyond the scarlet letter: Ending discrimination against former felons in Massachusetts. The Boston Banner, 59(46), 5.

[43] – Papadopoulos, F., Diamanteas, K., Economou, A., & Kokkinos, C. (2020). Rapid Drop-Volume Electrochemical Detection of the “Date Rape” Drug Flunitrazepam in Spirits Using a Screen-Printed Sensor in a Dry-Reagent Format. Sensors, 20(18), 5192.

[44] – Zambrano, D. (2018). Judicial Mistakes In Discovery †. Northwestern University Law Review, 113(1), 197-225.

[45] – Kroenig, M., & Starling, C. (2023). U.S. Lessons from Russia’s War on Ukraine. Asia Policy, 18(2), 64-74.

[46] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/trump-proposes-exiling-violent-repeat-american-offenders-from-country

[47] – https://www.infowars.com/author/sean-miller

[48] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6yJB5MVIEE

[49] – https://www.digitalpanopticon.org/Convicts_and_the_Colonisation_of_Australia,_1788-1868

[50] – Butlin, N.G., ‘Contours of the Australian Economy 1788-1860’, Australian Economic History Review 26.2 (1986). Butlin estimated a population of 1.1 million, with a possible range between 880,000 and 1,320,000 (p.107).

[51] – Evans, Raymond, and Ørsted–Jensen, Robert, ‘I Cannot Say the Numbers that Were Killed’: Assessing Violent Mortality on the Queensland Frontier (2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2467836 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2467836

[52] – Feeley, Malcolm M. and Deborah L. Little, ‘The vanishing female: The decline of women in the criminal process, 1687-1912’, Law & Society Review 25.4 (1991)

[53] – Gammage, Bill, The Biggest Estate on Earth (Allen & Unwin, 2011)

[54] – Columbus, Jan, ‘Genocide and modernity in colonial Australia, 1788-1850’, in A. Dirk Moses (ed.), Genocide and Settler Society (Berghan Books, 2004)

[55] – Lawson, Tom, The Last Man: A British genocide in Tasmania (I.B. Tauris, 2014)

[56] – McMichael, Philip, Settlers and the Agrarian Question (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

[57] – Meredith, David, and Deborah Oxley, ‘The convict economy,’ in Simon Ville and Glenn Withers (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Australia (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

[58] – Millis, Roger, Waterloo Creek (UNSW Press, 1994)

[59] – Nicholas, Stephen (ed.), Convict Workers (Cambridge University Press, 1988)

[60] – Palmer, Alison, Colonial Genocide (Crawford House Publishing, 2000)

[61] Reid, Kirsty, Gender, Crime, and Empire (Manchester University Press, 2007)

[62] – Rubenstein, William D., The all-time Australian 200 rich list (Allen & Unwin, 2004)

[63] – Ryan, Lyndall, ‘The Black Line in Van Diemen’s Land: Success or failure?’, Journal of Australian Studies 37.1 (2013)

[64] – Summers, Anne, Damned Whores and God’s Police (Pelican, 1975)

[65] – https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/the-victorians-and-australian-penal-colonies/

[66] – “Australia.” The Irish Cultural Society of the Garden City Area. May 13, 2009 <http://www.irish-society.org/Hedgemaster%20Archives/australia.htm>.

[67] – “Background on the Foundation of White Australia- The Convict Era: Timeline.” Humanities and Social Studies Education Academic Group. May 17, 2009.

<http://www.hsse.nie.edu.sg/staff/blackburn/convictbackground.htm>

[68] – “Botany Bay Folk Song”- First published in Sydney Golden Songster in 1893 This song is a burlesque, written by Stephens and Yardley, from the comedy ‘Little Jack Shepherd’ that played in London in 1885 and in Melbourne in 1886. ‘Botany Bay’ shares two verses with ‘Farewell to Judges and Juries’ a broadside c.1820

[69] – Chain Gang Image: <https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileChain_gang_-_convicts_going_to_work_nr._Sidney_N.S._Wales.jpg>

[70] – Charlotte of the First Fleet Image < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FirstFleetCharlotte1787.jpg >

[71] – “Convicts and the British colonies in Australia -.” Australia’s Culture Portal. May 2009 <http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/convicts/>.

[72] – “Convicts in Australia -.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. May 17, 2009 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convictism_in_Australia#Cessation_of_transportation>.

[73] – “Convicts To Australia … Research Guide – Emancipation.” 11 May 2009 <http://members.iinet.net.au/~perthdps/convicts/res-11.html>.

[74] – “The Convict”. Australia Studies Centre Online. May 17, 2009. <http://www.petra.ac.id/asc/history/convicts.htm>.

[75] – “The Convicts: Songs of Transportation – Raymond’s Folk Song Page.” Home – Raymond’s Folk Song Page. May 17, 2009 http://raymondfolk.wetpaint.com/page/The+Convicts%3A+Songs+of+Transportation?t=anon.

[76] – “Convict Punishment – History of Australia – 1788.” Eureka Council. May 17, 2009 http://www.eurekacouncil.com.au/Australia-History/for-expansion/1788-convict_punishment.htm

[77] – Dickens, C. (1999). Great Expectations (E. Rosenberg, Ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

[78] – Dorset Bridge Image < https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileDorset_Sturminster_Newton_Bridge_notice.jpg >

[79] – Dunn, C., McCreadie, M. The Founders of a Nation: Australia’s First Fleet – 1788. Retrieved May 11, 2009, from <http://www.ulladulla.info/historian/ffstory.html>

[80] – First Fleet Map < http://firstfleet.uow.edu.au/s_map.html >

[81] – “Getting out | State Library of New South Wales.” Home | State Library of New South Wales. May 11, 2009 <http://www.sl.nsw.gov.au/discover_collections/history_nation/justice/convict/GettingOut/getout.html>.

[82] – Governor Lachlan Macquarie < https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileLachlanmacquarie.jpg >

[83] – Hughes, R. (1988).The Fatal Shore: The epic of Australia’s founding. New York: Vintage Books.

[84] – “Index to Certificates of Freedom, 1823-69 State Records NSW.” Welcome to State Records NSW State Records NSW. May 17 2009 <http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/state-archives/indexes-online/indexes-to-convict-records/index-to-certificates-of-freedom/index-to-certificates-of-freedom/>.

[85] – Koster, O. (2007, July 25). We will transport 2m Brits to their Oz convict cousins. Daily Mail (London), 1ST; p.19. Retrieved April 20, 2009, from Lexis Nexis database.

[86] – Magwitch Image < http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/mclenan/5.html>

[87] – Map of the route followed by the First Fleet in 1788 http://firstfleet.uow.edu.au/s_map.html

[88] – Martin Cash <https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileMartin_Cash.jpg>

[89] – “MAGWITCH AS CONVICT.” Home: University of Michigan-Dearborn. May 2009<http://www.umd.umich.edu/casl/hum/eng/classes/434/geweb/MAGWITCH.htm>.

[90] – Magwitch – “He was taken on board and instantly manacled at the wrists and ankles.” (Scanned image, caption, and commentary by Philip V. Allingham. http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/mclenan/37.html).

[91] – Norfolk Island Picture < http://www.britishempire.co.uk/maproom/norfolkisland/norfolkislandfullmap.htm>

[92] – The Peril of Certain English Prisoners < http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/xmas/5.html >

[93] – “Pilot Guides.com: Short History of Convict Australia: Pardon and Punishment.” The official Globe Trekker website. May 2009 <http://www.pilotguides.com/destination_guide/pacific/australia/convict_australia/pardon_and_punishment.php>.

[94] – “Political Prisoners”. Convicts to Australia (A Guide to Researching Your Convict Ancestors). May 2009 <http://members.iinet.au/~perthdps/convicts/res-13.html>

[95] – Van Diemen’s Land Map <https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileVan_Diemen27s_Land_1852.jpg>

[96] – William Buckley < https://sites.udel.edu/britlitwiki/files//2018/06/FileWilliam_Buckley.jpg >

[97] – https://www.infowars.com/posts/trump-lambasts-crooked-joe-wars-inflation-green-agenda-trannies-illegal-aliens-at-pennsylvania-rally

[98] – https://x.com/IWArchivist/status/1779888550093189525

[99] – https://x.com/IWArchivist/status/1779889684438540687

[100] – https://x.com/IWArchivist/status/1779891809017098430

[101] – https://x.com/IWArchivist/status/1779895177437401088

[102] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUbGq4OcPVA

[103] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/exile-law

[104] – https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Geoffrey-Abbott/5970

[105] – https://www.britannica.com/editor/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica/4419

[106] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/exile-law/additional-info#history

[107] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/ostracism

[108] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/Roman-law

[109] – https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/circumventing

[110] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/capital-punishment

[111] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/punishment

[112] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/forced-labour

[113] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/outlawry

[114] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/law

[115] – https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alternative

[116] – https://www.britannica.com/topic/penal-colony

[117] – https://www.britannica.com/place/North-America

[118] – https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/notorious

[119] – https://www.britannica.com/place/Siberia

[120] – https://www.britannica.com/place/Soviet-Union

[121] – https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/1884047527235998099

[122] – https://scholarship.rollins.edu/honors/123/

[123] – https://scholarship.rollins.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=honors

[124] – https://scholarship.rollins.edu/do/search/?q=(author%3A%22Mary%20Vickers%22%20AND%20-bp_author_id%3A%5B*%20TO%20*%5D)%20OR%20bp_author_id%3A(%2287cb67d3-e865-4ab9-b264-95eadea65fb0%22)&start=0&context=1125725&facet=